Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process
CHEYENNE — Wyoming lawmakers will try again to eliminate the state's Strategic Investments and Projects Account (SIPA) in a continued effort to make the state's budget process more transparent for the public.
Efforts have been made in past legislative sessions to eliminate Wyoming's many financial 'coffee cans.'
In 2024, lawmakers successfully repealed the School Capital Construction Account and its related accounts. This year, the Legislature successfully eliminated the Budget Reserve Account (BRA) through Senate File 168 and nearly eliminated SIPA through the passage of SF 169.
However, Gov. Mark Gordon line-item vetoed SF 169 and kept SIPA online. The governor maintained his long-term support of simplifying the state's budget process, but he disapproved of the Legislature's approach in SF 169.
Gov. Mark Gordon
Gov. Mark Gordon
'(SIPA) was originally a compromise between a previous legislature and the then-serving governor,' Gordon wrote in his veto letter. He served as state treasurer in 2013, when SIPA was first created. 'The compromise recognized the value of the governor's authority to use some of the funds when making budget recommendations.'
Gordon argued the original structure of the bill limited his ability to make budget recommendations.
Currently, excess funds from the state's Permanent Mineral Trust Fund (PMTF) account are split evenly between SIPA and the state's main savings account (the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account, or LSRA).
SF 169 originally eliminated SIPA by July 2026 and transferred all excess funds into the LSRA.
Wyoming statute prohibits the governor from proposing appropriations from LSRA in excess of the 5% statutory reserve account. In other words, he can't make budget recommendations from this account.
'It is a cagey strategy to undermine a long-standing compromise between the executive and legislative branches and breach the original intent of SIPA,' Gordon wrote.
One effect of Gordon's veto removed the split of funds flowing into SIPA and LSRA; now, all excess funds go directly into SIPA, effective immediately. He reasoned this action is necessary, as he expects the state will see greater pressure to fund public schools with the passage of more tax cuts and diversions, along with falling oil and natural gas prices.
'The combined effects of these factors create substantial pressure on the general fund to cover any school funding deficit and still meet the ongoing costs of government,' Gordon wrote, 'as well as provide services to Wyoming families and businesses.'
Impact of veto
During the Legislature's Select Committee on Capital Finance meeting on Thursday, lawmakers moved to draft a bill similar to SF 169 and, in a sense, make it 'veto-proof.' Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, who was the primary sponsor of SF 169, said Gordon's veto 'left … quite a dilemma here.'
'The net effect of this line-item veto, if we allow this to stay in statutes the way it currently is, it zeros out the reserve accounts,' Hicks said.
Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs (2025)
Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs
Legislative budget and fiscal staff provided a comparison of the two versions of the bill and their long-term fiscal impacts, based on numbers from the January long-term forecast of the state's fiscal profile.
The SIPA transfers 45% of what it retains to the School Foundation Program (SFP) account, the state's main spending account to fund public schools. If the SIPA is entirely repealed, the SFP loses that funding.
Before SF 169 was signed into law, the LSRA and SFP were estimated to receive $124.1 million and $369.4 million, respectively, from SIPA over a six-year forecast period. Under the version passed by the Legislature, LSRA was estimated to receive $191.6 million in that same time period.
The SFP would receive a total of $111.4 million in the first two fiscal years, and then not receive anything starting in fiscal year 2027 with the repeal of SIPA. Under Gordon's vetoes, the SFP is estimated to receive $470 million over the six-year forecast period, and the LSRA will receive no funding at all.
'But I want to point out that, starting in FY 28 the (PMTF) reserve account can't guarantee the full amount, and it falls short by about $60 million,' said LSO senior fiscal analyst Polly Scott. 'As Sen. Hicks did state … the estimate is that the reserve account is depleted somewhere in (fiscal year 2028).'
Under the version adopted by the Legislature, the reserve account's life is extended beyond the six-year forecast, Scott added, because the state is relying on it less.
