Coalition politics and budget cuts: What to expect from Godongwana's upcoming speech
Minister of Finance, Enoch Godongwana briefing media on the 2025 Budget Process.
Image: Supplied / GCIS
While there have been calls for Enoch Godongwana to resign, South Africa's Finance Minister announced this past week that a third Budget Speech will be taking place later this month, on 21 May.
The announcement came after the 0.5% Value Added Tax (VAT) reversal, which was proposed in the March 2025 Budget, with the matter being taken to court by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
Earlier this year in February, the minister's first budget attempt was thwarted by political parties in Parliament, as the minister proposed a larger VAT increase of 2%.
Godongwana said that the Budget of 12 March 2025 and the proposed VAT increase sparked rigorous debate.
'This is welcomed in a healthy democracy. Today there is clarity that VAT will remain at 15%. This decision was shaped not only by political debate but by the voices of the South African people. When people speak we must listen. I'm encouraged by the passion shown, and it reflects the seriousness with which we approach the hard choices needed to place our finances on a sustainable path.'
Godongwana added that we are all new in South Africa to what is called coalition politics.
'There are lessons to be learnt by cabinet, legislature and ourselves. I'm pleased that we have agreed that we will balance the budget without raising VAT while protecting vital sectors such as education, health, and social grants,' he said.
Frank Blackmore, lead economist at KPMG shared his thoughts with Business Report on what he thinks Godongwana's re-tabling of the 2025 Budget Review for the economy.
Blackmore said, "The comprehensive review will include the Fiscal Framework, Appropriations Bill, Division of Revenue Bill, as well as the already tabled Rates and Monetary Amounts and Amendment of Revenue Laws Bills. Given the long delay since the original budget was tabled in February, until the new budget is passed, government services will continue to be funded under Section 29 of the Public Finance Management Act."
He added that this provision also applies, in part, to the funding of provinces and municipalities, it is therefore not the case that these levels of government will be cut off from funding.
"Public services should continue to be rolled out. The Minister also informed us that the National Treasury has begun developing the new fiscal framework to maintain the trajectory towards debt stabilisation, an essential element in strengthening public finances. A key point here is that the Treasury will need to revisit the economic assumptions, using the most recent data available,"Blackmore said.
"I imagine their GDP forecast will be revised down from the 1.9% we saw in the previously tabled budget. This process involves generating updated fiscal projections, recalculating revenue estimates, determining appropriate borrowing strategies, and consolidating these elements into a coherent fiscal framework. It seems that much remains open at this stage, and we will only see the full details on 21 May, by which time, one hopes, agreement will have been reached with all parties that form part of the Government of National Unity (GNU)."
Waldo Krugell, an economics professor at the North-West University, said,
"The work will be done by the Treasury's Budget Office. Economists are keen to see the impact of updated economic growth forecasts and what they mean for tax income and major ratios like debt-to-GDP."
Krugell added that Godongwana has also indicated that borrowing more will not be an option, so there will have to be some spending cuts to the proposals made in Budget 2.0.
Siyabonga Ntombela, University of KwaZulu-Natal academic and political analyst, warned that the government will attempt to recoup the lost revenue through alternative measures, such as increasing the fuel levy, which will in turn impact food prices.
