New report reveals why cities are rushing to replace thousands of streetlights: 'Accelerating the adoption'
A new report shows that 70% of cities in Southeast Asia have installed solar streetlights.
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations Energy Report 2024 notes that this saves money and supports clean energy, as TechBullion reported. It can also prevent crime, make roads safer, and boost nighttime economic activity.
Rising and volatile dirty energy prices affect electricity costs, and these 10 countries are working toward energy security and meeting carbon pollution reduction commitments.
The streetlights can have an especially profound impact in large cities such as Jakarta, Manila, and Bangkok. Ho Chi Minh City and Kuala Lumpur have also benefited.
"By using solar energy, cities no longer need grid power, reducing streetlight costs by 60-70%," TechBullion stated, pointing out that ASEAN said streetlights and other public lamps make up 20% to 30% of urban electricity demand.
Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines have banked millions of dollars per year because of "large-scale solar streetlight projects," allowing more money to be spent on health care, education, and transportation infrastructure, per the outlet.
One bonus is that the solar lights feature sensors that track movement to facilitate brightness adjustments and optimize efficiency. Another is that reducing light pollution — which has been increasing and affects 83% of the world's population — helps people sleep better and keeps ecosystems intact by protecting trees, preventing insect deaths, and making bird migration safer.
TechBullion said that the solar capacity of ASEAN has doubled over five years, per the International Renewable Energy Agency, and the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation has set a goal for the countries to use 23% renewable energy this year. Thailand, Indonesia, and Cambodia are "actively promot[ing]" these solar streetlights as part of the movement.
Many ASEAN countries experience extreme weather events that knock out power. Aging infrastructure and growing populations that contribute to energy shortages aren't helping.
But subsidies, tax incentives, and public-private partnerships are. "These fiscal policies have accelerated the adoption of solar streetlights, making them an economically viable solution for cities," TechBullion reported.
Do you think EVs will dominate our roads in 15 years?
No way
Absolutely yes
Only in some areas
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
How And Why The Future Of Geopolitics Is Playing Out In Southeast Asia
For Malaysia, 2025 was supposed to be the year it demonstrated it could lead not just at home but across one of the world's most diverse and diplomatically fragile regions. As chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), it had the rotating responsibility of setting the agenda, shaping regional priorities and projecting leadership in a moment of rising global uncertainty. It was an opportunity Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim appeared to embrace. When I met him last year, he spoke of regional leadership as both duty and opportunity. Speaking in Vientiane at the ASEAN Summit late last year, he laid out a vision centered on digital transformation, economic resilience and collective reinvention. The theme for the year, 'inclusivity and sustainability,' signaled a desire to lead with both principle and pragmatism. Now, six months into the chairmanship, as the summits settle into memory and the press statements fade from view, a more complex story is emerging. Malaysia's leadership of ASEAN has produced meaningful economic momentum but also exposed the structural limitations of the organization itself. The challenge for Anwar was not only steering a multilateral ship through stormy waters but doing so while ASEAN's engine showed signs of stalling. On the economic front, Malaysia's chairmanship has been one of the most active in years. Under Anwar's leadership, ASEAN prioritized the long-delayed Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA), a sweeping initiative to create harmonized rules around e-commerce, digital payments, cybersecurity and data governance. DEFA had been under negotiation for years but Malaysia made it a political priority, pushing through a shared roadmap and narrowing gaps on standards. This approach aligns with Joseph Nye's conception of soft power leadership, where values, attraction and institutional influence are used rather than coercion or capital to shape preferences. In a region of contrasting regimes—democratic, authoritarian and hybrid—Malaysia acted as an agenda-setter through persuasion, embedding liberal economic coordination as a regional value. DEFA also illustrated what liberal institutionalism calls functional spillover. By integrating economies through digital infrastructure, Malaysia aimed to generate momentum that could extend into greater political cohesion. With U.S. and China competition accelerating and global trade patterns shifting, ASEAN's digital integration has become a lifeline for small and medium enterprises in Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia itself. The goal, as articulated by Anwar, was to turn ASEAN's economic interdependence into strategic alignment. Even in its successes, the chairmanship underscored a difficult truth. The easier ASEAN's agenda, the less strategically transformative its impact. Digital harmonization is welcome but also the least controversial path. It does not provoke and that is partly why it progresses. There were few risks taken and even fewer uncomfortable decisions made. That was by design. It was also a tacit acknowledgment of what could not be solved. In Myanmar, the failure of ASEAN diplomacy became increasingly hard to ignore. Since the 2021 military coup, the country has descended into a deepening civil conflict with no clear end in sight. Malaysia attempted