What could Albanese do to improve productivity? Here is a short, non-exhaustive list

In his address last week at the National Press Club, the prime minister announced a 'productivity roundtable' in concert with the Productivity Commission's latest inquiry into the issue. I won't be at the round table, but I do have a few ideas.
First off, remember that productivity is the amount you produce with the hours and equipment you have. Work better with what you have or (usually) get better equipment to do your work faster, and productivity increases.
It is not about reducing the cost of producing things. Getting paid $10 less an hour to do the same amount of work does not increase productivity even if your employer is more profitable.
Unfortunately, productivity is often confused with profit and so business groups argue the key is lower company tax. They claim this will increase investment in things that increase productivity (such as new equipment or new buildings and structures).
The evidence, though, is pretty nonexistent.
The massive 2017 Trump company tax cuts, for example, which cut the federal US company tax rate from as high as 35% to a flat rate of 21% did bugger all to spur investment:
If the graph does not display click here
Hopefully the Productivity Commission will heed the advice of the current productivity commissioner, Danielle Wood, who in 2018, wrote that cutting the company tax rate would 'see national incomes go backwards for six years'.
And income is really what productivity is about – specifically workers' income and their living standards.
In theory, the real value of how much you earn an hour should rise in line with productivity. In the 1990s this mostly happened, but from 2000 onwards workers have missed out:
If the graph does not display click here
So, when worrying about productivity, we must remember to ask who benefits.
But what could the government do to improve productivity? Here is a short, non-exhaustive list.
This year, the government will pay about $10bn in diesel fuel rebates to mining and transport companies and the agriculture sector. By 2028-29 it will be $13bn. Despite growing almost as fast as the NDIS, we never hear the government talk about needing to rein in the expense:
If the graph does not display click here
But the fuel tax credit not only encourages use of fossil fuels, it creates a disincentive to investment in more efficient, and productive new vehicles – such as electric trucks.
Research and development is vital to produce new equipment and technology (such as electric trucks). But the Australian government spends much less on R&D than most other OECD governments:
If the graph does not display click here
The government in April extended the $20,000 instant asset write-off for small business. This was purely a political rather than economic decision. Rather than encourage investment in productivity enhancing equipment, it is mostly a tax rort to buy big utes.
How do we know this? Well, last week the AFR's wealth reporter, in a column about avoiding paying tax, described the instant asset write-off as 'a favourite perk of small businesses and sole traders'. They ain't lying.
What else is a bad productivity investment? Residential land. It adds bugger all. But Australians devote far too much capital to property – almost 2.5 times that of the US:
If the graph does not display click here
Our tax system encourages this with the 50% capital gains tax discount and negative gearing, while also reducing housing affordability.
The Parliamentary Budget Office estimated that removing the tax discount and negative gearing on investment properties would raise about $13.35bn in 2025-26.
Dental health hurts the economy and reduces productivity because workers avoid going to the dentist because of the cost and end up with chronic issues that reduce output. A public system would be much more productive because it would massively reduce the cost hurdle for workers.
The PBO estimated that putting dental into Medicare would cost $13.7bn. Rather conveniently for us, that is essentially the same as removing the CGT discount and negative gearing.
By the same token, we know health systems that are dependent on private health insurance, such as in the US, are unproductive because the resources devoted to them deliver worse outcomes than public health:
If the graph does not display click here
Australia's health system is generally well regarded, but a recent report noted that we faired quite poorly when it came to access to care.
Private health insurance is not a productive industry – consider the hours and expense devoted to marketing that yields no extra benefit.
The same goes for private schools and the fees people pay fees. A 2022 study found that private education does not improve a student's academic performance. More resources devoted to no better outcomes is the essence of poor productivity.
Currently both are exempt from GST, which effectively incentivises people to spend money on them (as does allowing donations to build structures in private schools to be tax deductible).
Including both within the GST would deliver revenue that could go to improving productive public schools and hospitals, while repairing the shrinking tax base of the GST.
Best of all, because richer households spend more of their income on both private school and private health insurance, the tax would actually be progressive.
If the graph does not display click here
Controversial? Of course. Which is why a government would also want to announce something huge – like say dental in Medicare.
Productivity is an ongoing issue, but the key is to always think about who benefits from changes, and that the solutions are not about increasing profits or offshoring labour or reducing workers' pay, but should always be about making people's lives better.
Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

South Wales Guardian

33 minutes ago

• South Wales Guardian

David Lammy arrives in Geneva to meet Iran's foreign minister for peace push

The Foreign Secretary is meeting Abbas Araghchi on Friday alongside his counterparts from France, Germany and the EU as he seeks to negotiate a settlement before US President Donald Trump decides on whether to take military action against Tehran. In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon. Meeting with @SecRubio and @SteveWitkoff in the White House today, we discussed how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict. A window now exists within the next two… — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 19, 2025 Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no-one.' Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said on Friday morning the White House had provided a 'very clear timescale now' for the UK and its allies as they push for de-escalation in the Middle East. She also told Times Radio: 'There is this two-week window where the US is offering diplomatic talks. And my counterpart, David Lammy, is over in Geneva today with leading European figures meeting with the Iranian foreign minister. 'We appreciate the seriousness of the situation, but we are hopeful that we will be able to achieve de-escalation and a diplomatic solution. And all of our efforts continue towards that end.' Israeli air strikes reached into the city of Rasht on the Caspian Sea early on Friday, Iranian media reported. Since the conflict erupted last week, at least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Meanwhile, at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.

