Woman Gets Revenge on 'Snooping Neighbor,' It Leaves Internet in Hysterics
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A group of neighborhood women found an unconventional way to handle a persistent snooper in their midst—and Reddit users are loving it.
The incident was detailed in a post shared by u/foodf***flee on June 17 to the r/pettyrevenge subreddit. The tale of subtle yet scathing retaliation against a nosy neighbor has earned 5,000 upvotes and dozens of comments from amused Reddit users.
According to the post, titled "Snooping Neighbour Got a Taste of Their own Medicine," the story originated from the Redditor's mother and centers around a woman named Judy, whose habit of snooping through other people's homes had become a well-known nuisance in their social circle.
"This is my mom's story," the user wrote. "Every week a few neighborhood ladies plan a meet-up in any one of their houses. Three weeks ago it took place at our home, and my mom caught Judy coming out of my old bedroom when she had left on the pretext of going to the washroom."
Though Judy claimed she "lost her way," the excuse didn't hold up. "She had been in our home before," the post noted. That incident led the mother to consult with others in the group, who revealed similar experiences of finding Judy in unauthorized parts of their homes. When confronted, the post claimed, Judy became "rude and defensive."
A stock image of a woman sticking her head out from behind a door.
A stock image of a woman sticking her head out from behind a door.
Getty
A recent survey by Talker Research for Newsweek found that disputes among neighbors are surprisingly common, ranging from noise complaints and lawn battles to property damage, intrusions and boundary disputes.
Rather than confronting Judy directly, the women in the Reddit post opted for what the poster describes a taste of her own medicine. "Last Saturday, when the get together was at Judy's place, my mother and her friends bought googly eyes stickers and one by one they left the room on pretext of washroom and pasted those stickers all around the house," the user wrote. They even stuck them on Judy's mailbox, front door, and fence.
The result? "A couple of neighbors had quite a show of her breakdown on Sunday going in and out, up and down her house looking for more stickers and removing them. Pretty sure the plan worked," the post concluded.
Gregg Ward, executive director at The Center for Respectful Leadership, also cautioned against retaliatory behavior. "If your neighbor doesn't behave in ways you want them to, the last thing you should do is get into a tit-for-tat battle with them," Ward previously told Newsweek. "It never ends well."
Jodi RR Smith, an etiquette consultant, agreed, telling Newsweek that the situation could have been handled with more grace and boundaries.
"What the mom decided to do, with the rest of the group, was just cruel," Smith said. "Judy knows she is a snoop. Judy knows the group knows she is a snoop. Now Judy knows that the group had a discussion and decided to make her the focus of their practical joke."
Smith suggested a more tactful approach, recommending hosts preemptively set boundaries in a group setting, such as by saying: "As you know the bathroom is at the top of the stairs. The door is open. Please do not enter any rooms where the door is closed."
"And if the behavior continues, a direct conversation is key, saying something like 'Judy, I need you to stop snooping around in my home. If this continues, I will not be able to invite you back," Smith noted.
She added: "Judy now needs to decide if she will alter her behavior and if she wants this group as friends."
'Genius'
Reddit users responded with glee to the mom's "petty" reaction to her neighbor's behavior.
"Genius! This is the way," wrote u/goodOmen78. Another user, u/Due_Classic_4090, added: "That is so petty, I love it!!!! Hahaha." U/Fire_or_water_kai agreed, calling it a "master class in petty!"
U/pc_principal_88 said: "This was actually pretty satisfying to imagine. Hopefully she gets the hint and chills tf [the f***] out when it comes to snooping thru peoples things, etc."
While Judy's future status in the neighborhood group remains unclear, one Redditor, u/obscurititty404, summed up the lingering question for many, saying: "It blows my mind that she's still invited to those events!"
Newsweek has contacted the original poster for comment via the Reddit messaging system.
