Kerala youth held with 5 crore worth hydroponic weed at Coimbatore airport
Coimbatore: Air intelligence unit (AIU) officers with the customs department on Wednesday night seized 5.25kg of hydroponic weed (ganja) worth Rs5 crore from a passenger at the city airport and arrested a 24-year-old native of Kerala on Thursday for smuggling the same into the country from Bangkok in Thailand.
Trichy Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate on Thursday posted a message on its X handle, stating the AIU officers, in coordination with the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, nabbed Muhammad Fazil, 24, of Villiappally in Kozhikode district in Kerala, at the Coimbatore airport around 11.30pm on Wednesday with more than 5kg hydroponic ganja based on intelligence inputs from the Directorate General of Analytics and Risk Management in Delhi.
He arrived at the airport from Bangkok via Singapore by Scoot Airlines.
Officials subsequently seized the contraband and arrested Muhammad Fazil under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and the customs act. He was produced before the chief judicial magistrate court on Thursday afternoon and remanded in judicial custody.
According to police officers, hydroponics is a cultivation method that commonly uses water with added nutrients, rather than soil.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Hydroponics weed is grown indoors in a fully controlled environment. "Mostly, this drug is smuggled from Bangkok in Thailand. Two days ago, the AIU team had arrested a passenger who arrived from Bangkok via Singapore by Scoot Airlines at the Trichy airport with three kilograms of hydroponic weed.
On April 23, the AIU arrested another passenger, who travelled from Bangkok via Colombo, at Trichy airport with 9.9kg of hydroponic weed worth almost Rs10 crore. Similar hydroponic weed smuggling cases have been reported from airports located in Kerala and other states in the country," said a senior police officer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Owner's risk no excuse: Punjab and Haryana high court holds railways liable for pilferage losses
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has held the railway department liable for compensating losses due to pilferage of iron consignments even when goods were booked at "owner's risk", clarifying that this classification does not absolve railways of liability if negligence is evident. Citing sections 79, 93, and 94 of the Railways Act, the court has emphasised the duty of the railways to account for consignments once they assume control, even if loaded at private sidings. "The refusal to allow re-weighment, a right under Section 79, was deemed a serious lapse," the court has held. Justice Pankaj Jain passed the order while deciding a 34-year-old matter in the appeals filed by the Steel Authority of India Limited and Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited, challenging the dismissal of their claim petitions by the Railway claims tribunal. The case dates back to the early 1990s, when the steel companies booked consignments of pig iron from Vishakhapatnam to Goraya, Jalandhar. Though the journey was expected to take 6–8 days, the wagons remained in transit for nearly a month. Suspecting pilferage, the consignees requested re-weighment of the goods. However, the request was repeatedly denied by the railway authorities. The companies engaged an independent surveyor, who confirmed significant shortages in the delivered material. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트, 지금 시작하세요 [자세히 보기] 임플란트 더 알아보기 Undo However, the railway tribunal previously rejected their claims on technical grounds, including lack of proper authorisation to file claims and failure to establish service of statutory notices under section 106 of the Railways Act. In its detailed order released last week, Justice Jain held that the railway tribunal erred. The judge held that the regional manager legal, who filed the claim, was duly authorised under a valid board resolution. Further, the court observed that statutory notice was served and backed by affidavit, and no evidence was produced by the railways to refute it. The single bench was also of the view that the denial of re-weighment and failure to counter the surveyor's findings pointed to such negligence. Finally, the court ordered compensation for the claimants for the full extent of the losses suffered, with 7% interest per annum from the date of filing until actual payment. The cause of action arose in the early 1990s, with the case pending before the high court since 1993. MSID:: 121975080 413 |
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Notices pasted on homes of 28 fugitives directing appearance before courts, cops