to reinvigorate regional mediation by appointing seasoned diplomat Othman Hashim as ASEAN's special envoy. It also helped shift the conversation from legitimacy—whether elections organized by the junta should be recognized—to survival: whether a ceasefire could even be secured. This shift aligns with Ronald Heifetz's theory of adaptive leadership, where leaders focus not on offering false solutions but on reframing problems. Malaysia sought to reposition ASEAN's role not as an arbitrator of constitutional legitimacy but as a humanitarian broker trying to limit further collapse. It was a subtle but important pivot in tone and responsibility. Yet even adaptive leadership has limits without leverage. The junta continued its military campaign unabated. The Five-Point Consensus, ASEAN's diplomatic centerpiece, remained stalled. The bloc's decision to bar junta representation at key meetings stayed in place but produced little change. Malaysia offered moral clarity, a public commitment to peace over procedural pretense. But institutionally, ASEAN lacked the tools to match that clarity with consequence. Here, Malaysia's efforts revealed the bind of ethical leadership in a realist system. Moral persuasion alone does not alter the incentives of actors who hold power through force. Malaysia elevated the regional narrative on Myanmar but in structural terms, it was diplomacy without teeth. Then there is the South China Sea, where Malaysia's approach revealed both strategic caution and geopolitical restraint. Tensions between China and the Philippines flared repeatedly in early 2025, with maritime standoffs and allegations of aggression becoming near-regular occurrences. ASEAN's Code of Conduct (COC), in development for over three decades, remains unfinished. Malaysia helped frame the third reading of the draft as progress but insiders acknowledged the COC remains largely symbolic. From a realist perspective, this is a case of balancing without alliance. ASEAN states, including Malaysia, are engaging in what scholars like Stephen Walt describe as hedging, preserving autonomy by avoiding overt alignment with any single great power. Malaysia's chairmanship helped maintain this equilibrium by avoiding escalatory language while keeping diplomatic channels to Beijing open. It was a leadership style defined by strategic ambiguity. While some criticized it as too passive, it also reflected an understanding of regional vulnerabilities. China is ASEAN's largest trading partner. It dominates infrastructure finance, technology investment and increasingly, soft cultural capital. For Malaysia, antagonizing Beijing would have undermined its own development strategy. Leadership in this context became an exercise in containment through diplomacy, not deterrence. Malaysia's Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan underscored the enduring logic of ASEAN's posture. 'ASEAN must stay united amid great power rivalry and transnational threats,' he told me in an email. He pointed to the ASEAN Political-Security Community Strategic Plan 2045 and ASEAN Vision 2045 as the anchors of long-term cooperation in areas such as cybercrime, transnational crime and emerging technologies. In his view, ASEAN's continued commitment to neutrality, dialogue and cooperation has helped the region maintain peace, foster trust and keep communication channels open. That steadiness, he argued, is what makes ASEAN's approach both distinct and resilient. What Malaysia's year made clear is that ASEAN cannot outmaneuver China with declarations. Nor can it enforce discipline internally when economic interests diverge. The chair did what was possible, coordinate, deflect and preserve cohesion. From a statecraft perspective, it was realist diplomacy with limited tools and modest aims. Complicating matters is the return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency. While ASEAN has historically tried to hedge between Washington and Beijing, the second Trump administration has made that calculus harder. Trump's transactional style, his disdain for multilateralism and his near-total disinterest in Southeast Asia have left regional leaders scrambling for relevance. Malaysia, meanwhile, has been diversifying further from Washington. Its open criticism of U.S. policy in Gaza and its application for BRICS membership mark a notable pivot. Earlier this year, Anwar's administration denounced Trump's floated plan to relocate Palestinians from Gaza, a move that galvanized domestic support but chilled diplomatic ties. At the ASEAN level, Malaysia proposed a joint condemnation of the plan. Predictably, it failed. ASEAN's rule of unanimity ensures that lowest-common-denominator diplomacy often prevails. Once again, Malaysia sought to assert moral leadership within a structure that resists moral consensus. Still, Malaysia's moves signal a slow but steady realignment of Southeast Asian strategy. There is less ideological loyalty to the West and more diversified engagement with the Global South. From a grand strategy perspective, this is not a rupture but an evolution. In the absence of consistent U.S. engagement, Malaysia and its neighbors are pursuing strategic pluralism that reflects a multipolar world. So how should Malaysia's chairmanship be remembered? It delivered tangible progress on digital integration, sharpened the language of diplomacy around Myanmar and maintained regional coherence in the face of rising tension. Anwar positioned Malaysia as a credible convener, capable of articulating shared values even when outcomes fell short. His administration approached leadership not as domination but as facilitation. At the same time, the chairmanship highlighted ASEAN's deeper drift. Structural weakness in crisis response, strategic inertia in security and institutional caution in the face of authoritarian breakdowns all remained visible. Malaysia could not transform ASEAN because ASEAN does not permit transformation. In that way, Malaysia's year at the helm was not a failure. It was a mirror. It reflected what ASEAN has become, a necessary institution that is not yet a decisive one. And it reflected what regional leadership requires in 2025, the ability to work within constraint, adapt to disorder and lead with clarity even when the system resists coherence. Anwar did not reshape the region. But he led it with intelligence, restraint and purpose. That is a form of strategic success worth acknowledging.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Founder Group and GCL Systems sign $220m renewable energy MoU
