Family of autistic man who died after 10 days in mental health detention call for change

ITV News Anglia's Katie Ridley reports on Declan Morrison's family's call for change after his death.
The family of an autistic man who died after being kept in a mental health detention suite for 10 days have called for changes to how people with learning disabilities are treated in the mental health system.
An inquest which concluded in October last year found that Declan Morrison, 26, died from "catastrophic" injuries after banging his head repeatedly against a wall in the detention suite which should only have been used for 48 hours.
Mr Morrison, from Cambourne near Cambridge, was non-verbal and required 24-hour care for his autism, ADHD, severe learning disabilities and bipolar disorder.
He had lived in private placements sourced by Cambridgeshire County Council, but by the end of 2021 his placement was unable to meet his needs and the council could not find anywhere suitable for him to go.
In March 2022, Mr Morrison was detained under the Mental Health Act and taken to Addenbrooke's Hospital, then transferred to a suite at Fulbourn Hospital where he was kept for 10 days.
His mother, Samantha Morrison, told ITV News Anglia: "He was lost, he was alone, he was left, he was frightened, he was under-stimulated. And he was misunderstood.
"The biggest thing is that he was alone."
A Prevention of Future Deaths report issued by the coroner after his inquest stated the suite was not suitable for someone with Mr Morrison's needs.
His family wants to stop people with learning disabilities being detained in these spaces - and they now have the support of their local MP, Ian Sollom.
The Liberal Democrat MP for St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire told ITV News Anglia: "There's over 2,000 people who are either autistic or have learning disabilities who are currently detained under the Mental Health Act, and that's just far too many, and for far too long as well."
Tim Nicholls, policy director at the National autistic Society, said that while autism is not a mental health condition, many autistic people develop mental health problems and can get into crisis.
He added: "What is absolutely vital is that the mental health system is better equipped with the right environments and staff training to really support people."
The Department for Health and Social Care said the number of people with learning disabilities in mental health hospitals is "unacceptable".
It told ITV News Anglia: "Our proposed reforms in the Mental Health Bill will limit the scope to detain people with a learning disability and autistic people, ensuring their needs are met in the community."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Leader Live

16 hours ago

• Leader Live

Wrexham: Heartbreak as father moved 140 miles for treatment

Danny Mendoza from Gresford fears his father might pass away almost three-hours-away and there's absolutely nothing he can do. Bernard Mendoza has dementia, and despite his son's best efforts to care for him, he was moved to the White House Care Home, Wrexham, in February this year. "Taking care of him sent me to breaking point in the end which is why he eventually went into a home", Danny says. "I couldn't do it anymore." Bernard, 83, settled in well to begin with, and his son was able to visit him every day. But eventually, he became aggressive towards members of staff. "Sadly, it's a common trait for those with the condition", Danny explains. After several incidents, Bernard was eventually sectioned under the Mental Health Act and last week he was transferred to the nearest bed in a mental health hospital - St Andrew's Healthcare in Northampton. Danny was distraught with the decision to move him so far away, and claims there's something 'seriously wrong' with the healthcare system if that is his father's best option. "I feel powerless", he said. "How is it that there isn't a single bed available for him in North Wales? "Seeing him for the first time once he'd been moved away from his home and family was heart-breaking. "He's all alone there, and right now he needs the love and support of his family. "And when I first saw him once he'd been moved, he looked like he'd been knocked for six. I was heartbroken. He just didn't look like dad. He could barely walk or hold a conversation with me. It was just so upsetting. "I place so much blame on myself and feel so guilty that this has happened. But now it's all out of my control." Danny says caring for his father since receiving the diagnosis four-years ago is 'the hardest thing' he's ever done. But now he fears he's losing what little time he has left with him, and the complications of transferring him have only made the situation worse. Currently, Danny is able to visit once or twice a week. Travel expenses have imposed further challenges, with a cost of £40 for fuel per trip. "I simply can't afford that", Danny says. "Plus it takes approximately two hours 40 minutes each way in the car. I can get free accommodation once I'm there but this can't be a long term solution." Teresa Owen, executive director of Allied Health Professions and Health Science, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board said: 'I am extremely sorry for the situation Mr Mendoza and his son find themselves in. 'Unfortunately, we work in an extremely pressured system and sometimes we do not have the capacity to admit to our own facilities in complex cases like these. This means we seek appropriate care from private providers. "Sadly, there was no one available to us to provide the type of care Mr Mendoza needed closer to his home, at the time he needed help. MOST READ 'We are in constant contact with those treating Mr Mendoza and are assessing our own capacity daily. We are focused on him receiving the best care and bringing him back home as quickly as possible. 'The Health Board's Mental Health and Learning Disability team in the east currently has four patients placed at St Andrews in Northampton. The number of these types of placements has reduced over the past 12 months but there is still more work to do. 'You can be assured this is a priority for us, as we want people to be closer to their homes and their families.' Danny remains hopeful that his father will return home to Wrexham soon to receive the appropriate care he requires.

