Starmer has chosen to make Britain irrelevant

As American stealth bombers swept towards their targets in Iran, there was one question that no one in the White House situation room would have asked: What does Britain think of this?
Donald Trump had no need to care about Britain's opinion for the simple reason that Sir Keir Starmer chose to stay out of the operation and make Britain irrelevant.
No B-2 bombers took off from Diego Garcia; no request came from Washington for Britain's permission to use the Anglo-American base on the island. Nor did the Americans ask for any other form of British military support.
Many of our diplomats will be heaving sighs of relief. We are in the clear, they will tell themselves. If America and Israel turn out to have failed and Iran repairs its nuclear plants in a few months before dashing to make a bomb – an unlikely but possible outcome – then Britain will be able to congratulate itself on its prescience. If the whole enterprise is a tragic error, then it pays to be irrelevant.
But there is a problem: the Prime Minister is not against this US operation; on the contrary Sir Keir's statement implies that it was necessary, saying: 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.'
Britain was 'informed' of the military action 'by a key ally,' according to Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, though he did not say which ally or whether the information had come in advance.
The world may conclude that Britain supports the American strike and deserves all the opprobrium that goes with it. You can be sure that Russia, China and Iran, itself, will draw this conclusion.
The danger is that Sir Keir has chosen the worst of all worlds: by not joining the action he has made Britain irrelevant; by not opposing it he will share the risk anyway.
The lesson should be carved in marble: the middle way is often the most damaging option. And if Britain is not prepared to use force alongside allies, then it would be better for our diplomats not to involve themselves in vital security issues in the Middle East. They will only be irrelevant when it matters most.
Another conclusion is just as painful. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, has delivered a masterclass in how to handle Mr Trump. Against his own instincts and the wishes of his most ardent supporters, the president has just embroiled America in a war in the Middle East.
The heaviest bunker-busting bombs in the world, which only the US Air Force can deliver, have smashed their way into Iran's uranium enrichment plant buried in a mountain at Fordow. At a stroke, a vital threat to the state of Israel has received the heaviest non-nuclear blow that America can deliver.
Mr Netanyahu achieved this by following a simple insight: Mr Trump helps allies who help themselves. Israel started this campaign without waiting for America, demonstrating its willingness to bear the costs and risks of military action. Once he saw how Israel was fully prepared to look after itself, Mr Trump decided to intervene with decisive effect.
On the eve of this week's Nato summit, Britain and every European ally should take note. The more they build up their own military capabilities and demonstrate their independent willingness to use them, the greater the chance of keeping Mr Trump in the Atlantic Alliance.
In all of this, no one has miscalculated more egregiously than Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran. He did not believe that Mr Netanyahu would strike, and Israel killed Iran's entire high command with one opening blow.
Khamenei did not think America would act either, judging by the obduracy of Iran's negotiating position at last-ditch talks in Geneva on Friday. He was catastrophically wrong on both counts.
Now the ayatollah's entire military strategy and his nuclear programme lies in ruins around him. The long reign of this blinkered and inept 86-year-old is effectively over.
Sir Keir can at least take comfort that he did not blunder on the same scale.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Sun

38 minutes ago

• The Sun

US might have killed any immediate threat of an Iranian nuke but here's why it may not have won the war yet

