Warren Buffett Says to Buy This Vanguard ETF. It Could Turn $1,000 Per Month Into $245,000 in 10 Years.
Warren Buffett believes most investors should choose a low-cost index fund.
Patience, consistency, and discipline could turn relatively small, regular investments into a hefty portfolio balance over time.
Besides strong performance, investors should consider the time commitment required, as well as the expense ratio.
10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF ›
Top fund managers consistently select individual stocks to build high-performing portfolios. While individual investors often believe they can do the same, and some actually might, the vast majority of people aren't as skilled at stock selection.
Here's where the recommendation of Warren Buffett comes into play. The Oracle of Omaha suggests the right course of action for most people is to simply invest their money in a low-cost index fund, particularly one that tracks the performance of the broad market S&P 500 index. One exchange-traded fund (ETF) of this type that comes to mind is the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO).
Investors who choose this path and follow it consistently put themselves in a position to be rewarded over time. For example, investing just $1,000 per month in this ETF could result in a portfolio balance of $245,000 in 10 years. Here's what you need to know.
In the past decade, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has produced a total return of 244%, with dividends reinvested. That's a fantastic outcome, likely buoyed by huge capital inflows into passive investment options over active strategies, generally solid economic growth, and the rise of several dominant tech enterprises. That trailing 10-year gain puts its compound annual growth rate at about 13% -- well ahead of the market's long-run average of 10% annually.
For the sake of this article, let's assume that the next 10 years will resemble the last decade when it comes to returns. Of course, nothing is guaranteed, and the future is inherently unpredictable. But if you invest $1,000 per month between now and 2035 (for a total of 120 investments), you'd have around $245,000 in a decade.
This is the power of dollar-cost averaging. You might think that to succeed as an investor, you have to make decisions like a pro and try to correctly time the market. The intention of buying low, selling high, and repeating the process sounds good in theory. However, it's virtually impossible to do well on a consistent basis. That's why a dollar-cost averaging approach makes the most sense: If you add more money to your portfolio consistently at regular intervals, you can be assured that you're taking advantage of the inevitable ups and downs of the market.
Knowing that $1,000 per month can end up becoming $245,000 should be enough to get any investor excited about putting money to work in the stock market. There are other clear benefits to adopting this no-brainer strategy.
For one, there's a strong chance the portfolio will beat a majority of the experts. Data shows that the performances of most actively managed funds lag the S&P 500 over long stretches of time. This doesn't prevent fund managers from charging high fees that further eat away at the returns of their investors. The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, on the other hand, has an expense ratio of just 0.03%. That's a charge of $3 a year for every $10,000 a person has invested in the fund. That's hard to beat.
Another benefit is that this is a hassle-free approach. Investors don't need fancy degrees or certifications, expert financial analysis skills, or hours of free time every week to listen to earnings calls. Putting money into the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF on a monthly basis is essentially an automatic investment allocation. It couldn't be simpler.
It instantly provides investors with broad diversification into 500 of the largest U.S. companies. The ETF has exposure to all sectors, from technology and financial services businesses to energy and utilities. It's a bet on the growth of the American economy and on the premise that it will continue doing what it has always done. This seems like a smart bet to make.
Buying $1,000 worth of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF every month should put you on the path to building your wealth in the next decade and beyond.
Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Neil Patel has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Warren Buffett Says to Buy This Vanguard ETF. It Could Turn $1,000 Per Month Into $245,000 in 10 Years. was originally published by The Motley Fool
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
The Israel-Iran conflict and the other big thing that drove the stock market this week
It's been a tense and dynamic week for the world at large. The market action on Wall Street over the past four sessions was been anything but that. For the week, the S & P 500 lost 0.15%, the tech-heavy Nasdaq ticked up 0.21%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was basically flat, up a mere 0.02%. Beneath the surface, though, there was plenty of news for investors to digest. Here's a closer look at the biggest market themes during the holiday-shortened trading week. 1. Geopolitics: The major news story was — and still is — the intensifying war between Israel and Iran. The big question on everyone's mind is whether the U.S. will get involved. As of Friday, reports indicate that while President Donald Trump is actively reviewing options to attack Iran, nothing has been authorized. The White House has said Trump he will make a decision in the "next two weeks". As a result of the Israel-Iran conflict, investors spent the week keeping an extra close eye on the movement in safe-haven assets like gold and the dollar, as well as risk assets such as oil. Gold prices pulled back this week after their initial spike last Friday, which is when Israel's first attack on Iranian nuclear infrastructure jolted markets. The U.S. dollar index , meanwhile, strengthened this week but still remains near multiyear lows. Oil rose again for the week, with international benchmark Brent crude climbing nearly 4%. For those looking to gauge what the market thinks will happen with Iran, look to oil. The commodity is currently acting as something of proxy on the odds of the conflict intensifying and America directly entering the fray. 2. Fed updates: The other big theme of the week centered on the health of the U.S. economy in the lead up to Wednesday afternoon, when we got the Federal Reserve's latest interest rate decision and revised economic projections. Ultimately, the Fed kept its benchmark lending rate unchanged on Wednesday following its two-day policy meeting. The decision followed lackluster updates on the state of the consumer and the housing market , along with lower-than-expected inflation readings the week prior. As we outlined earlier this week , the Fed is in a tough spot when it comes to abiding by its dual mandate of ensuring price stability and low unemployment. The state of play requires nuance. On the one hand, there is evidence in support of rate cuts, namely some cracks in the consumer — even if the consumer has remained largely and impressively resilient — and the Fed's own updated outlook for lower real GDP growth and higher unemployment this year. On the other hand, the Fed is now expecting higher inflation this year than it did in March, which would support the need for higher interest rates. Given these dueling dynamics and the uncertainty around tariff impacts, the central bank's decision to keep interest rates steady makes sense. While the Fed certainly doesn't want to wait too long and make the same mistake we saw coming out of the Covid-19 pandemic, we must acknowledge that the causes of a potential rebound in inflation are different this time around. Tariffs will likely push up prices, but that may be a one-time increase, as opposed to the sustained inflation we saw exiting the pandemic, which was driven by massive supply chain disruptions and shifts in consumer behavior. As a result, we believe the apparent bias to be more worried about the job market and overall economic growth — and therefore cut rates later this year — makes sense, too. Indeed, the Fed's updated projections still pencil in two rate cuts in 2025, the same as in March despite the aforementioned revisions to its inflation and growth outlook. Fed Governor Christopher Waller made the case Friday that the cuts should start as early as July, arguing that the inflation risk posed by tariffs is not significant and ensuring resiliency in the labor market should be a higher priority. Waller's argument is basically that it's better to move now than wait for a jump in unemployment. Our biggest focus at the Club is staying nimble, given the highly volatile nature of geopolitics at the moment. No doubt, rate decisions are important to think about, but they're only one small part of the investing puzzle to navigate each day. For this reason, we continue to focus more on individual company fundamentals and industry trends rather than higher-level dynamics, important as they are to shaping our worldview. Cybersecurity stocks are one example that we highlighted this week. Another example would be the news we got from Club names Meta Platforms and Amazon this week on their artificial intelligence efforts. We think the implications that AI will have on the cost structures, revenue opportunities and efficiency gains should weigh far more heavily in the minds' of long-term investors than whether the Fed will cut in July or September. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long META, AMZN. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett's Top Recommendation for Investors Could Turn $500 Per Month Into $100,000 in 10 Years.
