6 Surprising Purchases That Waste Shocking Amounts of Money

We all have habits that feel like smart money moves, only to discover later they quietly drain our wallets. From bulk buys to name-brand skincare, it's easy to be lured by perceived savings or prestige, but end up overspending.
Learn More:
Read Next:
Let's unpack some of the most surprising money sucks according to financial experts, and explore how to adapt our habits for lasting savings.
Buying in bulk often seems like a no-brainer since you're supposed to get more for less. However, Caleb Wood-Dagget, founder and financial advisor at Commonwealth Strategy Advisors in San Clemente, CA, pointed out that a lot of people waste money in this area without ever realizing it.
'Purchasing a lot of one item for a discounted price might sound like a good idea, but if half of it expires or goes unused, then you're not actually saving anything,' said Wood-Dagget. 'You just end up throwing money out slowly, rather than all at once.'
Melanie Musson of InsuranceProviders.com added that you can't assume just because something is in a larger container, it's cheaper.
'You need to consider the price per ounce or unit price, and compare it to the price of smaller packaging,' said Musson.
Find Out:
High-end brands promise premium ingredients or cutting-edge features, but sometimes a budget-friendly alternative delivers the same result.
'There is no magic skincare formulation,' Musson pointed out. 'Skincare products often share many of the same ingredients across the board. If you compare ingredients on a $100 bottle of facial lotion and a $10 bottle and see that they're the same, you can be assured that your result will be the same, but you'll save a lot of money with the cheaper bottle.'
Flying on discount carriers can feel like a win until hidden fees surface.
'While discount airlines do offer lower fares, they may charge for seat selection, food, carry-on bags and printed boarding passes,' according to Michele Frank, associate professor of accounting at Miami University's Farmer School of Business. These fees add up quickly, and could result in a traveler losing the 'discount' they thought they obtained.'
Frank also said discount airlines tend to have fewer planes, fly fewer routes and only fly on certain days of the week. This means if your flight is canceled, you may not be able to get on another flight for days, which could add hundreds of dollars to your trip if it means you have to spend extra days in hotel rooms, so it's important to factor in these costs.
High-interest financing quietly inflates costs. A common trap is charging items you can't fully pay off monthly, incurring interest that outweighs any immediate benefit.
'If you're planning a big-ticket purchase that you need to make, but don't have enough cash to save up for, look for 0% financing specials from big box stores,' said Andrea Woroch, a consumer and money saving expert. 'Otherwise, look for a new credit card offering 0% APR and a cash bonus to help pay off the purchase. Just make sure you can pay off the purchase before the 0% interest promo period expires.'
Generic groceries, medications and household items often match brand-name quality at a fraction of the price.
'There are a plethora of generic brand products that can save you a lot, from 30% to 50%, without sacrificing quality such as generic groceries, generic meds and even generic clothing from stores like Walmart, Target and Costco,' said Woroch. 'For instance, you can save 30% on over-the-counter medicine by sticking with the generic brand. The FDA requires that generic medicine, including over-the-counter, work both as effectively and safely as the name brand, and it's a whole lot cheaper.'
Unlimited data can feel like peace of mind, but if you rarely exceed, say, 15 GB/month, you could be overpaying.
A study from WhistleOut found Americans waste $1,500 a year on excessive wireless data plans, while Mint Mobile reported 76% of Americans are on unlimited data plans. But 63% of them don't even use 15 GB per month.
'This is likely because many consumers now use W-Fi at home, at the office and even on the go as more businesses and retailers offer Wi-Fi connections at no charge,' said Woroch. 'Review your actual data and see if your current provider offers a plan that meets your needs so you stop wasting money on this monthly bill.'
More From GOBankingRates
6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 6 Surprising Purchases That Waste Shocking Amounts of Money

