Academic faces private prosecution over posts on X
An academic is facing a private prosecution by the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) charity over posts on social media.
Three charges have been brought by the CAA alleging that Professor David Miller used a public communications network to send messages of a menacing character, contrary to section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.
The first hearing is set to take place at Westminster Magistrates' Court on July 2, HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirmed.
The case relates to posts on X, which Mr Miller is alleged to have published in recent months.
The CAA said the first message was posted on November 8 last year in relation to a discussion on violence in Amsterdam after a football match involving an Israeli team.
He is alleged to have sent another message on March 20, saying: 'Every genuinely anti-Zionist Jew can count on being kept safe by the movement, when the time comes. Every Zionist Jew must be held accountable and de-Zionised. #DismantleZionism.'
On March 24, he is said to have posted another tweet saying: 'Protests are not enough. Listen to our brothers and sisters in Gaza. Those who are interested in ending this genocide must begin by targeting those responsible near them: the entire Zionist movement globally must live in fear of accountability until it is dismantled and its ideology eradicated. And let's be clear, there are Zionists everywhere. In every town and city. Find out where they are. #DismantleZionism.'
Mr Miller was previously found to have been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed by the University of Bristol in October 2021 after making comments criticising Israel.
He successfully claimed at an employment tribunal last year that he experienced discrimination based on his anti-Zionist belief.
The CAA describes itself as an organisation of volunteers which works to 'expose and counter antisemitism through education and zero-tolerance enforcement of the law'.
Mr Miller has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Iranian protesters wave ‘down with the USA' flags on streets of Tehran — as president joins in
Iranians waving flags with anti-American slogans have taken to the streets of the capital in the wake of the US strikes on the country's nuclear sites on Saturday. Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian, was pictured with students at an anti-US rally today in Tehran, according to the Iranian government-affiliated Mehr news agency. Pro-government supporters holding banners reading 'down with the USA' and 'We are ready for the big battle' were seen during Sunday's protests. 3 A crowd of Iranians protesting the US airstrikes on nuclear facilities in in Enghelab Square in Tehran on June 22, 2025. Photo by ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty Images 3 Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian was at the rally. AP Photo/Vahid Salemi 3 Iranians holding a flag that reads 'down with USA' in Tehran. Photo by ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty Images Other protesters held up portraits of the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has not spoken publicly since the strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
Questions From the Bomb Shelter
Some dreams do come true. At night, I dream of the rising screech of sirens across Jerusalem, of running to a bomb shelter, of thinking wildly about my grown children elsewhere in Israel dashing through dark streets for safety as missiles whoosh overhead. I dream of distant booms that I hope are interceptions and not direct hits on apartment buildings. I wake to a chorus of sirens and to the harsh clack of the army's Home Front Command app on my phone, announcing how many minutes we have to seek cover. Outside, running to the shelter, I see the red flash of rocket engines overhead and their long white trails, and I hear far-off explosions. After the all clear, I get texts from my children: 'Safe.' News flashes appear of buildings hit in other cities by Iranian missiles that evaded interception, and of the search for the wounded and dead. I do not sleep again. Until dawn, I ask questions about why this is happening: Are the reasons we have been given for war true; can we possibly trust the people who gave those reasons; how in the world will this end? Life is a warped jigsaw puzzle: The pieces of the normal and the abnormal do not fit together. The small grocery on the next street seems fully stocked; the air-conditioning works in my apartment; faucets give water. The streets have not been this quiet since the pandemic lockdowns. I take morning runs through my untouched neighborhood, with my map app set to show public bomb shelters. Sometimes a workout ends with a sprint for cover. A news site shows pictures of an apartment building in another town: The 'before' image looks like my building, a 1950s housing project; 'after' shows savaged concrete and the gaping squares of what were people's homes. Everyone I know is sleepless because of the nighttime attacks. People who do not have bomb shelters or the reinforced rooms required by regulation in newer buildings