Scotsman

19 hours ago

• Scotsman

Historic vote brings assisted dying closer to becoming law in England and Wales

Opponents insist vote in favour of Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is not 'now or never' moment Sign up for the daily Trending Today. Get the stories the internet is talking about to your inbox. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Legalising assisted dying would 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo', parliament has heard, but opposition MPs insisted this is not a 'now or never' moment. Assisted dying is a step closer to being made legal in England and Wales after the proposed legislation cleared the House of Commons in a historic vote. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dame Prue Leith joins activists from Dignity in Dying in support of the assisted dying Bill in Parliament Square, central London, ahead of a debate on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in the House of Commons | Yui Mok/PA Wire A majority of MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. The outcome would lead to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill either clearing the House of Commons and moving to the Lords, or falling completely – with a warning the latter could mean the issue might not return to Westminster for a decade. A similar Bill, brought by Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur, is being considered by MSPs at Holyrood. Responding to vote by MPs, Mr McArthur MSP said: "I am delighted that the House of Commons have voted to pass Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill at Third Reading - it's a milestone moment for choice and compassion at the end of life. MPs have listened to dying people, to bereaved families and the public – and have voted decisively for safe and compassionate law change. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "Last month, MSPs backed the principles of assisted dying in recognition that under the current law, terminally ill people can suffer despite the best care, take drastic action to end their own lives, or travel at huge cost to die in a foreign country. With this vote, MPs have sent a clear message that the worst outcome of all would be to allow the status quo to continue and that a better, safer and fairer law is possible. "I'll be making this case to colleagues in the Scottish Parliament as my bill moves through its following stages. I look forward to working with them to ensure that in Scotland too we have an assisted dying law that gives dying people the choice they need and puts vital protections in place for all. Undoubtedly today's vote adds to the momentum behind this work. "I'd also like to personally congratulate Kim Leadbeater and acknowledge not only the work that she has done to bring about this result today but also the compassion, care and respect with which she has led the debate." The relatively narrow House of Commons majority of 55 from the historic yes vote in November means every vote will count on Friday. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Some MPs have already confirmed they will switch sides to oppose a Bill they describe as 'drastically weakened', after a High Court judge safeguard was scrapped and replaced with expert panels. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales with fewer than six months to live to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has insisted the multidisciplinary panels represent a strengthening of the legislation, incorporating wider expert knowledge to assess assisted dying applications. Opening her debate, Ms Leadbeater said her Bill is 'cogent' and 'workable', with 'one simple thread running through it – the need to correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She pushed back on concerns raised about the Bill by some doctors and medical bodies, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych), noting: 'We have different views in this House and different people in different professions have different views.' She noted that all the royal colleges have a neutral position on assisted dying. Some members of RCPsych also wrote recently to distance themselves from the college's criticism of the Bill and pledge their support for it. Campaigners opposing the assisted dying Bill demonstrate at Parliament Square, Westminster, central London, ahead of a debate on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in the House of Commons | Lucy North/PA Wire MPs have a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines – although voting is not mandatory and others present on Friday could formally abstain. Ms Leadbeater warned that choosing not to support the assisted dying Bill is 'not a neutral act', but rather 'a vote for the status quo'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Repeating her warning that the issue is unlikely to be broached again for a decade if her Bill fails, she told the Commons: 'It fills me with despair to think MPs could be here in another 10 years' time hearing the same stories.' But, leading opposition to the Bill, Conservative former minister Sir James said while this is 'an important moment', there will be 'plenty of opportunities' in future for the issue to be discussed. Sir James said: 'I disagree with her (Ms Leadbeater's) assessment that it is now or never, and it is this Bill or no Bill, and that to vote against this at third reading is a vote to maintain the status quo. 