"Certain goods will all of a sudden cost more. South Africa's borrowing ratings are below investment grade. The government will have to put some austerity measures to keep the country afloat," Ntombela said.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Survival is not enough: Why SA's SMMEs must learn to let go of old habits
The author points to SweepSouth as a great example of good entrepreneurship. Long before scaling, they spent time in communities speaking to domestic workers and potential clients. In the first four months of this year alone, 482 South African businesses shut their doors. It's a haunting number not only for our economy but for the families in crisis and the employees out of work. What went wrong? The hard truth is that many of these businesses probably thought they were doing everything right. They had loyal customers. They survived hard times before. But yet, this time they didn't. One of the most dangerous things in business is the belief that you already know your customer, what worked before will work again and experience equals insight. Longevity isn't the same as relevance. Just because you've been in business for ten years doesn't mean you know what your customers need right now. Often, business owners mistake time served for insights gained. We assume that because we've been in business for years, we have nothing new to learn and we continue to do things the same way we always have. We live with a blind belief of our customers loyalty. Meanwhile, our customers' lives have shifted under our feet. Their habits, budgets, and priorities change frequently and too many businesses fail to notice until it's too late. Lessons from start-ups In the incubator space, early-stage entrepreneurs are coached to question everything, taught to assume nothing and to approach every idea with curiosity. They are guided to understand that just because they believe it, it doesn't mean it's true for their customer. Ironically, it's often these first-time founders with no track record who are more open to listening than seasoned business owners. They learn to ask critical questions about what is happening in their customers' world and how it has changed. They know that being sure is the first step in being wrong. SweepSouth is a great example. Long before scaling, they spent time in communities speaking to domestic workers and potential clients. They listened. They tweaked. They tested. That's what helped them succeed - not just a good app, but gaining a deep understanding of their customers' needs. Empathy: the missing ingredient The test small approach is an empathy-first approach. Many businesses think they know their customers because they've sold to them before. But selling and understanding are not the same thing. Real empathy means asking: What's changed in your customer's world? What are they struggling with? What are they frustrated by? And here's the uncomfortable part: empathy takes time. It takes curiosity. It takes stepping away from your agenda and genuinely engaging with your customer's life, not just their wallet. It's within this space where opportunity lives. It's where old products evolve into new services. It's where pivoting happens. It's where an entirely new business is born. Testing in the real world Of course, it is one thing to listen. It is another to act on what you hear. In design thinking, we talk about testing and prototyping – fancy words for trying things out in the real world. It is about taking an idea, even a half-thought-through concept, and bravely sharing that with your customer. Not in a focus group, but in real life, where wallets open and close, and where value is either obvious or absent. Even big players do this. Nedbank redesigned its home loan process after learning that paperwork was a major pain point. They tested solutions inside their app, made tweaks based on feedback shared directly by their customers, and ultimately delivered something more useful to customers, all without risking a massive rollout. The courage to change The small businesses that are thriving today are not the ones with the flashy marketing or slickest tech. They are the curious. They ask the questions, they challenge their assumptions and they stay humble throughout. They don't want the ground to crumble; they change because they are paying attention. Perhaps that is the swift needed for South Africa's small business culture. We are brilliant at hustling. We are resourceful and always make a plan. But we forget to question ourselves. We treat change like it is a crisis instead of a habit and necessity. The world doesn't stand still, and neither should SMME businesses. Customer needs evolve, the markets shift and new competitors appear. The businesses that are set to thrive are the ones that stay curious and have teams that are continuously tweaking their services and models, always learning from their customers, and most importantly, always listening.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
US joining war on Iran creates major political headache for SA
With the world on tenterhooks following the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, South African politicians have been notably cautious in articulating their initial positions. By sunset on Sunday, 22 June, as news of the extraordinary US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities at Israel's behest continued to ricochet globally, barely a single South African politician seemed willing to come out publicly with a position on the matter. Fikile Mbalula. Gayton McKenzie. Herman Mashaba. These are hardly shrinking violets when it comes to making their views known on forums like X — yet on the matter of the Iranian bombing, at the time of writing, there was a deafening silence from them. Neither was there yet an official statement available from either the DA or the ANC, suggesting that SA's two biggest political parties were to some degree agonising over what, exactly, to say. From Parliament's committee on international relations: niks. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) was mute on Sunday too, and a Daily Maverick query to its spokesperson, Clayson Monyela, went unanswered. Ramaphosa issues mild reprimand of US By mid-afternoon, President Cyril Ramaphosa had grasped the nettle — kind of — and released a statement that said relatively little. 