The Planet Is Burning — But Proven Solutions Are Within Reach
In 2024, the world lost 6.7 million hectares of tropical primary rainforest, the highest level of loss in at least two decades. That's nearly double the destruction recorded in 2023. Fires were the main culprit, fueled by record heat, prolonged drought, and a failure to enforce environmental protections. But, amid the devastation, there is a powerful truth that is too often overlooked: we already know how to stop this.
New data from the University of Maryland's GLAD lab, published by Global Forest Watch, shows that the tropics lost forest at a blistering pace of 18 football fields per minute in 2024. The 3.1 gigatons of carbon released into the atmosphere from this single year of forest destruction was greater than India's entire annual fossil fuel emissions. The world's primary rainforests, vital for regulating climate, storing carbon, and preserving biodiversity, are disappearing before our eyes.
In Cambodia, where Wildlife Alliance has worked for more than two decades, we have helped protect over 1.4 million hectares of rainforest in the Cardamom Mountains, one of Southeast Asia's last intact forest ecosystems. This isn't symbolic protection; tangible, measurable, boots-on-the-ground conservation has kept the forest standing. Independent evaluations have shown that Wildlife Alliance's direct protection model is among the most effective in Southeast Asia at preventing deforestation in real-time. By integrating satellite surveillance, ranger deployment, and community incentives, we have created a replicable approach that can be adapted for other threatened forests around the world. Our approach combines law enforcement, technology, and community engagement through direct partnerships with the Cambodian government, Indigenous communities, and local authorities. We fund and manage ranger patrols, build capacity for rapid enforcement, and use satellite data to detect threats before they escalate.
The result? In the areas we patrol and manage, satellite data shows forest clearance has fallen to near zero.
We are not alone. In 2024, Indonesia and Malaysia reduced their primary forest loss. Their success was also no accident. It was the product of consistent government policies, corporate accountability, and better fire prevention. In southern Bolivia, the Charagua Iyambae Indigenous Territory showed what's possible when early warning systems and community land governance are taken seriously. Despite the flames raging across Latin America, this area stayed intact thanks to foresight, training, and local leadership.
Yet such examples remain the exception, not the rule.
Smoke from wildfires blankets forests south of the Orinoco River, Venezuela (March 26, 2024)
Alarmingly, Global Forest Watch reports that the 2024 fire season devastated forests across Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Nicaragua, and Mexico, much of it tied to agricultural expansion, mining, and weak governance. Bolivia saw a 200% increase in forest loss. Brazil alone accounted for 42% of all tropical forest destruction, with illegal soy and cattle farming driving deforestation deep into the Amazon. In Central America, forest fires burned through protected areas and Indigenous lands, often with ties to organized crime.
In Africa's Congo Basin, the world's second-largest rainforest, forest loss also reached record highs, driven by charcoal production, smallholder agriculture, and land pressures made worse by violent conflict. These are complex challenges. But complexity is not an excuse for inaction.
Too often, international climate finance goes to ideas still being tested or to 'capacity building' projects with little real-world enforcement impact. Meanwhile, field-tested models like ours, which deliver verifiable results, struggle to scale due to a lack of funding. The gap between rhetoric and reality is growing wider every year.
If we are serious about halting and reversing deforestation by 2030 — a promise made by over 140 countries in the Glasgow Leaders' Declaration — we must act differently.
First, we need more vigorous enforcement. Whether through national ranger programs or Indigenous-led patrols, the world must invest in proper protection on the ground. This includes satellite monitoring, rapid-response teams, and legal action against illegal deforestation.
Second, we must scale what works. Proven conservation models — as in Cambodia, Bolivia's Indigenous territories, and parts of Indonesia — need finance to expand. These efforts must be rewarded based on verified results, not good intentions.
Third, the global community must confront the reality that commodity production and deforestation remain tightly linked. Cattle, soy, palm oil, and mining continue to push deeper into tropical forests. Voluntary commitments are not enough; market countries must enforce laws like the EU Deforestation Regulation and ensure companies are not profiting from environmental destruction.
Fourth, Indigenous communities must be empowered and financed as frontline protectors of the world's forests. They are already doing this work, often without support or recognition. The world must back them, not just with words, but with resources, legal protection, and land rights.
And finally, forest protection must be treated as a frontline climate solution. Forests are carbon sinks, natural air conditioners, and buffers against extreme weather. Letting them burn undermines every other climate goal.
The forest loss in 2024 should be a turning point, shaking us out of complacency. But we've seen data like this before and still the money, policies, and enforcement needed to turn the tide remain insufficient.
