Voices: I'm a former submariner – here's what you need to know about Britain's new nuclear fleet
During the Cold War, and for a short time following the collapse of the Soviet empire, the United Kingdom had a fleet of submarines: the strategic deterrent, the hunter-killer fleet boats, and the diesel submarine flotillas.
We could justly say that we could act – independently and with our allies – across the world, and in any theatre of war.
Yet following the end of the Cold War, political decisions were made on the assumption that we no longer needed such capable forces; the peace had been won.
We lost all of our diesel submarines with one sweep of the political pen; we reduced the number of SSNs (nuclear-powered attack submarines) from a combined force of 13 Swiftsure and Trafalgar class, replacing them with highly effective but limited numbers of the Astute class (seven in total); we whittled down the shore support that would keep the boats we had at sea for longer. We stopped investing in the shore facilities that would support our submarines and provide a decent home for our submariners.
Numbers matter – it is a stark and irrefutable fact. From early in the last decade, it has become self-evident that there is a resurgent Russia. The military has known this for a considerable amount of time, and submariners never believed that the Cold War had ended.
Unfortunately, most politicians have felt it unpalatable to accept the truth of the in-house briefings and the obvious facts. In reality, we have needed to make significant steps towards re-arming and increasing our fleet capability for a decade or more.
This week's announcement, therefore, of the intent to procure 12 replacement SSNs for the Astute class vessels, is a very welcome political acknowledgement of a military reality – and may, in time, bring us back somewhere towards where we need to be to fulfil our standing obligations, nationally, internationally, and reactively.
Increases in capability are important – they keep you at the cutting edge of war fighting and able to stand up in the most challenging of arenas – but so are raw numbers. You can have the most capable ship in the world, but if you only have one, it is vulnerable, either to mechanical failure or to enemy action. Only with numbers do you have some sort of tactical resilience and the ability to show that you can project maritime power and influence beyond your own borders.
Over the past few years, the Royal Navy has suffered from a well-publicised lack of available Astute-class subs. While the reasons for this are complicated, a significant factor is the sparing strategy adopted by the Ministry of Defence. Without a decent cache of spares, a routine mechanical issue becomes an operational showstopper.
A flotilla of seven SSNs provides some (but arguably nowhere near enough) strategic resilience to respond to international maritime demands. Once you have a submarine on a long maintenance period, two on short maintenance periods, two on operational stand-down periods and one with a short-term defect, you very quickly run out altogether.
When balanced against the above availability, the permanent operational demands of having a submarine ready to protect home waters, plus one ready to deploy to protect longer-distance interests and one potentially supporting carrier-group operations or Nato exercises, means that there is no surge capacity or room for contingent operations.
What this new announcement must not become is a short-term political statement that fails to materialise as a result of budgetary constraints. To give our fleet the tools to do the job of defending our nation, we must have at least 12 hunter-killer submarines. A further discussion could then be had about strengthening our strategic deterrent flotilla, and the rest of our maritime, land, and air-defence offering.
The sledgehammer of Putin's military stance has finally cracked the UK's political nut. Let us hope that we turn this intent into a reality, sign the contracts, and start the process that will regrow our defensive capability into something that can properly deter and protect our nation from an increasingly risky maritime environment.
