State Department action sends ripples through South Sudanese community in Colorado
Political unrest half a world away is being felt here in Colorado as South Sudanese community members wonder what comes next.
Last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the transitional government in South Sudan is taking advantage of the United States. He is
revoking visas
for South Sudanese citizens and said no new visas will be issued.
South Sudan is reportedly on the brink of a
new civil war
. Colorado resident Nyadak Pal said, "It's bringing back memories of trauma."
She came to this country as a war refugee from South Sudan and eventually earned a degree from Metro State, as well as full citizenship.
"These are intellectuals that are adding to our economy," said Pal.
Rubio announced last week that he is revoking the visas of all South Sudanese passport holders due to "a failure to repatriate deportees in a timely manner."
It impacts students and those within the community concerned that they'll be deported regardless of immigration status.
"Overall, what brings us together is education," Pal said.
The effects of the visa revocation are wide reaching and tie into USAID cuts to South Sudan as well.
"There are children who have already died since this cutoff," said Peggy Gonder, who is on the board of
Seeds of South Sudan
. The Colorado nonprofit has helped refugees earn education in Kenya.
"Eighty-three have graduated high school. Twenty-four in college in Kenya, and we just graduated our first medical doctor."
While the visa change hasn't targeted their nonprofit, the USAID cuts have impacted food programs to camps where South Sudanese war refugees have come from.
As Pal hears of a looming civil war in South Sudan, she is working to organize her community together no matter what happens here in the U.S.
"So, this is where we find connection and alignment to try to bring our groups together in the name of education."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran; Vance, Rubio say that's not the goal
Just hours after Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States did not want 'regime change' in Iran, President Donald Trump said that might be a desired outcome. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on June 22 as Mideast tensions continued to escalate the day after the U.S. military bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. Trump's post signaling an openness to new leadership in Tehran followed his vice president and secretary of State appearing on the Sunday morning talk shows arguing the U.S. focus was not at launching a war with Iran. "We don't want a regime change," Vance told NBC's Meet the Press. "We want to end the nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here." During an interview with CBS's Face the Nation, Rubio said the U.S. had a very specific mission in mind to take out Iranian nuclear facilities and that the onus is now on Tehran showing an interest in diplomacy. 'There are a lot of regimes around the world that we don't like, okay?,' Rubio said. 'But in this particular case, what we are focused on is not the changing of the regime.' Five days before ordering the U.S. airstrikes, Trump on June 16 threatened Iran's supreme leader on social media and followed up a short while later with another two-word post: "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!" In his remarks from the White House announcing the U.S. bombing operation on June 21, Trump said he wanted to 'stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror.' 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier,' Trump said. 'For 40 years, Iran has been saying, "Death to America, Death to Israel." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could there be a military draft? Fears rise after US bombs Iran
Heightened tensions following the United States' June 21 attack on Iranian nuclear facilities has brought the specter of a military draft to the forefront of the minds of many. The U.S. struck three nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan June 21 in what has been dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer." In a June 22 Truth Social post, President Donald Trump said he was open to a regime change in the country, hours after Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. did not want a regime change. Live updates: What is Iran's next move? World awaits response to U.S. bombing There are currently no bills before Congress to institute a draft, however the Washington Post reported last year that influential former administration officials as well as some GOP lawmakers have publicly suggested a "national service mandate." Here's what you need to know about a possible military draft. The last draft call occurred in 1972, according to Air & Space Forces Magazine, and the draft was announced to be no longer in use by then Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird on Jan. 27, 1973. The final person inducted into the U.S. military – Dwight Elliott Stone, a 24-year-old apprentice plumber from Sacramento, California, – entered the Army on June 30, 1973, according to the magazine. Fallout of US attack on Iran: US warns of 'heightened threat environment' after strikes on Iran nukes Legislation would need to be passed through Congress amending the Military Selective Service Act in order to reinstate a draft, according to the Selective Service Agency. In 2015, then New York Democratic Representative Charles Rangel introduced a bill to re-instate a draft alongside a "War Tax" bill to point out the inequity of war as then President Barack Obama attempted to galvanize support for an Authorization for Use of Military Force against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. "When I served, the entire nation shared the sacrifices through the draft and increased taxes. But today, only a fraction of America shoulders the burden. If war is truly necessary, we must all come together to support and defend our nation," Rangle, who served in the Korean War, said in a statement at the time, according to The Hill. Currently, all men between 18 to 25 are required to register with the Selective Service System. The Selective Service Agency states that, should a draft be reinstated, the first to receive induction orders would be those whose turn 20 years old during the year of the lottery. Additional drafts would follow for those turning 21 through 25, then 19 and 18 would occur if additional soldiers were required. All of those who have registered with the Selective Service are presumed to be eligible to be drafted. The only exemptions from Selective Service registration are if a man: Is placed in a hospital, nursing home, long-term care facility, or mental institution on or before his 18th birthday, had no breaks of institutionalization of 30 days or longer, and remained institutionalized until his 26th birthday. Is confined to his home, whether his own or someone else's (including group homes), on or before his 18th birthday and cannot leave the home without medical assistance and remained homebound until his 26th birthday. A draftee could request to be reclassified, including as a conscientious objector, after he is drafted but before the day he is due to report. High school and college students can ask for service to be postponed while draftees can request hardship deferments. Ministers, certain elected officials and some dual nationals would be exempt from the draft. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Could there be a military draft in US? Fears rise after Iran attacks
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
US asks China to stop Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday urged China to intervene to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, which is one of the most important shipping routes for the world. In an interview on Fox News Channel's 'Sunday Morning Futures,' host Maria Bartiromo asked Rubio whether he expected Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz in an effort to disrupt oil transportation globally. 'I would encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio replied. As the world braces for possible retaliation from Iran — after the United States bombed three of its nuclear sites on Saturday — Rubio warned on Sunday that closing the vital strait would be 'economic suicide' for Tehran. He also warned that other countries could intervene if Iran takes that step. 'If they do that, it'll be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it,' Rubio said. 'And we retain options to deal with that.' 'But other countries should be looking at that as well,' he added. 'It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours. It would be, I think, a massive escalation that would merit a response not just by us but from others.' A spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Guo Jiakun, deflected when asked on Monday what China would do if Iran closed the strait, saying the international community should 'step up its efforts to promote the de-escalation of the conflict,' The New York Times reported. Rubio made clear in the Fox Business interview that the U.S. would only strike again if Iran retaliates. 'What happens next will depend on what they do,' he said. 'They want to negotiate, we're ready to negotiate. They want to get cute and do things that are dangerous, we have responses available that are devastating.' The Iranian Parliament on Sunday approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz after the United States bombed nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, the last of which is located inside a mountain Closing the strait, located between Iran and Oman, could have serious implications for both the global and U.S. economy. The Strait of Hormuz's width and depth allow it to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers, and very few alternatives exist if it is closed, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), making it a critical choke point for oil shipments. Approximately 20 million barrels, or 20 percent of global consumption, flowed through the strait in 2024.
