People desperately trying to call family in Iran are getting mysterious robotic responses
When Ellie, a British- Iranian living in the United Kingdom, tried to call her mother in Tehran, a robotic female voice answered instead.
'Alo? Alo?' the voice said, then asked in English: 'Who is calling?' A few seconds passed.
'I can't heard you,' the voice continued, its English imperfect. 'Who you want to speak with? I'm Alyssia. Do you remember me? I think I don't know who are you.'
Ellie, 44, is one of nine Iranians living abroad — including in the U.K and U.S. — who said they have gotten strange, robotic voices when they attempted to call their loved ones in Iran since Israel launched airstrikes on the country a week ago.
They told their stories to The Associated Press on the condition they remain anonymous or that only their first names or initials be used out of fear of endangering their families.
Five experts with whom the AP shared recordings said it could be low-tech artificial intelligence, a chatbot or a pre-recorded message to which calls from abroad were diverted.
It remains unclear who is behind the operation, though four of the experts believed it was likely to be the Iranian government while the fifth saw Israel as more likely.
The messages are deeply eerie and disconcerting for Iranians in the diaspora struggling to contact their families as Israel's offensive targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites pounds Tehran and other cities. Iran has retaliated with hundreds of missiles and drones, and the government has imposed a widespread internet blackout it says is to protect the country.
That has blocked average Iranians from getting information from the outside world, and their relatives from being able to reach them.
'I don't know why they're doing this,' said Ellie, whose mother is diabetic, low on insulin and trapped on the outskirts of Tehran. She wants her mother to evacuate the city but cannot communicate that to her.
A request for comment sent to the Iranian mission to the U.N. was not immediately answered.
Most of the voices speak in English, though at least one spoke Farsi. If the caller tries to talk to it, the voice just continues with its message.
A 30-year-old women living in New York, who heard the same message Ellie did, called it 'psychological warfare.'
'Calling your mom and expecting to hear her voice and hearing an AI voice is one of the most scary things I've ever experienced,' she said. 'I can feel it in my body.'
And the messages can be bizarre. One woman living in the U.K. desperately called her mom and instead got a voice offering platitudes.
'Thank you for taking the time to listen,' it said, in a recording that she shared with the AP. 'Today, I'd like to share some thoughts with you and share a few things that might resonate in our daily lives. Life is full of unexpected surprises, and these surprises can sometimes bring joy while at other times they challenge us.'
Not all Iranians abroad encounter the robotic voice. Some said when they try to call family, the phone just rings and rings.
Colin Crowell, a former vice president for Twitter's global policy, said it appeared that Iranian phone companies were diverting the calls to a default message system that does not allow calls to be completed.
Amir Rashidi, an Iranian cybersecurity expert based in the U.S., agreed and said the recordings appeared to be a government measure to thwart hackers, though there was no hard evidence.
He said that in the first two days of Israel's campaign, mass voice and text messages were sent to Iranian phones urging the public to gear up for 'emergency conditions.' They aimed to spread panic — similar to mass calls that government opponents made into Iran during the war with Iraq in the 1980s.
The voice messages trying to calm people 'fit the pattern of the Iranian government and how in the past it handled emergency situations,' said Rashidi, the director of Texas-based Miaan, a group that reports on digital rights in the Middle East.
Mobile phones and landlines ultimately are overseen by Iran's Ministry of Information and Communications Technology. But the country's intelligence services have long been believed to be monitoring conversations.
'It would be hard for anybody else to hack. Of course, it is possible it is Israeli. But I don't think they have an incentive to do this,' said Mehdi Yahyanejad, a tech entrepreneur and internet freedom activist.
Marwa Fatafta, Berlin-based policy and advocacy director for digital rights group Access Now, suggested it could be 'a form of psychological warfare by the Israelis.' She said it fits a past pattern by Israel of using extensive direct messaging to Lebanese and Palestinians during campaigns in Gaza and against Hezbollah.
The messages, she said, appear aimed at 'tormenting' already anxious Iranians abroad.
When contacted with requests for comment, the Israeli military declined and the prime minister's office did not respond.
Ellie is one of a lucky few who found a way to reach relatives since the blackout. She knows someone who lives on the Iran-Turkey border and has two phones — one with a Turkish SIM card and one with an Iranian SIM.
He calls Ellie's mother with the Iranian phone — since people inside the country are still able to call one another — and presses it to the Turkish phone, where Ellie's on the line. The two are able to speak.
'The last time we spoke to her, we told her about the AI voice that is answering all her calls,' said Ellie. 'She was shocked. She said her phone hasn't rung at all.'
Elon Musk said he has activated his satellite internet provider Starlink in Iran, where a small number of people are believed to have the system, even though it is illegal. Authorities are urging the public to turn in neighbors with the devices as part of an ongoing spy hunt. Others have illegal satellite dishes, granting them access to international news.
M., a woman in the U.K., has been trying to reach her mother-in-law, who is immobile and lives in Tehran's northeast, which has been pummeled by Israeli bombardment throughout the week.
