Interview: NATO is global driver of conflicts, U.S. activist says at pre-summit protest
THE HAGUE, June 22 (Xinhua) -- NATO has become a driver of global conflict rather than a force for peace, prioritizing military expansion at the expense of public welfare, a U.S. anti-war activist said here on Sunday during a protest ahead of the alliance's annual summit.
"The wars are multiplying, the military spending is escalating, and NATO is instructing nation after nation to take money out of education, retirement, health care, and green energy, and put it into weapons and wars," said David Swanson, executive director of the non-profit group World Beyond War, in an interview with Xinhua.
Swanson, who traveled from the United States to join the protest near the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, said NATO's presence in the city was "ironic," given what he described as the alliance's role in fueling conflicts around the globe.
"NATO should have come to The Hague because the International Criminal Court is here, and its leaders should present themselves for prosecution. But it should not be here to organize the world for more wars and more military spending," he said. "NATO can be abolished and the world (would) be safer without it."
The protest, attended by hundreds, took place two days before the NATO summit, where member states are expected to push for increased defense spending. While the demonstration was billed as opposing NATO and the war in Gaza, it also drew participants holding banners reading "No Iran War," following U.S. airstrikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities a day earlier.
Swanson said NATO's expansion since the Cold War, with 32 members currently, has only worsened global insecurity.
"NATO is expanding globally and adding partners around the world, and has become the single biggest distributor of weapons, promoter of wars, and creator of military bases around the world," he said, adding that it certainly should have disbanded when the Cold War ended.
He also criticized NATO member countries for following U.S. directives without regard for domestic public opinion or international law.
"NATO countries are servants of the U.S. government, colonies of the U.S. government, and obedient to the U.S. government," Swanson said. "They need to start listening to the people of their countries, to international law, and to the United Nations."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
France's Macron urges diplomacy, warns of ‘uncontrolled escalation' after US strikes on Iran
PARIS, June 23 — French President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday warned against an 'uncontrolled escalation' in the Middle East after the United States joined Israel's campaign against Tehran's atomic programme by bombing Iranian nuclear sites. 'No strictly military response can produce the desired effects,' Macron told a defence council meeting in Paris. 'The resumption of diplomatic and technical discussions is the only way to achieve the goal we all seek, which is to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons,' he added. The French leader however did not directly condemn the unprecedented US intervention. After a scheduled visit to Norway on Monday, Macron is on Tuesday due to go the Netherlands for a Nato summit which US President Donald Trump is also set to attend. In a joint statement with his German and British counterparts, Macron called on Iran 'not to take any further action that could destabilise the region' in response to the strikes. Earlier the French leader had urged Tehran to de-escalate and 'exercise the utmost restraint' after the strikes in a call with his Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian. He said he also told Iran to 'renounce nuclear weapons', warning of 'the risk of the worst for the entire region'. On Sunday, Macron also spoke with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. — AFP
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Nato strikes spending deal, but Spain exemption claim risks Trump ire
BRUSSELS: Nato on Sunday signed off on a pledge to ramp up defence spending before its upcoming summit, but Madrid insisted it would not need to hit the five per cent of GDP demanded by US President Donald Trump. The claim by Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez sets up a potential clash with Trump, who has pressured allies to commit to that headline figure when they meet for the two-day gathering starting on Tuesday in The Hague. Spain had been the last holdout on a compromise deal that sees allies promise to reach 3.5 per cent on core military needs over the next decade, and spend 1.5 per cent on a looser category of "defence-related" expenditures such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. Multiple diplomats at Nato said the agreement -- set to be unveiled at the summit -- had gone through with the approval of all 32 nations and that there was no exemption for Madrid. But within minutes Sanchez came out saying he had struck an accord with Nato that would see his country keep respecting its commitments "without having to raise our defence spending to five percent of gross domestic product". "We understand the difficulty of the geopolitical context, fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defence investment, if they so wish, but we are not going to do it," he said. Nato diplomats now fear that Spain's position could undermine its carefully choreographed show of unity with Trump in The Hague, which already risks being overshadowed by the US decision to strike Iran. "Not ok," one diplomat said, on condition of anonymity. Madrid's claims came after Sanchez on Thursday threw a last-minute grenade into preparations for the gathering in the Netherlands by taking a strong stand against the agreement. In a blistering letter to Nato chief Mark Rutte, Sanchez said that committing to a headline figure of five per cent of GDP "would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive". That prompted a warning from Trump that "Spain has to pay what everybody else has to pay." "Nato is going to have to deal with Spain," he told reporters on Friday, calling the country "notorious" for spending less on defence than other alliance members. The outburst from Madrid's centre-left leader also sparked fury from other Nato members desperate to keep Trump -- who has threatened not to protect allies spending too little -- on their side. The pledge is seen as key both to satisfying Trump and helping Nato build up the forces it needs to deter Russia. After several days of wrangling involving Sanchez and Rutte, officials said Spain on Sunday signed off on the pledge. Diplomats said that language around the spending pledge in the summit's final declaration had been slightly softened from "we commit", to "allies commit". They insisted the fundamentals of the deal remained intact and that it applied to Spain. But government sources in Madrid said the linguistic tweak meant only those countries that opted-in were covered by the promise and that Rutte was set to send a letter to Sanchez saying that Spain will have "flexibility". Sanchez is facing a difficult balancing act of aligning with Nato allies and cajoling his junior coalition partner, the far-left alliance Sumar, which is hostile to increasing military spending. Spain has been one of the lowest-spending Nato countries on defence in relative terms.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Interview: NATO is global driver of conflicts, U.S. activist says at pre-summit protest
THE HAGUE, June 22 (Xinhua) -- NATO has become a driver of global conflict rather than a force for peace, prioritizing military expansion at the expense of public welfare, a U.S. anti-war activist said here on Sunday during a protest ahead of the alliance's annual summit. "The wars are multiplying, the military spending is escalating, and NATO is instructing nation after nation to take money out of education, retirement, health care, and green energy, and put it into weapons and wars," said David Swanson, executive director of the non-profit group World Beyond War, in an interview with Xinhua. Swanson, who traveled from the United States to join the protest near the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, said NATO's presence in the city was "ironic," given what he described as the alliance's role in fueling conflicts around the globe. "NATO should have come to The Hague because the International Criminal Court is here, and its leaders should present themselves for prosecution. But it should not be here to organize the world for more wars and more military spending," he said. "NATO can be abolished and the world (would) be safer without it." The protest, attended by hundreds, took place two days before the NATO summit, where member states are expected to push for increased defense spending. While the demonstration was billed as opposing NATO and the war in Gaza, it also drew participants holding banners reading "No Iran War," following U.S. airstrikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities a day earlier. Swanson said NATO's expansion since the Cold War, with 32 members currently, has only worsened global insecurity. "NATO is expanding globally and adding partners around the world, and has become the single biggest distributor of weapons, promoter of wars, and creator of military bases around the world," he said, adding that it certainly should have disbanded when the Cold War ended. He also criticized NATO member countries for following U.S. directives without regard for domestic public opinion or international law. "NATO countries are servants of the U.S. government, colonies of the U.S. government, and obedient to the U.S. government," Swanson said. "They need to start listening to the people of their countries, to international law, and to the United Nations."
