‘Putting profit over people': big gas is waging war on a California clean air rule
This story is co-published with Floodlight.
On a windy night in early January, Barbara Ishida, a second grade teacher, spotted the Eaton fire glowing in the hills behind her home in Altadena, California. Her mind turned to the deadly wildfires in Lahaina and Paradise and she thought, 'Let's get out – now.'
Ishida and her husband evacuated safely, but the flames destroyed their home. An attribution study found that climate change, which is primarily caused by burning fossil fuels, made the January fires 35% more likely.
She thought the least they could do is rebuild in a way that wouldn't compound the climate crisis that raised the fire risk.
'Building back is our only option at this point,' Ishida said, 'so we're going to build back super environmentally friendly.'
Her vision is to build a fire-resistant home with no gas appliances. That approach is backed by a University of California Berkeley study in April that concluded all-electric construction is the best and most climate-friendly strategy to rebuild after the fires.
But the gas industry is pushing back against this idea. Proposed rules that would have encouraged Ishida and other homeowners to buy furnaces and heaters that emit no nitrogen oxides (NOx) – a key pollutant from gas appliances – have been weakened and delayed by a coalition of groups that includes SoCalGas, the country's largest gas utility.
SoCalGas has a history of lobbying hard against regulations that hurt its bottom line. After a fierce opposition campaign, the rules are going to a vote on Friday, 6 June.
The rules are proposed by the south coast air quality management district (SCAQMD), the agency responsible for improving air quality in Los Angeles and nearby communities, one of the most polluted air basins in the United States.
If passed, the rules are designed to create cleaner air and reduce planet-heating emissions by setting future targets for sales of new zero-emission space and water heaters. The rules would apply to manufacturers, distributors, sellers and installers. They are expected to prevent 2,490 premature deaths and avoid 10,200 asthma cases.
'Consumers will continue to have a choice of purchasing either a gas or electric space/water heaters when replacing their existing units,' explained Nahal Mogharabi, a spokesperson for the air-quality district. 'Importantly, consumers can continue to operate their existing units until the consumer chooses to replace it or the unit breaks.'
SoCalGas defended its role in the opposition campaign. 'SoCalGas' stakeholder engagement and outreach efforts on this topic are a regular part of any rulemaking process where we share information that could affect Southern California customers,' Erica Berardi, a SoCalGas spokesperson, wrote in an email.
BizFed, a business group that was also part of the opposition campaign, advocated for a delay in the rule-making process 'to allow for more transparency and sufficient public outreach to make Southern Californians aware of the significant costs associated with these changes', Elizabeth Daubel, communications director for BizFed, wrote in an email.
At the same time that the opposition campaign ramped up, groups allied with the gas industry filed a lawsuit against the SCAQMD, aiming to undermine its authority to impose such regulations.
The opposition is far from unique; a February report by a London-based thinktank InfluenceMap found that fossil fuel companies in the United States, European Union and Australia are waging parallel campaigns against laws that restrict use of gas in buildings – pushback that has largely succeeded in preventing and weakening these laws.
Ishida signed a letter supporting the proposed SCAQMD rules because she believes they would encourage Altadena to build back in a sustainable way. When she heard about the organized opposition to the rules, Ishida felt angry.
'They're just putting profits over people,' she said. 'It's sad and it's selfish and it's not right.'
Although progressive states like California are leading the transition away from fossil fuels, gas appliances remain ubiquitous in California homes and across the western United States.
Buildings account for one-quarter of greenhouse gas emissions in California but are subject to local control, meaning that local regulators like the SCAQMD have a big role to play in lowering emissions.
In 2023, recognizing the air pollution caused by gas appliances, the agency proposed amendments to two rules to encourage alternatives. Changes to Rules 1111 and 1121 would establish a zero-emission NOx standard for furnaces and water heaters.
