Neither glib lines nor warm thoughts can hide the cynicism of Labor's North West Shelf decision

Fans of naked political cynicism have had plenty to cheer of late. Those hoping for something more from their elected leaders – a bit of principle and coherency, say – have had no shortage of reasons to lament what Michael Stipe once called the downhill slide into abysmal.
In Australia, there is cynicism right through the Albanese government's proposed approval of a 45-year life extension for one of the world's biggest gas developments.
The 28 May announcement that Labor planned to greenlight the North West Shelf liquified natural gas (LNG) project, on the Burrup Hub in northern Western Australia, to run until 2070 came just 15 days after Murray Watt was sworn in as environment minister.
The rapid turnaround suggests either departmental advice backing the decision was waiting for him when he arrived, or he digested it particularly quickly. The advice hadn't been available a few weeks earlier, when Watt's predecessor, Tanya Plibersek, delayed the decision until just beyond the election, saying officials needed more time.
It is tempting to speculate what might have happened had the extension been announced prior to 3 May. Given the scale of Labor's victory, the impact may have been around the margins. It might have made things even tighter in Fremantle, where a community independent who ran hard against the extension, Kate Hulett, gave Labor's Josh Wilson a scare. It may have helped the Greens hang on in Melbourne and Brisbane, and added fuel to other climate-focused independent campaigns. We'll never know.
What we do know is the North West Shelf extension is backed not just by the minister, but the prime minister and cabinet – and there was nothing particularly surprising about where they landed. It was only a year ago that the resources minister, Madeleine King, released a 'future gas strategy' that – for reasons not fully explained – assumed greater ongoing demand for the fossil fuel than any scenario proposed by the International Energy Agency, and declared new sources of the fossil fuel would be needed 'to 2050 and beyond'.
Even with this factored in, the language Anthony Albanese used when asked about the decision was striking in its dismissiveness. His line varied a little depending on when you caught him, but included gas being needed for the Tomago aluminium smelter in New South Wales and to 'firm up' renewable energy in electricity grids on the east and west coasts.
This was mostly dissembling, and nonsense. For now, at least, no fuel from the North West Shelf is used in the east. Only a fraction is directed to power plants in Perth's electricity grid, which requires relatively little gas and has other sources to draw from. Nearly all the gas from the Burrup Hub is shipped overseas or used on site during production.
Albanese also justified decades-long gas expansion by saying Australia's 2050 target set was 'net zero, not zero' and 'you don't change a transition through warm thoughts, you do it through a concrete proposal'.
True enough, if your goal is just to get through a press conference unscathed. But the former is a line most usually rolled out by people arguing against the need to act rapidly on climate – not a club Albanese would usually want to align himself with.
The latter might be better saved for when you actually have a plan to reach net zero emissions across the economy. His government hasn't released one yet.
It reinforces a perception that the prime minister's commitment to the climate crisis is too often built on the idea that being better than the Coalition – which went to the election promising nothing to address the climate crisis for at least the next decade and a long-term nuclear pledge that didn't add up – is enough. But that's not how it works.
Labor did take strides on climate in the last term. Chris Bowen's renewable energy underwriting program – the capacity investment scheme – will help drive the construction of large-scale solar, wind and batteries needed to help replace creaky old coal plants.
The parliament passed a long-promised vehicle efficiency standard to help clean up emissions from most new cars. A Future Made in Australia bill introduced by the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, offers billions in tax credits for green industries. A subsidy for household batteries is on the way.
Sign up to Clear Air Australia
Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis
after newsletter promotion
But national greenhouse gas emissions are not coming down at anything like the pace required. Last year they didn't come down at all. And there is an equally compelling list of policy areas that have not been addressed.
Two stand out. The first is the reliance on often questionable carbon offsets that the owners of major industrial facilities can buy in lieu of making direct emissions cuts. Experts advise offsets cannot be used to justify expanding fossil fuel use if the world is going to limit climate breakdown. Instead, nature and other projects that draw down CO2 from the atmosphere will need to complement deep on-site cuts in fossil pollution. That isn't happening yet.
The second is the unwillingness to come to grips with the impact of Australia's near world-leading fossil fuel exports. On this, the country needs more than simple lines. It's true that it can't fix the problem alone, and the answer is not as simple as turning off the fossil fuel tap. It's equally true that if the world is going to come to grips with the crisis, exporters and importers have to work together as rapidly as possible to find new solutions.
Would anyone suggest Australia is taking this responsibility as seriously as it could? Labor has approved about 30 fossil fuel developments and expansions since it was elected in 2022.
Choosing another path would need a whole-of-government response that prioritises the climate crisis in decision-making. It means leadership from the top in tackling what getting to net zero actually means. Albanese's public comments since the election have been running in the opposite direction.
Meanwhile, Australia has been hit by simultaneous devastating drought and floods in neighbouring states. An unprecedented marine heatwave around the country has engulfed an area five times the size of the continent. It has contributed to havoc across the region, including a massive toxic algal bloom in South Australia and unprecedented damage to WA coral reef ecosystems that scientists have described as astounding and heart-breaking.
Researchers say the 'sleeping giant' of Antarctica has awoken and is showing signs of abrupt changes that could affect us all. The World Meteorological Organization says the world is racing towards breaking temperature goals set out in the 2015 Paris climate agreement much faster than expected.
Neither glib lines nor warm thoughts will help much in responding to these. Serious concrete proposals – both on across-the-board emissions cuts and adapting to what we're living through – are what's needed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