Founder Group has entered a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with GCL Systems Integration Technology to develop renewable energy projects across Malaysia and other ASEAN countries, with potential ventures valued at $220m. The collaboration will involve information exchange, action implementation and periodic reviews to ensure effective cooperation. Both parties are committed to providing their technical expertise for the execution of identified projects within the renewable energy sector. Each company will engage in meticulous procedures aimed at identifying viable projects. If any project materialises from the agreement, a separate definitive contract will be established detailing each company's commitments, including the provision of necessary assistance, relevant information and documents required by the other party. Both companies will use their internal resources to source potential ventures, analyse tenders, formulate business strategies and craft proposals. Founder Group CEO Lee Seng Chi stated: 'We are proud to announce our collaboration with GCL Systems Integration Technology on future renewable energy projects. 'Leveraging GCL's strong global reputation and expertise in manufacturing and supply of solar PV [photovoltaic] modules and storage will be an integral part of this cooperation to advance our capabilities to support Malaysia and the surrounding countries' renewable energy goals and promote a greener environment for our customers. 'Additionally, we anticipate significant revenue opportunities as we work to establish sustainable projects that will drive top-line growth as well as margin and income expansion, which we expect will result in substantial gains in shareholder value.' GCL Systems Integration Technology is a smart PV and storage system integrator, while Founder Group is an engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning solutions provider for solar PV systems in Malaysia. "Founder Group and GCL Systems sign $220m renewable energy MoU" was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
EDENA ANNOUNCES INDONESIA DIGITAL SECURITIES MARKET ENTRY
Establishes Strategic Joint Venture to Pioneer ASEAN's Digital Securities Hub JAKARTA, Indonesia, June 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Singapore-based Edena Capital Partners and its Korean technology subsidiary Group KS today announced their strategic entry into Indonesia's digital securities market, having successfully established joint venture "Edena Capital Nusantara" with prominent Indonesian partners to pioneer Security Token Offering (STO) exchange development across ASEAN's largest economy. The joint venture was formalized through a signing ceremony in Jakarta today, with Wook Lee (CEO) and Chase S. Cho (Co-CEO) representing Edena Capital Partners, alongside Indonesian partners PT Dua Saudara Nusantara and PT Milkyverse Dunia Digital. The ceremony was attended by key stakeholders including Rendy Ronaldy Bimantara (CEO, PT Dua Saudara Nusantara), Yayang Ruzaldy (Co-Representative, PT Dua Saudara Nusantara), and Rob Clinton Kardinal (Representative, PT Milkyverse Dunia Digital). Pioneering ASEAN's Digital Securities Transformation "Having established our strong local partnership, we are now positioned to enter Indonesia's inaugural STO exchange sandbox program and build ASEAN's leading digital securities infrastructure," said Wook Lee, CEO of Edena Capital Partners. "This joint venture enables us to connect Indonesia's 270 million people to international capital markets while establishing the foundation for ASEAN's digital securities ecosystem. We're integrating this with our proven exchange operations in Cambodia and strategic partnerships in Malaysia." Through Edena Capital Nusantara, the company will operate the "Edena Indonesia" STO exchange, cementing its position as the first international platform capturing Indonesia's first STO sandbox opportunity and leading ASEAN's digital securities evolution. ASEAN Digital Securities Leadership Strategy EDENA's Indonesia market entry strategy demonstrates regional advantages: Strategic Partnership: Joint venture with Indonesian market leaders Regional Hub Development: Positioning Indonesia as ASEAN's digital securities center Cross-Border Integration: Connecting Indonesia to broader ASEAN digital securities network Comprehensive Assets: Carbon credits and comprehensive tokenized asset offerings The platform will prioritize carbon credit tokenization – aligning with President Jokowi's Green Recovery initiatives and Indonesia's 2030 carbon neutrality commitments, while building comprehensive digital securities capabilities establishing Indonesia as ASEAN's innovation hub. Advanced Infrastructure for Regional Growth Operating from Singapore with regulatory expertise across ASEAN jurisdictions, EDENA has developed STO infrastructure for multi-jurisdiction compliance. The hybrid blockchain architecture enables regulatory adherence and cross-border transactions across different frameworks. EDENA's approach centers on building integrated infrastructure connecting regional markets. With global STO market projected at $2.4 trillion by 2030, the company's Indonesia entry positions it to lead ASEAN's digital securities transformation and establish regional digital finance leadership. SOURCE Edena Capital Partners Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
