Environment Minister Andrew Muir sees ‘merit' in public inquiry into illegal Mobuoy dumping site

Environment Minister Andrew Muir has said he believes there is merit in holding a public inquiry into 'abhorrent' illegal dumping at the Mobuoy landfill site.
Mr Muir told MLAs that the cost of fixing environmental damage caused at the Londonderry site could reach £700million.
Two men were jailed last week for their roles in one of Europe's largest illegal dumps.
Paul Doherty, 67, of Culmore Road, Londonderry, admitted seven charges between 2007 and 2013 relating to the contaminated Mobuoy dump at Campsie, outside Derry, and was sentenced to one year in prison.
Co-defendant Gerard Farmer, 56, of Westlake in Derry, pleaded guilty to three charges between 2011 and 2013 and was jailed for 21 months.
Mr Muir told the Assembly he shared public concern over the 'appalling situation' in Mobuoy and said he had approved the launch of a consultation on the draft remediation strategy.
He said: 'Safeguarding public health, ensuring safe drinking water and reducing the environmental impact of the Mobuoy site is of paramount importance to me.'
He added: 'There is no quick fix but I am committed to continuing to ensure that appropriate steps are taken to protect water quality and the environment during these processes.'
He said to date he had been advised that there had been no adverse impact on the safety of drinking water being supplied from the River Faughan.
SDLP MLA Mark Durkan said his party would support the remediation measures.
He said: 'While focusing on the future we cannot just forget the past, how an environmental crime on an industrial scale was allowed to happen.
'This could cost the public and public services hundreds of millions of pounds to put right.
'Will the minister seek support from his Executive colleagues for a public inquiry into this scandal?'
Mr Muir responded: 'This was an abhorrent crime on an industrial scale.
'I do believe there is merit for a public inquiry so I will be taking a paper to my Executive colleagues in regards to this.
'But the cost associated with the site is likely to be significant. This could cost up to £700 million to remediate this site.
'I will be looking to the UK Government, not just in terms of financial support in terms of any future public inquiry but also in terms of the remediation of the site.
'These are significant costs for us as an Executive to bear.'
He said he would be engaging with Foyle MLAs and representatives from Derry and Strabane Council over the site.
Mr Muir added: 'It is important we look to the past and understand lessons to be learned, but it is also important we look to the future and have remediation of this site.'
Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

ITV News

9 hours ago

• ITV News

Oaths, committees, and presidents: the next steps in Guernsey's election process

Guernsey 's General Election has drawn to a close, with the island choosing its 38 new deputies. Voters backed change, electing 20 new faces alongside 18 sitting deputies. With several well-established politicians - such as Peter Ferbrache, Carl Meerveld, Andrea Dudley-Owen, Victoria Oliver, and Rob Prow - all missing out on re-election, the make-up of the island's top decision-makers is going to look quite different for the next political term. But who will they be, and how are they decided? Here is what the next couple of weeks will look like for the future States of Guernsey... 20-30 June: Get to know one another Until the night of Monday 30 June, the previous States are officially still in government. However, it will not be a relaxing week for the newly elected deputies - they will spend this time getting to know one another, figuring out where their beliefs overlap and policies align, and declaring which positions and roles they might like to hold. Whilst some declared their ambitions going into the election, many Deputies Elect told ITV News shortly after they got in that they are keen to work collaboratively, saying the jobs they may go for will be contingent upon the broader makeup of the Assembly. Returning Deputy Sasha Kazantseva-Miller said: "The most important thing now is building an Assembly that can work together and putting good people in the right places. "I'm really keen we approach it in a constructive, collegiate way." She added that she felt the large turnout signalled an "exciting day for our democracy, with a good Assembly to take forward". 1 July: Swearing in On Tuesday 1 July, the Deputies Elect will be officially sworn in, promising to serve the island and the Crown to the best of their abilities. This means they are the official States members for the next political term. 1 July: Election for Chief Minister Tuesday 1 July will also be the day the island's most senior politician - the President of Policy & Resources - is decided. As well as leading the Committee, they will become Guernsey's next Chief Minister. The States will hold a secret ballot to determine the President, with successive rounds of voting held until an outright winner is elected. Some of those who have already signposted that they would like the top job include former P&R Committee member Mark Helyar, and Charles Parkinson, who came third in the popular vote. Former Chief Minister Jonathan le Tocq also suggested he would be willing to throw his hat into the ring, telling ITV News: "I'm conscious of the fact that we need leadership and stability and continuity, someone that can bring all sides together, so I think it's likely I will put my name forward for President of P&R". Another potential candidate for Chief Minister is poll-topper Lindsay de Sausmarez, who received the backing of 54% of the electorate. However, she is yet to declare this ambition, saying, "My thoughts are all over the shop because I have not had a chance to really sit down and even look at who my colleagues are going to be". 2 July: Election for the Policy & Resources Committee The day after politicians choose their P&R President, they will elect the four other States members to join the committee. This is the island's most senior team, responsible for developing policies relating to leadership and coordination, fiscal policy, economic affairs, and external relations. The committee will likely be formed of people whose beliefs and goals align with those of the President. 4 July: Election of other Presidents On Friday 4 July, the States will elect the Presidents of the other committees. Each potential team leader will have to be nominated by two of their colleagues, and will be elected via a secret ballot similar to the system used to decide the President of P&R. The other Presidents will chair the following committees: The States will also elect a president for the newly created Housing Committee. With housing having been a particularly contentious election topic, it will be interesting to see who is chosen for this role and what their plan is for fixing some of the island's issues in this area. 7 July: Election for other committee members Monday 7 July will see the members of various committees decided upon, giving Deputies their official roles and responsibilities for the next four years. The work Deputies do as part of committees determines which policy areas they will work on and will shape their political careers. The only committee which will not be voted for is the Civil Contingencies Authority, which is formed of the Presidents of Policy & Resources, Environment & Infrastructure, Health & Social Care, and Home Affairs. 15 July: Ratify 2024 accounts Finally, on 15 July, the new States Assembly will conduct their first official piece of political business - the ratification of the 2024 accounts. With core government spending having been £44 million in deficit in 2024, this will be a significant moment that brings new Deputies immediately into the reality of political life. Want the inside track on the key issues that will shape Guernsey's Election this June? Listen to Guernsey Votes, an ITV Channel podcast packed with expert guests, local insight and analysis you can trust...

