logo
Trump bypasses Congress and approves imminent Iran strike within hours — shockwaves across Washington

Trump bypasses Congress and approves imminent Iran strike within hours — shockwaves across Washington

Time of India2 days ago

Amid rising tensions, President Trump has reportedly approved attack plans against Iran, bypassing congressional approval and sparking widespread concern. Prompted by pressure from GOP hawks and Israeli officials, this decision has ignited criticism from lawmakers fearing an unauthorized war. While Trump awaits Tehran's response on its nuclear program, Congress is scrambling to prevent military action, urging public opposition to escalation.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Has Donald Trump already approved military action?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What are lawmakers doing to stop the strike?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
FAQs
Tensions in Washington are rising as President Trump moves closer to launching military action against Iran, surprisingly even without congressional approval.As reports circulate of a greenlit plan awaiting only Trump's final approval, lawmakers, advocacy groups, and the general public are scrambling to avert what they fear will be a catastrophic war.Rumor has it US President Donald Trump has approved the US attack plan against Iran without the consent of Congress.According to CBS News, Trump "approved attack plans on Iran Tuesday night."In response to reports that he has privately approved plans for a U.S. attack on Iran, President Donald Trump was scheduled to meet with top advisers in the White House Situation Room on Thursday morning.According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump stated to top aides that he "approved of attack plans for Iran, but was holding off on giving the final order to see if Tehran will abandon its nuclear program.""Using advanced F-22 air-to-air fighters, which flew Wednesday to a base in Britain, warships that can shoot down ballistic missiles, tanker planes to refuel aircraft in flight, and an aircraft carrier battle group, the U.S. military continued to move forces to Europe and toward the Middle East," reported the Wall Street Journal.Next week, the Trump administration is scheduled to provide senators with a classified briefing on Iran; however, the president may order a military strike before then, per a report by Common Dreams.Donald Trump, who criticized his predecessor for allowing new wars to break out on his watch, is apparently now himself planning to strike Iran. Netizens even mocked his dramatic change of stance after his old tweets resurfaced.The decision, which is prompted by pressure from Israel and warmongers, has sparked immense criticism from Congress and the public.Members of Congress who oppose war are acting quickly to garner support for legislative measures to prevent an unapproved U.S. attack on Iran, as the president is expected to make a final decision at any time.Even though new polling indicates that a majority of Americans oppose U.S. military action in Iran, only 37 members of Congress have supported anti-war resolutions that are currently before the House and Senate, according to one count, as per a report by Common Dreams.In a letter published Wednesday, the advocacy group Demand Progress urged Americans to contact their representatives and urge them to support war powers resolutions by calling 1-833-STOP-WAR.Iranian officials sharply criticized Trump's aggressive rhetoric and call for "unconditional surrender" in anticipation of a potential U.S. attack, saying on Wednesday that Iran "does NOT negotiate under duress.Not yet. According to reports, he approved the plans but will wait to see if Iran backs down on its nuclear program before making a final decision.War requires congressional approval. Lawmakers are pushing war powers resolutions to prevent an unauthorised strike, urging the public to contact Congress and oppose escalation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Can finally hug my wife, son...': What Mahmoud Khalil said after walking free from detention after 104 days; watch video
'Can finally hug my wife, son...': What Mahmoud Khalil said after walking free from detention after 104 days; watch video

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Can finally hug my wife, son...': What Mahmoud Khalil said after walking free from detention after 104 days; watch video