BBC News

2 hours ago

• BBC News

British couple win visa battle after MS deportation fear

A British couple who feared being deported from Australia after one of them was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) say they are "proud" to have been granted permanent Mathers, originally from Cheshire, had previously been told the potential cost of treating her condition for the health services meant a previous application alongside her boyfriend Rob O'Leary had been couple appealed against the decision in 2023 and launched an online petition earlier this year calling for Australia's minister for home affairs to review their recently shared they had been granted a visa after "a nearly four-year-long, emotional road". In their latest post, they said: "We are proud to announce we are Australia's newest Permanent Residents!"They added they were "over the moon" when their MP Allegra Spender told them that Tony Burke, minister for immigration, "personally contacted her to confirm the decision". Ms Mathers and Mr O'Leary, from London, met while backpacking in the country in 2017 and have lived there ever 2020, she was diagnosed with the relapsing-remitting variant of MS, which is a neurological condition with symptoms including muscle stiffness and difficulties in walking and Mathers received treatment in Australia under a reciprocal health agreement with the UK and said her condition had been "well managed" so the couple's requests for permanent residency were rejected in 2023 due to the costs linked to her medical entering Australia must meet certain health requirements, including not having "unduly increasing costs" for the country's publicly-funded healthcare service Medicare. Mr O'Leary said they had offered to pay the medical costs themselves or take out private insurance, adding that "the law is black and white, and the refusal is based on that, it's really hard for us".Their petition, which drew more than 25,000 signatures, called on Australia's minister for home affairs to review their case and look into immigration policies that "unfairly target individuals with well-managed health conditions". Mr O'Leary, who works in the construction trade, and his partner, who is a project manager and DJ, were "not asking for special treatment" but a chance to continue "working hard to contribute to this country in meaningful ways".In their latest post, they thanked supporters and said "there are so many things we've put on hold - just in case we had to leave"."But now, with this door wide open, we feel more focused and excited than ever to build our future in the country we love."Our families are overjoyed and already thinking of planning a trip to celebrate with us." See more Cheshire stories from the BBC and follow BBC North West on X.

The Guardian

3 hours ago

• The Guardian

Ancient trees are shipped to the UK, then burned – using billions in ‘green' subsidies. Stop this madness now

