Sterling slips ahead of Bank of England decision; Middle East in focus

19 June 2025 11:02
LONDON (Reuters) Sterling slipped versus a stronger dollar on Thursday ahead of the Bank of England's policy decision, with no change to rates the widely expected outcome, while investor sentiment remained fragile given the conflict in the Middle East.At 0618 GMT the pound was 0.24% lower at $1.339 and unchanged against the euro, which held at 85.515 pence.The dollar strengthened after the Federal Reserve held rates steady as expected on Wednesday, and amid a surge in safe haven demand as a conflict in the Middle East continues and President Donald Trump weighs US involvement.Traders are betting the BoE will follow suit in keeping rates steady on Thursday, even as the UK's economic growth is faltering and inflation cooled slightly in May.The chance of no change stands at 96%, with a tiny chance of a 25 basis point rate cut. Attention will be on the voting, after last month's surprise three-way split among policymakers.A Reuters poll last week of 60 economists found that all of them expect the BoE to keep rates at 4.25% in June and almost all forecast a quarter-point rate cut in August.A jump in the price of oil during the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict presents another problem for the central bank to grapple with, as it could keep inflation higher.The pound has slipped more than 1% since last Thursday, but it remains 7% higher against the greenback in 2025, helped by a rush away from US assets spurred by heightened trade uncertainty in light of Trump's tariffs.Also helping out is the fact that the UK is the only country to have struck a trade deal with the United States.
Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer finalised the deal at the G7 summit this week.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

UAE Moments

4 hours ago

• UAE Moments

US President Trump Extends TikTok Sale Deadline by 90 Days

In a significant move, U.S. President Donald Trump has extended the deadline for ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, to sell the popular video-sharing app's U.S. operations by 90 days. The US President posted on Social Truth, "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)." The TikTok ban took effect on January 19, one day before President Trump's inauguration. Upon taking office, President Trump gave TikTok 75 days to divest its U.S. business, but a second extension pushed the deadline to Thursday, June 19, but now the deadline is September 17. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," TikTok said in a statement. This article was previously published on saudimoments. To see the original article, click here

Middle East Eye

9 hours ago

• Middle East Eye

Maersk temporarily halts operations at Israel's Haifa port after Iran strikes

Danish shipping and logistics behemoth Maersk has temporarily halted operations at Israel's Haifa port, amid the country's escalating conflict with Iran. In a statement released on Friday, Maersk said it decided to suspend operations after 'careful analysis of threat risk reports in the context of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, specifically regarding the potential risks of calling Israeli ports and the ensuing implications for the safety of our vessel crews'. Maersk said it was in close contact with customers "impacted by this decision and are working to provide alternative transport solutions to minimise disruption". The company said it was continuing to operate at Ashdod and that it had not experienced any other issues in its other operations in the region. Israel and Iran have been locked in conflict since Israel launched unprovoked air strikes against Iran on 13 June, in what is widely being seen as an attempt to derail an Iranian nuclear deal with the US and exercise regime change in Tehran. More than 639 people have been killed in Iran, with Israel hitting residential areas and hospitals, along with strikes on military sites. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In Israel, the cities of Tel Aviv and Haifa have also incurred heavy damage following Iran's retaliatory missile strikes. Escalating tensions Mearsk has been under pressure from pro-Palestine activists to suspend all business ties with Israel, given its role in transporting weapons from the US to Israel for the war effort in Gaza. More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of Israel's war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as an act of genocide. Despite the efforts to push for Maersk to stop being involved in what critics call the "supply chain of death", the company has refused to halt operations with Israel. Maersk's decision to halt operations in Haifa came days after Bazan, Israel's largest oil refinery, stopped work in Haifa after it was hit by an Iranian-fired ballistic missile. Three workers were killed in the strike. Following escalating tensions, Maersk issued a statement on Monday, advising teams to work remotely as a precautionary measure. Haifa Port, Gautam Adani and Israel's plan for the Middle East Read More » However, Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd, which has a majority stake in Haifa Port, said operations were still moving smoothly despite the missile strike at the nearby oil refinery. Shrapnel from the missile strike was reportedly found at the port. Adani's purchase of the Haifa Port in 2023 is seen as integral to transforming it into a major international port, as part of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). IMEC aims to build a new trade passage from India to Europe, via the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Israel as a counter to China's Belt and Road Initiative. Haifa Port handles about 20 million tons of cargo annually, which makes it among the busiest ports in Israel. Adani Ports did not immediately reply to Middle East Eye's request for comment.

The National

10 hours ago

• The National

Has Europe given Iran an impossible nuclear ultimatum?

European negotiators have insisted Iran must accept that it cannot enrich uranium as part of its nuclear programme, so that peace can return to the Middle East, experts told The National. It is understood that Iran has been agreeable to limiting enrichment to 3.67 per cent, which is the standard level required for civilian nuclear reactors and was part of the previous nuclear agreement. But even this amount is unacceptable to the three European countries, Britain, France and Germany, currently holding talks with Iran in Geneva. 'The Europeans have now started insisting on zero as well, which the Iranians have said is going to be a non-starter,' said Darya Dolzikova, an expert on nuclear proliferation at the Rusi think tank. Iran has engaged in years of brinkmanship by defying international inspectors to enrich uranium to near weapons-grade level. Until the Israeli attacks of the last week, the threat of an assault on its installations seemed to have 'lacked some credibility for the Iranians'. In recent days the regime has appeared to accept the 3.67 per cent figure as a negotiating position, the same amount agreed under the 2015 JCPOA nuclear agreement. For any deal to last it will have to be signed off by US President Donald Trump who has also insisted on zero enrichment, said Richard Pater, director of Bicom, the Anglo-Israeli think tank. 'It all depends on whether 3.67 is acceptable to Trump or whether he's insisting on no enrichment whatsoever,' he said. 'But it's also this question of whether Trump will accept that [3.67 per cent] to get the big peace deal that he wants. Israel will then have no choice but to acquiesce to the American position.' Ms Dolzikova also argued that the Iranians would not agree to a deal that 'doesn't involve the United States as they are the critical players'. But Israel itself has insisted that it will not back down until Iran completely ends its nuclear programme and has made clear that any uranium enrichment on Iranian soil is something that it will not accept. Hasan Al Hasan, a nuclear expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, suggested that the 3.67 per cent figure was now redundant as 'there is no indication that Israel is in a mood to negotiate'. Having achieved near total freedom of action in the skies, Israel was likely to 'press ahead with its maximalist war objectives of eliminating Iran's nuclear and missile programmes and perhaps even regime change'. He added that Mr Trump's announcement that he would make no decision on joining the attacks - that would benefit from America's massive bunker-busting bombs - for the next two weeks was a signal for Israel to 'get the job done' in that period. But there is also a question whether within that fortnight window Israel, without US bombs, has the capability to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities. 'Israel is obviously probably more bullish right now and looking for the removal of the whole nuclear project in its entirety, but it remains to be seen whether that's in their gift,' said Ms Dolzikova. There is also a fear that if 3.67 per cent is agreed by Iran then it might in secret enrich uranium, and conduct a nuclear weaponisation programme viewing it as the only effective deterrent. 'If the regime survives this, then 3.67 per cent gives them another basis with which to start again,' said Mr Pater. 'Israel is under no illusion the Iranians given the chance, will do it all over again.'