logo
Inver Grove Heights man cited for damaging Easter display outside Capitol

Inver Grove Heights man cited for damaging Easter display outside Capitol

Yahoo03-04-2025

The Minnesota State Patrol says an Inver Grove Heights man damaged an Easter display outside the Capitol this week, according to a citation filed against him Thursday.
Capitol Security dispatchers could see a man on camera 'destroying' a display on the building's front lawn on Monday afternoon, the citation said. The display, which had a permit, included a wooden cross and the Ten Commandments, according to a State Patrol spokesman.
A trooper arrived as the man was walking away from the display.
He told the trooper the display 'was hate speech and didn't know damaging it was against the law.' He also said he didn't know it 'belonged to anyone and thought it was just left outside,' the trooper wrote in the citation.
The wooden cross was broken and part of the display was missing.
The trooper cited the man, 36, for misdemeanor criminal damage to property.
Woodbury attorney disbarred after being convicted of swindling client
Charges: Woodbury HS student had replica gun in backpack, ran from school
3rd person pleads guilty in $120k attempt to bribe Feeding Our Future juror
19-year-old St. Paul man ID'd as victim of fatal stabbing in Dayton's Bluff
Identical twin sister spared prison for trying to swap identity in fatal Amish buggy crash

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnesota labor union manager arrested and accused of making threats of violence toward State Capitol
Minnesota labor union manager arrested and accused of making threats of violence toward State Capitol

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

Minnesota labor union manager arrested and accused of making threats of violence toward State Capitol

Safety at top of mind at Minnesota Capitol after lawmaker shootings Safety at top of mind at Minnesota Capitol after lawmaker shootings Safety at top of mind at Minnesota Capitol after lawmaker shootings A Minnesota labor union manager has been charged after he allegedly made threats of violence toward the State Capitol. 41-year-old Jonathan Bohn, a Woodbury, Minnesota, resident, faces charges of allegedly making threats of violence with reckless disregard for risk. According to a criminal complaint filed Friday in Carver County court, Bohn sent the threatening text to a Waconia resident Wednesday night. Jonathan Bohn, 41. Carver County Sheriff's Office Court documents stated that some of the text messages said, "Today, I bought 500 bullets. I can't wait to shoot one of you motherf****** in the face," and "Excited to have my gun at the Capitol and blow somebody's f****** face off." Another text stated, "Excited to have my gun at the Capitol and blow somebody's f****** face off." Law enforcement officials say they found an unloaded firearm locked in a case in Bohn's garage while executing a search warrant of his house. The resident who received the text messages, whose identity wasn't revealed by police, told investigators he hadn't spoken with Bohn for a "considerable amount of time" due to political differences. A judge on Friday set Bohn's bail at $100,000 for cash bail and $1 million for non-cash bail. Conditions for the bail include having no contact with the man who received Bohn's text messages, staying at least half a mile from the State Capitol, surrendering any permit to carry a concealed weapon, no use or possession of firearms or dangerous weapons and not being able to leave Minnesota without permission. Bohn is the director of public affairs at the Inter Faculty Organization, a labor union that represents faculty at the seven Minnesota State universities. The union said in a written statement Friday that Bohn has been placed on administrative leave. "We are monitoring developments closely, cooperating as needed with law enforcement and will continue to keep our members informed," the union said. According to the statement, the group said it condemns political violence and threats of violence "in any form." Meanwhile, a person was arrested and is being held at Carver County Jail for allegedly sending Rep. Jim Nash a text message that officials say was "threatening in nature. The arrest comes less than a week after Minnesota House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were shot and killed in their Brooklyn Park home. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were also shot inside their home in Champlin around 90 minutes earlier but survived. As of Friday, the senator was in the hospital, and his wife has since been released. Vance Boelter is facing six federal and four state charges in the shootings. He was taken into custody Sunday night near his Sibley County home after a manhunt that lasted over 36 hours. Gov. Tim Walz on Thursday said the Minnesota Legislature should reconsider allowing people to carry firearms inside the State Capitol. Rob Doar, senior vice president of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, in a social media post said that doing so won't prevent bad actors from committing violence. Minnesota law allows open carry handguns at the Capitol with a permit to carry. contributed to this report.

