logo
Israeli military says it killed 2 Iranian Revolutionary Guard commanders

Israeli military says it killed 2 Iranian Revolutionary Guard commanders

New York Post4 hours ago

Shahriyari was responsible for all weapons transfers from the Iranian regime to its proxies across the Middle East in order… pic.twitter.com/O9nEjuauuW
🔴ELIMINATED: Behnam Shahriyari, commander of the Quds Force's Weapons Transfer Unit in the IRGC, was eliminated in a precise IDF strike in western Iran.
Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday that the military had killed a veteran commander in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' overseas arm, in a strike in an apartment in Iran's Qom province.
The commander, Saeed Izadi, led the Palestine Corps of the overseas arm, or Quds Force, Katz said in a statement.
The Israeli military later said that it killed a second commander of the Guards' overseas arm, who it identified as Benham Shariyari, during a strike on his vehicle overnight in western Tehran.
It said the commander 'was responsible for all weapons transfers from the Iranian regime to its proxies across the Middle East.'
4 The Israel Defense Forces announced it killed Saeed Izadi.
IDF
4 The Israeli military later said that it killed a second commander of the Guards' overseas arm, who it identified as Benham Shariyari, during a strike on his vehicle overnight in western Tehran.
Israeli Air Force
Shariyari supplied missiles and rockets launched at Israel to Hezbollah, Hamas and Yemen's Houthis, according to the Israeli military.
There was no confirmation from the IRGC on the killing of the two commanders.
The Quds Force built up a network of Arab allies known as the Axis of Resistance, establishing Hezbollah in Lebanon in 1982 and supporting the Palestinian militant Islamist group Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
But the Iran-aligned network has suffered major blows over the last two years, as Israeli offensives since Hamas' October 7, 2023, attacks on Israel have weakened both the Palestinian group and Hezbollah.
4 An IDF drone captured the elimination of Behnam Shahriyari in a precise airstrike as he drove in a vehicle in western Iran.
IDF
4 Shariyari supplied missiles and rockets launched at Israel to Hezbollah, Hamas and Yemen's Houthis, according to the Israeli military.
IDF
Katz said Izadi financed and armed Hamas during the initial attacks, describing the commander's killing as a 'major achievement for Israeli intelligence and the Air Force.'
Izadi was sanctioned by the US and Britain over what they said were his ties to Hamas and Palestinian militant faction Islamic Jihad, which also took part in the October 7 attacks.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mahmoud Khalil Blasts Trump After Release: 'They Chose The Wrong Person'
Mahmoud Khalil Blasts Trump After Release: 'They Chose The Wrong Person'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Mahmoud Khalil Blasts Trump After Release: 'They Chose The Wrong Person'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil has said the Trump administration "chose the wrong person for this" after he was freed from a Louisiana ICE detention center on Friday on a judge's orders. Khalil, a Syrian born former Columbia University student, was detained by federal immigration authorities on March 8 after the Department of Homeland Security alleged he was a national security threat, something he has strongly denied. Newsweek contacted the Department of Homeland Security and Columbia University for comment on Saturday via email outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Since coming to power in January, the Trump administration has targeted foreign born university students who it claims have been involved with disruptive pro-Palestinian activism on campus, with a number having their visas revoked and being detained by ICE. Trump has sought to crack down on pro-Palestinian activism in universities more broadly following a series of Gaza solidarity camps on campuses around the country from April to July 2024. The administration moved to ban Harvard from enrolling foreign students after it rejected demands related to campus activism, though this was later blocked by a judge. What To Know Khalil was released on bail shortly before 8 p.m. ET on Friday after U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz concluded he is not a flight risk as he's married to a U.S. citizen, has no criminal record and a baby at home. He spent more than three months in custody after being detained in March outside his apartment on the Columbia University campus. Khalil was involved with pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia and was involved in mediating with university leaders. On June 11, Farbiarz ruled Khalil could not be detained or deported based on Secretary of State Marco Rubio's determination. However, two days later, Farbiarz said he would not order Khalil's release after the Trump administration said he committed fraud on his green card, which the former student's legal team then appealed. Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil speaking after his release from federal immigration detention on Friday, June 20, 2025. Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil speaking after his release from federal immigration detention on Friday, June 20, 2025. Matthew Hinton/AP Speaking to reporters after his release, Khalil said: "Hundreds of men who I left behind me shouldn't have been there in the first place. The Trump administration are doing their best to dehumanize everyone here whether you are a U.S. citizen, an immigrant, or just a person on this land doesn't mean you are less of a human." Asked by a reporter from The Guardian whether he had any message for the Trump administration, Khalil replied: "Trump and his administration they chose the wrong person for this. That doesn't mean that there is a right person for this. "There's no right person who should be detained for protesting a genocide, for protesting their university, Columbia University, that is investing in the genocide of the Palestinian people so this is my message." Khalil added that after returning home he would "hug my wife and son," stating he'd only been allowed to spend one hour with his son under supervised conditions whilst in detention. What People Are Saying DHS told Newsweek via email in a statement: "This is yet another example of how out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security. Their conduct not only denies the result of the 2024 election, it also does great harm to our constitutional system by undermining public confidence in the courts." Dr. Noor Abdalla, Mahmoud Khalil's wife, in a statement: "After more than three months we can finally breathe a sigh of relief and known that Mahmoud is on his way home to me and Deen, who never should have been separated from his father." Alina Das, one of Khalil's attorneys and co-director of the Immigrant Rights Clinic at New York University School of Law, in a statement: "No one should fear being jailed for speaking out in this country. We are overjoyed that Mr. Khalil will finally be reunited with his family while we continue to fight his case in court." What Happens Next Despite his release, the legal case against Khalil remains open and he could still face deportation from the U.S. if the Trump administration wins its case. For now Khalil has regained his green card and will be allowed to travel to visit family in New York and Michigan, for court hearings in Louisiana and New Jersey and for lobbying in Washington, D.C.

