Court Overturns Biden's Car Dealer Scam Protections — 3 Red Flags To Watch For
Buying a car can be a hassle. Not only do you have to spend time shopping around for the best deal within your budget, but you also have to ensure you're not being swindled in the process. Until recently, a proposed rule aimed to shield consumers from car-buying scams and deceptive practices by car dealers.
Learn More:
Try This:
Under President Joe Biden's administration, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) introduced the Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) rule. It was designed to protect consumers from deceptive car dealer practices and junk fees while benefiting honest dealers. Here are the rule's four basic principles, according to the FTC:
Prohibits misrepresentations about material information: Deceptive claims about financing, pricing or add-ons are not allowed.
Requires car dealers to disclose the actual offering price: Consumers have a right to know the drive-off-the-lot price before visiting the dealership and throughout the buying process, excluding any required government charges.
Makes it illegal for car dealerships to charge consumers for unnecessary add-ons: Dealers cannot charge extra for add-ons that do not benefit the consumer.
Requires car dealers to obtain consumers' explicit, informed consent before charging them: This provision ensures there are no surprise fees or hidden charges. Dealers must receive a clear 'yes' from the buyer before applying any charges.
However, a recent court ruling overturned CARS, which will impact the way we purchase cars.
According to Troutman Pepper Locke, on Jan. 27, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion vacating the FTC's CARS Rule after two major automobile trade associations, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) and the Texas Automobile Dealers Association (TADA), filed petitions.
Discover More:
NADA and TADA challenged the rule's legality, arguing that the FTC violated its regulations by failing to issue an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) before introducing the rule. An ANPRM is a preliminary notice stating that a government agency is considering regulatory action. Generally, agencies must issue an ANPRM before developing a new rule.
The trade associations also argued that the FTC conducted a rushed and inadequate cost-benefit analysis before finalizing the rule.
'Monday's (Jan. 27, 2025) decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on NADA's and TADA's legal challenge is a victory for the rule of law and a great outcome for consumers,' stated a recent NADA press release.
NADA and TADA celebrated the court's decision, claiming the rule would have added significant time and undue burden to both consumers and dealers. However, without the rule, consumers may continue to face deceptive practices and junk fees from dishonest dealers. Here's what to watch for.
Now that this key consumer protection rule has been struck down, here are three red flags to be aware of when shopping for your next car:
If you're in the car-buying process, question every fee listed. An honest dealership should be able to clearly explain all charges and why they are required. If they can't, consider taking your business elsewhere to avoid overpaying.
If you see an advertisement for a vehicle at a significantly lower price than the market rate, be cautious. For example, if a car typically sells for $35,000 but is advertised for $25,000, there may be hidden fees or conditions. Shop around at multiple dealerships to ensure you're getting a fair and honest deal.
If a dealer promotes financing terms with interest rates significantly lower than the average car loan, proceed with caution. They may not be disclosing all the terms upfront. Consider securing financing through your bank or credit union instead of relying on dealership offers.
With the CARS Rule overturned, it's more important than ever for consumers to stay informed and vigilant during the car-buying process.
More From GOBankingRates
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Court Overturns Biden's Car Dealer Scam Protections — 3 Red Flags To Watch For
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Elon Musk's DOGE Wouldn't Have Worked Even If It Had Worked
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: Elon Musk listens as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump addresses a ... More House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill on November 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. As is tradition with incoming presidents, Trump is traveling to Washington, DC to meet with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House as well as meet with Republican congressmen on Capitol Hill. (Photo by) It's easy to forget that individual saving in no way shrinks consumption. Short of placing money saved into a coffee can, to save is to shift consumptive ability to someone else. What's true about individual saving is true about government savings. No act of parsimony shrinks the size of government either. That's why Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) wouldn't have worked even if it had worked. Short of the savings being placed in a much bigger coffee can, government spending cuts born of efficiency, headcount reduction, mandate reduction, or all three would have just freed up money for Congress to spend in new ways. In government as with individual, what's not spent is shifted to other existing priorities, or much worse, all new ones. It's the new spending initiatives that are the most perilous. Most start out small, and this includes Medicare. It's so easy to forget that it began as a $3 billion program in the 1960s, but is expected to pass $1 trillion in the coming years. Which speaks to the danger of spending cuts. Talk about "regime uncertainty." Unfortunate and economy-sapping as much government spending is today, the good news is that it's a known. In other words, the myriad ways that Congress politicizes the allocation of precious resources is already priced or factored into our day-to-day existence. That's not so with new initiatives. Who knows what Congress will dream up, and who knows how what Congress will dream up will end up? To see the peril of this, ask yourself if Congress would have had the votes to pass Medicare if it was known that sixty years later it would yet again be a nearly $1 trillion annual program today. That's why without excusing most federal outlays for even a second, when it comes to government the devil you know is better than the unknown. Which is why it's better to let Congress fight over what's known and priced, as opposed to freeing it to design all new programs and initiatives from the proverbial studs. They could end up much bigger than they presently are. Logically so. To which some will reply that what's been written doesn't, or wouldn't have applied to DOGE since any savings wouldn't free up money as much as the savings would reduce government borrowing. More realistically, it would just free up Treasury to borrow $2 trillion more in the future. With our federal government, no act of not borrowing subtracts from borrowing. It's all worth keeping in mind as conservatives in particular lament the failure of the latest gallant, but surely quixotic attempt to shrink the size and cost of government. These initiatives never work simply because in government as with individuals, money saved is never money that's not spent.