Here's What 18 People Think About What Trump Said About Possibly Pardoning Diddy
As you probably know by now, Sean 'Diddy' Combs was indicted in 2024 on federal charges including sex trafficking and racketeering.
Recently, HuffPost and BuzzFeed wrote about how Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked the president if he would consider pardoning Diddy. Trump told Doocy, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He used to really like me a lot, but I think when I ran for politics, that relationship busted up, from what I read."
"I don't know, he didn't tell me that. But I'd read some … nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden."
Trump, who once ran in the same wealthy social circles as Diddy, continued, "You know, it's different. You become a much different person when you run for politics, and you do what's right. I could do other things, and I'm sure he'd like me, and I'm sure other people would like me, but it wouldn't be as good for our country."
In other words, Trump didn't give a definitive answer on whether he would pardon Diddy.
People in the comments had a lot to say on the topic. Here are some of the best replies:
1."If Diddy is found guilty, he should not be pardoned. Stop pardoning people who were found or plead guilty."
—cole Melton
2."When considering whether to pardon someone, Trump couldn't care less about whether a person is guilty. As long as the person has some kind words for Trump and/or helped Trump get even richer, the person has a good chance of getting a pardon."
"Ask Trump voters if they voted for this corruption of the pardon system."
—Carl Hayman
3."The fact that Trump commented on pardoning Diddy during an active, ongoing trial…I am just speechless. It completely undermines the entire justice system."
—hampster
Related: 40 Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Creepy Wikipedia Pages
4."Always follow the money. Trump is using the power to pardon as an ATM. He only cares about the next money making opportunity, not law and order, justice, the Constitution, or keeping the guilty in jail. And most assuredly not you and me."
—d icard
5."Even MAGA people on Fox and Breitbart are exploding over this. They hate this idea. Democrats need to keep the topic of Trump possibly pardoning Diddy front and center. Talk about it whenever they can. Keep it in the headlines."
—TACO Trump
6."He says, 'I would certainly look at the facts.' And then what? Ignore them like he did with the results of the 2020 election? It used to be that if you wanted to win a high political office, you had to have character. Now all it takes (at least if you're a Republican) is to be a character."
—Carl Olson
7."'You are the company you keep' has never been more true than as it relates to these two."
—kylemcgee
Related: 23 Cute, Happy, And Wholesome Posts I Saw On The Internet This Week That You Absolutely Need To See
8."There is no justice system if anyone can simply prove love to their president and get a pardon."
—Cory Crete
"Pardons are now for sale."
—James Gettings
9."Well, being liked is obviously the most important factor in any pardon."
—Les Vogt
10."This isn't just grotesque; it's the rot made visible. Trump floating a pardon for a man indicted for sex trafficking, while reminiscing about party invitations and wounded egos, is less a statement of justice than a confession of moral bankruptcy. It's not about innocence or guilt — it's about whether someone 'used to really like' him."
"In Trump's world, the law isn't sacred; it's a velvet rope outside a nightclub, waved aside with the casual shrug of a man picking names from a guest list."
—Miles West
11."If our Republic is still standing in a few years, a different Congress must amend the Constitution to limit presidential pardons."
—Pedro Antonio Pastrano
12."No more presidential pardons. I would let them commute death sentences, but nothing more. Enough of this abuse. These people had their day in court and have had chances to appeal. I don't trust anyone with that power anymore. Get rid of it."
—Charles James
13."It's so weird (but so typical) that Trump has to tell everyone that Diddy 'used to like me a lot,' as if that's the most relevant thing about the issue. What a terrible thing it must be to live a life actually believing inside that you're incapable of being loved. That's the overriding reality that has made Trump who he is — an immensely insecure, flawed man."
—David Hardy
14."'When you're president you do what's right.' I can't believe he said that because he certainly doesn't abide by that whatsoever."
—Jenny Tayla
15."Whenever he talks about anyone — and I mean anyone — he always comments on if that person likes him or not. Narcissistic dictator."
—whatever19
16."I pray that Trump does not pardon Diddy. He's just as bad as Jeffrey Epstein and R. Kelly."
