logo
Do you know where your tax dollars are going? Take our quiz.

Do you know where your tax dollars are going? Take our quiz.

Washington Post30-04-2025

Keith Moore is head of editorial at Gapminder Foundation, a Swedish group that promotes access to reliable facts and data.
Federal government spending each year is a 13-digit number: about $6.8 trillion in the 2024 fiscal year. For many of us, that is unfathomably large. When every part of the budget is big, featuring hundreds of individual agencies, programs and departments with outlays of millions, billions, and even trillions of dollars, it can be difficult to know what represents the lion's share. And so it is little wonder the public has some major misconceptions about government spending.
Take our quiz and test your own understanding of the trends and proportions behind the U.S. federal budget.
✓ Check Yourself The Post partnered with Gapminder, a Swedish nonprofit, to survey 600 people ages 18 to 65. The sample was balanced to reflect U.S. demography.
1 of 5 In the 1980s, federal government spending was around 21 percent of the entire U.S. economy (GDP). What was it in 2024?
Around 23 percent
Around 41 percent
Around 53 percent
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
2 of 5 What is the biggest single item of U.S. federal government spending each year?
Buying and maintaining new weapons
Social security for retired workers
Debt interest
3 of 5 What share of U.S. federal government spending was on foreign aid in 2023?
Around 1 percent
Around 21 percent
Around 41 percent
4 of 5 Which federal government department or agency has the most civilian employees?
Defense Department (not including active military)
Social Security Administration
Department of Veterans Affairs
5 of 5 The federal government is the biggest single employer in the U.S. What percentage of all workers do they represent?
Around 1.5 percent
Around 15 percent
Around 35 percent 0 of 5
Your score:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NYC's new broker fee law already being flouted by sneaky real estate agents, tenants say: ‘Exploiting a loophole'
NYC's new broker fee law already being flouted by sneaky real estate agents, tenants say: ‘Exploiting a loophole'

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

NYC's new broker fee law already being flouted by sneaky real estate agents, tenants say: ‘Exploiting a loophole'

Well this is just un-FARE. Sneaky New York City landlords have been using tricky tactics to get around a new law that bans them from charging broker fees to renters, The Post has learned. Advertisement Some prospective renters have reported being faced with thousands of dollars in 'management' or 'technology' fees — that look awfully similar to those previously charged by landlords to pay for real estate brokers. 'They're exploiting a loophole in the law,' said Todd Roulich, a tenant broker in New York, of landlords and agents. 6 Some New York renters are still shelling out thousands of dollars in fees for real estate brokers they didn't hire, The Post has learned. Paul Martinka Advertisement Others have reported being told to sign forms stating that they were the ones to hire the broker — even when that wasn't true. The so-called FARE Act — or Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses — prohibits renters from being charged a 'broker fee' — which is typically about 15% of the annual cost of a unit. But the city Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, the agency responsible for enforcing the FARE Act, told The Post it has received nearly 300 'questions and complaints' about violations of the new law since it went into effect June 11. 6 One Zillow listing demands a security deposit, one months' rent and a 'service/broker fee.' r/NYCapartments/KittyInaPinkHoodie Advertisement 6 'I'm trying to apply for an apartment, and the broker said to apply I need to hire him as my broker to represent the application,' one Reddit user said, 'which of course includes a broker fee.' ZJL Studio – Queens native Kelly McGarry told The Post she met brokers at two different apartment showings this month — both of which used sneaky methods to try to collect a fee. McGarry, 27, reported that each one of the agents she met with tried to get her to sign paperwork saying she hired them, even though she hadn't. 'I've applied for apartments in the past before, and I've never had to verify anything … of that sort,' McGarry said. 'They knew the FARE Act was coming, and they were prepared to do what they could to get around it.' Advertisement One Zillow listing for an apartment in Bayside, Queens blatantly reads: 'For compensation as 'Service/Broker Fee', you as Renter agrees to hire Jack as Broker [sic].' 6 'With the FARE Act going into effect June 11, landlords will be prohibited from passing on the fees of real estate brokers they have retained to prospective tenants,' DCWP said in a statement. Christopher Sadowski Another listing, in Brooklyn's Prospect Lefferts Gardens, even appeared to ask for a security deposit and first months' rent as a mysterious lump sum of $5,040 — followed by $1,800 each additional month. Reports of similar underhanded schemes also abound on Reddit, with one disgruntled tenant writing: 'Some places we reach out [to] … makes us agree to 1 month payment of fees if we sign a lease with them, and they won't show without it.' 'I'm trying to apply for an apartment, and the broker said to apply I need to hire him as my broker to represent the application. which of course includes a broker fee,' another user said. Other agents appear to be even more bold, with one Reddit user posting a StreetEasy listing that outright asked for a $3,500 broker fee – despite the website's own disclaimer that 'under NYC law, you can't be charged a broker fee if you didn't hire a broker.' 6 One Reddit user posted a breakdown of fees they were charged post-FARE Act enactment, including a $3,500 broker fee due at signing. r/NYCapartments/maraxlee 'I'm pretty sure thru FARE we don't have to pay this broker fee,' the user wrote. 'The issue is we desperately need this place lol.' Advertisement The Dept. of Consumer and Worker Protection said when the law went into effect that 'landlords will be prohibited from passing on the fees of real estate brokers they have retained to prospective tenants' under the FARE Act. 'Landlords and their agents will be unable to pass their brokers' fees on to a prospective tenant after the effective date of this law, even if a lease was signed before the effective date,' the agency said in a statement. Some tenants may become even more desperate in the coming months according to The Real Deal, which reported that some landlords are already looking to raise rents to offset costs associated with hiring a broker themselves. 6 A November rally for the FARE Act, with council member Chi Osse speaking. Paul Martinka Advertisement Allia Mohamed, CEO of real estate website Openigloo, deemed that sneaky agents and landlords attempting to ignore and try to work around the law are simply a part of a 'very natural correction period' and that the matter will stabilize when bad actors are disciplined. 'What is really important is for renters to understand their rights when it comes to the FARE Act,' Mohamed said, and 'making sure that they're taking screenshots, saving links, keeping receipts, filing those complaints until we get through this correction period.' City council member Chi Osse, who introduced the legislation last year, urged New Yorkers to report agents and landlords who continue trying to charge a broker fee to tenants. Advertisement 'If you see an online listing that says a broker is working as a prospective tenants' broker, they're lying,' Osse said. 'They posted with landlords' permission, so they're working for the landlord.' To file a complaint regarding a FARE Act violation, consumers can visit or call 311.

