Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
The Liberal government's proposed border bill would empower police and the country's spy agency to seek information from a wide range of service providers — including medical professionals, banks and car rental companies — without a warrant, government officials spelled out Thursday.
In defence of the fiercely criticized bill, federal officials held a briefing with reporters where they argued the changes are needed to stay apace with the changing crime landscape. They spoke to reporters about the "lawful access" portions of the bill under the agreement they not be quoted directly.
The Strong Borders Act, also known as Bill C-2, was introduced earlier this month and has since received a wave of backlash from civil liberties groups, academics and some opposition MPs who argue it creates new surveillance powers infringing on personal privacy and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
An official on Thursday's call said they held the briefing to further explain the government's rationale for moving ahead on the headline-nabbing legislation.
If passed, C-2 would compel service providers to hand over basic information to police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) without judicial sign-off. It would also create a new order compelling the production of more detailed subscriber information with judicial authorization during a criminal investigation.
Depending on the case, that production order would require third parties to hand over names, addresses, telephone numbers and what services they sought.
The officials provided a hypothetical example: CSIS receives a tip that an individual associated with a Canadian telephone number may be planning a terrorist attack. In order to investigate, CSIS must first confirm which phone company is responsible for the phone number before it can seek a production order for more details, like the associated name and address.
Critic says it's 'ripe for abuse'
However, the bill also allows investigators to seize information and data (including subscriber information) without a warrant in urgent and time-sensitive circumstances
Critics argue the bill would infringe personal privacy and could breach the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Tim McSorley, national co-ordinator of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, said the way the bill is written is "ripe for abuse."
"Without a warrant, police and spy agencies could demand information about our online activities based on the low threshold of reasonable suspicion," he said in a statement Wednesday.
"Bill C-2 would undermine more than a decade of Canadian privacy-related jurisprudence to enable a massive expansion of domestic surveillance."
An official briefing reporters said while internet service providers will likely receive the most requests, they confirmed the definition of public service providers is sweeping.
That could include a car rental company, hotel or a financial institution. Medical professionals including hospitals, doctors and psychiatrists' offices could also meet that definition, they said.
The official stressed that police have to believe there are reasons to suspect that the information in question will assist in a criminal investigation, and said there is a mechanism in the bill allowing service providers to apply for judicial review if they are not comfortable handing over information.
But there are also legal consequences for those who don't comply.
WATCH | Privacy concerns over Strong Borders Act:
Strong Borders Act raises concern about police access to personal data
9 days ago
Duration 2:28
Civil liberties groups are concerned that the federal government's proposed Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, will give law enforcement agencies sweeping new powers, like making it easier for police to search your internet activity and data without your knowledge or a warrant.
The bill has support from Canada's police chiefs who argue the warrantless demands would garner the "bare-minimum information" but could make a difference early in an investigation. Child protection advocates have also been pushing for changes to compel internet providers to co-operate with law enforcement.
Richard Fadden, a former director of CSIS, said a phone book once allowed police "to do more or less the same" as what's been sought in this bill — though critics argue the new warrantless requests would provide far more data.
Since introducing the bill, the federal government has argued it's meant to keep borders secure, crack down on transnational organized crime and money laundering and stop the flow of deadly fentanyl across the border.
Canada has faced pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump to beef up border security. At times, his administration has justified its trade war by pointing to the southbound flow of irregular migrants and fentanyl.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
33 minutes ago
- CTV News
Applications open for new disability benefit program, payments start next month
Minister of Jobs and Families Patty Hajdu responds to a question during question period in the House of Commons in Ottawa on June 19, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Patrick Doyle OTTAWA — Canada's new disability benefit — a program that provides eligible people with up to $200 a month — is now open for applications. The program is available to people with disabilities between the ages of 18 and 64 who already have been approved for the disability tax credit. The government says applications will be reviewed by June 30 and payments are set to begin in July. The payments are meant to supplement provincial and territorial programs and Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu said all provinces and territories except for Alberta have pledged not to claw back their own benefits. The benefit was part of the Trudeau Liberal government's promise to help lift people with disabilities out of poverty. Many advocates for people with disabilities have panned the benefit, saying it will do little to actually address poverty. Hajdu, whose new portfolio covers disabilities, said she has heard that criticism. 'I don't think that disability (benefit) is what a person needs to sustain themselves, and I don't think it was designed in that way,' she said in a recent interview. 'But it is a payment that allows for a fuller autonomy of people with disabilities in that it's not directed towards any specific thing. It is a benefit that people can use to supplement whatever other earnings or income that they have.' As part of the program, the government is providing funding to community organizations to help people who may need guidance on applying for the tax credit or the benefit program. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 20, 2025. Sarah Ritchie, The Canadian Press
CBC
44 minutes ago
- CBC
At Vancouver city hall, 'abstain' means 'yes'
At Vancouver city hall, 'abstain' means 'yes' 13 hours ago Duration 2:18 Social Sharing Most weeks in local politics, there's debate over whether councillors voted for or against an important motion. But, as CBC Vancouver's municipal affairs reporter Justin McElroy reports, this week in Vancouver, the question was about councillors not voting at all. "It's not always easy to cast votes … but I think that's why we're there, and I think people expect us to make them," said Coun. Sarah Kirby-Yung, who has been critical of opposition councillors abstaining from a couple of different votes this week. "Abstentions are not a vociferous voice. You're not taking a position." A councillor who abstained from two of those votes defended the importance of abstentions. But the weird truth of Vancouver city hall is that abstaining is taking a legal position — though not the one the public might expect.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Canada Post reaches a deal with second-largest union. Could there still be a strike?
Canada Post and its second-largest union have reached an agreement in the ongoing labour dispute between the postal service and its workers. Article content In a statement released Thursday, the employer said it has a new collective agreement with the Canadian Postmasters and Assistants Association. As Canada Post's second-largest union, CPAA represents more than 8,500 employees, primarily those responsible for managing post offices in rural Canada. Article content Article content Article content What are the terms of the new agreement? Article content Article content The new agreement includes an 11 per cent wage increase over three years, retroactive to Jan. 1, 2024. The increase is split between 6 per cent in 2024, 3 per cent in 2025, and 2 per cent in 2026. The agreement is effective from Jan. 1, 2024, to Dec. 31, 2026. Article content According to a release from the union, the agreement also includes a $1,000 lump-sum payment to all full-time employees on the date of its signing, and $500 to all other employees. Article content No. Canada Post is still trying to reach a deal with CUPW, its largest union, which represents about 55,000 postal workers. It has been in a strike position since May 23, with the union having imposed a ban on overtime since that date. Article content Last week, the corporation received notice that Patty Hajdu, the minister of jobs and families, had approved its request for a vote to take place on the company's final offers to CUPW, which was delivered on May 28. The vote will be administered by the Canada Industrial Relations Board as soon as possible. Article content 'Canada Post welcomes the Minister's decision as it will provide employees with the opportunity to have a voice and to vote on a new collective agreement at a critical point in the company's history,' the company said in a statement. It is still unclear when the vote will take place. Article content