Do you have a similar story to share? Let us know via life@newsweek.com and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Alito Says Supreme Court Forcing Judges To Do 'Mind-Bending Exercises'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Justice Samuel Alito said a U.S. Supreme Court's ruling requires judges to engage in "mind-bending exercises" in a dissent on Friday. Alito said under the court's decision, the judge must review "the nature and circumstances" of a defendant's offense but is not allowed to consider "the seriousness of the offense." "The Court interprets the Sentencing Reform Act to mean that a federal district-court judge, when considering whether to impose or alter a term of supervised release, must engage in mind-bending exercises," Alito wrote in a dissent, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. Associate Justice Samuel Alito joins other members of the U.S. Supreme Court as they pose for a group portrait on October 7, 2022, at the Supreme Court building in Washington. Associate Justice Samuel Alito joins other members of the U.S. Supreme Court as they pose for a group portrait on October 7, 2022, at the Supreme Court building in Washington. AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File Why It Matters The court's ruling could influence what judges take into account when considering changes to the terms of a supervised release. What To Know The case centers around Edgardo Esteras, who was arrested and charged with domestic violence and other crimes while on supervised release for conspiring to distribute heroin. A district court revoked his supervised release and ordered 24 months of reimprisonment, arguing that his sentence must "promote respect for the law." The Supreme Court said the district court was not permitted to consider a statute requiring the sentence to "reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense." Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered the court's majority opinion. She wrote that "text, structure, and precedent all point in the same direction" in finding that district courts cannot consider the seriousness of the offense in revoking supervised release. Barrett said district courts "generally enjoy discretion over sentencing," but Congress chose to limit their discretion in this instance. Alito said the court failed to consider the practical application of its ruling. "Veteran trial judges often complain that their appellate colleagues live in a world of airy abstractions and do not give enough thought to the practical effects of their holdings. Today's decision is likely to earn the rank of Exhibit A in the trial bench's catalog of appellate otherworldliness," Alito said. Alito argued that the court's ruling lacks textual support and "it does not solve the problem faced by a judge who is compelled to consider the nature and circumstances of an offense but forbidden to consider its seriousness." "Imposing such a soul-searching obligation as a requirement that may be enforced in litigation is utterly impractical," Alito wrote. What People Are Saying Justice Samuel Alito, in a dissenting opinion: "None of this has any textual support, and it does not solve the problem faced by a judge who is compelled to consider the nature and circumstances of an offense but forbidden to consider its seriousness." Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: "Like the Court, I agree with Esteras: Courts cannot consider this omitted sentencing purpose when revoking supervised release. That answer is straightforward and responsive." What Happens Next The Supreme Court's ruling vacated the decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Man Who Came to US as Young Child Faces Deportation After Over 30 Years
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Karem Tadros, who has lived in the United States for more than 30 years after immigrating from Egypt with his family, who are all U.S. citizens, faces deportation to an unspecified country following his release from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in New Jersey, he told Newsweek in a Friday phone interview. Newsweek has reached out to ICE for comment via email on Friday. Why It Matters Tadros, who was detained from early May until mid-June, has been released but is still awaiting final court orders regarding his deportation status to a third country. His detention comes amid an immigration crackdown under the Trump administration. In addition to people residing in the country illegally, immigrants with valid documentation—including green cards and visas—have been detained and face legal jeopardy. President Donald Trump has pledged to carry out the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, and in the initial months of his second term, his administration has deported more than 100,000 people. Many migrants have been deported as a result of Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which grants the president authority to deport noncitizens without appearing before a judge, among other wartime authorities. The Trump administration has held discussions with several countries about taking in U.S. detainees who lack legal status and cannot be returned to their home countries due to safety risks or fears of persecution. (L): A photo of Karem Tadros as provided by him. (R): Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on June 18, 2025 in New York City. (L): A photo of Karem Tadros as provided by him. (R): Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on June 18, 2025 in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images What To Know On May 7, federal immigration officials detained 39-year-old Tadros. He told Newsweek in a phone call that agents arrived at his house, asking for Tadros, stating they had a warrant for his arrest and that there was an "administrative problem in their office that needs to be taken care of." They reportedly told him he would be gone for an hour. Tadros said they did not arrest him while he was walking out of the house to the unmarked agents' car. Once he was in the car, the agents reportedly informed him that he had a final deportation order. He then spent over a month at the Elizabeth Contract Detention Center in New Jersey, according to court documents reviewed by Newsweek. Tadros says he has a current work permit set to be renewed in August. He came to the U.S. as a young child, just over 3 years old, his attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, told Newsweek in a phone interview on Friday. He said he came to the U.S. on March 17, 1989. Tadros told Newsweek he was told he came at age 4, but also in the year 1989. Tadros' family members, an older brother, mother, and father, all obtained U.S. citizenship, he told Newsweek. "All the members of my family are U.S. citizens. They're all supporting me. We're all equally shocked," he said. His citizenship process was halted due to his 2006 conviction, telling Newsweek it was for "intent to distribute oxycodone." He said, "I was on the right path. I made a terrible mistake when I was younger." He spent six days in a county jail and was released on bail, completing his probation afterwards, he said. "Because of that, I was detained at Hudson County facility for 13 months. And I was released by the judge on a court date with no supervision, no nothing. So 17 years go by, now it's 2025, I haven't seen a single ICE officer since I was detained back in 2008, 2009," he added. In those legal proceedings, a judge found he would face persecution if he were deported to Egypt, thus ruling against it. "The government appealed that decision, and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed that decision in April of 2009," Sandoval-Moshenberg told Newsweek. Both Tadros and his lawyer told Newsweek that he is at risk of persecution because of his religion and lack of language knowledge. Tadros told Newsweek he has "a Jesus tattoo on my right shoulder." There are an estimated five to ten percent of the Egyptian population identifying as Christian. The administration isn't trying to change that ruling, and instead is looking to send Tadros to a third country. On June 16, Tadros was granted a Writ of Habeas Corpus, as U.S. District Judge for the District of New Jersey, Evelyn Padin, found the "petitioner has remained in perfect compliance with the conditions of release dictated in the April 9, 2009 Order of Supervision." The judge found it was "unlawful" for the government to keep Tadros detained and ordered his release. The judge's order stated that "ICE may identify a third country within thirty to sixty days of this order to which the Petitioner may be removed." The judge denied the Trump administration's request to place an ankle monitor on Tadros. He must stay within the tri-state area. During his June court proceeding, Tadros first learned of the possibility of being sent to Uzbekistan. His lawyer told Newsweek that's also when he found out that Sudan and Libya rejected his case. Hundreds of people have been sent to third-country locations. More than 200 Venezuelan nationals accused of gang affiliations were transferred to El Salvador, where they were imprisoned in the country's high-security mega-prison. The administration has also attempted to deport migrants to more unstable nations, including Libya and South Sudan, despite concerns over widespread violence and human rights conditions. These efforts have faced legal challenges, with U.S. courts blocking transfers to such conflict zones for now. The Trump administration has defended the use of third-country deportations as a necessary measure to deter unlawful entry and ease pressure on the U.S. immigration system. What People Are Saying Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin previously told Newsweek: "The Trump administration is enforcing immigration laws—something the previous administration failed to do. Those who violate these laws will be processed, detained and removed as required." What Happens Next The Trump administration has just under 60 days to confirm a country for Tadros' detention.
