'Can finally hug my wife, son...': What Mahmoud Khalil said after walking free from detention after 104 days; watch video
Mahmoud Khalil
M
ahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University student and outspoken pro-Palestinian activist, walked free on Friday after spending 104 days in the La Salle Detention Facility.
The Syrian-born permanent US resident had been detained since March 8 following immigration charges levelled by the Trump administration, which alleged ties to Hamas.
Upon his release, Khalil expressed relief and defiance, pledging to continue advocating for Palestinian rights and criticising both the US government and his former university.
'Incredible men left behind'
Speaking to reporters outside the detention centre, Khalil said, "I leave some incredible men behind me, over 1,000 people behind me, in a place where they shouldn't have been in the first place."
He hoped the detention facility would one day be converted into a museum, calling it a symbol of "America's racist policies against immigrants."
Family reunion and first plans
Khalil was denied the chance to witness the birth of his son in April, but now looks forward to spending time with his wife and child. "Just hug my wife and son," he said when asked what he planned to do first upon returning to New York.
"The only time I spent with my son was a specified one-hour limit that the government had imposed on us...
so that means that now I can actually hug him and Noor, my wife, without looking at the clock," Khalil added.
Judge questions motives behind detention
Federal Judge Michael Farbiarz, appointed by former US President Joe Biden, ordered Khalil's release after raising concerns that the Trump administration may have detained him in retaliation for his campus protests.
"There was at least something to the argument that there had been an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish Mr.
Khalil," said Farbiarz. "And, of course, that would be unconstitutional."
He added, "He is not a danger to the community, period, full stop."
Administration backlash
The Department of Homeland Security strongly criticised the judge's decision. "An immigration judge, not a district judge, has the authority to decide if Mr. Khalil should be released or detained," said DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin.
"On the same day an immigration judge denied Khalil bond and ordered him removed, one rogue district judge ordered him released," she added.
"This is yet another example of how out-of-control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security."
McLaughlin argued the Trump administration acted within legal bounds, stating, "It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card... We expect a higher court to do the same."
'No one is illegal -- no human is illegal'
Khalil also criticised Columbia University for investing in what he called "the genocide of the Palestinian people," and condemned the conditions at the Jena facility.
"The moment you enter this facility, your rights leave you behind," he said. "Just a different reality about this country that supposedly champions human rights and liberty."
He rejected claims he was a threat, saying, "No one is illegal -- no human is illegal. Justice will prevail no matter what this administration may try."
Case not over
Although Khalil has been released on bail, the Trump administration is appealing the decision and seeking to deport him based on additional allegations, including inaccuracies in his residency application and undisclosed past employment.
Despite this, the activist remains optimistic. His wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said, "This ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family... But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
How Trump targeted Harvard's foreign students and what court says now
Harvard University, known globally for its academic excellence and diverse student body, has found itself at the center of a political storm. Former U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration have repeatedly tried to restrict the university's ability to host international students — a move that directly challenges Harvard's global identity. Now, recent court rulings have provided temporary relief, but the situation remains SECURITY 'S ATTEMPT TO CUT HARVARD INTERNATIONAL STUDENT PROGRAMMEOne of the major actions came from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which tried to revoke Harvard's certification to host international students under the Student Exchange and Visitor Program. This program allows institutions to issue key visa documents (like the F-1 student visa), and without it, Harvard wouldn't be able to enroll students from responded by suing the government, claiming that DHS didn't follow proper procedures. In May, a federal judge temporarily blocked DHS's action. Then, in a more recent ruling, the judge issued a preliminary injunction, halting the move until the legal case is fully resolved — which could take months or longer. While the ruling is a win for Harvard, the judge noted that DHS still has the right to evaluate Harvard's status through regular procedures. For now, the university remains certified, but the review ENTRY BAN FOR INCOMING HARVARD STUDENTSadvertisementIn a separate action, Trump issued a presidential proclamation to stop new international students from entering the U.S. if they planned to attend Harvard. The administration argued that allowing these students in was not in the country's quickly challenged this in court, arguing that targeting students bound for one specific school didn't meet the legal standard of banning a "class of aliens." The same judge stepped in again to pause this entry ban — with no end date set yet. Harvard is now waiting for the judge to