As originally written, the new rules would have impacted more than 10m gas-fired residential and commercial furnaces and residential water heaters. The rules would not affect gas stoves, a flashpoint in similar regulatory efforts.
As they were written in October 2024, the proposed rules would have required all furnaces and water heaters installed to become zero emission by 2026 for new residential and commercial buildings. Existing buildings and mobile homes had a few more years to comply.
But in recent months, SCAQMD staff have softened the proposed rules. The current version now requires manufacturers to meet zero-emission sales targets for residential buildings, starting at 30% in 2027-28 and rising to 90% by 2036. The rule no longer requires that all new furnaces and water heaters be zero emission by a certain date.
The original rules would have reduced NOx emissions by 10 tons a day, which would have been the largest emissions reducing rule package adopted in over three decades by the SCAQMD. The revised rules would achieve a reduction of 6 tons a day of NOx emissions.
Kim Orbe, senior conservation program manager at Sierra Club, said pushing back the compliance date would allow manufacturers to continue building gas-powered equipment for years to come. She described the rules as 'tremendously weakened'.
In late 2024, an opposition campaign sprung up, prompting SCAQMD's board to push back a scheduled hearing and final vote by six months, to Tuesday 6 June.
SoCalGas and groups aligned with the company helped delay the rule-making process by encouraging public officials to oppose the rules, according to records obtained by the Energy and Policy Institute and shared with Floodlight.
Ahead of a major SCAQMD meeting on 20 December, SoCalGas employees sent 'urgent' requests to public officials, including mayors of cities in the south coast area, asking them to send letters, testify and pass resolutions opposing the rules.
Their emails claimed – misleadingly – that the rules would prohibit the sale and installation of all gas furnaces and water heaters.
Some of the letters that SCAQMD received from public officials were drafted by a consultant working for BizFed. Several city governments copied the consultant's draft letter onto their letterhead. Almost word-for-word letters were sent to the SCAQMD by the Orange county council of governments, the city of Lake Forest and the city of Loma Linda.
The response to the rules was overwhelming, generating over 12,500 comments. But staff reported that many letters opposing the rules contained faulty information, including that the rules would mandate homeowners switch to all-electric appliances.
The governing board delayed the vote and modified the rules to give more time to address concerns about 'cost, technology availability and consumer choice', Mogharabi wrote in an email.
'Even though the rule has been modified, as is typical during the rule-making process,' she added, 'the current NOx reductions are significant.'
Mogharabi noted that this summer, the agency is launching a Go Zero rebate program that will provide more than $21m to help residents and small businesses install zero-emission heating appliances.
On 10 January 2025, as unprecedented megafires burned out of control in Los Angeles – destroying thousands of homes and killing 30 people – SCAQMD officials held a public meeting to consider the proposed rules 1111 and 1121.
The tone of the meeting was somber. Officials began by acknowledging the wildfires and smoke cloaking the city, offering condolences to a board member who lost his home to the flames. Minutes later, lobbyists including a representative of SoCalGas asked for the rules to be delayed or retracted, citing the lawsuit challenging SCAQMD's authority to make such rules.
Jessi Davis, a SoCalGas lobbyist said, 'We think it would be prudent for the board to postpone this rulemaking until these issues are resolved by the courts.'
In December, a coalition of groups, including homebuilders, restaurant owners and unions, filed the lawsuit against the SCAQMD, seeking to overturn a related rule that phases out large gas-fired furnaces and water heaters in commercial and industrial facilities. That rule is different from the proposed rules, which are specific to smaller residential and commercial furnaces and water heaters.
'The legal theories they're trying to push would undermine the ability of the (agency) to protect its residents,' said Adrian Martinez, an attorney at Earthjustice, an environmental nonprofit that is intervening in the case. 'They're attempting to strip local entities like SCAQMD of the ability to clean up pollution.'
With another wildfire season on the horizon, Ishida is thinking about the future of Los Angeles if climate change continues to worsen. 'We're not going to be the only community that burns,' Ishida said. 'We're not going to be the last if we continue down this stretch.'