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

24 minutes ago

• Forbes

Managing Visual Media Risk In A GenAI World

Tal Lev-Ami is cofounder and CTO of image and video platform Cloudinary, which is trusted by more than 10,000 brands and 2 million users. Over the past two decades, there has been a shift in how people prefer to consume information online, with visual content—images, video and interactive media—having gradually overtaken text-heavy formats. Research from Intergralads found that user-generated video alone is forecast to account for 82% of all consumer internet traffic in 2025. As engaging and helpful as all this visual content is for consumers, it creates lots of technical challenges for those managing and delivering it. Brands today need to produce, retouch, share, moderate, publish and otherwise manage huge quantities of visual imagery across more channels than ever, making what was once a manageable nice-to-have a tech-powered, business-critical endeavor. Inevitably, brands are relying on AI to automate the repetitive yet critical tasks required to ensure visual content looks great and performs well across every device. GenAI, in particular, is proving invaluable for a range of tasks like scaling content creation and personalizing customer experiences. Doing so brings enormous benefits, but it also poses potential risks. According to Gartner's 2024 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, GenAI has moved beyond what it calls the "Peak of Inflated Expectations." That's not to say we shouldn't still be inspired and ambitious about applying the technology; quite the opposite. It means we're entering a more practical phase, where the reality of execution means having to contend with the less shiny aspects of GenAI like governance, compliance and risk management. After more than a decade into our journey with AI technologies, we've learned a lot about evaluating risk. Without question, companies that manage visual media at scale with GenAI are particularly exposed to errors, biases and compliance issues and need to have risk frameworks in place. The simple framework below is designed to help evaluate the risk of using GenAI to transform a specific image and video asset or a collection of them. • Scope: How many people are likely to see the asset? How many systems will be impacted? • Centrality: This refers to the centrality of the asset to the user experience. Does it appear above or below the fold? Is this the most prominent/large asset or "eye candy" at the edge or corner? • Probability Versus Severity Of Failure: Does the asset look a little bad or is there a risk it could harm the brand? For example, say somebody resizes the image and it distorts the aspect ratio—that's a little bad. But if the AI image is labeled in a racist or inappropriate way, that harms the brand. • Fidelity Versus Appeal: Fidelity focuses on accurately representing the original product. It's especially important when customers need to assess details like texture, color, fit or quality—common in categories like fashion and apparel—where accurate images help reduce returns. Appeal, on the other hand, emphasizes enhancing images to make them more eye-catching or emotionally engaging. This is often prioritized in social media, lifestyle branding and creative campaigns where the goal is to attract attention and drive engagement. Those last two trade-offs are especially tricky to optimize at scale without putting automation and clear rules in place for humans and AI to follow, in line with risk tolerance. Every type and size of business will have different rules. News organizations, for example, prioritize visual asset fidelity over appeal. By contrast, a luxury brand would likely prioritize appeal. A large enterprise that faces high scrutiny and regulatory risks would need strict human oversight of any AI automation. A smaller, more maverick business might decide to take more risks and "apologize later." To manage GenAI risks at scale, clear policies must be established that define where and how your organization will (and won't) use AI. It's equally important to establish the role of human oversight to mitigate risk and meet brand and regulatory guidelines. For instance, GenAI can assist in red-flagging obviously harmful user-generated content while escalating more nuanced decisions to human moderators. Similarly, GenAI can accelerate UI/UX workflows by generating initial layout concepts, which designers can then refine to meet aesthetic and usability standards. These should be reviewed on a regular basis (quarterly, for example) as things change very fast in the AI world. AI models that perform well in controlled demos may falter when exposed to real-world complexity and high-volume traffic. That's why before moving to production, companies should rigorously test GenAI systems in their own environments, using real data and scenarios to uncover hidden weaknesses. Incorporating A/B testing and shadow deployments can help identify unintended consequences early, before they impact users or brand trust. Using AI provenance tools like watermarking and metadata tracking can help maintain accountability. To manage compliance, it's important to stay ahead of evolving regulations on AI-generated content. Optimizing the workflow with GenAI is essential for harnessing visual media's many benefits, but doing this at scale safely requires proactive risk management. By aligning AI adoption with structured risk frameworks, companies can innovate at hyperscale while maintaining trust and quality. Businesses that scale AI responsibly, treating risk assessment as a core strategy rather than an afterthought, definitely stand to gain the best return on their visual media spend. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

The Drive

25 minutes ago

• The Drive

Senate Supermajority Required to Scrap USPS Electrification Plans

The latest car news, reviews, and features. Congress and the administration have hit yet another speed bump in their attempt to overturn the Postal Service's electrification mandate. Congress cannot toss out the EV mandate with a simple majority vote in the Senate, the body's procedural supervisor said Sunday, which will likely result in the issue being pushed in separate legislation, rather than as part of the tax and spending bill currently being evaluated by Congress. Thanks to a provision in the original legislation, Senate Republicans will have to find support for a 60-vote supermajority in order to overturn the mandate—a tall order in a chamber where they hold only a slim majority. And the kicker? Nobody's asking for this—at least nobody at the Postal Service itself, which has warned lawmakers that reversing the process now will only waste taxpayer money. Replacing existing EVs would cost the service approximately $1 billion—nearly half of that for vehicles already delivered, plus the cost of contracts for vehicles that have not yet been delivered. Mothballing the charging system that was just installed would mean writing off $500 million in recent investment. On top of all that, an about-face would set USPS back significantly in its ongoing effort to replace its ancient fleet of delivery vehicles, which the service has been trying to do since the first Trump administration. The original bill included provisions for adding more than 160,000 new delivery vans. Only 10% of the new vehicles added to the USPS fleet would have been electric under the original terms of the legislation. The Biden administration asked Congress to aim for a higher EV share after being elected in 2020. A new formula increased the minimum order of electric vans to 45,000 (a 300% increase) and baked in an order for nearly 10,000 electric Ford E-Transit vans on top of that allocation. As a result, vehicles being added to the USPS fleet in 2025 are split almost evenly between EV and ICE; from 2026 on, they would be exclusively electric. The revised replacement schedule would see the entire $10 billion plan completed by 2028. Got a tip? Send it our way at tips@ .article-sidebar]:pt-0>

