What Jamie Dimon Wants Every CEO To Remember About Leadership
Jamie Dimon shares 4 key reminders about leadership.
Effective leadership takes many forms, adapting to different circumstances and numerous business needs. While common principles underpin great leadership, each leader brings their unique style and approach. In the business world, the requirements of strong leadership shift depending on factors such as a company's maturity, industry trends, and global events. Few leaders have had to adapt more than JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.
Overseeing $4 trillion in assets and leading nearly 300,000 employees, Dimon has spent almost two decades at the helm of one of the world's largest financial institutions. In a recent fireside chat with Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen at the Adobe Summit, he shared four key leadership principles with an audience of 12,000 executives, marketers, and professionals.
In a world increasingly sensitive to feelings, leadership demands a commitment to truth over comfort. Radical honesty and direct communication—while sometimes uncomfortable—are essential for driving performance and maintaining transparency. "A lot of companies don't do that," Dimon noted, warning that avoiding hard truths can lead to complacency and diminished accountability across the board. He advised leaders, 'Don't try to use numbers to prove what you think. Try to use numbers to understand what you are doing.'
An example of not sugar-coating reality and looking at the numbers is Microstrategy (now doing business as Strategy), which made a strategic Bitcoin shift years ago that has yielded significant returns. On a personal level, being direct further stimulates growth, a philosophy Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang embraces to cultivate high-performing teams and loyalty.
Assembling a leadership team isn't just about finding great employees—it's about identifying individuals who can handle leadership's unique pressures and intricacies. Dimon emphasized that competence in one area doesn't always translate to effective leadership. "A lot of people who run stuff, they're a hot mess. Don't let them run something because they'll be a disaster," he cautioned. With leadership evolving in complexity, small details make a significant impact. Separating individual talent from leadership capability is critical to long-term success.
Technical skills and strategic thinking are vital, but humility is one of the most defining traits of exceptional leaders. From frontline employees to C-suite executives, treating people with genuine respect is a necessary leadership cornerstone. "People know when you care about them," Dimon observed.
This principle is reflected in the practices of leaders like Chevron CEO Mike Wirth, who writes handwritten letters to employees to reinforce morale. Dimon displays this principle by strengthening key relationships and positioning himself in a position of growth and development through frequent business travel and getting out of the office as much as possible. Ultimately, while people may forget what you say, they never forget how you make them feel.
Leading is anything but smooth sailing. It's not a question of if but when challenges will arrive. Dimon highlighted that grit and resilience are necessities in a leader's toolkit. With competition intensifying, technology rapidly accelerating, and the battle for top talent fiercer than ever, leaders' reservoirs of resilience will continually be challenged from all angles. To stay ahead, leaders must take risks, innovate, and continuously reinvent even when on top—a strategy that Siemens CEO Roland Busch prioritizes.
"You have to say 'absolutely not,' or 'absolutely, take the chance—go for it,'" Dimon said, underscoring the importance of being decisive in your leadership. Dimon's recent RTO stances demonstrate that grit also means making tough, sometimes unpopular decisions and standing by them.
Bruce Lee famously said, "I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times." Like martial arts, leadership is not about complexity. It's about mastering the basics. Whether leading a small team or a global enterprise, the principles of clear communication, team development, humility, resilience, and discipline will take leaders further than any fleeting trend.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Are Savvy Bitcoin and Ether Traders Preparing For as Summer Approaches?