When she last spoke to her family in Iran, they were mulling whether she should evacuate from the city. Then the blackout was imposed, and they lost contact. Since then she has heard through a relative that the woman was in the ICU with respiratory problems.
When she calls, she gets the same bizarre message as the woman in the U.K., a lengthy mantra.
'Close your eyes and picture yourself in a place that brings you peace and happiness,' it says. 'Maybe you are walking through a serene forest, listening to the rustle of leaves and birds chirping. Or you're by the seashore, hearing the calming sound of waves crashing on the sand.'
The only feeling the message does instill in her, she said, is 'helplessness.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
12 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Remains of three Israeli hostages recovered from Gaza
The Israeli military has said it has recovered the remains of three hostages held in the Gaza Strip. The military identified the remains as those of Yonatan Samerano, 21; Ofra Keidar, 70; and Shay Levinson, 19. All three were killed during Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack into Israel that ignited the ongoing war. Advertisement The militant group is still holding 50 hostages, with less than half of them believed to be alive. The military did not provide any details about the recovery operation, and it is unclear if an air strike which killed four Palestinians was related to it. 'The campaign to return the hostages continues consistently and is happening alongside the campaign against Iran,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. Kobi Samerano said in a Facebook post that his son's remains were returned on what would have been Yonatan's 23rd birthday. Advertisement Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 people in the October 7 attack. More than half the hostages have been returned in ceasefire agreements or other deals, eight have been rescued alive and Israeli forces have recovered dozens of bodies. Relatives and supporters of Israeli hostages held by Hamas displayed photos of the captives during a protest demanding their release in Tel Aviv, Israel, on Saturday (Ohad Zwigenberg/AP) Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Four people were killed on Sunday in an air strike in the built-up Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza, according to Al-Awda Hospital, where the bodies were brought. It said another 22 people were injured while waiting for aid trucks. Palestinian witnesses and health officials say Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire on crowds seeking desperately needed food, killing hundreds of people in recent weeks. The military says it has fired warning shots at people it said approached its forces in a suspicious manner. Advertisement The Hostages Families Forum, the main organization representing families of the hostages, has repeatedly called for a deal to release the remaining captives. 'Particularly against the backdrop of current military developments and the significant achievements in Iran, we want to emphasise that bringing back the remaining 50 hostages is the key to achieving any sort of victory,' it said in a statement on Sunday. Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in return for more Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Mr Netanyahu has rejected those terms, saying Israel will continue the war until all the hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated or disarmed and sent into exile. Even then, he has said Israel will maintain lasting control over Gaza and facilitate what he refers to as the voluntary emigration of much of its population, plans the Palestinians and others view as forcible expulsion. Advertisement Separately, World Central Kitchen, the charity run by celebrity chef Jose Andres, said it had resumed the distribution of hot meals in Gaza for the first time in six weeks after shutting down because of Israel's blockade, which was loosened last month amid fears of famine.
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer has chosen to make Britain irrelevant
As American stealth bombers swept towards their targets in Iran, there was one question that no one in the White House situation room would have asked: What does Britain think of this? Donald Trump had no need to care about Britain's opinion for the simple reason that Sir Keir Starmer chose to stay out of the operation and make Britain irrelevant. No B-2 bombers took off from Diego Garcia; no request came from Washington for Britain's permission to use the Anglo-American base on the island. Nor did the Americans ask for any other form of British military support. Many of our diplomats will be heaving sighs of relief. We are in the clear, they will tell themselves. If America and Israel turn out to have failed and Iran repairs its nuclear plants in a few months before dashing to make a bomb – an unlikely but possible outcome – then Britain will be able to congratulate itself on its prescience. If the whole enterprise is a tragic error, then it pays to be irrelevant. But there is a problem: the Prime Minister is not against this US operation; on the contrary Sir Keir's statement implies that it was necessary, saying: 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' Britain was 'informed' of the military action 'by a key ally,' according to Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, though he did not say which ally or whether the information had come in advance. The world may conclude that Britain supports the American strike and deserves all the opprobrium that goes with it. You can be sure that Russia, China and Iran, itself, will draw this conclusion. The danger is that Sir Keir has chosen the worst of all worlds: by not joining the action he has made Britain irrelevant; by not opposing it he will share the risk anyway. The lesson should be carved in marble: the middle way is often the most damaging option. And if Britain is not prepared to use force alongside allies, then it would be better for our diplomats not to involve themselves in vital security issues in the Middle East. They will only be irrelevant when it matters most. Another conclusion is just as painful. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, has delivered a masterclass in how to handle Mr Trump. Against his own instincts and the wishes of his most ardent supporters, the president has just embroiled America in a war in the Middle East. The heaviest bunker-busting bombs in the world, which only the US Air Force can deliver, have smashed their way into Iran's uranium enrichment plant buried in a mountain at Fordow. At a stroke, a vital threat to the state of Israel has received the heaviest non-nuclear blow that America can deliver. Mr Netanyahu achieved this by following a simple insight: Mr Trump helps allies who help themselves. Israel started this campaign without waiting for America, demonstrating its willingness to bear the costs and risks of military action. Once he saw how Israel was fully prepared to look after itself, Mr Trump decided to intervene with decisive effect. On the eve of this week's Nato summit, Britain and every European ally should take note. The more they build up their own military capabilities and demonstrate their independent willingness to use them, the greater the chance of keeping Mr Trump in the Atlantic Alliance. In all of this, no one has miscalculated more egregiously than Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran. He did not believe that Mr Netanyahu would strike, and Israel killed Iran's entire high command with one opening blow. Khamenei did not think America would act either, judging by the obduracy of Iran's negotiating position at last-ditch talks in Geneva on Friday. He was catastrophically wrong on both counts. Now the ayatollah's entire military strategy and his nuclear programme lies in ruins around him. The long reign of this blinkered and inept 86-year-old is effectively over. Sir Keir can at least take comfort that he did not blunder on the same scale.
