EV Ownership in 2025 Comes With Higher Costs for Insurance, Depreciation, and Charging
EV makers trumpet an average transaction price of $59,255 in April 2025, yet that "deal" hides an 11.6 percent incentive discount before you even charge the battery. Add the $1,500 for home-charger installation, and you're already $10,000 beyond a comparable gas SUV, incentives aside.
EV proponents love to tout "fuel savings," but grid electricity now averages 16.13 ¢/kWh across the U.S. At 30 kWh per 100 miles, that's $4.84 in juice, or about a third of gasoline's $14 for 100 miles at $3.50/gal and 25 mpg. Nice, right? Yet the devil lurks in the details: public fast-charging premiums, demand surcharges and urban "idle" fees can double that rate in a heartbeat. Maintenance feels breezy at $0.04/mile versus $0.08/mile for an ICE (saving roughly $3,000 over five years), but cheap brake pads can't cover body-shop bills when a battery swap runs $12,000 out of warranty.
An early-adopter premium evaporates faster than electrons at the charging station. When it comes to depreciation, EVs lose an average 58.8 percent of their value over five years, versus 45.6 percent for gas cars. On a $60,000 EV, that's a $35,300 hit; a similar ICE drops "only" $27,300.
Expect to shell out about 20 percent more in insurance. On average, you're looking at $337 monthly for EVs versus $281 for gas cars, thanks to pricier parts and repair times. That's roughly $3,000 extra over five years.
• Upfront Premium: $6,879 in incentives subtracted from MSRP doesn't offset the $10,000 charger & dealer markup.• Depreciation Gap: EV owners bleed an extra $8,000 in resale losses over five years.• Insurance Levies: EVs tack on $3,000 more in premiums.• Infrastructure Fees: City curb-side charging, demand surcharges, and road-usage taxes lurk in 2025's policy playbook.
Your next EV purchase should come with a spreadsheet, not just an excited thumb-twitch to "order now." Demand transparent TCO projections from dealers. Insist on five-year cost estimates that include charger installation, insurance, depreciation, and all the "voltage-supply chain" fees they'd rather bury in small print. If automakers want EW (electrification wow) to catch on, they need to own these costs as boldly as they tout eco-credentials. Otherwise, consumers will unplug from sticker hype and power down to real-world numbers.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
5 hours ago
- Business Upturn
INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Tempus AI, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Tempus AI, Inc. (NASDAQ: TEM) common stock between August 6, 2024 and May 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until August 12, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. Captioned Shouse v. Tempus AI, Inc. , No. 25-cv-06534 (N.D. Ill.), the Tempus AI class action lawsuit charges Tempus AI and certain of Tempus AI's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Tempus AI class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected]. CASE ALLEGATIONS: Tempus AI is a technology company advancing precision medicine through the practical application of artificial intelligence, including generative AI. The Tempus AI class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Tempus AI inflated the value of contract agreements, many of which were with related parties, included non-binding opt-ins and/or were self-funded; (ii) the credibility and substance of Tempus AI's joint venture with SoftBank Group Corporation was at risk because it gave the appearance of 'round-tripping' capital to create revenue for Tempus AI; (iii) Tempus AI-acquired Ambry Genetics Corporation had a business model based on aggressive and potentially unethical billing practices that risked scrutiny and unsustainability; (iv) AstraZeneca PLC had reduced its financial commitments to Tempus AI through a questionable 'pass-through payment' via a joint agreement between it, Tempus AI, and Pathos AI, Inc.; and (v) the above issues revealed weakness in core operations and revenue prospects. The Tempus AI class action lawsuit further alleges that on May 28, 2025, Spruce Point Capital Management, LLC issued research report on Tempus AI that raised numerous red flags over Tempus AI's management, operations, and financial reporting. On this news, the price of Tempus AI stock fell more than 19%, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Tempus AI common stock during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. Contact: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 800-449-4900 [email protected]
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's $56K India Gamble: Will the Model Y Sell in a Price-Sensitive Market?
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) is finally hitting the accelerator in India. After years of back-and-forth, the EV giant is opening its first showroom in Mumbai this July, followed by another in New Delhi. It's starting with the Model Yshipped straight from its Shanghai plantmarking the company's first official sales push into the world's third-largest car market. Internal documents and people familiar with the matter confirm that Tesla has also brought in Supercharger hardware, car accessories, and parts from the US, China, and the Netherlandslaying the groundwork for a broader rollout. This move follows Elon Musk's February meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and could signal the start of a long-term India strategy. But it won't be an easy ride. Each Model Y imported was declared at just under $32,000, but racked up over $25,000 in import duties due to India's 70% tariff on fully-built EVs. Final sticker price? North of $56,000 before tax and insurancenearly 50% more than the U.S. price post-incentives. For a market where EVs still make up just 5% of new car sales and luxury vehicles are under 2%, Tesla will need more than brand power to spark volume. Still, the company is quietly building momentum. It's securing warehouse space in Karnataka and Gurugram, boosting hiring across charging, retail, and policy teams, and sending execs from abroad to oversee showroom setup in luxury districts. The early signs point to a premium positioning play aimed at affluent Indian buyers. Whether that strategy holdsor pivotswill depend on how fast Tesla can shift from imports to local production. For now, it's a high-stakes, high-margin experiment in one of the world's fastest-growing auto markets. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Local Economic Development Act funds help New Mexico businesses grow
NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – For years, state and city grant funding has been used to grow businesses in New Mexico with the goal of keeping jobs here and boosting the economy. One local business who has expanded over the years said it's all thanks to that local funding. Vitality Works, located in Albuquerque, makes dietary and herbal supplements. 'We are the guys that really make the stuff for over 600 brands in the United States. Our name is on nothing, but we make other people's goods and fully package turnkey operations,' said Vitality Works CEO/Founder Mitch Coven. Coven said since he started his company in the 1980's, it's far surpassed his goals. He said the growth wouldn't have been possible without money from grants and tax credits. 'Everything that the city, county, state has made available to us has helped foster our growth even faster,' added Coven. One of the grants he's received is through the Local Economic Development Act, or LEDA which was signed into New Mexico law in the early 90's to incentivize and support growing businesses. 'We want the public sector to be an enabling partner that allows those entrepreneurs and those companies to be successful,' said Director of Economic Development for the City of Albuquerque Max Gruner. Vitality Works is just one company that's benefited from LEDA in the metro. In just the past eight years, the city of Albuquerque has committed more than $13.7 million in LEDA funding to help grow and retain 15 businesses. Those who qualify are expected to show how their company will expand, create jobs and have a local economic impact. 'We are really trying to use the mechanism of these incentives to create generational wealth for our families in Albuquerque,' said Gruner. Vitality Works produces 50,000 bottles of supplements and more a day. Coven believes his company is a way to give back to New Mexico as he employs more than 300 people and he sources some herbs in the state. His company is receiving it's second LEDA funding, which he hopes to use to expand the company even further by adding another 30,000 square feet to his facility. 'Our plans are to keep capturing the growth. We have to keep expanding,' said Coven. State LEDA funds are appropriated by the legislature, while participating cities also have their own LEDA funds, which are controlled by city councils. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