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Democrat Calls for 'Speedy Path to Citizenship' for 11 Million Migrants
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democratic Representative Maxwell Frost has called for a simpler path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, saying that the U.S. "should document every single one of them." Speaking at a Wednesday press conference in Orlando, Florida, Frost proposed the move while announcing new legislation about transparency with ICE. If documenting "every single" undocumented immigrant happened, it would make 11 million migrants legal, according to figures from the American Immigration Council. Why It Matters Immigration has been a central pillar of Trump's second-term agenda. The president has pledged sweeping crackdowns on border security, expanded deportation operations, and an end to federal benefits for undocumented immigrants. In recent weeks, there has been public resistance to this immigration enforcement. A series of immigration raids sparked a large protest in Los Angeles earlier this month. In response to some incidents of violence and looting, Trump announced the deployment of National Guard troops. Meanwhile, there have also been legal challenges to the administration invoking the wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to broaden deportation authority. Representative Maxwell Frost announces his filing of the Stop Unlawful Detention and End Mistreatment Act (SUDEM) at his office in Orlando, Florida, on Wednesday, June 18, 2025. Representative Maxwell Frost announces his filing of the Stop Unlawful Detention and End Mistreatment Act (SUDEM) at his office in Orlando, Florida, on Wednesday, June 18, 2025. Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel via AP What To Know Frost said that "being undocumented is not a crime" and called to give undocumented people "a speedy path to citizenship." The conference was called to unveil his new bill, the SUDEM Act, which stands for Stop Unlawful Detention and End Mistreatment. If passed, it would give detainees, their families and lawyers more information about who is being detained, where, when and why, the legal authority behind each detention and make public other data. What People Are Saying William F. Hall, an adjunct professor of political science and business at Webster University in St. Louis told Newsweek: "Notwithstanding the potential benefits that may be realized, if such a program to achieve a goal of mass documentation of all undocumented U.S. residents could be achieved, in my view, it would still appear that successful implementation of such an ambitious program for mass documentation of undocumented, would be highly improbable, mainly due to the estimates of the vast numbers that would be required to be documented, approximately 11-12 million, and the significant difficulties related to implementation of such an ambitious mass documentation program that would have to be successfully overcome. "This would also entail the need to develop, implement and administer a program that would require additional personnel, and perhaps even more significantly, development of a program that would allow undocumented individuals to feel safe in both accessing as well as participating in such a documentation system, two challenges that would appear to be extremely daunting at the very least and highly improbable, if not totally impractical or even impossible, especially given the current highly tense environment with respect to enforcement by ICE and implementation of immigration policies in general, at present." Frost at the conference: "I want to be clear, being undocumented is not a crime. My Republican colleagues who say I don't want any undocumented people in this country, I actually agree with you. So let's document every single one of them with a speedy path to citizenship. That's how we fix this problem." "We can't let politicians like Donald Trump pit us against one another," he added. "We are an immigrant filled community." Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican called "blanket amnesty" a "dangerous idea." "We must defend common sense and the rule of law," he wrote on X. You can't make this stuff up! At a Democrat rally today, Rep. Maxwell Frost proposed BLANKET AMNESTY for EVERY SINGLE ONE of the MILLIONS of ILLEGAL aliens Joe Biden let into the country. Republicans will never let this dangerous idea happen. We must defend common sense and the… — Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) June 18, 2025 On X, Texas Republican Brandon Gill said: "Dems want mass amnesty for every single illegal alien Joe Biden brought into our country. Why? So they can turn them into Democrat voters. And so they can rig congressional apportionment in their favor. We will never let that happen. What Happens Next Frost's bill is unlikely to pass given it would need bipartisan support and the Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives. Nevertheless, Frost told the press he will head to Washington D.C. to gather cosponsors.
