
It's peak A-level season, but AI is stealing young people's futures before they have even started
The rituals unfold as they always have: hushed shuffling inside a stuffy exam hall, nervous energy silently bouncing off the walls; an impossibly loud clock, counting down to impending doom. This week, up and down the country, rows upon rows of students will sit hunched over their desks clutching 'lucky' pens; praying that their hard work has been worth it. It is, of course, A-level season, which, done right, is supposedly the coveted, golden road to university, graduate jobs, money and a life lived right.
Yet, this year feels a little different.
Beyond the double doors of the sports hall, the world is changing at a rapid pace. While the next generation of workers study harder than ever, the qualifications they've been told hold the key to the next important step are suddenly in question: artificial intelligence (AI) isn't only analysing data and producing basic graphic design, but diagnosing illnesses and drafting legal documents, too; today's path, no matter how well they score, is muddied. This is a youth whose strange paradox means that the entry jobs and world they're preparing for may no longer exist by the time they reach it.
For graduates, recent and future, it's not exactly optimistic. There's barely a corner of the job market left unaffected, and now even industries that were once considered safe – in medicine, or law, for example – are beginning to utilise AI and automation at the expense of human work.
This week, Business Insider reported new data that confirms that companies are hiring less, having found that, over the last three years, 'the share of AI-doable tasks in online job postings has declined by 19 per cent'. The report continued to say that further analysis led to a 'startling conclusion: the vast majority of the drop took place because companies are hiring fewer people in roles that AI can do' – and they are hitting junior, entry-level roles first.
This month, the first law firm providing legal services via AI was approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. While many firms are using AI to support and deliver a range of back-office and public-facing services, Garfield.Law Ltd will be the first purely AI-based company.
It is announcements like this that are causing enormous worry for a generation who are looking to get their first foot on a career ladder. 'It means that the graduate job market has changed dramatically, in a very short period of time,' a careers consultant at a leading London university tells me. 'AI is causing a huge amount of uncertainty and a lack of confidence – both on the side of the employers and the students and graduates.'
Where are you supposed to begin now, then? How do you navigate getting that first foot on the career ladder once the (promised) stepping stone has been whipped away?
'Even people who work in affected industries themselves aren't sure,' she adds. 'They know what the pipeline was back in their day, but now they really don't know how this is all going to affect recruitment and, ultimately, career trajectories and the traditional ladder.'
We all know that AI is fundamentally warping the workplace as we know it – what experts are trying to work out now is exactly how, and how fast. According to reports from PwC, McKinsey, and the World Economic Forum, around 60 per cent of current jobs will require 'significant adaptation due to AI' over the next 10-30 years or so; by then, AI will simply be another integrated part of our day jobs. Goldman Sachs goes one further: by 2045, their research finds, up to 50 per cent of jobs could be fully automated, and estimates that 300 million jobs will be affected by AI. Not even that A* in history can compete.
But while these projections feel far into the future, recent reports show that AI is already having a significant impact today. Already, there are a lot fewer opportunities, and according to the Financial Times, graduate job listings dropped from 7,000 in 2023 to 5,800 in 2024. That's a drop of 17 per cent.
This means those on the market are more competitive than ever. In 2024, employers received an average of 140 applications per graduate vacancy, according to a report from Times Higher Education; a 59 per cent increase from the previous year and the highest number recorded since 1991.
'The anxiety in this cohort of students is off the scale,' explains futurist, author and Gen Z and Gen A expert Chloe Combi. 'But this situation has revitalised a conversation about which subjects are necessary. Every kid that's gone through exams and university in the last decade has been told 'learn to code', over and over again. But rapid progress suggests some of those high-employment computer science degrees might even become obsolete. In so many cases, there's an AI programme that can do that in a micro proportion of the time it would take a human to do the jobs these kids have been told to aim for. It's awful – and it's not like they've been given or followed the wrong advice, far from it. They've just been given advice that's become outdated in the blink of an eye.'
With white-collar, middle-class jobs now more under threat than ever, many are turning to more traditional blue-collar work – trades like being an electrician, plumber, or healthcare worker or hairdresser – sparking conversations about the power of the working class being revalued under this new industrial revolution.
Outside of trades, the advice is tentative but also reevaluates what is valuable. Investing in skills like critical thinking, strategic creativity, or very human traits like storytelling, negotiation and persuasion may now prove more lucrative than anything more traditional.
The expert itself, ChatGPT.com, has some ideas, too. 'As AI like me becomes more integrated into the workplace, students need to adapt intelligently,' the tool explains, in its ever-creepy self-aware tone. 'Don't only aim for a specific job title – those may not exist in a few years,' is its first point. 'Instead, study fields that build foundational thinking.'
