UN mission in Iraq closes key Mosul office as it winds down operations

A special mission established by the UN in 2003 at the request of the Iraq government has shut down a key office, in another step towards ceasing operations in the country by the end of this year.
The UN Assistance Mission in Iraq closed its offices Mosul this week. Unami, which has its headquarters in Baghdad, was set up after the US-led invasion that toppled the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein.
It was given a broad mandate to help develop Iraqi institutions, support political dialogue and elections, and promote human rights. The agency's heads have shuttled between Iraq's political, security and judicial officials to help resolve conflicts.
Baghdad requested last year that the mission end by 2025, saying it was no longer needed because Iraq had made significant progress towards stability. 'Iraq has managed to take important steps in many fields, especially those that fall under Unami's mandate,' Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani said in a letter to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres.
However, the mission will continue to deliver in its remaining mandate, 'including providing technical electoral assistance, promoting human rights, supporting humanitarian and development tasks', an Unami representative told The National.
In the final months of the year, the agency's work will be 'transferred to the UN Country Team operating in Iraq or to the national authorities', the representative said.
'In short, while Unami is leaving Iraq, the United Nations is not. The United Nations will continue to engage in support of the Government and the people of Iraq.'
Unami closed its office in the northern city of Kirkuk at the end of April. Its remaining offices in Erbil, capital of the Kurdish region, and in the southern city of Basra will be closed along with its headquarters at the end of the year.
Mr Guterres, who was in Baghdad this month for the Arab Summit, said during a meeting with Mr Al Sudani that the world body 'remains fully committed to continuing to support the government and people of Iraq following the departure of Unami'.
Farhad Alaaldin, foreign affairs adviser to Mr Al Sudani, told The National that ending the UN mission represents a significant milestone for Iraq.
'It reflects the international community's recognition of the progress Iraq has made in strengthening its institutions, achieving greater political stability, and moving beyond the post-conflict phase,' he said.
'This is not the end of Iraq's relationship with the United Nations, but rather the beginning of a new phase – one based on equal partnership, development co-operation, and mutual respect.'
Renad Mansour, director of the Iraq Initiative at Chatham House, said Mr Al Sudani's government was claiming the concept of sovereignty and that a monitoring mission such as the UN's that reports on the progress of the country should be abolished.
'This is not normal, and these are the words that are used by the Iraqi government: 'We want to be a normal country',' Mr Mansour told The National.
'From the perspective of the Iraqi government, the [UN mission] is outdated and does not fit with where Iraq is right now. From the UN perspective, they believe that they helped with rebuilding of the state.'
Iraq expert Sajjad Jiyad, a fellow at Century International, said Baghdad still needs international support in areas such as fighting corruption and enforcing reforms across state institutions.
'It still needs international support for things that have troubled the Iraqi state for these past two decades – issues like corruption and financial management, engaging in reforms, economic ones, military logistics,' he told The National.
The assistance may not come from the UN but other institutions, although Iraq will continue to deal with the UN, he said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Zawya

3 hours ago

• Zawya

National Human Rights Institution receives Chairman of the Arab Charter on Human Rights Committee

Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: As part of its ongoing efforts to strengthen institutional collaboration and promote the exchange of expertise with regional and international entities, the National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) welcomed His Excellency Counselor Mohammed Saeed Al Shehhi, Chairman of the Arab Charter on Human Rights Committee, to its headquarters in Abu Dhabi. He was accompanied by Mr. Osama Al Wakeel, Secretary of the Committee. The delegation was received by His Excellency Maqsoud Kruse, Chairperson of the NHRI; Dr. Abdul Aziz Al Noman and Ms. Ameirah Al Seraidi, Members of the NHRI Board of Trustees; His Excellency Dr. Saeed Al Ghfeli, Secretary-General of the NHRI; and Ms. Fajer Al Haidan, Head of Agreements and Reports Section. During the visit, the delegation was briefed on the NHRI's mandate and functions as an independent national institution, and its central role in supporting and advancing the human rights agenda in the United Arab Emirates. Discussions highlighted the NHRI's alignment with international, regional, and national human rights frameworks. The meeting also served as a platform to explore opportunities for enhancing joint cooperation and coordination in the implementation of the Arab Charter on Human Rights. Both sides expressed their commitment to advancing institutional efforts to adopt best practices in promoting and protecting fundamental rights and freedoms. H.E. Maqsoud Kruse congratulated H.E. Counselor Mohammed Saeed Al Shehhi on his recent appointment as Chairman of the Committee, and praised the visit as a testament to the Committee's commitment to constructive engagement and regional dialogue. He emphasized the importance of such exchanges in reinforcing a shared culture of human rights and strengthening broader Arab cooperation. About the National Human Rights Institution: The National Human Rights Institution was established under Federal Law No. (12) of 2021 as an independent entity with financial and administrative autonomy in carrying out its functions, activities, and mandates. The NHRI aims to promote and protect human rights and freedoms in accordance with the provisions of the UAE Constitution, applicable laws and legislations, as well as relevant international conventions, treaties, and agreements.