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
UK faces increased threat of Iranian attack
The threat of Iranian attacks in the UK could increase in the wake of the US bombing of the country's nuclear facilities, a Cabinet minister has warned. Overnight, Donald Trump deployed B-2 bombers to strike Iran's three main nuclear sites in what the US president described as a 'very successful attack'. Following the raid, countries across the world are bracing for potential retaliation, after Iran's foreign minister warned the bombings would have 'everlasting consequences'. Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, said that Iran's disruptive spying operations in the UK were 'already at a significant level'. He said that hardly a week went by without an Iranian cyber attack on the UK's infrastructure. He said: 'I think it would be naive to say that wouldn't potentially increase but again, there's a choice here for Iran. 'Do they want to continue being an agent of instability in the region and the wider world? Where has that got them? Where has it got the Iranian people? 'There is a better course of action for Iran to take here and I think they should consider that.' Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative party leader, said that Iran was 'a direct threat to the UK and had been for years'. Posting on social media platform X, she said: 'Our security services have stopped multiple Iranian terrorist plots and assassination attempts on UK soil. 'Its ballistic missiles can reach Europe. We should support any ally that seeks to damage Iran's nuclear programme and eliminate the threat posed by the terror-exporting Revolutionary Guards. 'Anti-British sentiment is almost as central to the ayatollahs' deranged ideology as their obsessive hatred of Israel and the United States. They use the term 'Little Satan' interchangeably to refer to both the UK and Israel.' Attacks on dissidents In recent months and years there have been numerous plots by Iranian linked groups targeting dissidents, and other foreign nationals in the UK. The threats have come in a variety of different forms, from attacks on individuals to alleged mass casualty assaults on Israeli linked premises. In May, police uncovered an alleged terror plot to attack Israel's embassy in London by a group of Iranian nationals. Sources told the Telegraph that the country's notorious Revolutionary Guard plotted the alleged attack to derail nuclear peace talks with the US. Sources inside the regime suggested a hardline faction within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is to blame for sanctioning an attack on the Israeli Embassy in Kensington, central London. The 'imminent' attack was allegedly foiled by MI5 and counter-terrorism police after a series of raids across the country. Four Iranians were arrested in connection with the alleged plot in what Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, described at the time as one of the 'biggest counter-state threats and counter-terrorism operations' the country had seen in recent years. Despite the warning, the four men have since been released without charge, although the investigation continues. That same month, three alleged Iranian spies appeared in court charged with targeting UK-based journalists so that 'serious violence' could be inflicted on them. Mostafa Sepahvand, 39, Farhad Javadi Manesh, 44, and Shapoor Qalehali Khani Noori, 55, all from London, are accused of targeting individual journalists working for Iran International, an independent media organisation based in London. They are charged with engaging in conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service, namely that of Iran, in carrying out UK-related activities and knew or ought to have reasonably known their conduct was likely to assist a foreign intelligence service. Following the charges, Yvette Cooper said 'Iran must be held to account for its actions'. In March last year, Iranian-British journalist Pouria Zeraati, who works for Iran International, was attacked outside his London home. Two Romanian men have been charged with wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm following an investigation by counter-terrorism police. The Iranian regime has used criminal proxies to target critics on western soil previously. Hiring individuals with no apparent link to Iran makes it harder for police to counter a potential attack. Following the attack, Mr Zeraati said he had moved abroad as he no longer felt safe living in the UK. In July last year he said that Britain's approach to the threat posed by Iran was not enough to guarantee his safety. Leading up to the attack, Iran International received repeated threats from Iran, with UK intelligence services foiling at least 15 plots to either kidnap or kill employees of the TV station. Iran International says it provides independent coverage of events in the country but the regime in Tehran has declared it a terrorist organisation and said its workers would be pursued by its security services. The Iranian chargé d'affaires in the UK, which serves as the head of its diplomatic mission, has denied any link between the Iranian regime and the attack on Zeraati. Anti-Iranian regime protesters are also potential targets and on Friday, demonstrators were attacked during an action outside the Iranian embassy. The Metropolitan Police said that seven men have been charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent, following the incident in which two men were admitted to hospital. Videos circulating on social media also show the protesters calling for an end to the Iranian regime.