David Bessell is a former career command-qualified submariner
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration almost totally dismantles Voice of America with latest terminations
The Trump administration has terminated 639 employees at Voice of America and its parent organization in the latest round of sweeping cuts that have reduced the international broadcasting service to a fraction of its former size. The mass terminations announced Friday rounds out the Trump-led elimination of 1,400 positions since March and represents the near-complete dismantling of an organization founded in 1942 to counter Nazi propaganda, whose first broadcast declared: 'We bring you voices from America.' Just 250 employees now remain across the entire parent group the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM), who operated what was America's primary tool for projecting democratic values globally. 'For decades, American taxpayers have been forced to bankroll an agency that's been riddled with dysfunction, bias and waste. That ends now,' said Kari Lake, Trump's senior advisor to USAGM, in Friday's termination announcement. VOA once reached 360 million people weekly across dozens of languages, former USAGM CEO and director John Lansing told Congress in 2019. In March, the White House put out a statement calling the outlet 'propaganda', 'leftist' and dubbed it 'The Voice of Radical America'. One of the examples cited to justify that explanation was VOA's refusal to use the term 'terrorist' to describe members of Hamas unless in statements, which falls in line with common and basic journalistic practice. The cuts represent a major retreat from America's Cold War strategy of using broadcasting to reach audiences behind the iron curtain. VOA had evolved from its wartime origins to become a lifeline for populations living under authoritarian rule, providing independent news and an American perspective in regions where press freedom is under assault. The layoffs also came just days after VOA recalled Farsi-speaking journalists from administrative leave to cover the war between Israel and Iran, after Israel shot missiles at Tehran less than a week ago in the dead of night. 'It spells the death of 83 years of independent journalism that upholds US ideals of democracy and freedom around the world,' said three VOA journalists, Patsy Widakuswara, Jessica Jerreat and Kate Neeper, who are leading legal challenges against the demolition, in a statement. The agency's folding began in March when Trump signed an executive order targeting federal agencies he branded as bloated bureaucracy, and VOA staff were placed on paid leave and broadcasts were suspended. Lake, Trump's handpicked choice to run VOA, had previously floated plans to replace the service's professional journalism with content from One America News Network (OANN), a rightwing pro-Trump network that would provide programming without charge. The sole survivor of the cull is the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, which transmits into Cuba from Florida. All 33 employees there remain, according to the announcement. USAGM offered voluntary departure packages through what it termed a 'Fork in the Road' program, providing full pay through September plus benefits. Some 163 employees accepted the buyouts rather than face involuntary termination, the agency said in a press release. Federal courts have allowed the administration to proceed with the terminations while legal challenges continue for now. The VOA cuts form part of Trump's broader assault on the federal workforce, with tens of thousands terminated across agencies including the IRS, Social Security Administration, USAID, and departments of education, health and agriculture.
New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Russian soldier kills, eats comrade in twisted attempt to survive Ukraine war: report
He bit more than the bullet. A Russian soldier on the frontlines in Ukraine murdered his comrade and ate the corpse to survive the grim wartime conditions — only to end up dying anyway, Kyiv's military intelligence reported. A call between two Russian soldiers who shared the jaw-dropping story of the cannibalistic 'Brelok', who killed his countryman 'Foma', was allegedly intercepted by Ukraine's Main Directorate of Intelligence, according to the Kyiv Post. 'F–king hell… Brelok f–king ate him, f–k me… nobody went anywhere. Brelok took him out and then ate him for f–king two weeks,' the first caller said. A Russian soldier reportedly killed and ate his comrade in order to survive the harsh frontline conditions in Ukraine. 'No f–king way… Holy sh-t… F—k my bald skull. Was Brelok really found as a 200?' the other person replied, using Soviet era slang for a soldier found killed in action. 'Yeah, they say he was a 200. He ate his comrade. So yeah… something to think about. I was shocked myself,' the caller concluded. The ghoulish cannibal was found dead, according to the report. Russia has recruited hardened criminals — including murderers and convicted cannibals — to bolster its ranks during the country's three-year invasion of Ukraine. Denis Gorin, a cannibal from Sakhalin, who killed four people and was sentenced to 22 years in prison in 2012, ate part of the body of one of his victims, Politico reported, citing Radio Liberty. Russia recently launched a deadly attack in Kyiv, killing 15 Ukrainians with Iranian-made vehicles. AFP via Getty Images Another criminal, Nikolay Ogolobiak — a Satanist convicted of killing two young women and cooking their organs in 2008 — was also sent to fight for Mother Russia back in 2023, according to that report. Convict Dmitry Malyshev, who was jailed for killing three men and pan-frying one of their hearts, was also sent to the frontlines, the Daily Mail reported. That deranged madman infamously took a selfie with freed murderer-rapist Alexander Maslennikov, who grinned in fatigues before being sent to the frontlines in 2024, the Daily Beast reported. Russia strongman Vladimir Putin continues to pound Ukraine — with Iranian-made drones killing 15 Ukrainians in Kyiv earlier this week.