The Sun

11 hours ago

• The Sun

It's time to step up Keir – don't get caught on the sidelines while Trump flexes muscles to the world

SIR Keir Starmer says he's focused on 'de-escalation' but it is clear the UK was not in the driving seat when America launched its dramatic overnight strikes on Iran. He insists the Government was 'given due notice' but that's just diplomatic code for we were told, not asked. 9 9 9 Britain played no part in the military action, didn't offer its bases, and wasn't in the room when the trigger was pulled. For a country that calls the US its closest ally, it's a humbling moment. While the PM has backed the goal - stopping Iran from building a bomb - he's skating carefully around the method. He won't say if the strikes were legal. He won't say what it would take for Britain to get involved. He's trying to have it both ways: supporting Washington while staying out of the firing line. So far, it's a delicate balancing act, but one that gets harder by the hour. If Iran strikes back, especially at US or Israeli targets, pressure on Britain to act will skyrocket. Meanwhile, the opposition is flexing its muscles. Priti Patel says the strikes were 'absolutely essential' and questions whether the UK even offered help. She's urging the government to move faster, act tougher, and stop hiding behind process. Wounded Iran immediately lashes out at Israel launching volleys of ballistic missiles causing 'large-scale destruction' And she's not wrong to ask: if Britain has the capability to help stop a nuclear Iran, why didn't we step up? The PM of course, wants to sound strong, act calm, and avoid war. But when your closest ally goes in hard, and you're stuck on the sidelines, questions start piling up. This comes as Starmer called for an urgent Cobra meeting this afternoon. 9 9 9 He told reporters on Sky News: 'I want to reassure the British public that we're doing everything we can to stabilise the situation, to de-escalate the situation and to get to a negotiated outcome. 'But I'm very clear in my own mind that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. "That is the greatest threat to stability in the region.' He said there was a 'risk of escalation' and added: 'That's a risk to the region. "It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme. 'In relation to the UK, we were not involved in the attack. We were given due notice, as we would expect, as close allies to the US, and we have been moving assets to the region to make sure we're in a position to protect our own interests, our personnel and our assets, and, of course, those of our allies.' By Annabel Bate The Russian foreign ministry 'strongly condemns' Trump's 'irresponsible decision' to inflict 'missile and bomb strikes' on Iran. It said in a statement: 'The consequences of this action, including radiological ones, have yet to be assessed. 'But it is already obvious that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security. 'The risk of an escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, already engulfed in multiple crises, has increased significantly.' It added: 'the UN Security Council must also react. 'The confrontational actions of the US and Israel must be collectively rejected.' The PM added how the UK had taken "all necessary measures" to protect Brits. Asked whether the UK could be required to intervene under Nato rules, if Iran attacked US bases in the region, Starmer said: "I'm not going to speculate about what may happen, because all of my focus is on de-escalation. "But I do want to reassure the public we have taken all necessary measures to protect UK interests, UK personnel and to work with our allies to protect their interests as well. "That's what you'd expect, but my focus is on de-escalating this situation. Dealing with the threat that is that nuclear programme, but getting the parties around the table to negotiate an outcome to this." INCREASED THREAT Iranian foreign minister today announced he is to meet with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin within hours. He warned the West of "unprecedented danger" after the US blitzed three of its nuclear sites. Meanwhile Donald Trump has threatened since even more strikes on the country, and dubbed the operation a "spectacular military success". The Prime Minister also released a statement this morning in which he called for Iran to "return to the negotiating table". He urged the Tehran to "reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis". But a Cabinet minister has warned the UK faces an increased threat of Iranian attacks. Business Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, has now warned Iran's spying operations in the UK were 'already at a significant level'. 'I think it would be naive to say that wouldn't potentially increase but again, there's a choice here for Iran," he continued. "Do they want to continue being an agent of instability in the region and the wider world? Where has that got them? Where has it got the Iranian people? 