KCC deputy leader defends Reform's performance

Comments made about the performance of Reform UK at Kent County Council (KCC) are nothing more than "political gesturing", the local authority's deputy leader has said.
A number of MPs and councillors have voiced concerns after Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf resigned before returning shortly after to lead the party's Department of Government Efficiency Unit (DoGE).
Dover and Deal Labour MP Mike Tapp has said the Doge project is "already in disarray", while the leader of the Liberal Democrats at KCC, Antony Hook, described the situation as "utter chaos".
KCC deputy leader Brian Collins rejected the criticism and said the comments demonstrated why Reform had swept the May local elections.
He told BBC Radio Kent: "This is the opposition doing political gesturing.
"I understand why they're doing it, but this is one of the very reasons why Reform were voted in, because the public have had enough of this sort of nonsense."
He said the party was "very calm, we're very collected, we're focused" at county hall.
"If the opposition want to jump up and down because they haven't got anything better that they want to do with their time, let them get on with it," he added.
In the week since the Doge team attended its first meeting at KCC, Mr Yusuf resigned and returned, while Nathaniel Fried - who was said to be leading the Doge unit - also quit, citing a lack of faith in the project.
The unit's plan is to produce recommendations on how to reduce inefficiencies in spending, with the help of artificial intelligence, data analysis tools and forensic auditing techniques.
In a letter to KCC leader Linden Kemkaran published over the weekend, Mr Tapp said Reform's decisions were being driven by "populist rhetoric" rather than the interests of residents.
The party has also faced accusations that there have not been any KCC committee meetings since it took control of the authority.
Denying there has been any kind of "hold up", Mr Collins said: "We're not going to be rushed or pressured, we're going to do things properly.
"A lot of the first few weeks have obviously been setting up our committees, our cabinet positions, getting who we feel are the right people in these positions.
"It's a long process."
Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Tice denies Reform UK in chaos after Yusuf returns
Reform council cost-cutting drive in doubt
No time frame for Reform Doge review in Kent
Farage to bring 'Doge' audits to Reform-led county
Reform UK to give council Musk-style audit
Kent County Council
Refrom UK

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

28 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Majority of Utahns support spending cuts, say DOGE has been effective

WASHINGTON — A vast majority of Utah voters say they support cutting the size of the government as Congress works to approve spending cuts implemented by the Department of Government Efficiency earlier this year. Nearly 80% of Utahns say they support downsizing the government, according to a new poll conducted by HarrisX for the Deseret News. That sentiment was largely shared among those who identify themselves as Republican, with 91% saying they support compared to just 9% who said they oppose. Democratic voters were more split among themselves, as 47% said they supported cutting the size of the government compared to 53% who said the opposite, according to the poll. Since President Donald Trump was sworn into office in January, the DOGE commission has identified spending cuts officials say would save the government billions of dollars. Congress has begun the process of approving those cuts, although lawmakers — Republicans and Democrats like — are torn on whether they agree with what's on the chopping block. A majority (60%) of Utahns say DOGE has been effective at identifying spending cuts compared to just 40% who said the opposite, the poll shows. That opinion is largely split along party lines, as 80% of Republicans said DOGE was effective, with only 29% of Democrats saying the same. On the other hand, 71% of Democrats said DOGE was ineffective compared to just 20% of Republicans who agreed with that sentiment. But when it comes to DOGE cuts and slashed funding, Utah voters say they feel mostly unaffected. A majority of Utahns (67%) say they don't know anyone who has lost their job because of the DOGE cuts, according to the poll. About 12% say a close friend has lost their job, 8% say a family member and another 17% say an acquaintance lost their job due to the DOGE cuts. Roughly 4% report their job was terminated because of DOGE cuts, the poll shows. The poll was conducted between May 16-21 among 805 registered voters in Utah. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. Proposed spending cuts are already making their way through Congress, with the House approving a $9.4 billion rescissions package on Thursday targeting foreign aid as well as federal funding for organizations the Trump administration has accused of being anti-conservative. The package was opposed by all Democrats, and a handful of Republicans also opposed the package. However, it underscores a desire among Trump allies to codify the cuts identified by DOGE as 'waste, fraud, and abuse' as quickly as possible. The recent sentiments also come in contrast to Deseret News polling last month that showed Utah voters believe the federal government should spend more money in several different areas, with foreign funding a strong exception.

Newsweek

an hour ago

• Newsweek

Exclusive: Hezbollah Says Won't Join Fight After US Attacks Iran

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A spokesperson for Hezbollah told Newsweek that the Iran-aligned militant group did not have immediate plans to retaliate against Israel and the United States after President Donald Trump ordered direct U.S. strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. "Iran is a strong country capable of defending itself, logic dictates that it can confront America and Israel," a Hezbollah spokesperson said. "Hezbollah remains committed to all matters agreed upon since the ceasefire." Hezbollah signed a ceasefire with Israel last November, just over a year after the Palestinian Hamas movement launched a surprise attack against Israel, sparking a regional conflict that drew in the Iran-led Axis of Resistance coalition. Israel and Hezbollah have continued to accuse one another of violating the truce, with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) carrying out strikes in recent days against the group's leadership, special forces and military infrastructure in Lebanon. "Despite the attacks carried out by the Israeli enemy," the Hezbollah spokesperson added, "the party has remained committed to the agreement." Hezbollah had previously indicated to Newsweek that the group would not intervene directly in support of Iran after Israel launched a sweeping series of strikes against Tehran last week, setting off daily exchanges of fire between the longtime foes. Yet the Hezbollah spokesperson emphasized that Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem, who assumed the helm after Israel killed longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah last September, has "supported" Iran through his statements, and that future actions may affect the group's calculus. "Therefore, the issue remains subject to developments," the Hezbollah spokesperson said. "However, Iran certainly has its own military capabilities." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