June 20, 2025 – Israel-Iran conflict
June 20, 2025 – Israel-Iran conflict

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

June 20, 2025 – Israel-Iran conflict

Update: Date: Title: Content: Our live coverage of the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran has moved here. Update: Date: Title: There's 'no question' the US will be dragged into a regional war if it strikes Iran, former CIA director says Content: There is 'no question' the United States would be plunged into a regional war if it strikes Iran, former CIA director Leon Panetta told CNN. The former head of the intelligence agency said the US made a 'terrible mistake' by going into Iraq two decades ago, starting a war that lasted years. 'It's a lesson that the president needs to learn, because if he goes in and attacks Iran, then there's no question that the United States would be in a regional war at that point,' Panetta told CNN's Kaitlan Collins. Panetta, also a former defense secretary, warned that Iran is bound to retaliate. 'So make no mistake about it. It may be an airstrike, but it would definitely involve the United States in a war with [Iran],' he said. Update: Date: Title: Explosions heard in Isfahan, Iranian state media says Content: Explosions have been heard in the central Iranian city of Isfahan, Iranian state media reports. The news comes shortly after the Israel Defense Forces said it had begun a new wave of attacks in Iran. Semi-official news agency Fars reported that the air defense system in the city had been activated. Isfahan is the home of Iran's largest nuclear research complex, which has been previously targeted by Israeli strikes. Update: Date: Title: 2 killed in strike on residential building in Qom, Iranian state media reports Content: A strike on a residential building in the central Iranian city of Qom killed two people and injured four others on Saturday, according to reports from state media. The strike, which hit the building's fourth floor, was reported shortly after the Israel Defense Forces said it had begun a new wave of attacks in Iran. The holy city of Qom is close to Iran's secretive Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant. One of those killed was a 16-year-old, according to a statement from Morteza Heydari, spokesman for the Qom Provincial Administration, made to Iranian media. Video geolocated by CNN shows impact damage to a building in southwestern Qom. In the video a fire can be seen burning on the upper floors of a multistory building. At the same time, semi-official Nour News reported air defenses were active over the capital Tehran, 130 kilometers (80 miles) to the north. Update: Date: Title: Video shows building on fire in Holon after latest Iranian strikes on Israel Content: Video released by Israel's national emergency services showed a building on fire in the city of Holon, near commercial hub Tel Aviv, following Iran's latest missile strikes on the country. Israeli fire and rescue services confirmed in a statement on Telegram that they were working to extinguish a blaze on the roof of a three-story building in Gush Dan, the wider metropolitan area around Tel Aviv, which includes Holon. The statement did not specify the city. The fire was caused by shrapnel after a missile was intercepted, according to the statement. Emergency agency Magen David Adom said no injuries were reported. Update: Date: Title: Israel says it has begun a new wave of attacks in Iran Content: Israel has begun a new wave of attacks in Iran, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Saturday, local time. 'The Air Force has now begun a wave of attacks against missile storage and launch infrastructure in central Iran,' the IDF said in a statement. Update: Date: Title: Iran files complaint with United Nations against nuclear watchdog chief Content: Iran has filed a complaint with the United Nations secretary-general and president of the Security Council against Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In his letter, Iranian UN ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani took issue with Grossi's 'approach regarding Iran's peaceful nuclear activities' and what he said was a 'failure' to condemn Israel's military action, according to the semi-official Iranian news outlet Fars News. The complaint comes after Mohammad Eslami, the head of Iran's atomic energy agency, on Thursday threatened legal action against Grossi for alleged 'inaction' during Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. That threat came after Israel attacked Iran's Arak nuclear facility in overnight strikes. 