Buffett shares a lot of investment advice in his shareholder letters and annual meetings. He recommends one investment for most people, including the executor of his estate. If you consistently add to your portfolio, you could have six figures within a decade of starting. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF › Warren Buffett is happy to share investment advice with anyone who's interested. His annual letters to shareholders and extended question-and-answer sessions at Berkshire Hathaway's annual meetings are incomparable sources of wisdom. Buffett has been a great guide for countless successful investors who like to pick great companies, not just great stocks. But the Oracle of Omaha's top recommendation for most investors is to ignore a lot of that and keep things as simple as possible. That's because it's often the behavioral challenges of investing in individual companies that trip up those who would otherwise be successful. Buying or selling a great company at the wrong price at the wrong time is a path to underperformance. Here's what Buffett recommends instead. One of the easiest ways for investors to avoid the behavioral tripwires that can lead to lagging the stock market is to stop trying to outperform the market average in the first place. That's why Buffett's top recommendation for average investors is to put money in an index fund. He prefers the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO). Buffett plans to take his own advice, too. He instructed the executor of his estate to put 90% of his wealth in the index fund after his passing. If you consistently put aside $500 of your paycheck every month, you could be sitting on a six-figure portfolio 10 years from now, even if you're starting from nothing. Buffett doesn't think dollar-cost averaging is for active stock pickers. While he doesn't try to time the market, he does try to value companies. Buying a company's stock without regard for its value (as dictated by a dollar-cost averaging strategy) won't lead to the outperformance stock pickers seek. But when it comes to passive investing, the best way to get the most out of your money is to put all your money into the fund and consistently add to it over time with money from your earnings. Earning average returns for a long time can produce above-average wealth. The S&P 500 expanded to a 500-constituent format in March of 1957. Since then, the broad-based index has gone on to produce a compound average annual total return of 10.5%. That return is achieved by reinvesting dividends, which most brokerages allow you to do automatically. If you set up a brokerage account and automatically purchase $500 of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF every month while reinvesting dividends, here's what you can expect if you earn average returns from the last 70 years. Years Investing Expected Value of Portfolio 1 $6,335 2 $13,335 3 $21,068 4 $29,611 5 $39,050 6 $49,477 7 $60,998 8 $73,726 9 $87,788 10 $103,324 Calculations by author. It's worth pointing out that $500 per month, or $6,000 per year, is less than the annual contribution limit for an IRA. That will ensure you keep your investments tax-deferred or even tax-free. While the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF doesn't have a history of capital gains distributions, investors still have to pay taxes on its income distributions from dividends. Those usually incur a 15% qualified dividend tax, so there's a slight tax drag. But even if you set aside 15% of each dividend distribution, you could end up with a portfolio value north of $100,000 based on average returns. If you contribute the $500 per month to an employer-sponsored retirement plan, you could end up with well over $100,000. That's because most plans include a matching contribution. While you might not have the Vanguard fund available in your plan, most include some low-cost index funds. Even with relatively high fees, that can be the easiest way to build a sizable portfolio for retirement. Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's Vice Chairman and longtime friend, once told a young investor that the first $100,000 is the hardest. (He used more colorful language.) Once you have $100,000, you can let off the gas a bit because the returns from the portfolio will start to do some of the work for you. Indeed, if all you did was invest $500 per month for 10 years like above and let it sit for another 10 years, you'd have close to $280,000 without adding another penny. Wait 15 more years, and you'll have around $1.25 million. That's the true power of compounding, and it doesn't take any special skills or market timing knowledge to get there. Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Adam Levy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett's Top Recommendation for Investors Could Turn $500 Per Month Into $100,000 in 10 Years. was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett's Top 7 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned From Them)
Warren Buffett didn't build his more than $100 billion fortune by being perfect. In fact, the Oracle of Omaha has been surprisingly candid about his biggest financial flubs over the decades. The good news is his mistakes offer valuable lessons for anyone trying to build real, sustainable wealth. Plus, they prove that even legendary investors are just humans who get it wrong sometimes. Welcome to the club! Find Out: Read Next: Here are Buffett's top money mistakes and, more importantly, what he learned from them. Buffett's investment in U.K. grocer Tesco shows how hesitation can turn small problems into major losses. Berkshire owned 415 million shares by 2012, but when concerns about management surfaced, Buffett sold only part of his position for a $43 million profit. When Tesco later overstated profits and shares collapsed, his delayed action cost Berkshire $444 million in after-tax losses. 