Verdict against a pardoned Capitol rioter is only a partial victory for a police officer's widow
Verdict against a pardoned Capitol rioter is only a partial victory for a police officer's widow

Associated Press

time6 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Verdict against a pardoned Capitol rioter is only a partial victory for a police officer's widow

WASHINGTON (AP) — Coming to court this week, a police officer's widow wanted to prove that a man assaulted her husband during a mob's attack on the U.S. Capitol and ultimately was responsible for her husband's suicide nine days later. A jury's verdict on Friday amounted to only a partial victory for Erin Smith in a lawsuit over her husband's death. The eight-member jury held a 69-year-old chiropractor, David Walls-Kaufman, liable for assaulting Metropolitan Police Officer Jeffrey Smith inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. They will hear more trial testimony before deciding whether to award Erin Smith any monetary damages over her husband's assault. But the judge presiding over the civil trial dismissed Erin Smith's wrongful-death claim against Walls-Kaufman before jurors began deliberating. U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes said no reasonable juror could conclude that Walls-Kaufman's actions were capable of causing a traumatic brain injury leading to Smith's death. Reyes divided the trial into two stages: one on the merits of Smith's claims and another on damages. The damages phase is expected to stretch into next week. Erin Smith claimed Walls-Kaufman gave her husband a concussion as they scuffled inside the Capitol. Jeffrey Smith was driving to work for the first time after the Capitol riot when he shot and killed himself with his service weapon. His widow claims Walls-Kaufman struck her 35-year-old husband in the head with his own police baton inside the Capitol, causing psychological and physical trauma that led to his suicide. Smith had no history of mental health problems before the Jan. 6 riot, but his mood and behavior changed after suffering a concussion, according to his wife and parents. Walls-Kaufman, who lived near the Capitol, denies assaulting Smith. He says any injuries that the officer suffered on Jan. 6 occurred later in the day, when another rioter threw a pole that struck Smith around his head. Walls-Kaufman served a 60-day prison sentence after pleading guilty to a Capitol riot-related misdemeanor in January 2023, but he was pardoned in January. On his first day back in the White House, President Donald Trump pardoned, commuted prison sentences or ordered the dismissal of cases for all of the nearly 1,600 people charged in the attack. Trump's sweeping act of clemency didn't erase Smith's lawsuit against Walls-Kaufman. Erin Smith, the trial's first witness, recalled packing a lunch for her husband and kissing him as he headed off to work on Jan. 15, 2021, for the first time after the riot. 'I told him I loved him, said I would see him when he got home,' she testified. Within hours, police officers knocked on her door and informed her that her husband was dead. She was stunned to learn that he shot himself with his service weapon in his own car. 'It was the most traumatic words I've ever heard,' she recalled. 'You just don't know what to do.' Walls-Kaufman's attorney, Hughie Hunt, urged jurors to 'separate emotion' and concentrate on the facts of the case. 'This is tragic, but that doesn't place anything at the foot of my client,' Hunt said during the trial's opening statements. Smith's body camera captured video of his scuffle with Walls-Kaufman. In his testimony, Walls-Kaufman said he was overcome by 'sensory overload' and 'mass confusion' as police tried to usher the crowd out of the Capitol. 'I couldn't tell who was pushing who or from what direction,' he said. The police department medically evaluated Smith and cleared him to return to full duty before he killed himself. Hunt said there is no evidence that his client intentionally struck Smith. 'The claim rests entirely on ambiguous video footage subject to interpretation and lacks corroborating eyewitness testimony,' Hunt wrote in a court filing in the case. More than 100 law-enforcement officers were injured during the riot. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick collapsed and died a day after engaging with the rioters. A medical examiner later determined he suffered a stroke and died of natural causes. Howard Liebengood, a Capitol police officer who responded to the riot, also died by suicide after the attack. In 2022, The District of Columbia Police and Firefighters' Retirement and Relief Board determined that Smith was injured in the line-of-duty and the injury was the 'sole and direct cause of his death,' according to the lawsuit.

Should irresponsible hikers be forced to pay for their rescue? This sheriff says yes
Should irresponsible hikers be forced to pay for their rescue? This sheriff says yes

Los Angeles Times

time16 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Should irresponsible hikers be forced to pay for their rescue? This sheriff says yes

