Soviet-era spacecraft plunges to Earth after 53 years stuck in orbit
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here A Soviet-era spacecraft has plunged to Earth, more than a half-century after its failed launch to Venus. Its uncontrolled entry was confirmed by both the Russian Space Agency and European Union Space Surveillance and Tracking. The Russians indicated it came down over the Indian Ocean, but some experts were not so sure of the precise location. Pictured: The Venera module, similar to Kosmos 482. (NASA) The European Space Agency's space debris office also tracked the spacecraft's doom after it failed to appear over a German radar station. It was not immediately known how much, if any, of the half-tonne spacecraft survived the fiery descent from orbit. Experts said ahead of time that some if not all of it might come crashing down, given it was built to withstand a landing on Venus, the solar system's hottest planet. The chances of anyone getting clobbered by spacecraft debris were exceedingly low, scientists said. Launched in 1972 by the Soviet Union, the spacecraft known as Kosmos 482 was part of a series of missions bound for Venus. But this one never made it out of orbit around Earth, stranded there by a rocket malfunction. Much of the spacecraft came tumbling back to Earth within a decade of the failed launch. The spacecraft known as Kosmos 482 was part of a series of missions bound for Venus. (AP) No longer able to resist gravity's tug as its orbit dwindled, the spherical lander – an estimated 3 feet (1 metre) across – was the last part of the spacecraft to come down. The lander was encased in titanium, according to experts, and weighed more than 1000 pounds (495 kilograms). Any surviving wreckage will belong to Russia under a United Nations treaty. After following the spacecraft's downward spiral, scientists, military experts and others could not pinpoint in advance precisely when or where the spacecraft might come down. Solar activity added to the uncertainty as well as the spacecraft's deteriorating condition after so long in space. After so much anticipation, some observers were disappointed by the lingering uncertainty over the exact whereabouts of the spacecraft's grave. 'If it was over the Indian Ocean, only the whales saw it,' Dutch scientist Marco Langbroek said via X. As of Saturday afternoon, the US Space Command had yet to confirm the spacecraft's demise as it collected and analysed data from orbit. The US Space Command routinely monitors dozens of reentries each month. What set Kosmos 482 apart – and earned it extra attention from government and private space trackers – was that it was more likely to survive reentry, according to officials. It was also coming in uncontrolled, without any intervention by flight controllers who normally target the Pacific and other vast expanses of water for old satellites and other space debris. space
Russia
USA
Astronomy
Europe
World CONTACT US
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
3 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Fermented poo and lunar cycles: How ‘witchcraft' is used to perfect wine
He prescribed a series of nine 'preparations' to aid farming. The first and most famous, preparation 500, involves spritzing the farm each year with the horn-fermented manure to boost microbial and fungal activity within the soil. 'The manure becomes imbued with growth forces, and it's really microbially diverse, and it's beautiful the way it's transformed,' Mudaly says. 'It looks nothing like cow manure. It's a really dark, almost black, colloidal substance, and we use that at about 85 grams to the hectare. It's quite a potent prep.' Once the solstice has passed, Mudaly will prune the vines and cover the wounds with a paste made from dung, clay and diatomaceous earth mixed with nettle or casuarina tea. Other preparations focus on additions to compost, including yarrow stuffed into stag bladders and animal skulls filled with dandelion flowers. So, does it work? Loading One review found that differences between the grapes, juice and wine composition of biodynamic and conventionally made wines were inconsistent. And there's certainly no definitive science linking lunar phases and plant physiology. But there are a few intriguing glimmers in the limited scientific press on biodynamics, including findings that suggest biodynamic wines taste better. 'Wines from biodynamically produced fruit were described as more complex, fresh and vibrant compared to conventional wines,' reads one study in academic wine journal Oeno One. An analysis of 128,182 French wine reviews also found biodynamic drops ranked about 12 per cent higher on average, although most of the ratings weren't fully blind, meaning reviewers were perhaps prone to unconscious bias. Organic and biodynamic vines offer 18 per cent less yield compared to conventional vineyards, according to a 2019 systematic review. This may be an advantage, flavour-wise, because smaller bunches of grapes ripen better. There is some evidence the resulting grapes hold more antioxidant phenols, which influence a wine's taste and mouthfeel, and flavonoids, which are increasingly linked to longevity. Other studies have reported no significant difference, though, compared to conventionally grown grapes. On the sustainability side, organic farms, which include biodynamic farms, have 30 per cent more species diversity on average and 50 per cent more organisms according to one meta-analysis. Another four-year field trial on German riesling grapevines found biodynamic soils squirmed with more earthworms and had better fertility than conventional and organic vineyards. Biodynamic winemaker Chris Carpenter said he adopted the practice at Lark Hill winery near Canberra to enrich the old, depleted, acidic soils so he could grow Austrian grüner vines. While he believes biodynamic wines are 'spectacular' and appreciably different to the conventional stuff, Carpenter takes Steiner's dogma with a pinch of salt. 'Some of it stands the test of time, and some of it does not at all,' he says. 'That's probably where I clash with more pure practitioners of biodynamics, in that I prefer to treat it à la carte, and take the good science and the evidence-based stuff and apply that to our vineyards.' Carpenter is unconvinced, for example, by preparation 501, where ground-up quartz or silica is left in the sun and applied to crops to enhance photosynthesis. 'That feels a bit more like homeopathy,' he says. A recent study, however, found applying silica to cabernet-sauvignon grapes boosted vine growth and resulted in a darker, more opaque red that was more intense in flavour and aroma. Even if there's no scientific consensus on biodynamic wines, Australia has the second-highest number of biodynamic farming hectares in the world behind Germany, according to academic Dr John Paull. And the practitioners swear by it.