Scottish Sun

40 minutes ago

• Scottish Sun

Ex-Celtic star on ‘weird' White House meeting with Donald Trump as he talked Iran and trans athletes

He replied to one of the President's questions but was called 'too nice' AWKWARD MOMENT Ex-Celtic star on 'weird' White House meeting with Donald Trump as he talked Iran and trans athletes Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) YOU'VE surely seen it by now - the cringe worthy, awkward and frankly strange video of Donald Trump meeting the stars of Juventus at the White House. In amongst the players - who looked a mixture of nervous, stunned or disgusted - was a former Celtic star who has now opened up on the "weird" Oval Office encounter. Sign up for the Celtic newsletter Sign up 1 Donald Trump hosted the Juventus squad at the Oval Office The Serie A giants were granted the opportunity to visit the President in Washington DC. But it descended into a bit of a farce as the squad were forced to listen to Mr Trump talk about the serious escalation in relations with Iran in front of them, as well as being asked for their opinions on trans athletes in sport. Mr Trump said at one point: "Could a woman make your team, fellas? "Tell me." After a few strange and anxious looks, the only one to offer a reply was former Celtic winger Timo Weah. He said "Yeah" before the president disregarded his response and replied "you're being nice." Mr Trump then turned to some senior Juve officials and asked: "What do you think, you think a woman could make the team? "General managers, what do you think?" One responded by saying: "We have a very good women's team." Mr Trump said: "You do have? Celtic transfer special - Nygren in and Kyogo to return "But they should be playing with women. "It's one of those things right. "They're very diplomatic." The President then asked where the two American players in the squad were - Weah and Weston McKennie - before shaking their hands and calling them "the best players on the field." Speaking after the bizarre incident, Weah, who played for Celtic on loan in the 2018-19 season, said: "It was weird. I was caught by surprise, honestly, when he started talking politics, with Iran and everything. "I was kind of like, I just want to play football... "They just told us that we have to go, and I had no choice but to go. "So I guess it was a cool experience, obviously being in the White House as a first time, it's always wonderful. "But I'm not one for the politics, so it wasn't that exciting." Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Major update after British couple faced being deported from Australia over devastating diagnosis

A British couple who have spent nearly a decade in Australia have been granted permanent residency, avoiding deportation in a last-minute decision by the federal government. Rob O'Leary and Jessica Mathers, who met while working in Sydney in 2017, were concerned they might be forced to return to the UK due to visa issues linked to Jessica's medical condition. But on Thursday, they took to social media to share their visas were approved: 'We are proud to announce we are Australia's newest permanent residents!' 'This morning, we received the life-changing news we've been hoping for, our visa has been granted!' The couple's immigration struggle had started in 2020 after Ms Mathers was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). The condition is a chronic and degenerative disease which affects the central nervous system, disrupting the brain's ability to communicate with the body. Ms Mathers received treatment in Australia under the Reciprocal Health Care Arrangement with the UK, which gives British citizens access to some Medicare services. When the couple applied for permanent residency, officials rejected the application and cited her MS diagnosis. The potential future cost of Ms Mathers' condition to the Australian economy formed the basis for the refusal. After they lost their appeal to overturn the decision in 2023, legal advice suggested the couple's case had little chance of success without direct ministerial involvement. The couple then decided to launch a public campaign to stay in Australia. Their story struck a chord with thousands of supporters, and a petition calling on the government to intervene attracted over 27,000 signatures. With their visas now secured, the pair have credited local Wentworth MP Allegra Spender for her advocacy behind the scenes. 'She shared that the Minister for Immigration, Tony Burke, personally contacted her to confirm the decision!' they said on Facebook, thanking the politician for her support. The pair said the decision has finally allowed them to turn the page after nearly five years of uncertainty and fighting to remain in Australia. 'Rob has proudly called Australia home for nearly 10 years, and Jess for 8,' they said. 'We're so grateful that our contributions have been recognised, and that we can finally move forward with clarity and security.' The prolonged visa battle meant the couple had to put their life on pause as they faced the threat of being deported at any moment. 'There are so many things we've put on hold, just in case we had to leave,' they said. 'But now, with this door wide open, we feel more focused and excited than ever to build our future in the country we love.' They also shared that their families back in the UK were overjoyed by the news and are already planning visits to celebrate with them in person. Now on holiday to mark their eighth anniversary as a couple, Rob and Jess said they plan to host a special celebration with family and friends to mark the milestone. A spokesperson for the Department of Home Affairs told Daily Mail Australia they do not comment on individual cases for privacy reasons. 'All non-citizens who wish to enter or remain in Australia must satisfy the requirements of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) and Migration Regulations 1994, including identity, health, security and character requirements,' they said.