Lawmakers respond
State Treasurer Curt Meier noted that the PMTF reserve account is acting the way the LSRA should act. He suggested removing the 1.25% guarantee from the PMTF reserve account into SIPA so it can 'function (as) what it was supposed to do.'
'You're spending money you don't have and then you're trying to catch up … so you can spend it in this year's legislative session,' Meier said. 'Let the reserve account stand on itself, rather than putting more pressure on it than what it can afford to bear.'
Then, the Legislature could move the unrealized capital gains into the LSRA, he said. The LSRA already provides $100 million to the school spending account once it drops below a certain threshold.
Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne
Chairwoman Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, suggested also discussing lifting this cap from the LSRA into the SFP at the committee's next meeting in September. For now, committee members voted to draft a bill that eliminates the SIPA, with a provision to remove the 1.25% flow guarantee from the PMTF reserve account, and discuss it at the next meeting.
'The elimination of the SIPA account is important, I think, to the Legislature as a whole, in order to simplify and provide transparency to the budget process,' Nethercott said. 'Because the SIPA account has been butchered. It's been tortured ... and no longer serves its intended purpose, creating a transparency issue.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
14 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Trump-Era Rollback of Transgender Rights Is Gaining Steam
Voters in at least 10 states have elected a transgender person to their legislature. A transgender man has argued a case before the Supreme Court. Last year, the first transgender woman was elected to Congress. Transgender people have become visible in ways that were unthinkable five years ago, a development that advocates thought would generate more societal acceptance. And yet, the political and legal tides are shifting in a different direction.
16 hours ago
As Musk's 'robotaxi' rollout approaches, Democratic lawmakers in Texas try to throw up a roadblock
NEW YORK -- A group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas is asking Elon Musk to delay the planned rollout of driverless 'robotaxis' in the state this weekend to assure that the vehicles are safe. In a letter, seven state legislators asked Tesla to wait until September when a new law takes effect that will require several checks before autonomous vehicles can be deployed without a human in the driver's seat. Tesla is slated to begin testing a dozen of what it calls robotaxis for paying customers on Sunday in a limited area of Austin, Texas. 'We are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025,' the letter from Wednesday, June 18, reads. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.' It's not clear if the letter will have much impact. Republicans have been a dominant majority in the Texas Legislature for more than 20 years. State lawmakers and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott have generally embraced Musk and the jobs and investment he has brought to Texas, from his SpaceX rocket program on the coast, to his Tesla factory in Austin. The company, which is headquartered in Austin, did not responded immediately to a request for comment from The Associated Press. The law will require companies to secure approval from the state motor vehicles department to operate autonomous cars with passengers. That approval, in turn, would depend on sufficient proof that the cars won't pose a high risk to others if the self-driving system breaks down, among other reassurances. Companies would also have to file detailed plans for how first responders should handle the cars if there is a problem, such as an accident. The letter asked Tesla to assure the legislators it has met all the requirements of the law even if it decides to go ahead with the test run this weekend. The letter was earlier reported by Reuters. Musk has made the robotaxi program a priority at Tesla and a failure would likely be highly damaging to the company's stock, which has already tumbled 20% this year. Musk's political views and his affiliation with the Trump administration have drastically reduced sales of Tesla, particularly in Europe, where Musk's endorsement of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany party in February's election drew broad condemnation. Tesla shares bottomed out in March and have rebounded somewhat in recent months. Much of the rise reflects optimism that robotaxis will not only be deployed without a hitch, but that the service will quickly expand to other cities and eventually dominate the self-driving cab business. Rival Waymo is already picking up passengers in Austin and several other cities, and recently boasted of surpassing 10 million paid rides. In afternoon trading Friday, Tesla shares were largely unchanged at $320.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
New election laws going into effect in July
