Sustainable aviation fuel not a ‘silver bullet' to decarbonisation, warns MP
Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is not a 'silver bullet' to decarbonising the industry, ministers have been warned.
Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the Transport Committee, urged the Government to 'look beyond' SAF in its mission to reduce carbon emissions.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said she is 'determined to make rapid progress' on the roll-out of SAF, to ensure Britain can continue to 'grow and thrive'.
In January, the Government introduced a mandate which requires an increasing amount of sustainable fuel to be used by jets, with the aim of ensuring 22% of all jet fuel comes from sustainable sources by 2040.
Opening a debate on the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill, Ms Alexander said she wants to see more passengers 'take to the skies, not less'.
She told MPs: 'We're determined to make rapid progress on this issue, because we do have an ironclad belief that our success as an island nation rests on our international connectivity.
'The flow of trade, exporting British expertise, the movement of people for business and leisure, all depend on aviation continuing to grow and thrive.
'We could put our head in the sand and pretend people do not want to fly, pretend the sector does not support hundreds of thousands of jobs, that people do not look forward to foreign holidays or family reunions, that air freight isn't a significant part of our trade by value, but we'd be on the wrong side of both reality and public aspiration.
'The truth is, demand for flight is only going in one direction. According to the CAA (Civil Aviation Authority), passenger levels were 7% higher in 2024 than the previous year.
'If we do not respond, if we don't set aviation up for long-term success, we don't just make ourselves poorer today, we kiss goodbye to the growth and opportunity this country needs in the decades to come.
'So I'm clear, I want a future where more passengers can take to the skies, not less. But like the rest of our economy, that must mean emitting less carbon, not more. This Bill will help to secure that future.'
Intervening, Conservative MP Sir Julian Lewis (New Forest East) said: 'I gather that only last week, the International Air Transport Association highlighted the fact that sustainable aviation fuels, at the moment, cost approximately five times the cost of conventional jet fuel.
'Can she explain how the measures in the Bill will bridge that gap to make it economical?'
Ms Alexander replied: 'There is constrained supply at the moment, we have one commercial production facility in the UK at Immingham.'
She added: 'What we need to do is build investor confidence to commercialise some of the demonstration projects in sustainable aviation fuel that exists around the country.'
During the second reading debate, Ms Cadbury said: 'I know that we need to see changes in aviation to meet our really ambitious climate goals, now that aviation and shipping are included in our carbon budget, this is even more important.
'I hope that the Government will also look beyond SAF when thinking about decarbonising aviation. SAF is not and will not be the silver bullet solution to the sector's responsibility, to this country's decarbonisation strategy.'
The MP for Brentford and Isleworth added: 'The Climate Change Committee warned this Parliament in 2023 that relying on SAF alone was, I quote, high risk.
'For example, Heathrow Airport is already the single greatest source of carbon emissions in the UK, and the current plans for expansion will add an extra eight to nine megatons of CO2 a year.
'And if the Government do expand Heathrow, then it will mean that other airports across the UK would face having to make cuts to ensure that aviation didn't reach its carbon targets.
'Or, furthermore, and probably both, as continuing increases in aviation emissions grow, that will have to be offset against significant cuts in emissions in other sectors.
'So I ask the Transport Secretary, what is the Government doing to address that particular challenge?'
Shadow transport minister Gareth Bacon branded the Government's pledge to begin work on the Heathrow expansion in this Parliament as 'very far-fetched'.
He added: 'There are substantial logistical and financial barriers to its construction, and so far, the Government has provided no solutions on these points.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
India to See Limited Inflation Fallout From Oil, Government Adviser Says
India's top government adviser said rising oil prices are likely to have a limited impact on inflation for now and Asia's third-largest economy remains in a relatively favorable position to weather global risks. While high oil prices due to the ongoing crisis in the Middle East is a matter of concern, 'it is still not something that is going to be significant in terms of impact,' Chief Economic Adviser V. Anantha Nageswaran said in an interview on Friday. Cooling inflation, ample liquidity and low interest rates will provide the right conditions for India's economy despite global uncertainties, he added.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Florian Wirtz joins list of most expensive soccer signings in history
Florian Wirtz became one of the most expensive players in soccer history when the Germany playmaker joined Liverpool from Bayer Leverkusen on Friday for a fee of up to 116 million pounds ($156 million). Neymar: $262 million (222 million euros) Paris Saint-Germain shattered the world-record transfer fee by signing the Brazil superstar from Barcelona in August 2017. It was more than double the outlay of Manchester United to sign Paul Pogba from Juventus for $116 million a year earlier. It remains the record transfer fee. ___ Kylian Mbappé: $216 million (180 million euros) A few weeks after buying Neymar, PSG also secured a loan deal for Mbappé — then the rising star of French soccer playing for Monaco — that included the option to make the move permanent in 2018. PSG did so, making it an outlay of nearly $500 million on two players. ___ Flush with cash after selling Neymar a year earlier, Barcelona spent most of it in a deal to buy Brazil playmaker Coutinho from Liverpool for a Spanish record fee. ___ Moises Caicedo: $146 million (115 million pounds) The Ecuador midfielder's move was previously the most expensive deal by a British club, with Chelsea buying him from Brighton in August 2023. ___ João Félix: $140 million (126 million euros) Atletico Madrid triggered a buyout clause in Félix's contract to sign the Portugal forward from Benfica in August 2019. ___ Jude Bellingham: $139 million (128.5 million euros) The England star got his big move to Real Madrid from Borussia Dortmund in June 2023, for an initial up-front fee of 103 million euros plus add-ons linked to performance. ___ Antoine Griezmann: $134 million (120 million euros) Atletico could afford to sign Félix after selling France forward Griezmann to Barcelona for a similar fee a few weeks earlier. ___ Neymar: $98 million (90 million euros) Outside from Europe, the biggest transfer deal also involved Neymar when he joined Al Hilal, a team in the Saudi Pro League, from Paris Saint-Germain in August 2023. That came at the height of Saudi Arabia's push to sign high-end soccer talent to ignite the oil-rich state's domestic league. ___
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
How Trump has targeted Harvard's international students — and what the latest court ruling means
President Donald Trump and his administration have tried several tactics to block Harvard University's enrollment of international students, part of the White House's effort to secure policy changes at the private, Ivy League college. Targeting foreign students has become the administration's cornerstone effort to crack down on the nation's oldest and wealthiest college. The block on international enrollment, which accounts for a quarter of Harvard's students and much of its global allure , strikes at the core of Harvard's identity. Courts have stopped some of the government's actions, at least for now — but not all.