'It is necessary to fulfil your constitutional duties by immediately ending this inaction and condemning these actions of the Zionist regime that are contrary to international regulations,' Eslami's letter read, according to Fars, adding that Iran 'will pursue appropriate legal measures, especially in relation to the inactions taken by your Excellency.' The IAEA head said later on Thursday that the agency was continuing to 'closely monitor and assess the situation regarding the Israeli attacks on nuclear sites' in Iran and that inspectors will remain in the country, ready to be deployed to nuclear sites when possible. Update: Date: Title: Israel and Iran's UN ambassadors vow to keep fighting Content: Both Iran and Israel's UN ambassadors say that their countries will continue to fight during a tense United Nations Security Council meeting. Both Iran and Israel's UN ambassadors say that their countries will continue to fight during a tense UN Security Council meeting. #cnn #news You can also watch the video on YouTube Shorts here. Update: Date: Title: Israeli military identifies missiles launched from Iran and tells public to shelter Content: Israel's military said it identified missiles launched from Iran and that defense systems are working to intercept them. The military called on the public to 'enter a protected space' and stay there until further notice. Leaving is only allowed after an 'explicit directive,' the military statement added. In a separate statement the military said it is working to intercept and 'strike where necessary to eliminate the threat.' Update: Date: Title: Gabbard says testimony on Iran intelligence taken "out of context" to sow division with Trump Content: Hours after President Donald Trump said publicly that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was 'wrong' in her assessment of Iran's efforts on obtaining a nuclear weapon, Gabbard asserted on X that media outlets were unfairly sowing division between her and Trump. 'The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division,' Gabbard said in a post to social media that highlighted video of her prior testimony on the issue on Capitol Hill. She continued, 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' What she testified: On Capitol Hill in March, Gabbard had testified that the US intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' More context: CNN has previously reported that US intelligence assessed Iran was up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver a nuclear weapon to a target of its choosing, according to four people familiar with the assessment. The International Atomic Energy Agency, a top international watchdog, said last week that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched at levels just below weapons-grade to potentially make nine nuclear bombs, which it termed 'a matter of serious concern.' The challenge for Iran is producing not merely a crude nuclear weapon — which experts say Iran could potentially do within the space of months if it decided to — but also producing a working delivery system, which could take much longer. Update: Date: Title: Hundreds of Americans have fled Iran and others face difficulties leaving as Trump weighs US military action Content: Hundreds of Americans have fled Iran as the conflict with Israel has escalated, an internal State Department report said. The detail in the Friday situation report underscores that US citizens in Iran are at risk as President Donald Trump weighs US military action. The exact number of Americans in Iran is not known, and the State Department does not require US citizens to register their presence abroad. Unlike in Israel, where the US is working to establish transportation options out of the country for the estimated hundreds of thousands of Americans there, no such options are available for US citizens in Iran. The US does not have a diplomatic presence there. 'We do not anticipate offering direct US government assisted departure from Iran,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce noted at a press briefing Friday. The situation report described some Americans facing difficulties leaving Iran. 'Security alerts also note Americans seeking to depart should be prepared to encounter checkpoints and questioning from authorities,' the report states. 