The Age
3 days ago
- The Age
Fermented poo and lunar cycles: How ‘witchcraft' is used to perfect wine
He prescribed a series of nine 'preparations' to aid farming. The first and most famous, preparation 500, involves spritzing the farm each year with the horn-fermented manure to boost microbial and fungal activity within the soil. 'The manure becomes imbued with growth forces, and it's really microbially diverse, and it's beautiful the way it's transformed,' Mudaly says. 'It looks nothing like cow manure. It's a really dark, almost black, colloidal substance, and we use that at about 85 grams to the hectare. It's quite a potent prep.' Once the solstice has passed, Mudaly will prune the vines and cover the wounds with a paste made from dung, clay and diatomaceous earth mixed with nettle or casuarina tea. Other preparations focus on additions to compost, including yarrow stuffed into stag bladders and animal skulls filled with dandelion flowers. So, does it work? Loading One review found that differences between the grapes, juice and wine composition of biodynamic and conventionally made wines were inconsistent. And there's certainly no definitive science linking lunar phases and plant physiology. But there are a few intriguing glimmers in the limited scientific press on biodynamics, including findings that suggest biodynamic wines taste better. 'Wines from biodynamically produced fruit were described as more complex, fresh and vibrant compared to conventional wines,' reads one study in academic wine journal Oeno One. An analysis of 128,182 French wine reviews also found biodynamic drops ranked about 12 per cent higher on average, although most of the ratings weren't fully blind, meaning reviewers were perhaps prone to unconscious bias. Organic and biodynamic vines offer 18 per cent less yield compared to conventional vineyards, according to a 2019 systematic review. This may be an advantage, flavour-wise, because smaller bunches of grapes ripen better. There is some evidence the resulting grapes hold more antioxidant phenols, which influence a wine's taste and mouthfeel, and flavonoids, which are increasingly linked to longevity. Other studies have reported no significant difference, though, compared to conventionally grown grapes. On the sustainability side, organic farms, which include biodynamic farms, have 30 per cent more species diversity on average and 50 per cent more organisms according to one meta-analysis. Another four-year field trial on German riesling grapevines found biodynamic soils squirmed with more earthworms and had better fertility than conventional and organic vineyards. Biodynamic winemaker Chris Carpenter said he adopted the practice at Lark Hill winery near Canberra to enrich the old, depleted, acidic soils so he could grow Austrian grüner vines. While he believes biodynamic wines are 'spectacular' and appreciably different to the conventional stuff, Carpenter takes Steiner's dogma with a pinch of salt. 'Some of it stands the test of time, and some of it does not at all,' he says. 'That's probably where I clash with more pure practitioners of biodynamics, in that I prefer to treat it à la carte, and take the good science and the evidence-based stuff and apply that to our vineyards.' Carpenter is unconvinced, for example, by preparation 501, where ground-up quartz or silica is left in the sun and applied to crops to enhance photosynthesis. 'That feels a bit more like homeopathy,' he says. A recent study, however, found applying silica to cabernet-sauvignon grapes boosted vine growth and resulted in a darker, more opaque red that was more intense in flavour and aroma. Even if there's no scientific consensus on biodynamic wines, Australia has the second-highest number of biodynamic farming hectares in the world behind Germany, according to academic Dr John Paull. And the practitioners swear by it.
AU Financial Review
5 days ago
- AU Financial Review
Alan Turing built AI to save lives. Now we're regulating it to death
In the early 1940s Alan Turing, based in Bletchley Park in England, was tasked with breaking the Enigma code, used by the German navy to locate their submarine fleet. Turing conceded that the finest human brain could not break the daily resets of the code in less than 20 years – a far cry from the urgent needs of the British armed forces that it be broken in less than 24 hours. So Turing created the first model of a general-purpose computer – Turing is widely considered to be the father of theoretical computer science – to overcome the limitations of the human brain to perform a vital task.