'None of those things are true. There will be plenty of opportunities.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted the same way as in November, including those who abstained. Ms Leadbeater this week appeared to remain confident her Bill will pass, acknowledging that while she expected 'some small movement in the middle', she did not 'anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded'. All eyes will be on whether Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and senior colleagues continue their support for the Bill. Sir Keir indicated earlier this week that he had not changed his mind since voting yes last year, saying his 'position is long-standing and well-known'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Prime Minister had taken a seat in the Commons on the Government front benches by Friday afternoon, as the debate drew to a close. Health Secretary Wes Streeting described Ms Leadbeater's work on the proposed legislation as 'extremely helpful', but confirmed in April that he still intended to vote against it. Ahead of the debate, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'. A vote must be called before 2.30pm, as per parliamentary procedure. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Friday's session began with considerations of outstanding amendments to the Bill, including one to prevent a person meeting the requirements for an assisted death 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking'. The amendment – accepted without the need for a vote – combined with existing safeguards in the Bill, would rule out people with eating disorders falling into its scope, Ms Leadbeater has said. Another amendment, requiring ministers to report within a year of the Bill passing on how assisted dying could affect palliative care, was also approved by MPs. Marie Curie welcomed the amendment, but warned that 'this will not on its own make the improvements needed to guarantee everyone is able to access the palliative care they need' and urged a palliative care strategy for England 'supported by a sustainable funding settlement – which puts palliative and end of life care at the heart of NHS priorities for the coming years'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Supporters and opponents of a change in the law gathered at Westminster early on Friday, holding placards saying 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers'. Among the high-profile supporters were Dame Prue Leith, who said she is 'quietly confident' about the outcome of the vote, and Dame Esther Rantzen's daughter Rebecca Wilcox. Opposition campaigner and disability advocate George Fielding turned out to urge parliamentarians to vote no, saying: 'What MPs are deciding on is whether they want to give people assistance to die before they have assistance to live.' A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested public support for the Bill remains at 73 per cent – unchanged from November. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75 per cent from 73 per cent in November. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation took another step in the parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dignity in Dying campaigners in support of the assisted dying Bill celebrate in Westminster, central London, after the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was passed in the House of Commons | Lucy North/PA Wire This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. Friday was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Ms Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date on Friday, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Conservative former minister Sir James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

BBC News

a day ago

• BBC News

NHS Devon scraps changes to cardiac care after objections

Planned trial changes to overnight heart attack services in south Devon have been Devon said it would not be going ahead with the proposals to drive out-of-hours heart attack patients to hospital in Exeter rather than Torbay to help cut costs and divert resources to cut treatment backlogs, said the Local Democracy Reporting signed a petition against the plan and two MPs said in the Commons the move could have endangered people. The service withdrew the plans in May to consider feedback and it now said it would develop a broader cardiology strategy for the region to be revealed next month. It said the strategy would be guided by clinical data and public feedback."Rather than only focusing on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, the scope will be expanded to include prevention such as cardiovascular disease, urgent and emergency care and elective care," it said."The priority remains the commissioning of safe, reliable and sustainable cardiology services that meet the needs of Devon's population now and in the future." Steve Darling, Liberal Democrat MP for Torbay, said the U-turn was "very good news" and showed people "won't stand by when vital services are at risk"."It's not a definitive victory but it feels like a step in the right direction, now it all depends on where this journey ends," he said."By campaigning we have achieved the outcomes that many people wanted, and we can have higher levels of confidence that we know where we are heading."