'Numerous US citizens have described delays and harassment along their exit route.' The report also notes that two Americans were reportedly detained while attempting to depart the country. One source trying to get a US citizen family member out of Iran expressed frustration at the State Department earlier this week, saying the agency seemed to defer everything to seemingly overwhelmed US embassies. This person wanted to see the department apply more pressure to Iran's neighboring countries to approve Americans' entrance. They also suggested dispatching embassy officials closer to the Iranian border to help. Update: Date: Title: Local hospitals report 33 injuries after Iranian strike on Haifa Content: A total of 33 people were physically injured by an Iranian strike on Haifa in northern Israel Friday, according to figures shared with CNN by local hospitals. One person is in serious condition and two others are in moderate condition after the attack, the city's Rambam hospital said. A further 16 mildly injured patients were treated at Rambam, it said. A spokesperson for the Bnai Zion Medical Center in Haifa said that it admitted 14 people in 'light condition' after the strike. According to a Friday update by Israel's emergency services, 685 people have been taken to the hospital with physical injuries since Israel began its 'Rising Lion' operation last week and Iran retaliated with its own missile strikes. Of those, 643 people were 'lightly injured,' Magen David Adom (MDA) said in a statement. A total of 24 people have been killed in Israel since the conflict began last week, MDA said. Update: Date: Title: Trump tells reporters they're in danger while discussing potential Iran retaliation Content: President Donald Trump warned reporters they were personally in danger as he discussed possible Iranian retaliation on Americans stemming from the conflict with Israel. When asked by a reporter whether he would expect Iran to launch attacks against Americans if he ordered military action, Trump said: 'We're always concerned about that, and we have to take them out and be very strong.' 'You're even in danger, talking to me right now,' Trump said to the reporters. 'Do you know that you are in danger talking to me right now? So I should probably get out of here,' Trump added. Update: Date: Title: Iran expressed concerns about "inaction" of E3 in condemning Israel at Geneva meeting Content: Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi expressed 'concerns' about the UK, France and Germany's 'inaction' in condemning Israel's attacks when he met with their foreign ministers in Geneva on Friday, according to Iranian state-affiliated media. Iran's ISNA news agency quoted Araghchi as saying he also stressed to the ministers that Iran would continue to 'exercise its legitimate right of self defense against the Zionist regime, with the objective of stopping the aggression and preventing future recurrences.' The minister said he told his counterparts Iran's nuclear program is peaceful and remains under the supervision of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. 'If the attacks are ceased and the aggressor is held accountable for its blatant crimes, Iran will be ready to consider diplomacy,' Araghchi said, according to ISNA. Update: Date: Title: Trump says 2-week timeframe is the "maximum" to decide on US involvement in Iran Content: President Donald Trump indicated that his two-week timeline for a decision on US military involvement in Iran is the 'maximum' amount of time — and that he could make up his mind sooner. 'I'm giving them a period of time. We're going to see what that period of time is. But I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum,' Trump told reporters in New Jersey. It's the president's first comments on the self-imposed deadline since his press secretary yesterday read aloud his statement setting that time frame for a diplomatic solution. Trump suggested, however, that he is not considering the possibility of US ground troops as he weighs an attack on Iran's nuclear sites. 'I'm not going to talk about ground forces. The last thing you want to do is ground forces,' he said when asked if that was on the table. He also appeared to suggest he does not believe Israel has the capacity to take out all of Iran's nuclear facilities alone: 'They really have a very limited capacity. They could break through a little section, but they can't go down very deep. They don't have that capacity. And we'll have to see what happens. Maybe it won't be necessary.' Officials and experts have suggested using the US' unique bunker-busting capabilities toward those ends. Trump also said he will 'always a peacemaker,' but 'sometimes, you need some toughness to make peace.' Update: Date: Title: "Diplomacy just for the sake of talks" will not work, Israel's UN ambassador says Content: Israel's ambassador to the United Nations struck a dismissive tone when asked about the possibility of a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran, saying 'diplomacy just for the sake of talks' would no longer work. Ambassador Danny Danon told CNN's Boris Sanchez the Iranians have been 'the masters of deception for so many years.' He added that diplomacy would not work until Iran commits to 'actually take out their capabilities, to neutralize them completely, to not enrich uranium.' 