The mystery seller of a $105M empty lot next door to Jeff Bezos's estate has just been outed
The mystery seller of a $105M empty lot next door to Jeff Bezos's estate has just been outed

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

The mystery seller of a $105M empty lot next door to Jeff Bezos's estate has just been outed

The secretive investor behind a record-setting 'billionaire bunker' transaction in Miami is celebrating his success. The seller of an undeveloped parcel right next door to Jeff Bezos has been revealed as a man named Mikhail Peleg, according to a release. The German developer and investor snagged $105 million for the plot on Monday, marking a record property price for the ultra-exclusive Indian Creek Island. The identity of the buyer could not be determined, but paid in cash, Forbes reported. 4 Peleg sold his empty Indian Creek Road parcel (far left) for $105 million, saying goodbye to his neighbor of two years, Jeff Bezos. Romain Maurice/MEGA 4 Jeff Bezos, who owns two properties adjacent to the parcel, photographed with Lauren Sanchez. Dave Benett/amfAR/Getty Images for amfAR Peleg is married and lives in Switzerland with two daughters, Sophia and Maria. He purchased the roughly 2-acre strip of land in 2018 for $27.5 million. Peleg's initial plans to build were ultimately scrapped, agent Ilya Reznik previously told The Post. Peleg had high hopes for the man-made island when he snapped up his empty plot there seven years ago. 'When I purchased this property in 2018, it was the highest sale price on the market,' Peleg said in a statement shared with The Post. 'People told me I was overpaying, that it wasn't a smart investment. But I saw the long-term potential in both the land and the vision we had for the property.' The property at 9 Indian Creek Island Road listed for $200 million late last year. Besides the eye-watering price tag, the property made headlines for its proximity to Jeff Bezos's holdings there. The Amazon billionaire purchased two neighboring homes in 2023 for $68 million and $79 million, respectively. Occupying 200 feet of west-facing waterfront along Biscayne Bay, the parcel boasts views of downtown Miami and space enough for a deep-water megayacht to dock. 4 Indian Creek Island is home to a number of wealthy homeowners. AFP via Getty Images 4 The $105 million sale beats out an island record set by Bezos last year. Romain Maurice/MEGA The property underwent two price cuts during its tenure on the market, down to $150 million in March and $130 million in June, according to Zillow. Initial reports of the under-contract sale in early June quoted a $110 million sales price from a developer familiar with the deal, but the mystery buyer paid out $5 million less than expected. The deep-pocketed buyer, previously identified only as 'an international finance executive,' by the Wall Street Journal, closed on Monday for $105 million. The final sales price for the empty parcel is just $15 million shy of Miami's most expensive home sale, but certainly sets a new record for Indian Creek Island. The previous record was set by Bezos himself, who purchased an $87 million home on the other side of the island last year while the parcel's neighboring two homes underwent renovations. 'I believe that truly exclusive locations, even if expensive, always prove profitable,' Peleg said in his statement. Access to the island is heavily restricted. Its tony inhabitants, including Tom Brady, Carl Icahn, Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, are secured by their own police force and a marine patrol. Just 41 homes currently occupy the island.

Germany's DMK dairy giant clears first hurdle in Arla merger plan
Germany's DMK dairy giant clears first hurdle in Arla merger plan

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Germany's DMK dairy giant clears first hurdle in Arla merger plan

Germany's DMK Group and the Danish-Swedish giant Arla Foods have cleared the first hurdle on their way to becoming Europe's largest dairy co-operative. Farmers from both organizations agreed to a planned merger with large majorities at separate meetings, the companies announced on Wednesday. At DMK, more than 200 dairy farmers met in the northern German city of Hanover to vote on the merger plans, which were announced in April. The EU's competition authority must now give its approval, a process that could take until next March, DMK said. Until then, the two organizations will continue to operate separately. According to a DMK spokeswoman, the merger would bring together more than 12,000 farmers in a joint co-operative, to be named Arla. This would include around 4,600 farmers from DMK in Germany and the Netherlands, and some 7,600 from Arla in Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. DMK has its headquarters in Zeven in the northern German state of Lower Saxony, while its administration is based in Bremen. Arla is based in the Danish town of Viby, which is also set to be the future headquarters of the merged company. Together, the two co-operatives have an annual turnover of almost €19 billion ($22 billion) and around 28,700 employees. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store