The number of rescues in the wilderness areas around Mt. St. Helens keep going up — and the actions of some of those before they call for help have drawn criticism as reckless. One man, 21, kayaked over a waterfall, suffering a spinal injury. A 54-year-old woman glissaded down Mt. St. Helens — sliding down a snow-covered slope — and suffered a head injury when she struck a rock. Each of those rescues in May, in a remote, mountainous county, required six-hour efforts. And one West Coast sheriff is now pondering sending the most egregious victims a bill. The idea would involve a new county ordinance where a person could be cited 'if they are found to be reckless or negligent in their actions where search and rescue is requested to respond,' according to the Sheriff's Office in Skamania County, the remote, sparsely populated county in Washington that is home to Mt. St. Helens. 'I need to find a creative way to deter the current behavior we are witnessing while attempting to recoup the financial burden placed on our county,' Sheriff Summer Scheyer said in a statement. 'This ordinance is still in the planning phase, but I believe it would be an added deterrent for those who take exceptional risks.' The number of search-and-rescue missions soared in May in Skamania County compared to the same month last year, the Sheriff's Office said, with a number of missions taking four to nine hours to complete the rescue. Skamania County isn't alone. In southern Utah, the Garfield County Sheriff's Office on Tuesday announced it was requiring permits for some of the most remote and challenging slot canyons, noting 'a significant increase in search and rescue operations.' Nationwide, the number of national park search-and-rescue operations is in the thousands — 3,308 in 2023 — which can entail anything from a child who is separated from their parents to a hiker who is lost in the backcountry. The idea of forcing irresponsible hikers to pay for their rescue has come up before. In New Hampshire, the state says people may be required to pay back the costs to rescue them. One way to avoid such charges is buying 'Hike Safe Cards' — $25 per person and $35 per family — that supports the state's search-and-rescue efforts. One recent rescue that gained attention involved a pair of hikers who had to be rescued after they hiked despite a forecast of rain, sleet and snow in the middle of January, went off a marked trail and feared they were hypothermic. Rescuers had to break a trail — for three-quarters of a mile in steep terrain — to get to the hikers. 'The pair were found to be inadequately prepared for the conditions that were forecasted,' the Fish and Game Department said in a news release, and neither had Hike Safe Cards. In 2013 in California, a massive search-and-rescue operation was launched in Orange County for two hikers, Nicolas Cendoya, 19, and Kyndall Jack, 18. They called for help after going on an Easter Sunday hike in Trabuco Canyon and became lost. The cellphone they used to make the call stopped working before authorities could identify their location. Cendoya was found three days later, shoeless and disoriented half a mile from their car, and Jack, the day after, in shoulder-high brush. After authorities found methamphetamine in the vehicle, which the pair had parked before the hike, some government officials called for the $160,000 rescue bill to be paid back. Cendoya pleaded guilty to one felony count of drug possession but was eligible for a drug-diversion program, which if completed successfully would mean he could have the case against him dismissed. Court records indicated the case was dismissed in 2015. A judge, however, denied the Orange County Fire Authority's request that the agency get back the $55,000 it spent on the search for the pair, saying the fire agency was not a victim of a crime and couldn't seek restitution. In response, California lawmakers changed the law to allow government officials to seek reimbursement for future rescues, with certain conditions. Signed into law in 2015, the law allows a county or city to seek reimbursement for the costs of a rescue if it required 'the use of extraordinary methods,' and 'was caused by an intentional act in knowing violation' of any law 'that resulted in a criminal conviction of that person for that act.' But a county can't collect if the person rescued can't afford to pay. The county also can't collect more than $12,000 unless the person rescued was convicted of a felony. Although Orange County did not recoup its costs, the hikers did face other legal action to hold them financially accountable. Jack was sued by a volunteer rescuer who was injured during the search, falling more than 100 feet, according to the rescuer's attorneys. The volunteer, who accused Jack of negligently putting rescuers in danger, received $100,000 as part of a legal settlement, paid from a homeowner's insurance policy held by Jack's mother. The rescuer's attorney said Cendoya also settled with the rescuer for an undisclosed amount of money. Some search-and-rescue organizations don't support the idea of charging people needing rescue. 'No one should ever be made to feel they must delay in notifying the proper authorities of a search or rescue incident out of fear of possible charges,' the Mountain Rescue Assn. says. In a position paper in 2009, the association said that most services that rescue people in the mountains in the U.S. 'are provided by teams of unpaid professional rescue mountaineers who give up their own time to participate in search and rescue activities.' 'The typical search and rescue mission is over within a matter of a few hours, and with the vast majority of the work performed by unpaid professional volunteers, the costs are generally very low,' Charley Shimanski, then the president of the Mountain Rescue Assn., said in a statement. 'It's true that teams are sometimes over-taxed, and that newcomers to the backcountry call 911 in questionable circumstances,' the Colorado Search and Rescue Assn. said. 'Yet we still don't believe charging for services is the answer. We know from experience that when people think they're going to be charged, they often delay calling, or even intentionally evade, rescuers.' Times staff writer Alex Wigglesworth contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store