'But I'm not sure that they are there yet,' Danon said. Danon, who has described the Iranian attack that hit Israel's Soroka hospital as a war crime, was asked about his response to those who argue Israel has committed war crimes by striking hospitals in Gaza. 'You cannot make that equation because, you know, we chased terrorists and we allow people to evacuate those places,' he said. The ambassador said Israel gives civilians advance notice, including in Iran, and that the military tries to 'minimize civilian casualties.' Update: Date: Title: Trump says Gabbard is "wrong" on Iran nuclear intelligence Content: President Donald Trump took direct aim at his director of national intelligence on Friday, saying Tulsi Gabbard 'is wrong' about Iran's efforts on obtaining a nuclear weapon. The comment comes as Gabbard's standing in the administration diminishes, according to sources who spoke with CNN this week. Trump was asked Friday about his intelligence community's assessment that Iran is not close to building a nuclear weapon. 'Well then, my intelligence community is wrong,' Trump told reporters in New Jersey, asking the reporter who in the intelligence community had said that. Told that it was Gabbard, Trump said, 'She's wrong.' Gabbard testified to Congress in March that Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon — a direct contradiction of Israel's claims that Iran was racing toward a bomb. More background: Though Gabbard has been among the most visible voices for the president's national security policy, she has struggled behind the scenes to carve out her own place in the Trump White House, CNN reported this week. Recently, Trump has come to see her as 'off message' when it comes to the conflict in the Middle East, according to one senior White House adviser. CNN's Katie Bo Lillis and Kristen Holmes contributed reporting to this post. Update: Date: Title: Trump said it would be "very hard" to ask Israel to end its Iran strikes as he pursues diplomacy Content: President Donald Trump said it would be difficult for him to request Israel stop its airstrikes in Iran, even as he pursues a diplomatic solution to end the conflict. 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now if somebody is winning,' the president told reporters in New Jersey, where he will attend a fundraiser at his golf course.'It's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing. But we're ready, willing and able. And we've been speaking to Iran and we'll see what happens,' the president said. Trump repeated a bit later that it would be a hard ask, given Israel's military successes so far. 'It's very hard to stop, when you look at it — Israel's doing well in terms of war,' he said. 'I think you would say that Iran is doing less well, it's a little bit hard to get somebody to stop.' Trump dismissed European efforts to engage diplomatically with Iran, saying they hadn't helped efforts to end the conflict. 'They didn't help,' he said. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want — they want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help on this one.' Update: Date: Title: US State Department "can't speculate" on whether Trump will push for Iran-Israel ceasefire talks Content: US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said she 'can't speculate' on whether the Trump administration will press for a ceasefire between Iran and Israel to allow US-Iran nuclear talks to move forward. 'I'm not going to characterize what's happening now, or the reaction by the president or the secretary of state to what those negotiations might be,' Bruce said at a news briefing Friday. The Iranians have said that they will not return to talks with the United States until Israel stops its military strikes. Bruce reiterated that US President Donald Trump 'still holds out the hope for negotiations.' She also underscored that Iran and its proxies 'should not target US interests or personnel, and if they do, the consequences will be dire.' Update: Date: Title: Explosions rock several areas of Iran's Khuzestan province, semi-official media says Content: Israeli attacks caused explosions in several parts of the southwestern Iranian province of Khuzestan on Friday, according to Iran's semi-official Mehr News Agency. Three cities, Ahvaz, Mahshahr and Andimeshk, were targeted in the attacks, Mehr News Agency reported, though the attack on Mahshahr did not reach the city, instead causing an explosion in an area outside of it. Residential houses were damaged in the Ahvaz attack, according to the agency. An empty shed may have been the target of the attack, it said.