—smileyzombie492
17."Trump is sans empathy. He is a woman-hating dumpster fire."
—jamesnylan
18.And finally, "At least he didn't say he would. I was relieved to not read even that. The bar is low. 😭"
—goldenovercoat28
The article people commented on originally appeared on HuffPost.
Some replies have been edited for length and clarity.
Also in Internet Finds: Lawyers Are Sharing Their Juiciest "Can You Believe It?!" Stories From The Courtroom, And They're As Surprising As You'd Expect
Also in Internet Finds: People Are Sharing "The Most Believable Conspiracy Theories," And Now I'm Questioning Everything I Thought I Knew
Also in Internet Finds: 51 People Who Quickly Discovered Why Their Hilariously Clueless Partner Was Single Before Meeting Them

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Critics Point Out Glaring Contradiction In Trump's Iran ‘Regime Change' Post
President Donald Trump sparked incredulity on social media Sunday — including from Republicans ― after appearing to call for regime change in Iran. In a post on his Truth Social platform, the president wrote: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' The post stunned critics, especially given that top Trump administration officials — including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — had earlier dismissed the idea of ousting Iran's leaders. Instead, they had spun U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites as aimed at solely stopping the development of nukes. Conservative attorney George Conway, a vocal critic of Trump, sarcastically summed it up: 'Pretending to be an ignorant and impulsive sociopath by appearing to make shit up as he goes along is just @realDonaldTrump's way of playing 7,822-dimensional chess.' Pretending to be an ignorant and impulsive sociopath by appearing to make shit up as he goes along is just @realDonaldTrump's way of playing 7,822-dimensional chess — George Conway 👊🇺🇸🔥 (@gtconway3d) June 22, 2025 I swear it was just like 8 hours ago when Pete Hegseth said "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," to reporters at the Pentagon. That's weird. — Fred Wellman (@FPWellman) June 22, 2025 And less than 24 hours ago, Sec. of Defense Pete "Jaeger Bomb" Hegseth specifically stated it was not about regime change. — Alex Cole (@acnewsitics) June 22, 2025 Miga Taco anyone? — Mike Palmer, CFP® (@dfa_advisor) June 23, 2025 Just wondering if my MAGA friends have to change the color of their hats now that Trump is all about Making Iran Great Again. You know he has that Trump Tower Tehran in his head - lots of great business opportunities for Trump Org from a Trump-installed regime! — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) June 22, 2025 You cannot believe a thing any of them ever say. — Blowhard (@AmeetSampat) June 23, 2025 In other words,no one knows what they are doing — Erica Murdoch (@ericamurdoch) June 22, 2025 VANCE: "Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change."HEGSETH: "This mission was not and has not been about regime change."RUBIO: Regime change is "certainly not the goal of what we're working on here."TRUMP: — Megan Cassella (@mmcassella) June 22, 2025 It's like a tariff negotiation but with bunker busting bombs and nuclear holocaust instead of maple syrup. — Mike Madrid (@madrid_mike) June 22, 2025 Kayleigh McEnany's 'Every Dictator' Take On Trump Iran Strike Draws Online Fire CNN Panel Recoils At Conservative Guest's Comment To Friend's Undocumented Wife U.S. Soccer Star Dishes On 'Weird' Oval Office Moment With Trump


Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Malaysian PM Anwar's Popularity Rises on Stability and Growth
Support for Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim rose as he crossed the midpoint of his five-year term amid political stability. The premier's approval rating stood at 55% as of May, compared with 54% in December and 50% in November 2023, according to a poll by Merdeka Center. Anwar's government also saw its rating climb to 50% as of May, compared with 40% in June last year.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Market Get Fresh Injection of Uncertainty After US Strikes Iran
