‘Peace always cheaper than war': South Korea's new leader Lee Jae-myung vows to pursue talks with North Korea
New South Korean President Lee Jae-myung (AP)
Just a day after being sworn in as South Korea's new president, Lee Jae-myung pledged on Wednesday to pursue dialogue with
North Korea
while maintaining strong military deterrence. In a powerful inaugural address delivered at the National Assembly's Rotunda Hall, Lee called for peace and reconciliation on the Korean peninsula, framing diplomacy as both a moral and strategic imperative.
'No matter how costly, peace is still cheaper than war. It is better to win without fighting than to win through conflict, and the most reliable form of security is peace that requires no fight at all,' Lee said during the televised ceremony attended by around 300 guests.
The newly elected leader, who secured a landslide victory, was thrust into office without a transition period following the impeachment of his predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol.
Yoon had attempted, and failed, to impose martial law in December, leaving a political vacuum that Lee now fills without the typical time to assemble his team.
Addressing lawmakers in a chamber where his party holds a commanding majority, Lee reiterated South Korea's readiness to respond decisively to any military or nuclear provocations from Pyongyang. 'Our defence budget equals North Korea's entire GDP. We have the world's fifth-largest military,' he said, signalling strength while underscoring his willingness to keep communication lines open.
In a shift from his predecessor's hardline stance, Lee made no preconditions for talks with the North. Analysts say this represents a significant change in tone. 'It signals his desire to resolve disagreements through talks,' said Hong Min, senior analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification. 'It is notable that Lee has clearly indicated a different approach to North Korea.'
Lee also emphasised the need for a robust alliance with the United States and strengthened trilateral cooperation with Japan, while cautioning against overreliance. 'Cooperation with the United States and Japan is essential,' he said. 'But we should not put all our eggs in one basket.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump issues worldwide travel alert for Americans amid Israel-Iran conflict: Here are dos and don'ts
The Donald Trump-led State Department on Sunday posted a 'Worldwide Caution' on its travel alert page, citing the conflict between Israel and Iran. This comes a day after the US struck three Iranian nuclear bases. Trump stated that he is not ruling out a regime change in Iran. Donald Trump issued a travel alert for Americans worldwide(AP) In its latest alert, the State Department said: 'The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East.' Officials further warned Americans about potential demonstrations against US citizens and interests. 'The Department of State advises U.S. citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution. Please read carefully our Travel Advisory, country information, and any recent security alerts when planning travel,' the press release read. Read More: How China, Pak, others reacted to US airstrikes on Iran: 'Catastrophic consequences' Meanwhile, the department also posted an update on Israel and the West Bank, saying the embassy in Jerusalem and Branch Office Tel Aviv will not be open to provide emergency US passport services on Monday, June 23. 'US citizens seeking to depart Israel or the West Bank should take the first available option, even if it is not your first choice of destination. Ben Gurion Airport remains closed, and there are still no regularly scheduled commercial or charter flights operating from there." Dos for Americans Abroad Monitor Local Conditions: Check country-specific travel advisories on for real-time updates on security risks. Enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) at to receive alerts and facilitate emergency contact. Maintain a Personal Safety Plan: Prepare for unexpected crises by identifying safe locations, keeping emergency contacts updated, and ensuring your phone is charged, per the US Embassy in Saudi Arabia's security alert. Consider Evacuation Options: In Israel, contact the US Embassy for evacuation flights or cruise ships, as announced by Ambassador Mike Huckabee. Read More: Every US citizen a 'target': Iran after US strikes on Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow nuclear sites Don'ts for Americans Abroad Do Not Travel to High-Risk Areas: Avoid travel to Israel, Iraq, or Iran due to armed conflict, terrorism, and civil unrest. The State Department explicitly warns against travel to Iran, advising those present to shelter in place. Avoid Large Gatherings: Steer clear of protests or crowds, which may target US citizens or interests, especially in the Middle East. Do Not Ignore Airspace Closures: Refrain from planning air travel through regions with closed airspace, such as Israel or Iran, where commercial flights are limited.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Are Iranian officials planning to replace Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei? Here's all details about plot