Wildlife Alliance stands ready to help scale what works. We don't need another conference or another set of promises. We need action grounded in science, delivered in partnership, and driven by urgency.
The forests are burning. We have the tools to stop it. The question is not whether we know what to do but whether we will do it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
New study makes startling discoveries after studying birds' feathers: 'It's a slower and more meandering process'
A recent University of Utah study found that birds are molting at earlier dates. The underlying reason? Our planet's warming. Researchers used 13 years' worth of data on 134 bird species to come to their conclusion. They studied molting patterns from 2011 to 2024 and found that fall migratory birds consistently molted a day earlier than in the previous year. Molting is a crucial precursor to migration and, consequently, breeding. Old feathers could negatively impact both their flight and mating capabilities, Kyle Kittelberger, research team lead, told Spring migratory birds, however, were a different story. "We didn't see any shift at the community level for spring body molt," Kittelberger said. "Some of the reasons for that might be birds tend to migrate much faster in the spring … whereas in the fall, it's a slower and more meandering process." The specific reason isn't entirely clear yet. Kittelberger suggests that earlier breeding or later migration times — both of which result from the warming planet — are viable options. If molting overlaps with either breeding or migration, it could sap birds' energy, damaging species' survival in the long run. If that is the case here, it could spell bad news for migratory birds — and humans. Different bird species provide different benefits to humanity. Take hummingbirds, for example. Most hummingbird species migrate and are excellent pollinators. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, about 35% of the entire world's food supply depends on pollinators to reproduce. The extinction of hummingbird species will globally jeopardize human food supplies. And that's just one example out of many. On the whole, every bird plays a part in their local ecosystem, spreading seeds, scavenging carcasses, and keeping pests at bay. Without them, the world will be thrown out of balance. Kittelberger already has the next steps in mind. He told that he plans to research birds in their breeding and/or post-breeding grounds. "That is the next element of this kind of research," he said, "to not only look at what's going on in the summer when they're beginning to molt but to see if that overlaps with anything like breeding." If you'd like to help on an individual level, there are a couple of things you can do. Converting just a portion of your yard to a native lawn can give pollinators, like hummingbirds, crucial food sources. You can also consider donating to climate causes that research birds and conserve their habitats, like the National Audubon Society. Do you think America could ever go zero-waste? Never Not anytime soon Maybe in some states Definitely Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Washington Post
7 hours ago
- Washington Post
‘Jaws' made people fear sharks. 50 years later, can it help save them?
When 'Jaws' debuted in U.S. theaters 50 years ago today, it helped launch a new era in American movies. Steven Spielberg's blockbuster about a bloodthirsty great white terrorizing a beach town also stoked fear and fascination, exacting a toll on sharks. After 450 million years of evolutionary history, shark populations are collapsing, and more than a third of shark species and their relatives face extinction. Now scientists are trying to use the lure of 'Jaws' to advance shark conservation efforts. With the exception of surfers and fishermen, people 'didn't think about sharks much' 50 years ago, said David Shiffman, a marine conservation biologist at Arizona State University. But after 'Jaws' was released, many summer beachgoers began to worry about sharks, even though attacks on humans are rare. Last year, there were 28 confirmed unprovoked bites in the United States — and only 47 worldwide. This excessive fear of sharks was termed the 'Jaws effect' and helped fuel a surge in shark-fishing competitions — especially targeting white sharks. Although sportfishing posed a threat to sharks, Shiffman said the most significant impact of 'Jaws' was more indirect. When the film came out, industrial fishing was just beginning to ramp up, and the risks posed to shark populations by commercial fisheries have become clear over time. 'Unsustainable fishing practices are the single largest threat to marine biodiversity, including but not limited to sharks, more so than climate change, more so than plastic pollution, more so than oil spills,' Shiffman said. Following the release of 'Jaws,' efforts to protect sharks lost traction. The lack of movement to curb indiscriminate fishing techniques or take specific action to prevent the targeting of sharks for their fins and meat led to sharp declines in global shark populations. An estimated 100 million sharks are killed each year, according to studies, and the global number of oceanic sharks and rays has declined by 71 percent since 1970. 'We know over the last 50 years, in the period really since 'Jaws' came out, that shark populations worldwide have been absolutely smashed by fishing,' said Colin Simpfendorfer, a shark fisheries researcher at James Cook University in Australia. 