Floodlight is a non-profit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Are the Maga isolationists losing influence over Trump's Iran deliberations?
The Trump administration is managing internal dissent over deliberations on whether to launch a strike against Iran, breaking what many supporters saw as a campaign pledge not to involve the US in new conflicts in the Middle East. Trump for the second time this week disregarded testimony by his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that Iran had not been seeking to build a nuclear weapon as of March this year. 'She's wrong,' Trump said, then added: 'My intelligence community is wrong.' In a striking about-face, Gabbard late on Friday said her March testimony had been taken 'out of context' by the media and claimed there was no difference between her opinion and Trump's. 'The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division,' she said in a post on X. 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' Gabbard was nominated to her position in large part because of her skepticism of the US intelligence community and its role in the US involvement in a series of 'forever wars' in the Middle East, especially the Iraq war. Her transition from Democrat to Trump supporter is indicative of the broad coalition that Trump has united under his America First movement – and the potential for a schism as the US grows closer to launching an attack on Iran. Steve Bannon, an influential advisor who has been critical of the potential for a US-Iran war, was seen having lunch at the White House with Trump this week, following a series of podcast episodes in which he and other popular MAGA pundits criticised what they saw as preparations for a preemptive US strike against Iran. Bannon came to lunch armed with talking points that the Iran strike would be a bad idea and the massive 30,000lb bunker-buster bombs that could target the Iranian uranium enrichment facility at Fordow may not destroy the target. The Guardian previously reported that Trump was not fully convinced the bombs would destroy the target, and has held off authorising strikes as he also awaits the possibility that the threat of US involvement would lead Iran to talks. Others close to the administration have pushed back forcefully in support of a strike on Iran. Republican congressmen including Mitch McConnell and Tom Cotton have lashed out against the isolationist wing of Trump's support; the radio host Mark Levin has personally spoken with Trump in support of stronger backing for Israel; and other top members of the administration – including secretary of state Marco Rubio – are avowed Iran hawks. Others, such as vice-president JD Vance, are public anti-interventionists but have limited their criticism of potential strikes to allow Trump the space to make a decision. But Bannon is believed to have an outsized influence on Trump's decision-making on the war. According to US media, he has warned Trump he shouldn't trust Israeli intelligence that the Iranian government was seeking a nuclear weapon imminently. Others in the MAGA wing of Trump's support have sought to rebuild ties after sharply criticising Trump's positioning on the Israeli strikes against Iran. Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host, had called Trump earlier this week in order to apologise after blasting those advising Trump to launch strikes against Iran as 'warmongers.' 'Tucker is a nice guy,' Trump said from the Oval Office on Wednesday. 'He called and apologised the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciated that.'
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kai Trump follows in family footsteps by briefly pretending to work at fast food restaurant
Donald Trump 's granddaughter, Kai Trump, followed in the family footsteps, briefly, this week by trying her hand at working at a fast food outlet. In a TikTok video posted Wednesday, the golfer and daughter of Donald Trump Jr. took on a shift at a Dunkin' Donuts drive-through. Kai, 18, wore a tank top and skirt in the brand's signature colors of pink and yellow in the nine-second clip. She took an order for a medium iced coffee, tapping it into the register and then handing the beverage through the window to the driver in his car. The stunt is to promote a YouTube video in which she and her younger brother, Tristan, tried out Dunkin's signature drinks and snacks. The clip immediately evokes the moment in October, during the peak of the 2024 presidential election, when her grandfather put on an apron at a Pennsylvania drive-through McDonald's and learned to operate the french fries station. Then-candidate Trump similarly delivered takeout orders to customers in their cars as part of the photo opportunity and also hosted an impromptu press conference. 'It requires great expertise, actually, to do it right and to do it fast,' Trump said. 'These people work hard. They're great. They're great. And I just saw something—a process that's beautiful.' The stunt was arranged for fast-food fan Trump to hit back at Democratic presidential candidate, then-Vice President, Kamala Harris, who often spoke of her time working at McDonald's during college. Trump baselessly claimed she was lying about working there. Kai Trump, who has a large social media following and is an avid golfer, saw her profile rise significantly after she spoke at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July, shortly after the assassination attempt on her grandfather.