Iranian officials are reportedly considering removing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The idea is backed by political, military and clerical figures. The move comes amid airstrikes by the US and Israel. While some support reform and foreign dialogue, others want retaliation. In this photo released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks to a group of people and officials in Tehran, Iran, Friday, March 21, 2025. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Internal Plots Against Khamenei Barriers to Removing Supreme Leader Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Possible Role for Hassan Rouhani Security Measures and Leadership Concerns FAQs Following recent airstrikes by the United States and Israel, reports have emerged that some Iranian officials are discussing the possibility of removing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The discussions involve multiple high-level figures from within the country.A group of Iranian officials, including businessmen, military personnel, political leaders and clerics, are reportedly planning to replace Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, The Atlantic report said citing sources. These discussions are still in the early stages. One source described it as just one of many plots forming within Tehran. Officials believe Khamenei is losing influence and may not remain in control even if he keeps his position, the report sources claim the situation in Tehran has changed after the airstrikes. Some say the strikes have increased the chances of removing Khamenei, though others warn that events could go in the opposite Assembly of Experts holds the authority to remove the Supreme Leader. However, organizing a vote requires stability, which is hard to achieve while airstrikes continue. As a result, even though some want to begin the process, it may not happen President Hassan Rouhani is being considered for a future role, though sources confirm he is not involved in current discussions. There is disagreement among the group. Some want to reach out to US President Donald Trump, while others want a strong reaction to the recent strikes, the report reports from The New York Times said that Khamenei had limited all electronic communication. He now communicates through a trusted aide. This step was taken out of concern for his safety. Some Iranian officials believe Israeli intelligence may have penetrated Iran's security structure. Khamenei has reportedly named three senior clerics as potential successors in case he is killed.A group of Iranian businessmen, political leaders, clerics, and military officials is reportedly planning the move, according to sources cited in media is under airstrikes, and organizing a formal vote through the Assembly of Experts is difficult under current security and political conditions.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
What are the consequences of US strikes in Iran? Expert weighs in
US President Donald Trump ordered precision strikes on three nuclear sites across Iran early Sunday, the Associated Press reported. The strikes, which hit nuclear enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordo, and a uranium complex near Isfahan, marked a significant escalation in tensions between Washington and Tehran. According to a New Yorker report, this action could have dangerous consequences. A B-2 bomber arrives at Whiteman Air Force Base Mo., Sunday, June 22, 2025, after returning from a massive strike on Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday.(AP) In a televised address, as per the report, Trump claimed the facilities were 'completely and totally obliterated' and demanded Iran either make peace or 'face further consequences.' White House officials have stated that the full extent of the damage is unclear. Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's advisor has warned that US military bases used to target Tehran will be considered 'legitimate' targets, AFP reported. Also read: Iran Israel war news LIVE updates: Khamenei's advisor says US bases used in attacks are 'legitimate targets' US airstrikes came a week after Israel attacked Iran The US strikes came a little over a week after Israel launched an offensive on Iran, reportedly with Trump's backing. Fordo, a heavily fortified site built into a mountain, was believed to be accessible only through US military capabilities which makes America's involvement critical to Israel, the New Yorker report added. James M Acton, a nuclear policy analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, warned that US airstrikes on Iran could spark the start of a drawn-out crisis and not a quick victory. Expert warns Iran could withdraw from nuclear treaty Acton, in a telephonic interview with the magazine, said it could trigger immediate retaliation and push Tehran to abandon the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) entirely. The nuclear policy analyst said that Iran has short-range ballistic missiles which can strike US bases and assets in the region. He claimed that US strikes on Iran, despite being called a 'one-and-done' offensive, could open the door to sustained conflict and destabilize the entire region. The airstrikes, Acton told New Yorker, also risks undoing what was remaining of the 2015 nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The landmark deal, negotiated under Barack Obama, placed strict limitations on Iran's nuclear enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief. Trump had unilaterally withdrawn the US from the deal in 2018. Acton warned that if Tehran decided to pull out of the NPT, expel inspectors, and restart their nuclear program, Iran could be back in action within a year or two. He added even in the best-case scenario; reconstitution would be faster than almost two decades of restrictions under JCPOA. Although the administration is hailing the US strikes as a message of strength, Acton argued that the lack of congressional authorization and diplomatic alternatives raise serious constitutional and strategic concerns. With the region already volatile, the US attack has shook global confidence in Washington's foreign policy restraint and has reignited fears of yet another endless war in the Middle East, one with nuclear implications. FAQs What sites did the US strike in Iran? American forces struck three sites: the nuclear enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordo, and a suspected uranium storage site near Isfahan. Why did Trump order the strikes? Trump claimed the attacks were to force Iran to 'make peace' and prevent nuclear weapons development. What is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)? The NPT is an international agreement that prevents non-nuclear states from acquiring nuclear weapons and allows inspections by the IAEA. Iran is a signatory. What was the JCPOA, and why did Trump leave it? The JCPOA was a 2015 deal limiting Iran's nuclear program. Trump withdrew from it in 2018, claiming it was too lenient and temporary.
