Teenagers who sleep longer and earlier are likely to do better at tests, study finds

Young people who go to bed earlier and sleep for longer than their peers tend to have better brain function and perform better at cognitive tests, according to researchers from the UK and China.
A study of more than 3,000 adolescents found that those who got an early night, slept longer and had the lowest sleeping heart rates would outperform others on reading, vocabulary, problem solving and other mental tests.
Professor Barbara Sahakian, from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Cambridge, said: 'Regularly getting a good night's sleep is important in helping us function properly, but while we know a lot about sleep in adulthood and later life, we know surprisingly little about sleep in adolescence, even though this is a crucial time in our development.
'How long do young people sleep for, for example, and what impact does this have on their brain function and cognitive performance?'
While it has long been understood that sleep plays an important role in helping bodies function, researchers were surprised by the impact of even the smallest differences in sleep.
Professor Sahakian added: 'Even though the differences in the amount of sleep that each group got was relatively small, at just over a quarter-of-an-hour between the best and worst sleepers, we could still see differences in brain structure and activity and in how well they did at tasks. This drives home to us just how important it is to have a good night's sleep at this important time in life.'
Typically, studies looking at how young people sleep have relied on self-reporting, which can be inaccurate. Researchers at Fudan University, Shanghai, and the University of Cambridge turned to data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, the largest long-term study of brain development and child health in the United States.
As part of this study, researchers gave young people Fitbits to gather objective data on their sleep patterns and compare it against brain scans and results from cognitive tests.
They found the adolescents could be divided into one of three groups. Group one, accounting for 39 per cent of participants, slept an average of seven hours and 10 minutes. They tended to sleep the latest and wake the earliest. Group two, accounting for 24 per cent, slept an average of seven hours and 21 minutes, with average levels across all sleep characteristics.
Meanwhile, group three, accounting for 37 per cent, slept an average of seven hours and 25 minutes. They went to bed and fell asleep the earliest, and had lower heart rates during sleep.
Researchers found no significant differences in the school achievements between these groups, but group three outperformed the other two when it came to cognitive tests looking at vocabulary, reading, problem solving and focus. They also had the largest brain volume and best brain functions, while group one had the smallest volume and poorest brain functions.
First author Dr Qing Ma from Fudan University said: 'Although our study can't answer conclusively whether young people have better brain function and perform better at tests because they sleep better, there are a number of studies that would support this idea.
'For example, research has shown the benefits of sleep on memory, especially on memory consolidation, which is important for learning.'
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine says that the ideal amount of sleep during adolescence is between eight and 10 hours.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

a day ago

• The Guardian

Researchers call for urgent exploration of methods to cool Earth

It is already obvious that some governments are not acting fast enough to keep the planet's temperature from rising dangerously. While it is essential to continue to concentrate on reducing methane and carbon dioxide emissions as quickly as possible, other methods of cooling the planet need to be urgently explored, according to academics at the University of Cambridge's engineering department. One of the problems is that many of the ideas put forward so far, including injecting sulphates into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space, could do more harm than good. This is because sulphates cause acid rain and interfere with rainfall patterns. To avoid controversy researchers are experimenting with alternatives to sulphates, substances that reflect sunlight but are benign. They will hoist them into the stratosphere using weather balloons then recover them to see what changes this exposure causes. No materials will be released but their cooling effect and whether they could otherwise be harmless can be gauged. Other ideas like drilling holes in the Arctic ice in the winter and pumping seawater over existing ice floes in below freezing air temperatures to thicken them are also being tried, along with spraying seawater to form clouds over the ocean, also to reflect sunlight. If these ideas are otherwise harmless, and work, they might yet save us.

The Independent

2 days ago

• The Independent

Avoiding memory decline could be as simple as a positive attitude

A 16-year study involving over 10,000 individuals aged 50 and above found a significant link between maintaining a positive outlook and better memory function. Researchers observed that participants reporting higher levels of well-being consistently achieved superior scores on memory tests throughout the study period. The study indicated that a positive disposition was also associated with an increased sense of personal agency, including feelings of control and independence. While the connection between positivity and cognitive health was modest in scale, its statistical significance suggests a tangible relationship between psychological state and memory preservation as people age. Experts from Alzheimer's Research UK noted that this observational study highlights the importance of mental wellbeing for overall brain health, though further research is needed to understand the full connection. The hidden health benefit of staying positive in your middle age

Telegraph

3 days ago

• Telegraph

Cambridge faces backlash for axing top Covid expert

The University of Cambridge is facing a backlash over its decision to lay off a leading virologist who helped guide Britain through the Covid pandemic. Dr Chris Smith, the host of The Naked Scientists podcast, was told earlier this month that he was being made redundant. The university has said the closure of the post was necessary both to save costs and because it did not align with Cambridge's outreach strategy. However, Dr Smith said The Naked Scientists podcast, which he launched 24 years ago and has surpassed 150 million downloads, is a highly effective form of outreach. The programme aims to increase public understanding of science and frequently highlights the work of Cambridge researchers. Listeners from as far afield as Australia have begun petitioning the university after Dr Smith shared news of the proposed redundancy. Podcast 'may be in jeopardy' In a statement, he said: 'I have been informed by the University of Cambridge, my employer for whom I have worked loyally for over 20 years, that on the grounds of cost-cutting they intend to make me redundant, imminently. 'This potentially jeopardises The Naked Scientists, which is produced under my university role and means the team under me are also under threat. 'As if that isn't bad enough, as it stands – and I have nothing concrete to say otherwise – I will also lose my current medical consultant job, because this is contingent on my university employment. 'Why I am so desperately hurt by this decision is that it completely fails to recognise the huge, multi-award winning effort that I have put in over many years to raising the profile of science, technology and medicine originating from Cambridge University, for a truly global audience.' Dr Smith's role combines lecturing at the university's Institute of Continuing Education (ICE) and working as a consultant virologist at Addenbrooke's, the university's teaching hospital. Since 2014, he has been a public understanding of science fellow. Cambridge needs to cut costs to tackle a £53 million deficit, which the university's internal watchdog blamed in part on 'a lack of budgetary control'. In a letter to Dr Smith, the university also said that 'profile-raising and conversion of applicants to fee-paying courses' at ICE must be concentrated in its own 'external engagement division'. Dr Smith said: 'There are people studying science at Cambridge University because of The Naked Scientists. Over the pandemic, I gave 2,500 interviews to media all over the world on behalf of Cambridge University.' Listeners, including fellow scientists and science teachers, have sent letters of complaint to Cambridge protesting against the proposed redundancy. One said that his daughter had been inspired by the podcast to study science at A-level and hoped to gain a place at Cambridge to study veterinary medicine. Another wrote: 'In a world where science is being persecuted, particularly abroad, the last place I thought I'd see this is Cambridge University.' A spokesman for the University of Cambridge said: 'The Naked Scientists podcast is a separate entity that the university neither owns, controls nor has any direct influence over. 'The University of Cambridge is currently consulting with Dr Chris Smith about the future of his role with the university.'