'An attentive investor, I'm embarrassed to report, would have sold Tesco shares earlier. I made a big mistake with this investment by dawdling,' Buffett said. Speed matters in damage control. When red flags are abundant, sometimes quick decisive action means you avert a financial disaster. Learn More: Believe it or not, Buffett has called Berkshire Hathaway 'the dumbest stock I ever bought.' He purchased what was, at the time, a failing textile company because he felt insulted during a sale negotiation. Instead of walking away from Berkshire Hathaway as planned, his wounded pride led him to buy the entire business and fire the previous owner. The financial cost was enormous. Buffett said his holding company would be 'worth twice as much as it is now' if he'd stuck to his original plan of investing in insurance companies instead. This single emotional reaction cost him decades of better returns. The takeaway is clear: Never let personal feelings influence money decisions. When you feel personally slighted in a financial deal, that's exactly when you need to step back, take a breath and think logically. In 1993, Buffett thought Dexter Shoes had lasting competitive advantages that would protect its profits. Within a few years, those advantages evaporated and the company became worthless. Buffett explained: 'What I had assessed as a durable competitive advantage vanished within a few years.' This loss taught him that 'a truly great business must have an enduring 'moat' that protects excellent returns on invested capital.' Companies need permanent moats — like unbeatable brands, exclusive technology or cost advantages — that competitors can't easily copy. Without sustainable protection, any successful business will eventually attract competitors who'll drive profits to zero. The key is finding businesses whose advantages will last decades, not just a few good years. This mistake still haunts Buffett. Despite owning Geico insurance, which spent millions on Google advertising, he completely missed the search giant's investment potential. He had firsthand evidence of Google's business model working but failed to connect the dots. 'I made the mistake in not being able to come to a conclusion where I really felt that at the present prices, the prospects were far better than the prices indicated,' Buffett admitted. His reluctance to venture beyond familiar territory cost him one of the greatest investment opportunities in history. The lesson here is about missed opportunities. Sometimes the best investments are hiding in plain sight, but we ignore them because they seem too complicated or unfamiliar. Buffett's $9 billion acquisition of Lubrizol Corporation became an issue when it emerged that David Sokol, a Berkshire executive who recommended the deal, secretly owned stock in the company. Sokol made $3 million from the transaction without disclosing his conflict of interest. The oversight violated insider-trading rules and hurt Berkshire's reputation. At the 2011 annual meeting, Buffett said he should have asked better, more direct questions about Sokol's involvement. The lesson? Trust but verify, especially when large sums are involved. Even with people you've worked with (or simply known) for years, asking uncomfortable questions can prevent you from making mistakes. When crude oil hit $100+ per barrel in 2008, Buffett jumped into ConocoPhillips stock expecting energy prices to keep climbing. Instead, he bought at the peak and watched the investment lose billions as oil crashed. This demonstrates how even smart investors can get caught up in market excitement. 'When investing, pessimism is your friend, euphoria the enemy,' Buffett has said. When everyone is optimistic about a sector, prices often reflect that optimism, leaving little room for profit. Buffett learned that great companies can still be terrible investments if you pay the wrong price. Market euphoria creates expensive stocks, while pessimism creates bargains. The best time to buy is when others are selling, not when everyone else is buying too. U.S. Air's impressive revenue numbers looked very attractive in 1989, so Buffett bought preferred shares. Bad news for Buffett, those revenues came with a hidden cost. Airlines need constant capital to grow, buying new planes and expanding routes, leaving little for shareholders. By the time the airline achieved meaningful profits, debt payments ate up most of the returns. The company couldn't even pay dividends on Buffett's preferred stock. He got lucky selling at a profit later, but knew it was pure chance. This taught him to distinguish between real growth and expensive growth. As Buffett said, 'Investors have poured money into a bottomless pit, attracted by growth when they should have been repelled by it.' Some businesses need to spend huge amounts just to increase sales, leaving shareholders with nothing. The lesson is: If it looks too good to be true, it just might be. What makes Buffett extraordinary isn't his perfect track record, it's his willingness to admit errors publicly and extract valuable lessons from them. Each mistake became a teaching moment that improved his future decisions. His Google miss made him more open to technology investments, eventually leading to major positions in Apple. His ConocoPhillips overpayment reinforced his discipline about buying only at attractive prices. His Dexter Shoes loss sharpened his focus on truly durable competitive advantages. The real wisdom isn't avoiding all mistakes. Unfortunately, that's impossible. It's learning from failures quickly and adjusting your approach. Buffett's biggest errors became steppingstones to better investing, not permanent setbacks. For the rest of us, it's a lesson in endurance. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on Warren Buffett's Top 7 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned From Them) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
