Territorial ambitions of China in South China Sea & the future of rule-based Indo-Pacific
Dr. Prashant Prabhakar Deshpande has post-graduated in Economics with a Gold Medal in 1976 and was awarded a Ph.D in Social Sciences from Nagpur University in 2007.
At the third India-France-Australia trilateral focal points meeting in Delhi on 19th June 2024, the three countries have vowed to work jointly towards a free, open, inclusive, and rules-based Indo-Pacific amid China's growing muscle-flexing in the region. The three sides reportedly reviewed progress made under the three pillars of trilateral cooperation, namely:
Maritime safety and security; Marine and environmental cooperation, and; Multilateral engagement.
The meeting identified new proposals for furthering the trilateral cooperation under the framework of the Indo Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI) and the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) mechanisms.
The Ministry of External Affairs had stated in a statement that, the 3 countries have reaffirmed their commitment to advancing their shared values working together towards a free, open, inclusive, and rules-based Indo-Pacific.
The IPOI is an open, inclusive, non-treaty based, global initiative that was announced by PM Narendra Modi at the 14th East Asia Summit in November 2019 to promote collaborative efforts among like-minded nations to better manage, conserve and secure the Indo-Pacific maritime domain, while, the IORA is an inter-governmental organisation, aimed at strengthening regional cooperation.
New China rules to detain foreigners in South China Sea
China claims almost the entire South China Sea brushing aside the competing claims from several Southeast Asian nations including the Philippines, although The Hague Tribunal had concluded in 2016 that China's claims to historic rights within the 9-dash line were contrary to UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) and have no lawful effect beyond the maritime entitlements granted under the convention. The panel had also held China's activities within the Philippines' 200 nautical-mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ), such as illegal fishing and environmentally ruinous artificial island construction infringed on Philippines' sovereign rights.
Disregarding the claims of Southeast Asian nations & the international ruling, China however continues to deploy coast guard and other boats to patrol the waters and has turned several reefs into militarised artificial islands. Chinese and Philippines vessels also had a series of confrontations in the disputed areas.
Under the New Chinese coast guard rules that took effect from June 15, 2024, it can detain foreigners for trespassing in the disputed South China Sea.
The Group of Seven bloc (G7) has also criticised the incursions by China in the waterway as being dangerous, opposing China's militarisation & intimidation activities in the South China Sea.
The US Navy and others undertake voyages in the South China Sea to assert the freedom of navigation in international waters which Beijing considers as violations of its sovereignty.
In the past, China had objected to the US and other Western warships sailing through the South China Sea & Chinese and US forces having had a series of close encounters in the South China Sea.
Importance of South China Sea
South China Sea is a vital waterway through which trillions of dollars of ship-borne trade annually passes. Huge unexploited oil and gas deposits are also believed to lie under its seabed & the sea is also important as a source of fish for the growing populations. Malaysia and Brunei also have overlapping claims in some parts.
However, most recently confrontations between China and the Philippines have raised fears of a wider conflict over the sea that could involve the United States and other allies.
The flashpoints
An escalating diplomatic row and recent maritime run-ins between China and the Philippines are said to have made the highly strategic South China Sea a flashpoint. Central to the recent standoffs between the Philippines and China are two hotly contested features located inside Philippines's 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone, which China claims as its own.
China uses the so-called 9-dash line that takes in about 90% of the South China Sea to assert its claim to sovereignty over the Scarborough Shoal, a submerged reef coveted for its bountiful fish stocks, and the Second Thomas Shoal, home to a small contingent of Filipino sailors living aboard a rusty warship that Philippines intentionally grounded in 1999 to further its territorial claims.
China has deployed hundreds of coastguard vessels to patrol these areas, alarming the Philippines, rival claimants and other states operating in the South China Sea. The United States is also said to be wary of China's growing military power and territorial ambition.
Encounters between the Philippines and China in Asia's most contested waters have grown more tense and frequent over the past year as China has pressed its claims and Philippines has refused to cease its fishing and resupply activities to Filipinos at the two shoals which China considers to be illegal intrusions and has therefore tried to repel the vessels.
China's coastguard has stepped up so-called grey-zone activities such as, use of water cannon, collision, and ramming tactics, and, according to Philippines, use of a military-grade laser to try to stop the Philippines resupply and patrol missions & has also deployed an armada of fishing boats which the Philippines and allies consider militia.
China's actions have also drawn international condemnation and concern from major powers including the United States, Japan, Australia, France, and Britain.