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Omnicom Group Inc.'s (OMC) $13 Billion Deal with IPG Under Investigation Over Political Bias Concerns
Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC) is one of the . Back in December 2024, Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC) announced its plan to acquire The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., which is a leader in the advertising and marketing services sector. The planned merger is valued at over $13 billion through an all-stock transaction, possibly making the merged entity one of the largest advertising groups globally with annual revenue exceeding $25 billion. Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC) continues to be considered one of the best advertising agency stocks to buy right now. However, on June 12, 2025, it was reported that the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will review the merged entity of Omnicom Group and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (NYSE:IPG), and may restrict it from withholding ad placements on media platforms for political purposes. This move is attributed to corporate America's political biases, which fuel concerns about fairness and competition in the digital market. Thus, this step may result in a delay of the M&A process for Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC). Based in New York City, OMC is a global media, marketing, and corporate communications holding company. Its main segments include advertising, customer relationship management, public relations, and specialty services. While we acknowledge the potential of OMC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Undervalued Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Now and 10 Low Risk High Reward Stocks Set to Triple by 2030. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watchdog finds ‘rampant abuse' of remote work among federal employees during Biden administration
A U.S. government watchdog found 'rampant abuse' of work-from-home policies by federal workers, according to a new report released on Friday. The Inspector General of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which oversees the federal workforce, found 'compliance failures and weak internal oversight' as the root cause of the problem. The report focused on procedures that allowed employees to work remotely, rather than whether they were effectively performing their jobs. The report sampled badging data, timesheet, and remote-work agreements of dozens of federal employees in 2024, during President Joe Biden's administration, following a 2023 request from Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, who took issue with telework policies. 'Under the previous administration, OPMʼs telework and remote work policies were mismanaged and oversight was virtually nonexistent,' OPM Acting Director Chuck Ezell said in a statement. 'That era of telework abuse is over,' Ezell declared. 'At President Trumpʼs direction, OPM has restored in-person operations to ensure federal employees are working for the taxpayers.' On the first day of his second term, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies and departments to 'take all necessary steps to terminate remote work arrangements' and require employees to return to the office on a full-time basis. Federal employees were required to return on March 3; therefore, the findings and recommendations of the OPM report, which aimed to develop written procedures detailing internal controls concerning remote work, are now considered closed, according to the executive summary. OPM is the chief human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the federal government's 2.8 million employees. President Trump has claimed that many federal workers took on second jobs while still being paid by the federal government, or were not fulfilling their duties when working remotely. There was a dramatic increase in working from home during the Covid-19 pandemic in the first Trump administration. Based on a small sample of timesheets, the report found that 58.1 percent of the sampled employees failed to meet the minimum requirements for in-office work in 2024. According to OPM's inspector general, three in ten (29.7%) telework agreements had lapsed, 21 percent of those sampled had discrepancies in their paperwork, and 15 percent did not have any approved agreements on file. The report did not investigate why this was the case, but suggested that possible reasons included 'weak or missing management controls,' 'negligence or carelessness,' and 'intentional fraud or abuse.' Under the order signed by President Trump mandating a return to in-office work, limited exemptions are allowed as determined by departmental heads. Similarly, new internal controls and compliance reviews have been set for employees who continue to telework. When workers were summoned back into their offices five days per week in March, many were met with less-than-desirable conditions, from cramped workspaces to dirty bathrooms. In addition to the return to the office, the Trump administration also sought to cut costs by reducing space and staff. Multiple federal employees across various agencies and departments told news outlets at the time that they found themselves working elbow-to-elbow as staff consolidated into smaller workspaces. Understaffed cleaning crews are reportedly struggling to keep up with the demand for tidy spaces, resulting in dirty bathrooms with no paper towels. Some staff were asked to bring their own toilet paper or help out by taking their trash home, a federal employee told USA Today.