The National

a day ago

• The National

Europe's tepid response to Israel's strikes says a lot

The Middle East is on edge. The crisis in Gaza deepens daily. Diplomacy has stalled – a high-level UN conferenc e to advance efforts towards a two-state solution to the Palestine-Israel conflict has been indefinitely postponed. Meanwhile, the EU – whose response to the destruction of Gaza has been woefully inadequate – is more divided than ever now that Israel has opened another front with Iran. Its 27 member states are split between those that back Israel and those that are alarmed by the collapse of international law. The EU's collective voice has largely been silent. The EU is not incapable of strong action; its robust response to the war in Ukraine proves that. But Ukraine is seen as a neighbour, and Russia as a direct threat to EU and Nato security. Brussels' rhetoric has been clear and can be summed up as the EU standing with Ukraine every step of the way. When it comes to Gaza, however, the EU defaults to financial aid. An additional €25 million ($28.7 million) was pledged recently, bringing the EU's total to more than €100 million this year. But what is sorely lacking is moral clarity – a principled, united voice calling on Israel to stop. The EU's former foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, has been one of the few to speak out clearly. Addressing dignitaries last month while collecting the Charles V European Award in Spain he said Europe was 'facing the largest ethnic cleansing operation since the end of the Second World War in order to create a splendid holiday destination once the millions of tonnes of rubble have been cleared from Gaza and the Palestinians have died or gone away'. The Middle East may lie outside the EU's immediate sphere but geography is not the only issue for the bloc's lack of action. It is also about leadership. The Middle East may lie outside the EU's immediate sphere but geography is not the only issue for the bloc's lack of action Kaja Kallas, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, has shown a marked reluctance to engage on Gaza. Ms Kallas lacks knowledge of the Middle East — a startling deficiency for someone in her role. But surely within the vast bureaucracy of Brussels, she could find capable advisers with regional expertise? Ms Kallas's unwavering focus on Ukraine is personal. Her family suffered under Soviet oppression, and she has made it clear that her mission is to support Ukraine. But a seeming lack of parallel empathy for Palestinians – who are equally victims of overwhelming military force – is striking. Meanwhile, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, a German politician, has faced intense criticism for her stance. Germany has not only defended Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's actions in Gaza, but also imprisoned pro-Palestinian demonstrators and turned away Palestinian doctors invited to Germany for humanitarian lectures. Ms Von der Leyen has loudly condemned Russia's war crimes in Ukraine, but on Israel's crimes in Gaza she has remained largely silent. She continues to blame Iran for this latest regional escalation – despite Israel's initial strikes – and has been accused of pursuing a 'pro-Israel solo run,' according to Irish MEP Barry Andrews. He noted that Mr Netanyahu's recent speech justifying attacks on Iran 'echoed President Bush's justification for invading Iraq in 2003'. Meanwhile, the humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders (MSF) has gone further, accusing EU governments of 'hypocrisy and inaction' that is fuelling the suffering in Gaza. So, what can the EU do to regain its relevance – and its integrity? First, it must abandon the requirement for unanimity in foreign policy decisions and move towards qualified majority voting. This would streamline decisions and prevent a handful of member states from blocking action. Second, the EU should appoint a high-profile special envoy with real gravitas — someone respected by both Israelis and Palestinians, and who is trusted in the region. Candidates like Martin Griffiths, former UN humanitarian chief, or Kenneth Roth, long-time director of Human Rights Watch, would bring credibility, experience and moral authority. Such an envoy could engage regional players – including Hamas, Israel, Egypt and Qatar – to push for a ceasefire, demand accountability for settler violence and begin sketching a roadmap for regional de-escalation. Third, the EU must use its economic leverage. As Israel's largest trading partner, the EU has influence — but rarely applies it. Brussels could suspend parts of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, re-direct aid to vetted Palestinian civil society groups, provide economic incentives to neighbouring states for de-escalation and impose targeted arms embargoes using the EU's Common Position on Arms Exports when weapons are used in violation of international law. And when it comes to Iran, the only sustainable path is diplomacy. The EU should reactivate its backchannels — through France, Germany, and the UK — to pursue arms control, sanctions relief and renewed diplomatic engagement, including on proxy groups like Hezbollah or the Houthis. If it acts, this crisis could become an opportunity for the EU. It could reclaim its place as a regional power, not just a trade bloc. It could show that Europe can lead independently of the US. Most importantly, it could demonstrate that the EU is not just a cheque book for humanitarian aid but a credible broker for peace.

Zawya

a day ago

• Zawya

Iraq says oil exports unaffected by war

Iraq said on Wednesday its oil exports are flowing normally through Hormuz Straits despite the escalating mutual attacks between nearby Iran and Israel. Most of the crude exports by OPEC's second largest oil producer pass through Hormuz, which Iran has frequently threatened to block over the past years. Iraq produced just over four million barrels per day (bpd) in May and exported nearly 3.3 million bpd, mostly to China and India, according to the Iraqi Oil Ministry. 'Iraq's oil exports have not been affected by the conflict between Iran and Israel…I don't think they will be affected because they are far from the centre of the hostilities…Iraq's oil exports are still flowing out normally,' said Shada Al-Izzawi, a member of Iraqi parliament's oil and gas committee. 'The attacks by two countries against each other have not yet affected any oil site or export terminal in Iraq,' she told the official daily Alsabah. Izzawi did not make clear how Iraq will continue to export crude to the global market if Iran carries out its threat and shut Hormuz, a strategic narrow water way through which more than 18 million bpd pass, nearly a fifth of the world's oil consumption. But an Iraqi oil analyst said the Iran-Israel conflict should prompt Baghdad to reach agreement with the northern Kurdistan region to re-open the 970-km Kurkuk-Ceyhan pipeline, which has an export capacity of nearly 400,000 bpd. 'Iraq should intensify efforts to reopen the Cayman pipeline to export an additional 400,000 through Turkey…this will give Iraq's crude exports more flexibility in case the conflict in the regional escalates further,' said Nabil Al-Marsoumi, an energy and economics professor at Basra university in South Iraq. Another well-known Iraqi expert, Hilal Al-Taan, told Shafaq news agency that Iraq's crude exports could be virtually come to a standstill if Hormuz is shut. (Writing by Nadim Kawach; Editing by Anoop Menon)