American Democracy Might Not Survive a War With Iran
American Democracy Might Not Survive a War With Iran

Atlantic

timean hour ago

  • Atlantic

American Democracy Might Not Survive a War With Iran

The current debate over bombing Iran is surreal. To begin with, bombardment is unlikely to lead to a satisfactory outcome. If history has shown one thing, it is that achieving a lasting resolution by bombing alone is almost impossible. There was a reason the United States sent ground forces into Iraq in 2003, and it was not to plant democracy. It was that American officials believed they could not solve the problem of Saddam Hussein's weapons programs simply by bombing. They had tried that. The Clinton administration bombed Iraq for four days in 1998. At the end, they had no idea what they had destroyed and what they hadn't. They certainly knew they had not put a permanent end to the program. In 2003, if George W. Bush thought he could have permanently ended Saddam's weapons programs by bombing alone, he would have taken that option. Iran today poses the same dilemma. America's weapons may be better than they were in 2003, its intelligence capabilities greater, and Iran may be weaker than it was even a year ago, but the problem remains. Bombing alone will not achieve a verifiable and lasting end to Iran's nuclear program. It can buy time, and Israel's strikes have done that. American strikes could extend that period, but a determined Iranian regime will likely try again. A permanent solution would require a far more intrusive international verification regime, which in turn would require a ground presence for protection. However, that is not the main reason I oppose bombing Iran. Nor is it the reason I find the discussion of all of this so bizarre. You would never know, as The New York Times churns out its usual policy-option thumb-suckers, that the United States is well down the road to dictatorship at home. That is the context in which a war with Iran will occur. Donald Trump has assumed dictatorial control over the nation's law enforcement. The Justice Department, the police, ICE agents, and the National Guard apparently answer to him, not to the people or the Constitution. He has neutered Congress by effectively taking control of the power of the purse. And, most relevant in Iran's case, he is actively and openly turning the U.S. military into his personal army, for use as he sees fit, including as a tool of domestic oppression. Whatever action he does or doesn't take in Iran will likely be in furtherance of these goals. When he celebrates the bombing of Iran, he will be celebrating himself and his rule. The president ordered a military parade to honor his birthday. Imagine what he will do when he proclaims military success in Iran. The president is working to instill in our nation's soldiers a devotion to him and him alone. Imagine how that relationship will blossom if he orders what he will portray as a successful military mission. Indeed, I can think of nothing more perilous to American democracy right now than going to war. Think of how Trump can use a state of war to strengthen his dictatorial control at home. Trump declared a state of national emergency in response to a nonexistent 'invasion' by Venezuelan gangs. Imagine what he will do when the United States is actually at war with a real country, one that many Americans fear. Will he tolerate dissent in wartime? Woodrow Wilson locked up peace activists, including Eugene V. Debs. You think Trump won't? He has been locking people up on flimsier excuses in peacetime. Even presidents not bent on dictatorship have taken measures in wartime that would otherwise be unthinkable. Then there is the matter of terrorism. What if Iran is able to pull off a terrorist attack on U.S. soil in retaliation for an American strike? Or even just tries and fails? The courts will permit a president almost anything in the aftermath of an attack: Any restraints they've put on Trump will vanish. The administration may claim that anti-terrorism laws permit it to violate the rights of American citizens in the same way that it is currently violating the rights of the noncitizens being scooped off the streets by masked men. The attorney general has already threatened to use terrorism statutes to prosecute people who throw stones at Tesla dealerships. Imagine what she will do to anti-war protesters with the justification of a real terrorist threat. Finally, there are the global implications. The United States is currently ruled by anti-liberal forces trying to overturn the Founders' universalist liberal ideals and replace them with a white, Christian ethnoreligious national identity. American officials are actively supporting similar anti-liberal forces all around the world, including the current anti-liberal ethnoreligious government of Israel. Any success Trump claims in Iran, whatever its other consequences, will be a victory for the anti-liberal alliance and will further the interests of anti-liberalism across the globe. This is true even though the current regime in Iran is itself anti-liberal. Should the mullahs fall, Trump and Israel are likely to support a military strongman against any democratic forces that might emerge there. That has been Israel's policy throughout the region, and even presidents who did not share Trump's proclivity for dictators, such as Barack Obama, have acquiesced to Israel's preferences. I'm not interested in using American military power to make the world safer for dictatorship. I might feel differently if Iran posed a direct threat to the United States. It doesn't. The U.S. policy of containing Iran was always part of a larger strategy to defend a liberal world system with a liberal America at its center. Americans need to start thinking differently about our foreign policy in light of what is happening in our country. We can no longer trust that any Trump foreign-policy decision will not further illiberal goals abroad or be used for illiberal ends at home. Today, the United States itself is at risk of being turned into a military dictatorship. Its liberal-democratic institutions have all but crumbled. The Founders' experiment may be coming to an end. War with Iran is likely to hasten its demise. Not that it matters, but count me out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store