'President Cyril Ramaphosa and the South African government have noted with a great deal of anxiety the entry by the United States of America into the Israel-Iran war,' it read, followed by a weak rebuke of the Trump administration. 'It was South Africa's sincerest hope that President Donald Trump would use his influence and that of the US government to prevail on the parties to pursue a dialogue path in resolving their issues of dispute.' The statement concluded, as is on brand for Ramaphosa, with a call for 'peaceful resolution'. Despite the fact that Tehran and Pretoria enjoy warm diplomatic relations, Ramaphosa's statement revealed the diplomatic egg dance that the situation presents to the South African government. South Africa cannot risk alienating the Trump administration further, with the relationship still on life support from the buildup to the Trump-Ramaphosa Oval Office showdown in late May. The Israel factor is a significant complication The difficulty for Pretoria is that the Iranian strike was overtly carried out at the behest of Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump's brief televised announcement, confirming that US fighter jets had targeted multiple nuclear research sites in Iran, ended not only with 'God bless the Middle East' and 'God bless America' but also, specifically, 'God bless Israel' — a closing flourish that left little doubt about whose interests were being prioritised. South Africa has positioned itself internationally as one of the staunchest critics of Israel's conduct, culminating in its landmark International Court of Justice case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza. Pretoria has also publicly cut diplomatic ties with Israel, formally downgrading the embassy. In the face of this new regional escalation, it must now consider how to balance that principled commitment with its allegiance to Iran, a fellow BRICS member — while simultaneously avoiding direct confrontation with a still-dominant United States. With that in mind, the silence of the political class on Sunday was, frankly, understandable. BRICS buddies band together? South Africa and Iran have shared membership of BRICS since an invitation was issued to the latter at the 2023 Johannesburg summit. Other BRICS states were less hesitant in responding to the bombing. The Chinese foreign ministry issued an unambiguous condemnation: 'China strongly condemns the U.S. attacks on Iran and bombing of nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency]. The actions of the U.S. seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law, and have exacerbated tensions in the Middle East. China calls on the parties to the conflict, Israel in particular, to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible, ensure the safety of civilians, and start dialogue and negotiation.' Saudi Arabia, whose new BRICS membership sits awkwardly with its often-fraught relationship with Iran, struck a more guarded tone. Its official English-language X account posted: 'The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is following with great concern the developments in the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran, represented by the targeting of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States of America.' The United States, meanwhile, was vocally backed by a handful of close allies. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer offered a firm endorsement of the bombing, posting on X: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' But from other corners of the West, the reaction was unease rather than celebration. Carl Bildt, co-chair of the European Council on Foreign Relations, called the bombing a 'clear-cut violation of international law'. UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he was 'gravely alarmed' by the use of force by the US. A massively unpopular war Complicating the picture for South Africa is the fact that this conflict is likely to be widely unpopular across the globe — including among Western populations. Comparisons are already being drawn with the disastrous US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and social media suggests a growing generational divide in how such conflicts are understood as the post-World War 2 political consensus crumbles. Young people in particular are questioning why Israel, which has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and possesses undeclared nuclear weapons, is held to a radically different standard than Iran, which remains under international inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. This is also a moment when support for Israel is at an all-time low. Tens of thousands of protesters flooded European capitals over the weekend, voicing opposition to the ongoing bombardment of Gaza. In June, a YouGov poll showed support for Israel in Western Europe had sunk to its lowest levels ever recorded. In Germany, France and the UK, only between 13% and 21% of respondents now hold favourable views of Israel, compared to 63% to 70% expressing negative sentiments. As South Africa mulls its response, the stakes are particularly high. The government has sought to portray itself as a champion of the Global South, a defender of international law, and a broker of multipolar diplomacy. The entrance of the United States into open hostilities against Iran, with Israel applauding from the wings, tests every aspect of that narrative. DM
Eyewitness News
5 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Former Zambian president Lungu to be buried in SA after tensions between family & government
JOHANNESBURG - Former president of Zambia Edgar Lungu's funeral will be held in South Africa. His family revealed that he will be laid to rest in Johannesburg. It's the first time a former head of state of another country will be buried in South Africa. The repatriation process of Lungu's remains was halted earlier this week. His body was meant to be returned to Lusaka from Lanseria airport on Tuesday. His family said this was due to the continued disagreements with the Zambian government. READ: Repatriation of former Zambian statesman Lungu's remains from SA halted They've accused President Hakainde Hichilema's administration of undermining the agreements reached surrounding Lungu's death. He died in a Pretoria hospital earlier this month after suffering a long illness. Lungu's family has expressed their appreciation to the South African government for honouring their request to hold a private funeral in the country.