USA Today

8 hours ago

• USA Today

Activist Mahmoud Khalil speaks out after release from ICE custody

NEWARK, NJ − Mahmoud Khalil emerged though the airport gate, fist raised and smiling to a cheering crowd, as he pushed his newborn baby's stroller with his arm around his wife. Arriving at Newark International Airport the afternoon of June 21, a day after a federal judge ordered his release from immigration detention, the 30-year-old Columbia University graduate and Palestinian activist vowed to keep up his advocacy. Standing with his family and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, he declared he wouldn't be deterred. 'Your words of support, your messages, have kept me going,' Khalil said in brief remarks. 'Still, the fight is far from over.' He planned to continue speaking out against what he called a genocide in Gaza, and American support, including from Columbia, for Israel's siege of the Palestinian territory after the 2023 Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel. Israel has denied this accusation, though some human rights observers have reached this conclusion. At the airport, Khalil approached the crowd to take a Palestinian flag from a friend, then draped it over the stroller of his son Deen, who was born 2 months ago, while Khalil was detained in Jena, Louisiana. Asked if he had a message for the Trump administration, Khalil said, 'My existence is the message. Palestinian existence is a message.' A day earlier, a federal district judge in New Jersey ordered Khalil's release after over three months in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody following his advocacy at the Ivy League campus. The order marked a blow to the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian student protests. Ocasio-Cortez said Khalil's detention by the Trump administration was solely political. "It is an affront to every American," she said. "We will continue to resist the politicization and the continued political persecution that ICE is engaged in. We welcome Mahmoud home." Why was Khalil in ICE detention? Khalil, a lawful permanent resident born in a Syrian refugee camp, was a student negotiator and spokesperson for pro-Palestinian demonstrators in spring 2024. Students called on Columbia to divest from its investments in Israel that helped propel war efforts. Israel's siege of Gaza has killed 55,700 Palestinian people, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's health ministry. The mounting death toll came after Hamas-led attacks in Israel that killed 1,200 people and took 251 others hostage, Israeli tallies show. Critics, including university administrators, accused the protesters of creating an unwelcoming environment for Jewish students. Organizers have denied accusations of antisemitism, and Khalil spoke out against antisemitism on CNN. Columbia's encampment demonstrations triggered similar protests on college campuses across the country. On March 8, federal agents detained Khalil, without a warrant, at his university-owned apartment building lobby in Manhattan. His wife Noor Abdalla, who is born in the United States and was 8 months' pregnant then, was by his side as they returned from dinner with friends. In recorded cell phone video, Abdalla repeatedly asked agents why he was being taken and what agency they represented. They gave her no responses before taking Khalil, who appeared calm in footage. His detention triggered waves of protests in New York City calling for his release. Eventually, Khalil arrived to a Louisiana ICE detention center, where he'd stay for over 3 months. During that time, his son was born and other international students were detained in the Trump administration's sweeping crackdown on immigration. Khalil's case was the first of several high-profile incidents in which pro-Palestinian student activists were detained by immigration authorities and targeted for deportation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio alleged Khalil participated in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities" that "undermine U.S. efforts to combat anti-Semitism." Rubio cited an obscure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to revoke Khalil's green card on the basis that he threatened American foreign policy interests. What did the judge rule in Khalil's case? Federal district Judge Michael Farbiarz of New Jersey ruled June 11 that Rubio had no authority to detain or deport Khalil on foreign policy grounds. Farbiarz said the government's other argument, that Khalil 'fraudulently or willfully' misrepresented material facts on his application for permanent residency, could still be used to detain him. On June 20, Farbiarz called Khalil's months-long detention in a Louisiana detention center potentially punitive. "Extraordinary circumstances" warranted Khalil's release, Farbiarz said. Among those were findings that Khalil − who has no criminal record nor has been charged with any crimes − didn't pose a flight risk or a danger to others in the community. Farbiarz, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, also raised concerns about the chilling effect his detention had on free speech, and the ability of an immigration judge to take on such issues. Justice Department lawyers didn't object to evidence presented. They also didn't present proof alleging Khalil committed violence, property destruction or incitement to violence, Farbiarz added. After the ruling, the Trump administration disputed Farbiarz's order, arguing he had no authority in immigration removal proceedings. Meanwhile, administration officials said Khalil was twice removable on foreign policy grounds − namely over accusations of antisemitism and support for the Hamas militant group, and that he misrepresented information to obtain legal status. While Farbiarz has ruled out the foreign policy argument, the court is considering information he submitted to immigration officials. Khalil's lawyers have called the administration's allegations "meritless." Khalil has a pending lawsuit in New Jersey federal court against the Trump administration. Khalil's lawyers say the Trump administration violated his constitutional rights around free speech and due process. A day after his arrival to Newark, demonstrators planned to rally in New York City in support of Khalil. Columbia didn't respond to an email request for comment. Smiling alongside his wife and son, who he'd only seen once during his detention, he looked at the crowd and vowed to continue demonstrating. "This is why I will continue to protest with every one of you," Khalil said. "Not (even) if they threaten me with detention, even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine." Contributing: Michael Karas, The Bergen Record; Michael Loria, USA TODAY.