CHEYENNE – Regulating Wyoming's elections was arguably one of the top priorities for the state Legislature in this year's legislative session, with dozens of election-related bills filed for consideration. However, only a fraction of these bills made it to the governor's desk. One of them, House Bill 79, 'Bond elections-voter threshold requirement,' was vetoed by Gov. Mark Gordon. Another bill, HB 156, 'Proof of voter residency-registration qualification,' was allowed to become law without his signature. While Gordon agreed only U.S. citizens and Wyoming residents should be allowed to vote in the state's elections, he had significant legal concerns about the bill. 'Because I believe in adequate checks to ensure only qualified electors can vote, I am allowing this bill to become law, despite the likelihood that it will invite litigation,' Gordon said in a March 21 statement. Here is a breakdown of new election-related laws that will go into effect, starting July 1. Proof of residency, citizenship Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette, former chairman of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, was the primary sponsor of HB 156. It sets a new residency requirement to vote in Wyoming, requiring a person to be a bona fide state resident for at least 30 days prior to Election Day. Voters must prove state residency and U.S. citizenship when registering to vote, and the bill is effective starting with the August 2026 primary election. It also gives the secretary of state rulemaking authority over which forms of identification to prove Wyoming residency and U.S. citizenship are accepted. Secretary of State Chuck Gray's office held a public comment period on the new voter registration rules from May 5 through June 20. His office held an in-person and virtual public comment event earlier this month at the state Capitol, where all attendees expressed support for the rules change. The Equality State Policy Center recently filed a lawsuit in United States District Court for the District of Wyoming challenging HB 156. The lawsuit claims HB 156 violates both state and federal law and threatens to deprive legitimate Wyoming voters of their right and freedom to vote. In response to the litigation, which names himself and all 23 of Wyoming's county clerks, Gray said it is a 'meritless attempt' by the far left 'to undermine the common-sense election integrity measures Wyomingites want.' Ban on ranked-choice voting Rep. Joe Webb, R-Lyman, was the primary sponsor of HB 165, 'Ranked choice voting-prohibition.' His bill prohibits ranked-choice voting in all Wyoming elections. This method of voting allows the electorate to rank candidates by order of preference. The cast ballots are tabulated in multiplied rounds, with the elimination of each candidate until a candidate with the most votes is declared a winner. Election funds Starting July 1, only public funds can be used to pay for the costs of elections. Gillette Republican Rep. Christopher Knapp's HB 228, 'Prohibition on private funds for conducting elections,' prohibits county clerks and other officials responsible for conducting elections from accepting 'any donation in the form of money, grants, property or personal services from an individual or nongovernmental entity' related to funding election processes. Federal funds used to conduct elections, donated meals to election workers and the use of private real property as a polling place are exempted under this bill. HB 337, 'Prohibiting foreign funding of ballot measures,' places restrictions on foreign national contributions to ballot measure campaigns. Wyoming is now the 10th state to put these restrictions in place, according to Ballotpedia. Any political action committee or group/organization pushing a statewide initiative or referendum is now required to file a statement 'related to funding from prohibited foreign sources,' under HB 337. Foreign nationals are considered a prohibited funding source under this bill. Other election laws In order to form a new political party, the deadline to file a petition with the secretary of state's office changed from June 1 to May 1 under Senate File 166, 'Political party formation-amendments.' The petition can be circulated no earlier than March 1, instead of April 1, of the year preceding the general election. Finally, Cheyenne Republican Rep. Ann Lucas' HB 318, 'Maintenance of voter lists,' creates specific maintenance requirements of voter lists in regard to driver's licenses and identification cards. There is already an agreement in current law between the secretary of state and Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) to match voter registration data with driver's licenses to verify voter registration. Lucas' bill requires using this information to determine a voter's citizenship, if the voter subsequently received a driver's license from another state or any other evidence that makes a person ineligible to vote. WYDOT is required to provide a monthly list of all people who have indicated a noncitizen state when obtaining their driver's license or ID card to the secretary of state. The secretary of state is allowed under the bill to utilize the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program to verify the citizenship of registered voters in Wyoming. The bill also authorizes investigative powers to the secretary of state and county clerks to lawfully investigate if evidence shows the voter moved to another state and, based on results, mail notice of intent to cancel that person's voter registration in Wyoming.