Mahmoud Khalil M ahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University student and outspoken pro-Palestinian activist, walked free on Friday after spending 104 days in the La Salle Detention Facility. The Syrian-born permanent US resident had been detained since March 8 following immigration charges levelled by the Trump administration, which alleged ties to Hamas. Upon his release, Khalil expressed relief and defiance, pledging to continue advocating for Palestinian rights and criticising both the US government and his former university. 'Incredible men left behind' Speaking to reporters outside the detention centre, Khalil said, "I leave some incredible men behind me, over 1,000 people behind me, in a place where they shouldn't have been in the first place." He hoped the detention facility would one day be converted into a museum, calling it a symbol of "America's racist policies against immigrants." Family reunion and first plans Khalil was denied the chance to witness the birth of his son in April, but now looks forward to spending time with his wife and child. "Just hug my wife and son," he said when asked what he planned to do first upon returning to New York. "The only time I spent with my son was a specified one-hour limit that the government had imposed on us... so that means that now I can actually hug him and Noor, my wife, without looking at the clock," Khalil added. Judge questions motives behind detention Federal Judge Michael Farbiarz, appointed by former US President Joe Biden, ordered Khalil's release after raising concerns that the Trump administration may have detained him in retaliation for his campus protests. "There was at least something to the argument that there had been an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish Mr. Khalil," said Farbiarz. "And, of course, that would be unconstitutional." He added, "He is not a danger to the community, period, full stop." Administration backlash The Department of Homeland Security strongly criticised the judge's decision. "An immigration judge, not a district judge, has the authority to decide if Mr. Khalil should be released or detained," said DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin. "On the same day an immigration judge denied Khalil bond and ordered him removed, one rogue district judge ordered him released," she added. "This is yet another example of how out-of-control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security." McLaughlin argued the Trump administration acted within legal bounds, stating, "It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card... We expect a higher court to do the same." 'No one is illegal -- no human is illegal' Khalil also criticised Columbia University for investing in what he called "the genocide of the Palestinian people," and condemned the conditions at the Jena facility. "The moment you enter this facility, your rights leave you behind," he said. "Just a different reality about this country that supposedly champions human rights and liberty." He rejected claims he was a threat, saying, "No one is illegal -- no human is illegal. Justice will prevail no matter what this administration may try." Case not over Although Khalil has been released on bail, the Trump administration is appealing the decision and seeking to deport him based on additional allegations, including inaccuracies in his residency application and undisclosed past employment. Despite this, the activist remains optimistic. His wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said, "This ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family... But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York."

The 300-year-old Anglo-Arabic School is Delhi's oldest academic institution with history in every stone
The 300-year-old Anglo-Arabic School is Delhi's oldest academic institution with history in every stone

The Hindu

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

The 300-year-old Anglo-Arabic School is Delhi's oldest academic institution with history in every stone

Just outside the walled city at the bustling Ajmeri Gate in Delhi, and across the narrow lanes of GB Road, the capital's red-light district, stands the longest running education institution in a quiet contradiction. The Anglo-Arabic Model School, North India's oldest surviving school, built in the late 1600s, rests here like a relic of forgotten grandeur. Founded by Mir Shihab-ud-Din Siddiqi, a leading military general known by his title Ghaziuddin Khan during the reign of Aurangzeb, this Mughal-era institution is not just a school. It is a symbol of Delhi's complex, layered history. Inside the gates, history breathes through every stone. Red sandstone walls, Persian arches, jharokhas, and intricately carved jalis frame courtyards where pine trees, rare in Old Delhi, sway gently, offering quiet pockets of green against the city's restless buzz. A small mosque stands at the centre, welcoming all who come to offer namaz. Beyond these walls, a different world waits, where women sit behind barred windows, and their children, some bearing names the world hesitates to acknowledge, slip quietly through the gates of the academic institution in the hope of a better future. Principal Mohd Wasim Ahmed does not flinch about the school's location. 'Some of our students come from GB Road. Their mothers are our parents first,' he says. His words carry the weight of quiet defiance. The school has produced luminaries such as Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Muslim educationist and reformist, hockey Olympian Mirza Masood, Congress politician Meem Afzal, and many others who shaped India's intellectual and political movements. The school, notably, remains grounded, not in nostalgia, but in service to whoever walks in through its centuries' old doors. Preservation is a matter of priority here. Although the school has adapted to modern needs, the management is committed to safeguarding its historic character. Over the decades, support from leaders including Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Sheila Dikshit helped maintain both infrastructure and the legacy. 'Whenever the school needed help, the government was ready to provide it,' saysbiology teacher Maqsood Ahmad, teaching here since 1992. What started as a boy's school in 1696 was changed to a co-education school as recent as in 2012. However, out of 1,500 students, only 130 are girls. 'It is not even 9%,' says the principal. But he remains optimistic. 'With these tall ceilings and Mughal architecture, we don't even need air conditioners. This space is naturally balanced and so are our students,' he says with pride. At this historic location, two worlds meet at the edges every day: the world inside, where history breathes with purpose, and the world outside, where women wait behind closed windows, trapped by society's silence. In between stands the school, not as a bystander, but as a quiet force, a place that does not judge, only teaches. In a city that so often draws lines, this school chooses to hold contradictions together.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store