(Bloomberg) -- US strikes on Iran over the weekend have added to risks for global oil supply, which has so far been unaffected by some of the most extreme military actions in the Middle East in years. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Brent crude jumped early on Monday to trade above $80 a barrel for the first time since mid-January after US President Donald Trump said air attacks had 'obliterated' Iran's three main nuclear sites. Prices then pared much of that gain, as the vital Strait of Hormuz remained open to tankers. Analysts are now trying to weigh the increased geopolitical risk against previous fears that strong production and a lukewarm global economy could result in a supply glut. Here's what oil watchers are saying: Rapidan Energy Group Iran will likely be very cautious about disrupting Hormuz, the narrow passage separating Iran and the Arabian peninsula through which about 25% of the world's oil and 20% of global liquefied natural gas must pass, said Bob McNally, president and founder of Rapidan Energy Group and a former White House energy official. 'Traders are holding their breath, waiting to see if Israel or Iran expand this conflict beyond military and political targets into traded energy,' McNally said on Bloomberg Television. 'So far, no one has pulled that trigger. And if they don't, I can see the price reversing.' Kpler Iran has other options for retaliation, including using its regional proxies to disrupt global trade flows more indirectly, according to Kpler Ltd. senior crude analyst Muyu Xu . That's what happened after Israel's invasion of the Gaza strip in 2023, when Houthi rebels in Yemen began attacking ships in the Red Sea. A direct move to disrupt Middle East oil flows would have severe consequences for prices, she said. 'If Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz, even for one day, oil can temporarily hit $120 or even $150 a barrel,' she said. 'And if it attacks major oil production or export facilities in neighboring countries, it may drive up prices higher for longer.' Vanda Insights Oil markets have been incredibly choppy since Israel began strikes on Iranian nuclear infrastructure earlier this month, with some trading sessions beginning with price spikes before they retreated into daily losses. Traders need to look past the surprise of the news and analyze whether the underlying risks have actually changed, said Vandana Hari, founder of consultancy Vanda Insights. 'Beyond the knee-jerk reaction to the shock US attacks, the market needs to assess if the risk of the worst-case supply disruption scenarios has risen,' Hari said. 'I don't see a material increase.' Onyx Commodities Long-time oil market hand Harry Tchilinguirian said he's particularly watching whether Iran risks pulling the US deeper into the conflict by responding with strikes on American military assets or energy infrastructure in the region, which could drive prices higher. If the response is confined to Israel, that could reduce fears of escalation. 'Basically, the ball is now in Iran's court to respond, and while it says all options are on the table, some are more consequential than others,' said Tchilinguirian, head of oil research and analytics for Onyx Commodities Ltd. Sparta Commodities It's not just crude oil that faces risk. The Strait of Hormuz is also a major chokepoint for LNG and refined products including diesel and jet fuel. Some fuel markets may see the biggest price responses to the latest development, said June Goh, senior oil market analyst with Sparta Commodities. Diesel and jet fuel supply chains are most exposed to the Middle East as oil products from the Arab Gulf flow through Hormuz to feed the main demand hub in Europe, Goh said. 'The east-west spread for middle distillates is expected to widen further to incentivize barrels to flow into Western markets.' Saxo Bank Even without a full-scale disruption, the threat of Iranian action in the strait could hamper shipments, said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy for Saxo Bank A/S. Such delays could lead to short-term price spikes, but gains would be capped after countries released strategic reserves, and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates redirected some crude to facilities outside Hormuz. 'The current geopolitical risk premium — now exceeding $10 a barrel — cannot be sustained for long without a tangible supply disruption,' Hansen said. 'Absent that, price gains may struggle to hold.' RBC Capital Markets Iran has options for retaliation beyond attempting to fully shut the strait, such as strikes on tankers or the port of Fujairah in the UAE, or exerting pressure on remaining allied groups in Iraq and Yemen to assist, said RBC Capital Markets LLC analysts including Helima Croft. It may take days or even weeks to comprehend the nation's full response. 'Above all, we would caution against the knee-jerk 'the worst is behind us' hot take at this stage,' Croft said. 'President Trump may indeed have successfully executed an 'escalate to de-escalate' move, but a wider expansion cannot still be ruled out at this juncture.' (Updates with comments from Saxo and RBC. A previous version was corrected to remove a reference to Indian product flows.) Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data