Elderly Haj pilgrims scammed; outraged Malaysians demand 'religious figure' is exposed

Editor's Note: Siti Kasim has reacted with furore the involvement of a religious figure who allegedly scammed 47 elderly Malaysian pilgrims while claiming how they deceived their victims with their scull caps and robes.
'The worse kind of people are the ones that use religion to make their fortune,' fumed the human rights activist and lawyer in her recent Facebook post.
'And there are plenty of them around in Malaysia. Wearing their skull caps and their robes with the black marks on their foreheads, they become a symbol of piety when some of them are devils in disguise.
'I totally despise these people and I'm certain they will rot in hell! Despicable!'
FOR many, performing the Haj pilgrimage is a once-in-a-lifetime experience where years of toil are needed to fork out for the expenses.
So imagine the shock and outrage of Malaysians upon hearing the news that 47 senior citizens had allegedly fallen victim to a Haj scam by a local agent involving a well-known religious figure.
These unfortunate victims were allegedly blackmailed and held against their will along with having to trek through dangerous routes to avoid detection by the authorities or worse, to make do without food or water.
Reacting to the widely publicised scam, digital creator JalalMisai (@jllmisai) asked just who was this 'well-known religious figure?' And why was the advertisement blurred out in the media reports?
Siapa agamawan terkenal tu..? Kenapa kaburkan poster iklan haji tu..?
Jemaah dah bayar RM30k tapi dapat layanan macam pelarian di tempat orang.. https://t.co/kPidbuqQvC
— JalalMisai (@jllmisai) June 14, 2025
'Pilgrims paid up to RM30,000 but only to be treated like refugees in a foreign land,' lamented the poster who cited a Berita Harian news report on the apparent scam.
One netizen wanted the relevant individual to be named and shamed while pointing out that these sorts of cases could lead to wider ramifications. Not least the Saudi authorities could reduce the quota for Malaysians because the reported scam breached haj visa ruling.
Some commenters contended that both the scammer and religious influencer were Malay and their identities had not yet been revealed.
They wondered where were those who constantly played the race card claiming that 'non-Malay crooks were a protected lot' given that the alleged Malay criminals in this case were not exposed'?
It was also argued that whenever a VVIP is allegedly linked to a scandal, their identities are shrouded in mystery. On the contrary, the ordinary Joe will be roundly named and shamed.
One commenter wondered if such is democratic practice considering that senior leaders of the country who are majority Muslims have remained silent on this issue.
Another surmised that perhaps the tell-tale sign that the package was a scam was its lower than usual price.
Reporting on the same news, Buletin TV3 (@BuletinTV3) quoted a relative of some of the victims who claimed that the senior citizens were 'psychological manipulated'.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Buletin TV3 (@buletintv3)
This made the calls to reveal the identities of the scammers even louder.
Thankfully, one netizen furnished the original advertisement which was blurred by Berita Harian for netizens to judge for themselves.
One netizen warned this will lead the erosion of trust for the clergy and religious influencers.
Always go through the Pilgrimage Funds Board a.k.a. Tabung Haji was the advice of one commenter. No need to resort to external sources and be at risk of such scams.
There are probably a slew of legal implications preventing the media from exposing the identities of the alleged scammers. But what of the cops?
According to Bernama, Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department acting director Datuk Seri Muhammed Hasbullah Ali said an investigation paper had been opened under Section 420 of the Penal Code following three reports lodged by the victim's next of kin – two in Mantin (Negeri Sembilan) and one in Ayer Hitam (Johor).
Muhammed Hasbullah said the police will also work with the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM), Tabung Haji and the Tourism, Arts, and Culture Ministry (MOTAC) to blacklist companies offering Haj packages without approval so as to prevent people from becoming victims.
But surely there should be no reason why the cops cannot issue a statement and reveal the relevant suspects. Why the delay? – June 16, 2025

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Barnama

42 minutes ago

• Barnama

PDRM's Terrorism Response Garners Global Recognition

KUALA LUMPUR, June 20 (Bernama) -- The Royal Malaysia Police's (PDRM) capability in tackling terrorism threats has not only been recognised at the regional level but also by global powers such as the United States, says Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. He said this was evident in the trust placed by the US in PDRM's expertise to carry out the rehabilitation of two Malaysian detainees previously held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 'This shows that in this particular case, the PDRM's Special Branch possesses expertise and competence that convinced a major power like the United States. 'It means we can stand as equals in efforts to address terrorism threats so they do not pose a danger within our own country,' he said during the handover ceremony of the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) post at the Police Training Centre (Pulapol) here today. Media reports previously stated that the US had repatriated two Malaysian citizens in December 2024, after they had been detained at Guantanamo Bay for 18 years. The two individuals involved, Mohammed Farik Amin, 49, and Mohammed Nazir Lep, 48, are currently undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation process that includes social support services, welfare assistance, and health screening before being reunited with their families. Saifuddin said it was crucial for the country to have a capable IGP, such as the 14th IGP Tan Sri Razarudin Husain, who played a key role in the repatriation of the two men. He praised Razarudin's composure when engaging with various US agencies, including the CIA and FBI, in resolving the matter. Meanwhile, Saifuddin stressed that the appointment of an IGP was not an award but a responsibility and burden that must be shouldered with full accountability.