camp out with friends or family members, if they can. Leaving Israel is virtually impossible, because all flights out have been canceled. In WhatsApp groups, friends trade long lists of suggestions for dealing with stress: dance and laugh with your family, breathe slowly, don't scarf sweets, stop doomscrolling war news an hour before bedtime (who are you kidding?). I receive a text message purporting to be from the Israeli military warning that terrorists will target bomb shelters, so people should stay away from them. A news item cautions citizens to ignore such digital warfare. As a journalist, I get repeated emails from the military censor, reminding me that the location of direct hits cannot be published, lest it help the enemy aim better. Some people work from home; some are not working. Many are serving in the reserves, as they have, off and mostly on, since the other war started more than 600 days ago. The Israelis killed by missiles get less coverage, my daughter points out, than if they'd been killed in terror bombings during the Second Intifada. The dead in Tehran are only a number. The dead in Gaza—our soldiers, many more Palestinian civilians—have mostly been relegated to back pages. Mass protests demanding that Israel's government reach a deal with Hamas for the release of our hostages and the end of the war have stopped, because a missile could hit a crowd. Iran is the news. That the unfinished war in Gaza has now barely become background is, itself, a reason to begin asking questions. On June 12, media reports said a nighttime meeting of senior ministers would be held to discuss hostage-deal negotiations. Afterward, it emerged that the announced topic was a ruse, a diversion aimed at Iran. In reality, the ministers moved from the normal meeting room to a bunker, where they approved the attack. Or, I ask: Is this new conflict itself a diversion from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war in Gaza, where he has promised but cannot deliver 'absolute victory'? At 3 a.m. on June 13, sirens woke everyone in Israel. The Houthis again, I assumed. Just another single missile from Yemen that would be intercepted within 10 minutes, as has happened often over the past months. My wife and I ran for shelter, where we learned from news bulletins that Israel was bombing Iran. And yet, no missiles had been fired at Israel. The messages on the Home Front Command app, we realized once we had caught our breaths, warned only that we must be ready for Home Front Command instructions in case of an attack. This was strange, as people around me noticed. Sirens normally sound only when missiles are on their way, when danger is immediate. At a press conference that first day, the army spokesperson explained that the aim was that citizens would 'be alert and attentive' to instructions. This may be the full explanation. But trust in this government has been so strained that I consider other possibilities. I find myself wondering whether the oddly timed alert had a political origin, meant to create the sudden solidarity and support for fighting that sweeps a country when war begins. At the outset of the Iran campaign, that support appeared to materialize. A survey conducted from the third to the fifth day found that 70 percent of Israelis favored the offensive. Prominent commentators repeated and expanded on Netanyahu's explanation: that 'within a short amount of time' Iran could build nuclear weapons. 'The knife is at [our] throat,' one columnist wrote. 'Israeli intelligence has uncovered the fact that Iran has begun the process of the 'breakthrough'' to creating a bomb. I cannot dismiss this evaluation. If it's true, it's nightmarish. What if one of those warheads that hit Tel Aviv were nuclear? But, lacking our own sources of data, we journalists cannot verify or challenge this claim. Governments publish or leak intelligence for political purposes, which may not require that what is made public offers a complete or true picture of what secretive agencies have uncovered. And even when an intelligence community is convinced of its conclusions, it can be mistaken. Americans need only recall the lead-up to the Iraq War in 2003. Israeli espionage obviously penetrated Iran to an extraordinary extent, as shown by the ability to locate Iranian generals. But this doesn't mean its evaluations of Iranian intent are accurate. The U.S. assessment that Iran was not on the verge of building a bomb is at least as questionable. Regardless, the attack on Iran is under way. How long can Israel, already exhausted by the Gaza war, keep fighting on a new front? Would Netanyahu, who rejected Barack Obama's diplomatic agreement to stop Iran's nuclear effort, accept a new one? Without an accord, how long would it take Iran to rebuild, and create a nuclear weapon? Iran's air defenses have failed. Its stock of ballistic missiles did not deter Israel. For Tehran, a nuclear deterrent may have just grown all the more attractive. This danger did not end with the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, including the deep-underground Fordo facility. Arms-control experts have warned that Iran already had a significant supply of highly enriched uranium, and