make a longer-term decision on this linked his efforts to concerns about antisemitism on Harvard's campus, especially during pro-Palestinian protests. But Harvard's leadership has insisted they're already working to address these issues and won't bow to political VISA SCRUTINY AND DISCRIMINATION CONCERNSIn another move, the Trump administration ordered US embassies and consulates to inspect the social media accounts of anyone applying for a visa to study or work at Harvard. The idea was to screen for content that could be seen as anti-American or after, the State Department expanded this to include all student visa applicants across the country, not just those going to Harvard. Visa applicants were told to make their social media accounts public, raising concerns about privacy and were also told to give priority to schools where international students make up less than 15% of the student body. Since Harvard and other Ivy League schools have higher percentages of foreign students, this effectively places them at a IT MATTERS?International students are a major part of Harvard's community — making up about 26% of the total student population. In certain programs, like public policy, business, and law, that number is even say the Trump administration's actions are part of a broader effort to pressure elite universities into changing campus policies related to protests, admissions, and academic hiring. Supporters argue that the government is simply holding institutions accountable. Either way, Harvard believes it's being unfairly targeted, and the courts are now playing a key role in deciding what comes next.(With AP inputs)Tune InMust Watch
India.com
36 minutes ago
- India.com
Iran Israel war: Who are favouring Israel... which countries are supporting Iran... Know details here
Iran Israel war: Who are s favouring Israel... which countries are supporting Iran... Know details here Iran-Israel War: A fierce war has been going on between Iran and Israel for the last several days, hundreds of people have lost their lives in this war, many military bases have been completely destroyed. Apart from this, displacement has also been seen on a large scale. Meanwhile, the question is which countries are supporting Iran, and which countries are standing with Israel at this time? Which countries are with Iran? Iran's biggest dilemma at this time is that many countries are supporting it, but it is not necessary that they will come forward to help it when needed. The biggest example of this is many Muslim countries that are strongly opposing Israel's attack, but it seems difficult to say whether they will jump into the battlefield if needed. Among the Muslim countries, countries like Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon and Iraq are seen standing with Iran. A big name in this is Pakistan , which is a nuclear-rich country. Pakistan is currently trying its best to get 21 Muslim countries to stand with Iran by showing solidarity. The big thing is that at this time countries like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Turkey, Somalia, Libya and Algeria have condemned the Israeli attack. Who are supporting Israel Among these nations are prominent players such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Norway, Austria, Germany, India, Canada, Poland, Spain, and even the European Union as a collective entity. The majority of these countries have affirmed their backing of Israel's legitimate right to self-defense, particularly in the face of challenges presented by groups like Hamas.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Spy chief flip-flop? After Trump's 2nd rebuke over Iran intel, Tulsi Gabbard shifts tone
File photo of Tulsi Gabbard and US President Donald Trump A rare and public fracture has emerged within the highest levels of the US national security establishment, as director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Saturday revised her stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions, hours after being directly contradicted by President Donald Trump. In a striking turn, Gabbard posted on X that her earlier testimony to Congress, where she said that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, had been taken "out of context." She acknowledged that US intelligence now believes Iran could have a nuclear weapon "within weeks to months" if it decides to finalise assembly. "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," Gabbard wrote. "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." Her statement came after a sharp rebuke from President Trump, who told reporters Friday, "She is wrong," in response to her previous assertion that Iran is not actively building a nuclear weapon. The president had earlier dismissed her analysis outright, saying, "I don't care what she says," during a press interaction earlier in the week. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The disagreement comes at a particularly sensitive moment, as the White House weighs its strategic posture in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict. Trump's public alignment with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long warned of Iran's nuclear capabilities, further highlights the rift within the administration. Despite the public back-and-forth, officials within the administration have attempted to downplay the tension. They emphasised that uranium enrichment by Iran does bring it closer to a weapons threshold, even if the final steps toward weaponisation have not been confirmed. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the intelligence community's assessment has not undergone a fundamental change. According to the source, spy agencies still believe that Iran would need up to three years to develop a deliverable nuclear warhead capable of striking a target.