Epilogue
Amid the rise in tensions with China, the Philippines has strengthened its partnerships with other Indo-Pacific neighbours & signed deals to increase base access, joint exercise training, and weapons transfers with the United States. Japan has also stepped up its presence in recent years by selling military equipment to the Philippines and Vietnam to improve maritime security capacity. However, to prevent China's prospective domination of a main artery of global trade, nothing less than a multilateral approach is considered necessary through an optimal combination of engagement and deterrence. Like-minded powers and China's besieged neighbours need to collectively deploy a combination of diplomatic, economic, and military countermeasures to uphold a free and open order in the world's most dynamic region. The India-France-Australia trilateral focal points meeting in Delhi therefore assumes importance in the emerging scenario.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
PM spoke to Iran President; Will he talk to US, Israel too? Asks Congress
Congress has questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's selective outreach after his phone conversation with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian amid escalating tensions in West Asia. Party MP Pramod Tiwari asked why the Prime Minister hasn't spoken to the US and Israeli leaderships, urging a balanced peace appeal and an all-party meeting. Show more Show less
Economic Times
31 minutes ago
- Economic Times
At G7, India bridged North-South divide
At the recently concluded G7 Summit , the restoration of ambassadorial ties between India and Canada marked a decisive moment in global diplomacy . This move underscores India's emergence as a stabilising power in an increasingly fractured world ties with Canada is essential for repairing and strengthening India's global standing. It signals India's commitment to bridging divides, stabilising international relations, and solidifying its role as a leader, shaper, and stabilising force on the world G7 leaders, India made its stance clear: 'Galvanise global action against terrorism and take strict action against those who promote and support it.' The message was direct, urgent, and global — not just aimed at distant conflict zones, but at the heart of international a summit dominated by headlines of Trump's abrupt departure and escalating tensions in the Israel-Iran conflict, India emerged as the voice of moral clarity. With the rise of transnational extremism and diaspora-driven threats, including the violence linked to fundamentalist elements in Canada, India's call wasn't about diplomatic gains — it was about safeguarding lives and ensuring societal harmony. The message was unambiguous: terrorism, in any form and from any geography, is a threat to all of a carefully choreographed yet unequivocal engagement, Narendra Modi met Mark Carney on the G7 sidelines, the first formal contact between PMs since the freeze in 2023. What unfolded was not a mere thaw, but a strategic of high commissioners, revival of senior-level dialogues, and renewed cooperation across critical domains — including clean energy , food security, and digital infrastructure — signalled a shared resolve to rebuild ties on firmer ground. The message was clear: differences must not derail dialogue, and diplomacy must endure even when trust has been the most forward-looking developments of this rapprochement lies in critical minerals cooperation — a domain that could define not just bilateral trade, but global technological sovereignty. India's current over-dependence on China for lithium (over 70%) and battery technology (75%) constitutes a strategic vulnerability. In contrast, Canada's rich reserves, ethical mining frameworks, and political alignment offer a viable alternative. Yet in 2023, a mere 2% of Canada's critical mineral exports reached India — a gross underutilisation of potential. According to the International Trade Centre, the latent export capacity exceeds C$589 mn in key materials like potash (C$344 mn), nickel (C$76 mn), and aluminium scrap (C$127 mn). Canada already accounts for 63% of India's potash imports — indicating not only mutual interdependence but existing trust in supply India offering duty-free access to 41 critical minerals and Canada's 2022 Critical Minerals Strategy actively seeking global partners, both sides are poised to create a mineral corridor that supports clean energy goals, enhances supply chain security, and aligns economic interests with ecological raw materials, the dialogue laid the foundation for deeper convergence in frontier technologies — from AI to digital public infrastructure and cooperation is not merely about economic opportunity; it's about safeguarding democratic digital spaces in an era of algorithmic warfare and data manipulation. India's leadership in creating India's digital public goods and advocating for ethical AI has already drawn admiration globally. At the G7, these capabilities were not only acknowledged but sought the most delicate, yet defining, element of this G7 visit for India was GoI walking a fine, but resolute line on the Canadian Sikh community : confronting radicalisation without stigmatising a community. It reaffirmed the Sikh community's invaluable role in India's identity, while unequivocally denouncing violence masquerading as a G7 guest, channelled the conscience of the 'global south', advocating for equitable access to green technologies, debt relief for developing nations, and a climate agenda that is inclusive, not prescriptive. Amid widening North-South divides, India positioned itself as a pragmatic bridge — one that understands both the aspirations of developing countries and responsibilities of global a world on the brink of fragmentation, this was a blueprint for cooperation rooted in clarity, courage, and common purpose.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Bad News for India as Donald Trump's air strikes on Iran likely to put India's Rs 334000000000 trade in trouble, PM Modi now plans to...
Prime Minister Narendra Modi New Delhi: The strikes by the United States on three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday night have raised a big concern for India as well. According to the reports, if the conflict escalates, over USD40 billion worth of trade with key regions of West Asia at risk. However, it is important to note that if India has less to lose if the war remains contained. Talking to Moneycontrol, Global Trade Research Initiative's founder Ajay Srivastava said that any disruption to shipping lanes, port access, or financial systems in this corridor would 'severely impact India's trade flows, inflate freight and insurance costs, and introduce fresh supply chain risks for Indian businesses.' The US' involvement in the conflict has raised concerns that Tehran may choose to retaliate by attacking American military bases in the West Asian region such as in Qatar. Apart from that, Iran's parliament has approved a measure to close the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, their state-run Press TV reported on June 22. Iran's parliamentary vote is not binding, and a final decision has to be taken by the Supreme National Security Council. Trade Issues The recent developments are unlikely to significantly affect New Delhi's trade with Gulf nations, which exceeded USD 220 billion in the previous fiscal year. However, rising oil prices and potential disruptions in key maritime routes like the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea could pose serious challenges for Indian shipments. It is important to note that India's bilateral trade with other West Asia countries comprising of Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, at USD 41.8 billion in FY25. Out of this, with Iran and Israel, India's trade was only $5.4 billion in the previous financial year. India is especially vulnerable to a possible Strait of Hormuz closure. 'Nearly two-thirds of its crude oil and half of its LNG imports transit this route. Any closure could send oil prices soaring, sharply inflating India's import bill, worsening inflation, and putting pressure on the country's fiscal position. Shipping insurance premiums and freight costs are also expected to surge, squeezing not only India's energy markets but also broader trade between Asia and Europe,' Srivastava said.
