Bournemouth Reject PSG's £55m Bid for Defender
Bournemouth Hold Firm as PSG Circle Illia Zabarnyi
Big money, bigger statement
Paris Saint-Germain's £55 million approach for Illia Zabarnyi has been turned away by Bournemouth, as revealed by Sky Sports. It is not just a show of transfer window intent but a statement of rising ambition on the south coast. Bournemouth's decision to reject the second bid, following PSG's initial £40 million plus £5 million in add-ons, signals how highly they rate the 21-year-old Ukrainian.
Photo Yahoo Sports
Advertisement
Zabarnyi cost Bournemouth £24 million plus add-ons when he arrived from Dynamo Kyiv in 2023. His composure on the ball and defensive assurance have quickly made him a centrepiece of the club's rebuild. Now, valued at over £70 million, he is attracting the kind of offers once reserved for more established Premier League defenders.
Zabarnyi's rise and value
Bournemouth's valuation is not simply stubbornness. As a club once regarded as a stepping stone, they are growing bolder. In Zabarnyi, they see a long-term project worth protecting. The Cherries 'do not want to sell but the ongoing advances may be difficult to reject,' says Sky Sports, and rightly so. Financial prudence always dances with ambition in the modern game.
PSG's persistence and timing
PSG's willingness to return with another offer shows how seriously they rate Zabarnyi. They are expected to submit a third offer in the coming days. Their gaze stretches across Europe's elite, but targeting a Bournemouth centre-back speaks volumes about the player's progress.
Premier League clubs no longer pushovers
Bournemouth's stance is part of a wider trend. Clubs outside the traditional top six are showing teeth. Whether it is Brighton, Brentford or now Bournemouth, the model has shifted. Talented players come in, are developed smartly, and sold only on terms that make sporting and financial sense.
Our View – EPL Index Analysis
As a concerned Premier League supporter, especially one who has seen talents like Nathan Aké and Tyrone Mings leave Bournemouth for bigger stages, this report prompts worry and admiration in equal measure.
Advertisement
On one hand, Bournemouth's hardline stance deserves respect. Turning down £55 million for a defender bought at £24 million less than two years ago suggests ambition, belief and a refusal to be bullied by football's financial giants. They clearly value what Zabarnyi brings not just in defence but as a symbol of their evolution.
Yet, PSG's ongoing pressure is relentless. You fear that, much like many before him, Zabarnyi could be tempted by Parisian lights and Champions League football. Bournemouth might hold out for £70 million or more, but if the player pushes for a move, that balance becomes fragile.
'PSG are expected to submit a third offer in the coming days' sounds like inevitability, not just interest. As fans, we hope the club is prepared for every scenario. Whether that means keeping Zabarnyi or replacing him smartly, the message must remain clear: Bournemouth are not here to make up numbers anymore.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chelsea not planning to revisit goalkeeper transfer
Chelsea are not planning to revisit a deal to sign Mike Maignan from AC Milan later in the transfer window. The West Londoners held talks with AC Milan over the transfer of the France goalkeeper earlier this month, but failed to find an agreement on a fee. Chelsea had hoped to sign Maignan in time for the FIFA Club World Cup but were expected to resume negotiations again after the tournament. Advertisement However, Enzo Maresca looks likely to continue with his current options. Fabrizio Romano has revealed that Chelsea 'maintain their confidence' in Robert Sanchez, Filip Jorgensen and Mike Penders as their options for the season and currently have no plans to resume talks for Maignan. Maignan's contract at AC Milan expires next summer and the Italian side run the risk of losing the goalkeeper on a free transfer in 2026. The Rossoneri had demanded a fee of around £21m for the 29-year-old, with Chelsea's offer in the region of £12.9m falling significantly short of their price tag. Read – Eight transfers you might have missed this summer See more – Every footballer signed for £100m as Wirtz joins Liverpool Follow The Football Faithful on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | TikTok
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chelsea make goalkeeper decision and Barcelona considering sale
All of the latest transfer news, rumours and speculation. 2025-06-22T09:23:52Z Real Madrid forward Rodrygo reportedly has some eye-watering demands which could end interest from Arsenal. 2025-06-22T09:22:55Z Advertisement Barcelona sporting director Deco has revealed that a centre-back will be sold this summer... but it will not be Ronald Araújo. 2025-06-22T09:21:21Z Chelsea will not return with a renewed offer for Mike Maignan after the Club World Cup after Milan rebuffed their initial attempts to sign him before the tournament. 2025-06-22T09:20:03Z Welcome to Sunday's live updates of the latest news, rumours and done deals from the transfer market.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
While institutions own 38% of Serabi Gold plc (LON:SRB), individual investors are its largest shareholders with 51% ownership
The considerable ownership by individual investors in Serabi Gold indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy 44% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders Insiders have been buying lately AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If you want to know who really controls Serabi Gold plc (LON:SRB), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Institutions, on the other hand, account for 38% of the company's stockholders. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Serabi Gold, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Serabi Gold Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Serabi Gold. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Serabi Gold, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Serabi Gold is not owned by hedge funds. Fratelli Investments Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 10.0% of shares outstanding. Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.4% of common stock, and Aberdeen Group Plc holds about 6.2% of the company stock. Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Serabi Gold plc. It has a market capitalization of just UK£137m, and the board has only UK£346k worth of shares in their own names. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public -- including retail investors -- own 51% of Serabi Gold. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions. With an ownership of 10.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Serabi Gold , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