'We didn't do a lot about it because a lot of people thought sharks were bad and getting rid of them was probably a good thing.' In 2022, Congress attempted to address the issue of shark finning — the practice of chopping the valuable fins off live sharks and dumping their bodies overboard. But banning finning in the United States has had little effect on the practice in international waters, especially in Asia, where the fins are prized as the main ingredient in shark fin soup. Studies have shown that bans on finning have been largely unsuccessful as long as the sale of shark meat remains legal. The European Union restricts the trade in shark fins, and the 2022 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora expanded protections for 97 shark species and further restricted the international shark trade, but effective enforcement remains a challenge. Citizen-led efforts across the world have gained momentum, including the launch of the Asian Shark and Ray Alliance this year to drive conservation across the continent. An increase in dive tourism has also spurred protection efforts in Southeast Asian nations like the Maldives and Indonesia. For endangered sharks, it's a race against time to gather information that might help save them. And while 'Jaws' might have contributed to the harms of unsustainable fishing practices, researchers and conservationists are now attempting to use the film to further scientific understanding and influence public policy. 'It created a fascination with sharks, and people began to realize we don't know that much about them, and a huge amount of research has happened on sharks and exploration of their lives in the last 50 years,' said Steve Palumbi, a marine biologist at Stanford University. Wendy Benchley, a conservation advocate and widow of author Peter Benchley, who wrote the novel on which 'Jaws' is based, said the enthusiasm generated by the film has been a powerful tool. 'Thousands of people around the world wrote letters to Peter saying, 'Oh I'm just riveted by sharks, I can't wait to learn more,' ' Benchley said. ' 'Jaws' has, and I have, been working on this for 50 years. So this moment is important because people are concentrating on sharks and on 'Jaws.' ' This interest has driven scientific advances that enabled researchers to study sharks' responses to pollution, stress and environmental change. The key to that research can be found in sharks' jaws: their teeth. Shark teeth, which are replaced every few weeks, can number in the thousands over a shark's lifetime. The chemical makeup of the teeth can reveal information about the environment the sharks lived in. And increasingly, their accumulation — or absence — is helping track how human activity has reshaped ocean life. 'There's been some really interesting work to reconstruct the population of sharks to understand exactly when human populations start to really affect sharks, and how dramatic that effect has been,' Simpfendorfer said. Recent studies have also confirmed sharks' importance to maintaining coastal food ecosystems, with significant human implications. 'Understanding the role they play in ecosystems is a powerful argument for understanding why we should protect them,' Shiffman said. 'We want healthy food chains off our coasts because they provide billions of humans with food and tens of millions of humans with jobs. And to have a healthy food chain, you need a healthy top of the food chain.' Yet as shark populations hurtle toward extinction, the perception issue persists. Other apex predators such as tigers, polar bears and lions have benefited from forceful worldwide conservation campaigns that have translated into legal protections. But sharks haven't received the same degree of attention. 'Jaws' has already given white sharks a much-needed boost, and conservationists are hoping this will translate to other species. 'Great white sharks are actually one of the best studied and best protected species of sharks, and that is in no small part because of the fascination from 'Jaws,' ' Shiffman said. 'There are many other species that are doing much, much worse. There are many shark species that don't have five scientific papers about them.' In the United States, some researchers are noticing a greater harmony between the public and sharks. 'Over the last five to eight years, more and more sharks have been hanging around the beaches of Cape Cod,' Palumbi said. 'It's led to more people realizing that they have to give way, that they have to share space with white sharks, and that means moving someplace else to swim, not going to places that the white sharks are hunting.' John Baker, president and chief program officer at WildAid, a conservation group, is hoping this trend will continue. 'With the spotlight back on 'Jaws' after 50 years, we kind of need to elevate the image of sharks as the 'polar bear of the ocean,' ' Baker said.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers call for urgent exploration of methods to cool Earth
It is already obvious that some governments are not acting fast enough to keep the planet's temperature from rising dangerously. While it is essential to continue to concentrate on reducing methane and carbon dioxide emissions as quickly as possible, other methods of cooling the planet need to be urgently explored, according to academics at the University of Cambridge's engineering department. Related: UK scientists to launch outdoor geoengineering experiments One of the problems is that many of the ideas put forward so far, including injecting sulphates into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space, could do more harm than good. This is because sulphates cause acid rain and interfere with rainfall patterns. To avoid controversy researchers are experimenting with alternatives to sulphates, substances that reflect sunlight but are benign. They will hoist them into the stratosphere using weather balloons then recover them to see what changes this exposure causes. No materials will be released but their cooling effect and whether they could otherwise be harmless can be gauged. Other ideas like drilling holes in the Arctic ice in the winter and pumping seawater over existing ice floes in below freezing air temperatures to thicken them are also being tried, along with spraying seawater to form clouds over the ocean, also to reflect sunlight. If these ideas are otherwise harmless, and work, they might yet save us.