Savvy bitcoin BTC and ether ETH traders are shoring up their defenses as the broader market continues to foresee bullish price action over the summer. That's the message from an options-based strategy called 25-delta risk reversal, which involves the simultaneous purchase of a put option and sale of a call, or vice versa. At the time of writing, risk reversals based on Deribit-listed bitcoin and ether options indicated that investors were positioning for downside volatility over the summer. BTC's 25-delta risk reversals for June, July, and August tenors were negative, indicating a preference for put options, which offer downside protection, over calls or bullish bets, according to data source Amberdata. In ETH's case, puts were pricier out to the July end expiry. Traders typically buy put options to hedge their long positions in the spot and futures markets, protecting themselves from potential price declines. "Risk reversals in both BTC and ETH continue to show a preference for downside protection across June and September tenors. This suggests that long holders are actively hedging spot exposure and preparing for potential drawdowns," Singapore-based QCP Capital said in a market note. The nervousness is evident from the over-the-counter liquidity platform Paradigm, where the top five BTC trades for the week include a put spread and a bearish risk reversal. Meanwhile, in ETH's case, a long position in the $2,450 put crossed the tape alongside a short strangle (volatility) trade. Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency by market value, has spent over 40 days trading back and forth above $100,000, according to CoinDesk data. According to analysts, profit-taking by long-term holders and miner selling have counteracted the strong uptake for spot ETFs, leaving prices directionless. "Bitcoin has recently tracked sideways, suggesting its current price may be too high for many retail investors. Open interest in BTC options has risen, with a positive and rising 25 delta put-call skew on 30-day contracts, which may imply that market participants are seeking short-term protection through put options," Coinbase Institutional's weekly report noted. On Friday, BTC closed (UTC) below the 50-day simple moving average (SMA) to trade below the key support for the first time since mid-April. The breakdown may lead to more chart-driven selling, potentially resulting in a drop below $100,000. Some observers, however, expect a rally to new record highs. According to market observer Cas Abbé, BTC's on-balance volume continues to indicate strong buying pressure, suggesting that prices could rise to $130,000-$135,000 by the end of the third quarter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Banks Drop the Climate Pretense and Follow the Money
Forget betrayal. Forget backsliding. What global banks are doing right now isn't a reversal of climate commitments—it's a long-overdue reality check. In 2024, they dumped nearly $900 billion into fossil fuel financing, according to the latest 'Banking on Climate Chaos' report. And while advocacy groups are clutching their pearls, investors are quietly nodding. Banks funding fossil fuels haven't lost their way—they've just stopped pretending. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Barclays topped the charts, each tacking on over $10 billion in new fossil-fuel financing. JPM alone dropped $53.5 billion into oil, gas, and coal. That's not exactly chump change—and it's certainly not the behavior of an institution planning to kick the hydrocarbon habit anytime soon. Critics say this undermines climate targets. The reality? These banks were never designed to hit climate targets. Their mandate is to maximize returns. And with interest rates stabilizing, oil prices firming, and energy demand still rising globally, fossil fuel investments—messy, profitable, scalable—are back in vogue. Yes, some of these banks made splashy commitments during the ESG boom. They joined net-zero alliances. They funded glossy sustainability reports. But those were branding exercises, not binding strategies. The minute those commitments became a regulatory liability—or a political punchline—they started dissolving. Exhibit A: the exodus from the UN-sponsored Net-Zero Banking Alliance, timed nicely with President Trump's return to office. 'This reversal exemplifies the limits of voluntary commitments by financial firms whose primary goal is short-term profit,' the report complains. That's the closest the report comes to admitting the obvious: voluntary green finance was always a shaky foundation for fact, the Banking on Climate Chaos report makes that plain: banks committed $869 billion to fossil fuel companies in 2024 alone—up $162 billion from the year before. Nearly half of that financing came from U.S.-based banks, with JPMorgan Chase leading at $53.5 billion, followed by Bank of America ($46 billion) and Citigroup ($44.7 billion). Barclays was the top fossil fuel financier in Europe at $35.4 billion. Meanwhile, over $347 billion went to the top 100 companies actively expanding their fossil fuel not lost on anyone that some of the same banks being scolded for fossil fuel financing are still pouring money into renewables and climate tech. But here's the thing: they're not missionaries—they're market players. And right now, oil and gas projects are delivering stable returns, while clean tech continues to wrestle with cost overruns, supply chain headaches, and policy volatility. Banks are not public policy arms. They're capital allocators. And right now, capital is flowing toward fossil fuels for one simple reason: the energy transition isn't happening fast enough to make renewables the better bet. There's also the regulatory vacuum to consider. As long as no one is forcing banks to price in climate risk with real teeth, voluntary initiatives will keep folding under pressure. A report can scold them all it wants—until there's a law on the books or a tax on the balance sheet, banks will do what they've always done: follow the money. What's more, climate advocacy itself has lost coherence. The same groups that demand banks stop lending to fossil fuels often oppose mining permits for the metals and minerals needed for clean tech. That contradiction hasn't gone unnoticed in boardrooms. Banks, to their credit, have at least picked a lane: they'll fund what actually gets built. And for now, what's getting built—at scale, at speed, and at profit—is still largely oil and gas. As long as energy security, inflation, and political volatility remain unresolved, fossil fuels will continue to look like the safer bet. Not morally. But financially. So yes, banks are still backing fossil fuels. And yes, they're still issuing climate reports. But no, they're not confused. They're just honest—at least in their balance sheets. The climate movement may not like it, but until the economics change or the regulations bite, this isn't a scandal. It's a strategy. And for now, it seems to be working. By Julianne Geiger for More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Ether Leads Crypto Selloff as US Attacks Nuclear Sites in Iran
Ether fell sharply while Bitcoin held steady after President Donald Trump said American bombers and missiles had struck Iran's three main nuclear sites. The second-ranked token fell as much as 7.7% on Sunday morning in Asia to about $2,200, its lowest intra-day level since May 9. Bitcoin briefly dipped below $101,000 but pared losses to trade relatively evenly in the aftermath of the attacks.