How green is this? We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station. Welcome to the scandal of Drax, where Britain's biggest polluter gets to play climate hero. The reality is that billions in public subsidies has enabled Drax to generate electricity by burning 300m trees. Now the government is trying to force through an extension that would grant Drax an estimated £1.8bn in public subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already pocketed, keeping this circus going until at least 2031. This isn't green energy. The mathematics alone should horrify anyone who cares about value for money or the environment. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal. Even if you replant every tree Drax destroys, it takes up to a century for new growth to reabsorb the carbon released. We're supposed to reach net zero by 2050, not 2125. Yet through circus-trick accounting, all of Drax's massive emissions magically disappear from Britain's climate ledger. They've simply been wished away – counted as 'zero', while the company becomes our largest single contributor to climate breakdown. Extraordinarily, this scandal unites opposition across the political spectrum. From the Greens to Reform, from the Morning Star to the Daily Telegraph, there's rare consensus that Drax represents everything wrong with our approach to climate policy. The Labour-dominated public accounts committee condemned Drax as a 'white elephant' that's been allowed to 'mark its own homework' while claiming 'billions upon billions' in subsidies. A Lords committee agreed, saying parliament needs to see key documents before approving any more funding. I don't agree with Ed Miliband on everything – we clearly have different views on nuclear power. I respect the energy secretary's commitment to tackling climate crisis, and it is worth noting that the further subsidies are half of what was previously on offer for Drax. But that's exactly why continuing to subsidise Drax at all is so disappointing. When Miliband announced his plans to 'ramp up' biomass burning back in 2009, he was genuinely trying to find alternatives to fossil fuels. But 16 years on, this policy has gone badly astray. What was meant to be a bridge to renewable energy is actually making emissions worse. If, on Monday, the House of Lords votes to extend this unabated wood burning for another four years, what is to stop these subsidies being extended again and again? And why should the government deal with a firm as untrustworthy as Drax? Perhaps most damning is what Drax refuses to reveal. After the BBC's devastating Panorama investigation into the company's destruction of Canadian primary forests, Drax asked auditor KPMG to investigate, hoping for a clean bill of health. However, the evidence was so damning that the reports are still being hidden from the public. If Drax has nothing to hide, why not publish these reports? A former top Treasury official turned whistleblower accused it of deliberately concealing unsustainable practices to secure subsidies. The case, now settled, raises questions of dishonesty that should disqualify any company from public funding. The extra billions Drax is seeking could help build enough wind and solar capacity to power millions of homes. It could create permanent jobs in genuine renewable industries, not temporary employment destroying irreplaceable ecosystems. Every pound spent subsidising tree burning is a pound not invested in technologies that could actually deliver net zero. While other countries race ahead with wind, solar and battery storage, we're burning money on the most primitive fuel known to humanity. There's a huge loophole in the government's pledge to stop Drax burning trees from primary forest. Their restrictions on Drax only apply to subsidised electricity supplied to the grid. Drax wants to power private data centres but there is no plan that prevents it from destroying ancient forests to power 21st-century AI searches. That means Drax could be cutting down even more primary forests than it does today. MPs have lost trust in the government's ability to hold Drax to account – the criticism from parliamentary committees has been brutal. The environmental movement didn't fight to establish renewable energy so politicians could facilitate the burning of ancient forests that took millennia to grow. Real climate action means making hard choices, not hiding behind accounting tricks that make our emissions disappear on paper while making them worse in reality. It is time for Labour MPs to speak up; the fight for net zero is hard enough. More subsidies for Drax's wood burning in the name of sustainability is just more fuel on that fire. Dale Vince is a green energy industrialist and campaigner

Daily Mail​

4 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

I'm a tax accountant and these are the four biggest mistakes you're making on your returns - and it's costing you money

Australians are forgetting to claim work-related expenses and often select the wrong work from home deduction in their tax returns. That's according to a leading taxation accountant who has singled out the top five errors taxpayers make as tax time approaches on July 1. Belinda Raso from Tax Invest Accounting said taxpayers are missing out on hundreds of dollars by making little mistakes. 'They just rush in and lodge way too early and usually don't claim what they are entitled to,' Ms Raso said. WFH deductions One of the most common tax mistakes involves deductions made for working from home. Ms Raso said people who WFH do not always apply for the maximum deductions they can receive. Work from home expenses can be worked out via two different methods: the fixed rate 'shortcut' method of 70 per cents per hour, or the actual cost method, where they calculate their total expenses. 'It is very important that you work out both methods to ensure that you're getting the largest possible deduction,' she said. 'Another thing that people forget to do is, if they are going by that fixed rate method of 70 cents per hour... they're forgetting to claim everything else, and this includes computer equipment, it includes furniture, it includes software, the list is endless.' Medicare levy surcharge The next mistake Australians often make is incorrectly recording their liability for a Medicare levy surcharge - the additional charge on taxpayers who do not have private health insurance. Ms Raso said that the tax office will change the return if they have proof workers are liable for the levy. Australians forget to work out the most savings-efficient method for determining their claimable work-from-home expenses, Ms Raso warned 'It is up to you to understand when you are and when you're not liable for this,' Ms Raso said. Work related allowances The experienced accountant said some Australians make a huge mistake by failing to claim work-related expenses, such as claiming goods that they use for both personal and work use. 'As an example, one of the most common ones is a computer or laptop,' Ms Raso said. 'You sit there and think, "well, I use this for both personal reasons and for work, I can't claim it then". That's not true. 'Any expense that you're claiming, you can apportion a personal element to it and just claim whatever percentage is for work. It doesn't mean that you can't claim it.' Logbook Her final tip was for Australians who use a personal vehicle for work purposes. She said workers should ensure they are recording their usage accurately in a logbook. 'If you are travelling over 5,000 kilometres for work, for actual work-related travel, you should be keeping a logbook,' Ms Raso said. 'But this is more than just tracking your kilometres in a logbook.' Workers should also keep records of their fuel and oil costs, or odometer readings. They will also need evidence of other car expenses.