Fast Company

28 minutes ago

• Fast Company

NATO's 2025 summit in The Hague could make history. Here's why

U.S. President Donald Trump and his NATO counterparts are due to gather Tuesday for a summit that could unite the world's biggest security organization around a new defense spending pledge or widen divisions among the 32 allies. Just a week ago, things had seemed rosy. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte was optimistic the European members and Canada would commit to invest at least as much of their economic growth on defense as the United States does for the first time. Then Spain rejected the new NATO target for each country to spend 5% of its gross domestic product on defense needs, calling it 'unreasonable.' Trump also insists on that figure. The alliance operates on a consensus that requires the backing of all 32 members. The following day, Trump said the U.S. should not have to respect the goal. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. Trump lashed out at Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's government, saying: 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain. Spain's been a very low payer.' He also criticized Canada as 'a low payer.' Spain was the lowest spender in the alliance last year, directing less than 2% of its GDP on defense expenditure, while Canada was spending 1.45%, according to NATO figures. Then Trump ordered the bombing of nuclear installations in Iran. In 2003, the U.S.-led war on Iraq deeply divided NATO, as France and Germany led opposition to the attack, while Britain and Spain joined the coalition. European allies and Canada also want Ukraine to be at the top of the summit agenda, but they are wary that Trump might not want President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to steal the limelight. A short summit, decades of mutual security The two-day summit in The Hague involves an informal dinner Tuesday and one working session Wednesday morning. A very short summit statement has been drafted to ensure the meeting is not derailed by fights over details and wording. Indeed, much about this NATO summit is brief, even though ripples could be felt for years. Founded in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed by 12 nations to counter the threat to security in Europe posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, notably via a strong U.S. presence on the continent. Dealing with Moscow is in its DNA. Keeping the peace outside the Euro-Atlantic area is not. NATO's ranks have grown to 32 countries since the Washington Treaty was signed 75 years ago. Sweden joined last year, worried by an increasingly aggressive Russia. NATO's collective security guarantee — Article 5 of the treaty — underpins its credibility. It's a political commitment by all countries to come to the aid of any member whose sovereignty or territory might be under attack. Trump has suggested he is committed to that pledge, but he has also sowed doubt about his intentions. He has said the U.S. intends to remain a member of the alliance. A civilian runs NATO, but the U.S. and its military hold power The United States is NATO's most powerful member. It spends much more on defense than any other ally and far outweighs its partners in terms of military muscle. Washington has traditionally driven the agenda but has stepped back under Trump. The U.S. nuclear arsenal provides strategic deterrence against would-be adversaries. NATO's day-to-day work is led by Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister. As its top civilian official, he chairs almost weekly meetings of ambassadors in the North Atlantic Council at its Brussels headquarters. He chairs other 'NACs' at ministerial and leader levels. Rutte runs NATO headquarters, trying to foster consensus and to speak on behalf of all members. NATO's military headquarters is based nearby in Mons, Belgium. It is always run by a top U.S. officer. Ukraine's role at the summit is unclear With Trump demanding greater defense spending, it's unclear what role Ukraine will play at the summit. Zelenskyy has been invited, but it's unclear whether he will have a seat at NATO's table, although he may take part in Tuesday's dinner. Russia's war in Ukraine usually dominates such meetings. More broadly, NATO itself is not arming Ukraine. As an organization, it possesses no weapons of any kind. Collectively, it provides only non-lethal support — fuel, combat rations, medical supplies, body armor, and equipment to counter drones or mines. But individually, members do send arms. European allies provided 60% of the military support that Ukraine received in 2024. NATO coordinates those weapons deliveries via a hub on the Polish border and helps organize training for Ukrainian troops. NATO's troop plans A key part of the commitment for allies to defend one another is to deter Russia, or any other adversary, from attacking in the first place. Finland and Sweden joined NATO recently because of this concern. Under NATO's new military plans, 300,000 military personnel would be deployed within 30 days to counter any attack, whether it be on land, at sea, by air or in cyberspace. But experts doubt whether the allies could muster the troop numbers. It's not just about troop and equipment numbers. An adversary would be less likely to challenge NATO if it thought the allies would use the forces it controls. Trump's threats against U.S. allies — including imposing tariffs on them — has weakened that deterrence. The U.S. is carrying the biggest military burden Due to high U.S. defense spending over many years, the American armed forces have more personnel and superior weapons but also significant transportation and logistics assets. Other allies are starting to spend more, though. After years of cuts, NATO members committed to ramp up their national defense budgets in 2014 when Russia illegally annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the NATO allies agreed to make 2% of GDP the minimum spending level. Last year, 22 countries were expected to hit that target, up from only three a decade ago. In The Hague, the allies were expected to up the ante to 3.5%, plus a further 1.5% for things like improving roads, bridges, ports and airfields or preparing societies to deal with future conflicts. Whether they will now remains an open question.