Borneo Post

an hour ago

• Borneo Post

Contractor, ex-wife get 34 years for killing domestic helper

Mohammad Ambree Etiqah KOTA KINABALU (June 20): A contractor and his former engineer wife were jailed for 34 years by a High Court here for a joint charge of killing a domestic helper four years ago. The jail term is counted from today. In passing the sentence, Justice Datuk Dr Lim Hock Leng explained that although both defence counsel put in impassioned mitigation pleas, the court could not ignore the cruelty suffered by the deceased at the hands of the first and second accused, as highlighted by the prosecution. 'The court takes into account the nature of the injuries and the manner in which they were inflicted over a period of time,' said the judge. Lim found the first accused, Mohammad Ambree Yunos @ Unos, and the latter's former wife Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulong, who was the second accused, guilty of their charge under Section 302 of the Penal Code. The indictment provides for the death sentence or a jail term of up to 40 years and whipping of not less than 12 times, upon conviction. Mohammad Ambree was calmed after the court passed the sentence while Etiqah wept in the dock after the court found her guilty of the charge. 'In addition to the time that the first accused must serve in prison, he is to receive the minimum 12 strokes of whipping. 'The second accused is spared the otherwise mandatory punishment of whipping on account of her gender, pursuant to Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code,' the judge ruled. Muhammad Ambree, 40, and Etiqah, 33, were convicted after a full trial on a charge of murdering Siti Afiah Daeng Damin, a 28-year-old Malaysian, at the third floor of a condominium in Penampang between December 8-11, 2021. The court said that the imprisonment term is to run from the date of conviction, i.e June 20 instead of the date of their arrests, given that both the accused persons have been out on bail. In his reserved decision, the judge held among others that, 'In particular, the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the essential elements, namely; (i) the identity and death of the deceased; (ii) the deceased died as a result of injuries which were sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death; (iii) the accused persons caused those injuries with the requisite intention within Section 300(c) of the Penal Code; and (iv) they acted in furtherance of a common intention in causing those injuries. 'There were various issues and defences raised by both the accused persons against the prosecution's case and against each other, including but not limited to the admissibility of the phone and video evidence, similar fact/ bad character evidence, motive, alibi, the statements of the accused persons to the 15th prosecution witness, the investigating officer in relation to exhibits used to harm and cause injuries to the deceased, the conduct of the accused persons, the cause of death, absence of common intention, and so on,' said the judge. The court further said that the second accused sought to lay the blame solely on her ex-husband, who is the first accused, who similarly sought to blame her. 'Specific to the first accused, he contended that the similar fact/bad character evidence is inadmissible against him, the second accused had, in addition, alluded to the death of the maid being caused by an intruder or that the injuries could have been self-inflicted; or that the cause of death is attributable to asthma but these defences were abandoned at the clarification hearing on March 3. 'In any event, these purported issues and defences are unmeritorious and do not stand up to scrutiny, in short, having considered all the evidence and submissions at the end of the trial, this court finds the first and second accused guilty of and convicts them on the charge of murder as preferred against them, there is no reasonable doubt raised by either the first or second accused,' the judge ruled. The court said that in passing the sentence, the court had taken into account public interest, the gravity of the offence and the need for a deterrent sentence, as well as the fact that both the accused persons are first offenders. 'The first accused has expressed remorse for what it is worth, the second accused has not expressed remorse to her counsel in the course of mitigation although reference was made to a case of Duis Akim where the accused, who had been convicted had expressed remorse,' said the judge. Etiqah's counsel Dato' Seri Rakhbir Singh then said that 'I wish to express that the issue of remorse was not put forward but I will do so now respectfully addressing that issue for the purposes of mitigation for and on behalf of the second accused'. This case was first brought to court on December 29, 2021. The prosecution had called 15 witnesses to testify against Mohammad Ambree and Etiqah. For their defence, Ambree and Etiqah were the only witnesses. On April 26, 2022, Etiqah had succeeded in her appeal at the Court of Appeal here against a High Court's verdict which disallowed her be released on a bail. The Court of Appeal granted her RM30,000 bail with one local surety. Then on October 20, 2022 Mohammad Ambree, who was represented by counsel Datuk Ram Singh, was granted bail of RM30,000 with RM10,000 deposit with two local sureties by a High Court here. Deputy public prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus handled the trial. Previous Article Traditional healer freed from charges of raping student

New Straits Times

2 hours ago

• New Straits Times

[UPDATED] Fighting crime in future time: New IGP vows to utilise AI

KUALA LUMPUR: Newly appointed Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail vowed to place emphasis on the use of artificial intelligence to enhance the capabilities of the police. "In order to carry out policing in the near future, the use of artificial intelligence is an issue that I feel will need to be focused on. "This is to ensure that the police continue to evolve and advance forward," he told reporters at the Police Training Centre here after his handing-over of duties ceremony today. He said AI could help police resolve security problems that arise, whether they are regular crime or national threats. "With this opportunity, I will lead the police to greater achievements in line with modernisation, especially in the use of the latest technology. "The best way for me to reveal the rest of my plans is through a press conference in a few days' time," he said. Khalid said he would continue the various efforts implemented by his predecessors. "I believe this is an opportunity for me to increase the efforts and credibility of the police in handling crime, including cross-border crimes," he said. Khalid took over as the inspector-general of police from Tan Sri Razarudin Husain today. Khalid was born on April 8, 1965, in Manong, Perak, and he joined the police in 1987. He has held various notable posts throughout his career, including from 2014 to 2018, where he served as the police attaché at the Malaysian Embassy in London before returning to Malaysia to helm the Special Branch in Pahang. He was promoted in 2023 to Bukit Aman as the Special Branch director, where he continued to serve until he was promoted to the top post in the force.