The Sun
33 minutes ago
- The Sun
West MUST neuter nuclear Iran before it gets bomb… alternative is arming regime that would rejoice in our extermination
SAY it loud – if the Islamic Republic of Iran has nuclear bombs, it is very bad news for this country, the free world and the human race. We are right to be wary of western intervention in the Middle East. 10 The invasion of Iraq eventually gave birth to Islamic State. Western intervention in Afghanistan left the women-hating Taliban in power. But all arguments for appeasement return to one question. Can the free world live with nuclear -armed Mullahs? The Islamist fanatics in Tehran shout the rhetoric of extermination — against Israel, the Great Satan (the US) and Little Satan (us). We have no choice but to take them seriously. Iran's leaders are in the last- chance nuclear saloon. President Trump has sensibly given them two weeks to stop building nuclear weapons. All of Trump's instincts are to avoid armed conflict. 'Going into the Middle East is the worst decision ever made!', he raged in 2019. Trump campaigned for his second term as a deal-maker, a peacemaker, an America-Firster more at home on the golf course than the battlefield. Missiles streak into downtown Israeli city as Iran breaches Iron Dome defences But sometimes we must fight for our freedom — and survival. If Iran cannot be persuaded to give up their nukes peacefully, then conflict can't be avoided. Unless we are prepared to see nukes in the hands of a regime that would rejoice to see us exterminated. Even Trump supporters are against the idea of the US once again playing Earth's policeman. 'Drop Israel,' urges Tucker Carlson, traditionally Trump's greatest cheerleader. 'Let them fight their own wars.' This is the MAGA line — abandon old allies, step away from NATO, let the freeloading foreigners fight their own wars. Don't get involved, dude! But all the experts agree that Israel simply does not have the firepower to eradicate Iran's nuclear weapon programme. Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment plant is inside a mountain. Destroying it requires American hardware. Specifically, it requires American Stealth bombers carrying 30,000lb bunker-busting bombs. Right to worry And even that may not be enough. Trump has given Iran's Mullahs every chance to abort their plans. They should take it. As the world steels itself, it is worth stating — the Iranian people are not our enemy. Iran has been a sponsor of global terror, but nobody has suffered more under Tehran's religious fanatics than the people. Iranian women have been beaten to death for daring to remove their hijab. Any military intervention should be a last resort to remove the possibility of Iran ever having nuclear weapons. It should not be the start of a war against the Iranian people. We are right to worry about bombs falling on the nuclear facility. Europe does not want to see millions more refugees on the move. Or a Chernobyl -like disaster. But what should we fear more? Bombs dropped on fanatics who would dance on our graves — or a nuclear-armed Iran? Rachel a streetwise Eva Peron AT 9pm sharp every night on London's Argyll Street, the strolling West End crowds are greeted by an astonishing sight. Rachel Zegler, radiant Hollywood superstar, appears on a balcony dressed as Eva Peron and belts out a version of Don't Cry For Me Argentina that is so damn good you hope Madonna and Elaine Paige never hear it. 10 What a voice. What a performance. And what a shock to the system if you have been doing a spot of late-night shopping. Rachel – star of Snow White and Spielberg's West Side Story reboot – is playing Argentina's Eva Peron in Evita at the London Palladium until September. And for the show's defining moment, every night, she comes off the Palladium stage, on to that balcony overlooking Argyll Street, and she sings – like a cross between Aretha Franklin and an angel. Ticket holders who have paid to see the show watch Zegler's performance on a TV monitor. One punter wrote: 'Sorry – are you saying I've paid £350 for two tickets and she's singing the biggest number outside at people who HAVEN'T