Berhampur: Police in Ganjam district on Saturday served proclamation orders against 28 accused in various cases who are on the run for a long period despite warrants issued against them by courts. Police personnel pasted the notices on the gates of the residences of the offenders. As per the notices, the warrantees were asked to appear before the respective courts or before police within 30 days. If they failed to do so, steps would be taken to attach their movable and immovable properties, police said. SP (Ganjam) Suvendu Patra on Sunday said the proclamation proceedings under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) are being conducted in all police stations in order to ensure the presence of fugitives before courts. "If they fail to appear within the mentioned timeframe, they will face serious consequences, including attachment of properties," he said. "This process would expedite the speed of pending trials and increase public confidence in the criminal justice system" he said. Some years ago, police had adopted the process, which yielded good results with executing long-pending warrants. He said proclamation orders have been issued to 28 people in 11 different police stations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find the Best Help Desk Software [Explore] Help Desk Software | search Ads Search Now Undo The highest orders were issued by Gangapur police (5) followed by Bhanjanagar (4), Polasara and Buguda (three each). Most of the accused are on the run for over 10 years after committing various offences, police said. Jeebananand Jena, inspector in-charge, Bhanjangar police station, said the process has already yielded results as they arrested a 57-year-old accused on Saturday, who was on the run for 22 years. The accused was identified as Sibaram Nayak, a resident of Sana Tulasipalli, he said. A police team found he was at home when they went to put up the proclamation order and immediately arrested him. He said the accused was allegedly involved in a property offence case (receiver of stolen properties) in 2003 in Berhampur. Despite the court issuing warrants against him several times, he did not turn up, police said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Top Traffic Offences: What We See — And What We Don't
New Delhi: In popular imagination, Delhi's traffic violations play out like a well-worn reel — bikers zipping past without helmets, cars casually parked across footpaths, autos cutting through traffic, and intersections gridlocked by design and defiance. These are everyday images we associate with road indiscipline. But zoom in on the city's prosecution data until May 31, 2025, and the frame shifts. The real story of Delhi's most common offences is not just about what's obvious — it's also about what's often invisible. Improper or obstructive parking, no surprise, leads the charge. The western range has logged over 1.03 lakh violations, followed closely by the New Delhi range with 89,000-plus and 70,498 in the Central Range. From narrow residential lanes in Malviya Nagar to the buzzing commercial stretches of Punjabi Bagh, the script is familiar: too many vehicles, not enough space, and little regard for where they're left behind. It's a citywide obstacle course where cars routinely spill onto pavements, entrances, and exits — anything but a marked slot. Riding without a helmet, too, continues to dominate with around 2,45,727 violations across five ranges. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like local network access control Esseps Learn More Undo In the New Delhi range, it's not among the top five. The western range leads the chart, with 57,064 prosecutions, while the central, eastern and northern ranges have all seen above 50,000 prosecutions. Yet, despite repeated campaigns and crackdowns, the helmet remains more of an afterthought than a necessity for many riders and even more so for pillion passengers. But where things get interesting — and alarming — is just beneath this layer of visible violations. Two seemingly quiet offences are emerging just as prominently: driving without a Pollution Under Control Certificate (PUCC) and valid insurance. These aren't the headline-making, in-your-face kinds of infractions. You don't see smoke trails or flashing "No Insurance" signs on a car. But the numbers tell a sharp story. In the western and eastern ranges, over 69,000 vehicles were prosecuted without a PUCC, with this being the top offence in the eastern range. Similarly, in the southern range, with 62,379 prosecutions, PUCC violations surpassed cases of illegal parking and held the first position in the top five. This is in a city where air pollution is a seasonal crisis and vehicle emissions are a major contributor. Likewise, driving without valid insurance, often dismissed as an oversight, is widespread. In the Central Range, 38,606 prosecutions were recorded, a figure that surpasses even helmet violations in some other ranges. Driving without a licence is also growing. In all six ranges, it's one of the top five offences. 47,427 prosecutions were recorded in the western range, followed by 41,848 in the northern range. What makes the violations concerning is that they go largely unnoticed, until a traffic stop, or worse, an accident. A missing PUCC means a potentially polluting vehicle left unchecked. No insurance means no financial or legal cover in the case of a mishap. Yet, because they don't obstruct traffic or draw attention, they rarely spark the same reaction as a badly parked car. Interestingly, across all seven traffic ranges in Delhi, the top five offences remain the same: improper parking, missing PUCC, helmetless riding, lack of a driving licence, and missing insurance. The uniformity speaks volumes. It suggests not just a pattern in enforcement, but a pattern in behaviour cutting across class, region and vehicle type. From Lutyens' Delhi to neighbourhoods of the east and north, the rules people flout remain consistent. The data also challenges how we perceive road safety. Helmet drives, parking fines, and tow-away zones dominate the public narrative — and rightly so. But the real danger may lie in the quieter breaches. They may not be visible, but their impact — legal, financial, environmental — runs deep. It's about what slips past unchecked.