Boston Globe
16 hours ago
- Boston Globe
‘Whole of Ukraine is ours,' Putin muses without ruling out capturing key city
'Wherever a Russian soldier steps foot, that's ours,' he added. Putin's insistence on maintaining the offensive in Ukraine has come at a diplomatic cost. President Trump's election last year gave Russia hope that it could restore economic and diplomatic ties with the United States while continuing to wage war in Ukraine, but Trump has become impatient with Russia's insistence on continuing the war. The Russian president made clear he had no intentions of soon ending the war. But it was less clear whether Putin, whose comments came in response to a question about his military's ultimate goals in Ukraine, was suggesting that Russia would annex additional territory beyond the four Ukraine regions that it has already declared are officially part of Russia. Advertisement In peace talks, the Kremlin has insisted on formal recognition of sovereignty over those regions — one of several positions that are unacceptable to the Ukrainian government. But since those annexations, Russian forces have pushed into three additional regions. Advertisement On Friday, before Putin's remarks, the Kremlin made its most direct statement yet, acknowledging that improved relations with the US were tied to Russia's willingness to end the war. 'American diplomats believe that we need to directly tie the process of removing the irritants in bilateral relations with the settlement in Ukraine,' Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin's spokesperson, told reporters at the conference Friday. Peskov reiterated the Kremlin's position, which is that it wants to discuss relations with the United States separately from efforts to end the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin has been hoping that a thaw with Washington would lead to the lifting of some economic sanctions, the return of some American companies, US investments in Russian natural resources, and more leeway for Russia to assert its interests in former Soviet states. At the same time, Putin has shown little interest in bending to US, European, and Ukrainian demands to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, where his forces are on the offensive. Trump had promised to end the war in Ukraine 24 hours after taking office, but efforts to mediate have been dogged by deep disagreements between the warring countries about what peace should look like. After two direct meetings between Russian and Ukrainian representatives, the negotiations have led only to agreements to exchange prisoners of war and bodies of fallen soldiers. Frustrated by the lack of progress, Trump has his diplomatic attention elsewhere, most recently the conflict between Iran and Israel, where he is considering whether to join the war on the side of Israel. Meanwhile, Russian air assaults on Ukraine have intensified in recent weeks, dimming any hopes for a ceasefire. On Thursday night, Russia launched drone attacks on Odesa and Kharkiv, injuring 20 people and killing one person in Odesa, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine said on Facebook. Advertisement Peskov said Russia expected Russian and Ukrainian representatives to set a date for their third meeting next week, but that the Kremlin was determined to achieve its stated goals in Ukraine either diplomatically or militarily. The talks between Russia and the United States on restoring bilateral ties have also been dragging. Despite multiple phone calls between Putin and Trump this year and at least four public meetings of Russian and American officials over the same period, nothing substantive has been achieved so far on that issue. The two countries' diplomatic missions are still understaffed and some consulates are still shut. There has also not been any tangible movement in terms of American companies returning to Russia or sanctions being lifted. The St. Petersburg conference, a yearly event promoted by the Kremlin as a magnet for Western businesses, has turned into a platform where Russian state companies showcase themselves. Again this year, no major American investors showed up and there was little sign of Western interest. At the conference, Putin instructed government members that they cannot allow it to slip into 'stagnation and even recession.' 'This cannot be allowed under any circumstances,' Putin said. On Thursday, Russia's economy minister said the country was on the verge of sliding into a recession, putting more pressure on its central bank to lower interest rates, which now are at 20 percent. This article originally appeared in