'There is a better course of action for Iran to take here and I think they should consider that.' Just last month, cops busted an alleged terror plot targeting Israel's embassy in London by Iranian nationals. And, the UK has already declared Iran as a security threat under new laws that state they must register their activities in the UK or face five years in jail. Mr Reynolds also earlier confirmed the UK wasn't involved in the strikes. He told Sky News: "We support the prevention of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. We had proposed a diplomatic course of action, as other European countries had done. "The Iranians had rejected that. And I know people will be waking up this morning, and they'll be worried. ANALYSIS: Global fall-out of the US strikes By Patrick Harrington Philip Ingram, an international security expert, told The Sun: 'Iranian ballistic missiles will not reach the United States and therefore to try and respond to the United States attack Iran's going to have to do something different. "It'll bring its coalition of the willing that it has together or as we call them the axis of evil. So we've got Iran, Russia, North Korea and China. 'China will likely sit back and wait to see what's happening, to begin with. But North Korea may provide Iran with some missile technology. 'Russia is sitting there laughing all the way to the bank effectively. 'The escalating conflict helps Russia by moving Russia-Ukraine further down the agenda so that people aren't focusing on it. 'Iran and Russia will join forces to try and cause as much disruption in different countries as possible through protest and through disinformation. 'There will be two reactions directly out of Iran. One, the stimulation of their proxy organisations that they have operating across the world. Hamas and Hezbollah have been largely destroyed by Israel. 'But they've still got the Houthis in Yemen. I think we will see a massive uptake in Houthi activity in disrupting international shipping in the Red Sea. 'The other reaction could be trying to close the Straits of Hormuz. 30 percent of the world's oil and gas goes through there. "Even a threat to close it will put energy prices spiking to a level that will make the spike we saw when Russia invaded Ukraine seem like small change." "They'll want to know what this means, and I do want to give them reassurance that whilst the British government, the UK has not been involved in these attacks, we have been making extensive preparations for all eventualities, including how we look after British nationals in the region and how we get them out, and the assets we have in the region to protect British infrastructure, British bases, British personnel if we need to do that. "But from where we are now, what I think we need to do as the President I believe himself has said is, get back around the table. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, but we need a diplomatic process." And Britain's military base of Diego Garcia was not used by the US as a staging post for the US military attack on Iran, as reported by The Times. The jets were flown from the US military base in Guam in the Pacific – twice as far from Iran as Diego Garcia. There had been speculation that Diego Garcia would be used by the US, which would have caused a legal, diplomatic and military headache for the UK government as it would have had to give approval to any US attack. This would have dragged the UK directly into the conflict. Government sources said Diego Garcia was not used. France has also expressed "concern" over US air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, calling on all parties to "exercise restraint". Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot posted on X: "France has taken note with concern of the strikes carried out last night by the United States of America against three sites of Iran's nuclear programme." He made it clear that France didn't take part in the planning of those strikes. Barrot added that he "urges all parties to exercise restraint to avoid any escalation that could lead to an extension of the conflict". There was no immediate reaction from President Emmanuel Macron, who had said Saturday that France and its European partners planned to step up talks with Iran. 9 9 9

The Independent

14 hours ago

• The Independent

Jonathan Reynolds: UK knew about impending US missile strike on Iran

US President Donald Trump confirmed that the US military carried out strikes against three Iranian facilities: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The strikes were confirmed on Saturday, June 21, despite earlier pleas from the UK for de-escalation. Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds stated the UK was aware of the impending US military action against Iran. Reynolds, the UK's business and trade secretary, clarified that the UK was not involved in the attacks. He added that a "key ally" had informed the UK about the planned strikes. Watch the video above