paid?' Er, yes. Like so many current West End shows, Evita has trigger warnings – telling fans not to be alarmed by loud music and flashing lights. But the greatest shock is that anyone expecting to see Rachel Zegler belt out Don't Cry For Me Argentina should not be sitting in the Palladium. They should be standing in the street outside. Do not Tipp-ex truth DOES the English language contain a more pathetically inadequate euphemism than ' Asian grooming gang '? Somehow that does not cover the worst sexual abuse scandal in British history. Asian – you mean Chinese? Or Indian? No, we don't mean that at all, do we? And grooming gang – what a criminally pitiful understatement for the systemic mass rape of white working-class girls. Why do we struggle to get our heads around the enormity of what has happened in Bradford, Rotherham, Manchester and a dozen other northern cities? Why do we find it so hard, even now, to look the truth in the eye? Because the truth is unbearable. Baroness Casey's report is devastating. In 200 searing, traumatic pages, one paragraph screams for attention. In the report of one child victim, the word 'Pakistani' was Tipp-Exed out. The announcement of an inquiry into over-whelmingly Pakistani gangs abusing vulnerable white children is long overdue. Let us – finally – hear the truth about how thousands of girls were failed by cops, Labour councils and social workers. No more turning away for fear of looking racist. No more whitewashing. And no more Tipp-Ex. Heely idiotic EYEBROWS are raised at the sight of Balenciaga's highly impractical high-heel trainers – yours for £820. But doesn't every generation wear unfeasible footwear? I can vividly remember the numerous occasions during the glam rock days when Billericay High Street chuckled as I fell from my platform boots like some kamikaze member of the Glitter Band. Mind you, my platform boots did not cost 820 quid. Rock on, Rod GEARING up for Glastonbury next week, Sir Rod Stewart – 80-and-a-half years old – reveals that he has had a sprint track installed in his Essex back garden. 'I keep myself very fit,' he says. 'I have an indoor pool. 'Frank Sinatra once said to me, 'Rod, the secret of being a great singer is having powerful lungs. Do lots of underwater swimming'.' We can't all have a sprint track in our back garden and health tips from Sinatra. But we can all be inspired by remarkable Rod, who says he still loves a drink. Rod Stewart once showed us how to be young. Now he is showing us how to grow old. Oasis fans quite something LIAM GALLAGHER bristles at an Edinburgh council official referring to Oasis fans as 'fat, drunk and rowdy'. Liam – mate – do you really want an Oasis crowd to be svelte, sober and polite? Even in middle age, Oasis fans always are mad for it. And never slightly sensible for it. Reign man Cruise TOM CRUISE is to be awarded an honorary Oscar after being nominated four times. He was nominated for Best Actor twice, for Born On The Fourth Of July and Jerry Maguire, Best Supporting Actor for Magnolia and Best Picture for Top Gun: Maverick. For my money, Cruise deserved an Oscar for his career-defining performance opposite Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man, playing a spoilt brat on the skids who learns to love because of his relationship with his disabled brother. If you doubt that the Cruiser is a great actor, have another look at Rain Man. If Tom Cruise had a face like the back of a number 73 bus, he would have half a dozen Oscars by now. End is nigh street ONE of the UK's oldest shops, W.H. Mogford & Son in Bristol, a beautiful and beloved hardware store, is closing its doors this September. It is a miracle that it has survived for 160 years. 10 Around 13,500 high street retailers closed their doors for ever last year, at a cost of 169,000 jobs. Our high streets have been battered by online shopping. Car-hating councils. And apathetic police forces who stand aside for brazen shoplifters, as passive as gendarmes on the beaches of northern France. Shop local when you can. Spend your money in your community. The British high street is dying. And our lives will be diminished when it has gone.