PRESIDENT Donald Trump's surprise attack on Iran's three main nuclear sites is a dramatic escalation of the Middle East crisis. By neutralising the places where it was enriching uranium to A-bomb grade, the Americans have almost certainly killed any immediate threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon. 3 3 3 But Washington has not necessarily won the war yet. Israel's extraordinary decapitation strikes on military leaders and nuclear scientists ten days ago battered the Islamic Republic but it did not back down. Even taking out Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei himself would not necessarily collapse the regime or make Iran give in. America can do vastly more harm to the Iranians than Israel, but will they back off? More importantly, could Iran's leaders survive giving in to Trump's demand they abandon any nuclear enrichment project to Washington's satisfaction? Cutting their losses by accepting Trump's demands would be wisest for the sake of 90million ordinary Iranians. Remember, Trump had ominously ordered the ten million people of the capital, Tehran, to evacuate the city for their own safety. But Iran's leaders are drenched in the cult of martyrdom. Suicide bombing was promoted by the ayatollahs' regime from the beginning. Their proxies in Lebanon blew up 242 US Marines there in 1983 with the first 'spectacular' suicide truck bomb. Watch Trump hail 'very successful' bombing on Iran's nuke bases Next month in their religious calendar is Muharram, which is when Iran's Shiites celebrate what cynical secular Westerners regard as past futile sacrifices. So making the case for cutting losses goes against the grain. Even if Khamenei and the official Iran government go for a deal with Trump, they could face a backlash from hardline fanatics. They could argue America and Israel are never going to risk a ground invasion. Trump's supporters won't accept body bags coming back from Iran as they did from Afghanistan and Iraq for years for nothing. They can sit out an air war and absorb the bombs and casualties, they hope. And they can shoot and hang any Iranians who protest. As the Revolutionary Guards controlling Iran's missiles showed immediately after the American air strikes, they can hit back hard — at least against Israel. They may be shrewd enough to avoid US targets so Trump won't retaliate against Iran, but hit Washington's allies. Israel was already in their sights and, however effective its defences, even a handful of missiles getting in paralyses a port like Haifa or the main airport, Ben Gurion Israel is losing money hand over fist, if mercifully few lives. The Iranians would be wise to find a way to calm things rather than stirring up more death and destruction. Mark Almond Let's not ignore that Britain could find itself in the line of fire. Long before the current crisis, Iranian propaganda demonised us as the Little Satan scurrying along beside the American Great Satan. So when Keir Starmer voiced the British government's support for the US and Israel's right to nullify the Iranian nuclear threat, that will have been 'proof' enough for Iran's fanatical missile controllers. Only the day before Trump's salvo of bunker busters and cruise missiles on Iran, a man was arrested for allegedly scouting the British base at Akrotiri, apparently as a target for a potential terrorist attack. Although a British passport holder, he is reported to be an ethnic Azeri, the second-biggest part of Iran's population mix. The Ayatollah himself is half-Azeri through his mother. Iran could have 'sleeper cells' of similar saboteurs waiting for the signal to go into action against Britain and other US allies — or even inside the US itself. The Iranians would be wise to find a way to calm things rather than stirring up more death and destruction. But that was true long before this war broke out.

Sky News

40 minutes ago

• Sky News

Israel-Iran live: Trump calls to 'make Iran great again' - as Tehran urges UN over 'historic test'

Donald Trump has asked why there would not be a "regime change" in Iran following US strikes, calling to "make Iran great again". Meanwhile, Iran's UN envoy says the current situation provides a "historic test" for the body. Watch and follow the latest below.

BBC News

an hour ago

• BBC News

Iran accuses US of 'waging war' under 'absurd pretext' after strikes on nuclear sites

Update: Date: 22:55 BST Title: World should thank Trump, Israeli representative at UN says Content: Following the comments from the Iranian representative at the UN Security Council, we heard from Israel's Danny Denon - who says the world should be thanking Donald Trump. "The entire world should say on record here today thank you," Danny Danon says. "Thank you to Donald Trump for acting when so many hesitated." He says that some at the UN have "denounced" the US and Israel, but queries "where were you when Iran enriched uranium far beyond the point of civilian usage, when it built a fortress beneath a mountain to prepare for our extermination?" He says that it cannot be ignored that "diplomacy was tried" but says Iran "turned negotiation into theatre" and used it as "camouflage" to buy time to build missiles and enrich uranium. Danon continues, saying that Iran negotiated agreements "it never intended to keep". "The free world gave it every chance," he says, and that the cost of inaction would have been "a death sentence". Update: Date: 22:54 BST Title: US 'waged a war under absurd pretext' - Iranian representative at UN Content: Iran's ambassador and permanent representative to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani Iran's representative to the UN Security Council has accused the US of having "waged a war" against Iran "under a fabricated and absurd pretext". Amir Saeid Iravani says Iran reserves the right "to defend itself" against "blatant US aggression" before adding that the timing, nature and scale of "Iran's proportionate response" will be decided by its armed forces. In a lengthy statement, Iravani also accuses Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of pulling America into "another costly, baseless war" and says the actions by the US and Israel are a "flagrant breach of international law". The Iranian representative says Israel has promoted the "deceitful and false narrative" his country was "on the cusp of acquiring a nuclear weapon". He continues: "The silence, double standards, and complicity of international organisations and some Western countries, including France and the UK, are equally reprehensible." Amir Saeid Iravani ends his address by calling on the council to hold the US and Israel "fully accountable". Update: Date: 22:52 BST Title: A day after strikes, Iran accuses US of 'waging war' under 'absurd pretext' Content: A satellite image shows damage at the Isfahan nuclear site after US airstrikes Welcome back to our continuing coverage of the conflict in the Middle East. It's been almost 24 hours since the United States carried out strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites - Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. On Sunday, in comments at the UN Security Council in New York, Iran accused the US of "waging war" "under an absurd pretext". At the same time, US President Donald Trump hinted at regime change in Iran - despite the US, and Israel, saying the aim of their strikes was to stop Iran getting a nuclear weapon. We'll bring you the latest developments over the course of the day, so stay with us. In the meantime, if you need a recap of the past 48 hours, you can get it in our previous page.