Next, it advises to 'combine technical and human insight' by, for example, taking a degree that blends fields, like philosophy and AI ethics, or computer science and psychology. Finally, back to the same point – don't specialise in your career if you can help it; 'be adaptable, not replaceable', it warns, quite bleakly, and 'learn how to work with AI, not compete against it'.
That black hole of uncertainty is only expanding.
'In the next 10 years, there's going to be a very necessary transformation of the university system,' Combi says. 'Unless you're very privileged, I believe, a degree that's learning for learning's sake is going to become obsolete. Hopefully, there'll also be a massive resurgence of apprenticeships, and hands-on apprenticeship degrees, which are a combination of the practical and theoretical.'
To be fair, this has been necessary for a long time. The promise of apprenticeships as a solid alternative to expensive degrees never really followed through – a combination of historical class bias, the stigma of 'less prestigious' vocational qualifications and a lack of policy and funding has consistently held the idea back. But that could now all change.
For now, the quotes have been learned and the equations solved; the sleepless nights and frantic panics will soon be over for another year, and another generation of A-level students who lived to tell the tale. But though it might be unpredictable, they have an exciting road ahead: one that could be the perfect challenge for a digitally-fluent and adaptable Covid-generation. If anyone can adapt, it will hopefully be them.
It won't be until after they've picked up those long-awaited results in August that the real test will begin: not the one they just sat, but the one no one prepared them for.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
People left surprised after cruise ship worker shares payslip
A Royal Caribbean cruise ship worker has revealed how much he takes home as a casino host on board the brand's liners. Brit Chris Wong has worked at sea for the company since 2013, regularly posting content online about his life on the ocean waves. This week he announced his current contract will be his last, as he sails into new waters in 'the next phase of my life'. However, A recent YouTube post saw the entertainment employee sharing the sums of his most recent pay slip. With 114,000 followers on YouTube, he describes himself as probably the most followed casino host on land or sea - and explained that previous insights into his salary had been amongst his most popular content ever. Around 2 minutes 40 seconds into the 17-minute-long clip, Wong bravely goes where many employees might not - he shares his payslip on screen for all to see. The white and blue financial document clearly carries Royal Caribbean's branding, although Wong has covered up confidential details such as his employee number and address. The one piece of information most people want to see though hasn't been scratched out; how much he brings home for a month's work. Receiving two pay slips, one for salaried pay, the other for additions such as tips, Wong revealed he earned $4,340.30 (£3,222.93) in a month this year Wong explains in the clip, entitled 'How Much Money I Currently Earn Working On A Cruise Ship in 2025': 'The only thing I haven't scribbled out is the bottom, which is my net pay and this is exactly how much money I was paid for that two week period.' Showing two two-week pay slips, the first sum is $2,890.21 (£2,145.52), while the second, based solely on additional earnings such as tips and commission, is $1,450.09 (£1076.50). The grand total for his work in January this year comes to $4,340.30 (£3,222.93). He explains that he's on 'fantastic money', saying: 'For me to earn something like that in the UK, it's actually quite difficult at this point in time, with the way inflation is and everything'. He adds that earning that sum without having to pay for rent, with only minimal bills for his phone and internet use, and no large outgoings such as a house or a car, means he's very happy with his salary. Those tuning into the video admitted they were impressed by Wong's earnings and his job, saying: 'Congrats! So happy to see you doing well!!!! Don't listen to the naysayers, make as much $ as you can and save, save, save!' Another added: 'As long as you like/love what you do and feel your compensation is fair, stick with it as long as that remains true.' This week, Chris revealed that he was handing over the casino host baton to a colleague after deciding to leave Royal Caribbean. 'On a Royal Caribbean Blog discussion forum, he posted: 'I have officially announced and decided that this will be my last ever contract as a crew member for Royal Caribbean. After a long career with this company, it is now time to move on to the next phase of my life. I am excited and nervous for what is to come.' Last month, another cruise crew member lifted the lid on what it's like to work as a member of guest services - and who the happiest employees are on a ship. Posting on Reddit, the employee revealed that their biggest pet peeve is when holidaymakers 'demand' to speak to the manager'. 'Most of these people I would be happy not to have to deal with, however what they fail to realise is that I might get in trouble if I immediately call a supervisor without trying to resolve the issue by myself first,' they explained. 'If seeing the manager is warranted, I promise you won't have to say it.' And luckily it's really pretty easy to keep cruise crew happy, according to the staff member. They said: 'Be nice. That's literally it. We deal with all sorts of entitled complainers. 'Now some, if not most, complaints are perfectly valid but if you're not an a**hole about it, we'll do everything we can. And we will appreciate you being nice to us.' But if you are looking to hit the high seas as a crew member, there's one job that's the most desirable position onboard, according to the cruise worker. They revealed that entertainers are 'by far' the happiest members of staff onboard the ship. The crew member said: 'They have the most time off and are very well paid.'