Tehran has now threatened to withdraw openly from the Non-Proliferation Treaty. I am turning over these questions not just because they are the unanswerable anxieties of war but because we Israelis have so many reasons to distrust the man who has led us here. Perhaps no one said it better than Benjamin Netanyahu himself, back in 2008. At that time, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was under police investigation even as he was exploring peace talks with Syria. Netanyahu challenged Olmert's motives in a television interview: 'We're talking about a prime minister who is up to his neck in investigations, and who doesn't have a public and moral mandate to decide such fateful matters for the state of Israel. There's a real concern … that he will make decisions on the basis of his personal interest in political survival and not the national interest.' The same is now true of Netanyahu, who has refused to leave office despite being indicted in three corruption cases in 2019. His trial has dragged on for five years, and the prosecution finally began cross-examining him early this month. Because of the war with Iran, though, courts are holding only urgent hearings and the trial is on hold. Since the Hamas attack of October 7, Netanyahu has resisted public pressure for a judicial inquiry into the catastrophe. Last week, his government just barely survived a coalition crisis. These conditions hardly inspire confidence in his decision to drag the country into a potentially calamitous war.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani slams US bombing of Iran nuclear sites: ‘Dark new chapter'
Anti-Israel mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is blasting the US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites as an 'unconstitutional military action. 'Donald Trump ran for president promising to end wars, not start new ones,' the Democratic Socialist said in a statement released on X late Saturday. 'Today's unconstitutional military action represents a dark, new chapter in his endless betrayals that now threaten to plunge the world deeper into chaos,' the New York City candidate wrote. 'In a city as global as ours, the impacts of war are felt deeply here at home.' 4 'Donald Trump ran for president promising to end wars, not start new ones,' candidate Zohran Mamdani said in a statement on X, blasting the bombings. Vincent Alban/UPI/Shutterstock 4 'Today's unconstitutional military action represents a dark, new chapter in his endless betrayals that now threaten to plunge the world deeper into chaos,' Mamdani said about Trump's decision. AP Mamdani also blamed the 'political establishment' for spending money on weaponry and 'endless wars' rather than on fighting poverty and promoting peace. 'For Americans middle aged and younger, this is all we have known,' said Mamdani, who is running a strong second in polls to front-runner Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary for mayor. 'We cannot accept it any longer,' the candidate said. The Cuomo campaign had no immediate comment on the US airstrikes. But city Comptroller and Democratic mayoral candidate Brad Lander also slammed the bombing. 'Trump's reckless & unconstitutional strikes against Iran are a dangerous escalation of war — and threaten countless Iranian, Israeli & American lives,' Lander wrote on X on Saturday, after President Trump's address to the nation outlining why the US launched the bombs at Iran. 4 City Comptroller and Democratic mayoral candidate Brad Lander also condemned the bombing, calling it 'reckless & unconstitutional.' William Farrington 'My thoughts are with families fearing for their safety, and the thousands of New Yorkers worrying tonight about loved ones in Iran,' Lander said. Trump defended the bombing in his speech by saying, 'Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror.' The US strikes came before Tuesday's final day of voting in the Big Apple's Democratic primary for mayor after Sunday's last day of early voting, overshadowing and potentially impacting the outcome. Stay up to date on the latest developments in the U.S. airstrike on Iran Mayor Eric Adams, who is seeking re-election on an independent ballot line, said he ordered the NYPD to 'increase its presence around religious, cultural, and diplomatic sites throughout the five boroughs' in the wake of the US attack. 'Thinking about our large Persian population here in NYC at this time,' he wrote on X on Saturday night. Mamdani's close Democratic Socialist ally, New York City Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, said Trump's bombing of Iran is 'grounds for impeachment.' 4 Trump defended the bombing, saying, 'our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror.' via REUTERS Mamdani has come under fire for his vicious bashing of Israel, which has also struck Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities in an effort to prevent Tehran from building nuke bombs. He is a staunch supporter of the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against the Jewish state, and refused to condemn the 'globalize the intifada' rallying cry — a slogan that has been denounced for allegedly stoking antisemitic violence.