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Shop owner forced to resort to using horse and cart for deliveries after council set up controversial bus gates
A shop owner has been forced to use a horse and cart for his deliveries due to council-enforced bus gate restrictions. John Ball, owner of Cut Price Carpets in Cambridge, has been using his two-year-old horse Sybil to transport his carpets to customers over the popular Mill Road Bridge. A controversial Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) - approved last October - was introduced on the bridge in March, banning nearly all motor vehicles from using the bridge and leading to the installment of a bus gate. Any owner of an unregistered vehicle found to be crossing the bridge is slapped with a £70 fine, enforced by ANPR cameras, with more than 4,600 fines issued in its first seven weeks. Mr Ball described the new restriction of the city-centre bridge, which has divided locals and caused furious debate, as 'devastating' for his business. Cambridgeshire County Council insists the restriction had been introduced to provide a 'more enjoyable, safer place to visit'. The shopkeeper, who discovered the loophole of using the horse and cart to transport deliveries to the other side of the bridge, remarked: 'they can't fine me'. He added: 'I've been here for 29 years for a reason, because we're good at what we do and we're reasonable - we look after people. 'We've been in the same shop, serving the local community. I'd just love for them to open the bridge back up because it's destroying us little independent businesses.' Mr Ball also revealed that the new restriction on what he described as a 'main arterial road' was having detrimental impacts on other small independent businesses. Adding that the now 'dying road' had simply become a 'rat run' for taxis, who are still permitted to cross the bridge, he said: 'It's just snowballing. The taxis are using it as a cut-through and they're flying up and down there. 'Mill Road is a main arterial road. It's the main high street of Cambridge. But it's just a dying road. 'It's just getting filled up with nothing but takeaways and food-orientated shops. Little independent businesses are very few and far between.' The controversial TRO was approved last year by county councillors, closing the bridge to traffic except buses, pedestrians, cyclists, emergency services, taxis and Blue Badge holders' registered vehicles. It was imposed following consultations that found majority support for the changes, which are designed to improve the road for pedestrians and cyclists, assist the reliability of public transport and aid air quality. Some living nearby believed it will transform the bustling area, which is packed with shops, pubs and restaurants and make it more pleasant to visit, as well as cutting pollution from engines. But opponents argued it increases pollution by creating more congestion in nearby streets, while business owners have warned of catastrophic consequences from collapsing footfall. Protesters also claim a public consultation – in which 52.9 per cent of people supported the Traffic Regulation Order – was not carried out properly. Anyone found to be driving illegally through the bus gate is at risk of being issued a Penalty Charge Notice of £70, discounted to £35 if paid within 21 days. Since the introduction of the restriction, more than 100 fines per day have been issued by the council, a Freedom of Information request submitted by the Local Democracy Reporting Service uncovered earlier this month. Last week, Mr Ball joined the Friends of the Mill Road Bridge 2 campaign group who took their case to the High Court, challenging the council's traffic restriction order which started in March. Their challenge of the TRO rested upon four grounds, including that the council had failed to 'provide legally adequate reasons'. However, the council's lawyers argued the TRO had gone through a proper democratic process and therefore the bus gate was something for council members, not the High Court, to determine. Cambridgeshire County Council spent around £300,000 on a first attempt to impose the bus gate, including £72,000 on a legal challenge that it lost in court. It then immediately relaunched the plan, which was passed by councillors in October last year – prompting the judicial review from Ms Rose on ground including a failure to take into account a petition conducted by Mill Road Traders' Association. But the council went ahead and installed the infrastructure for the bus gate without waiting for the outcome, with building costs coming to another £200,000. Around 60 protesters spent several nights there in November, trying to disrupt work from taking place. In March, vandals damaged the ANPR cameras with paint. Alex Beckett, chairman of the highways and transport committee at Cambridgeshire County Council, previously defended the restriction, stating: Mill Road is the centre of a community. We want it to be a more enjoyable, safer place to visit and to encourage more people to come into the area. 'Reducing motorised through traffic and installing the bus gate will help achieve this. 'What's important is that we now move forward with developing plans for public realm improvements supporting local businesses and allowing Mill Road to thrive.' The outcome of the High Court case is not expected for some weeks.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Meet Harry and Meghan's new 'divisive' PR chief who rules with an 'iron fist' and spent years trying to smear the Royal Family - could she soon be getting up to her old tricks?
We often don't realise the extent to which royals and celebrities are run by their private behind-the-scenes staff. Not only do these public relations professionals draft statements and plan coverage on their employer's behalf, they are also usually their closest advisors.