The insecurity of power

Listen to article
For millennia, humankind has feared ferocious beasts, unforeseen calamities, "divine retributions", forces beyond comprehension, and natural phenomena beyond their control. Notwithstanding the powerlessness and inherent ignorance in prehistoric times, some individuals seized opportunities to emerge as leaders — such as the 'big men' or chiefs — who embodied mythical figures like Prometheus, Heracles, Theseus, Perseus, Apollo and Asclepius, selflessly pursuing their people's welfare and guiding them, however briefly and imperfectly, to safety and light.
This was primarily because the legitimacy of most of them was rooted in transparency, proven abilities and a consensus built sincerely, albeit informed by limited knowledge. However, as societies became more complex and knowledgeable, so did the rules of legitimacy and the nature and scope of transactions between the rulers and the ruled.
The evolution of language, which drives reason, logic and philosophy, has equipped humans with reliable tools to examine themselves and their environment, shedding light on their ignorance and gaining a deeper understanding of their surroundings. From nascent reasoning to the Socratic and dialectical methods, and from the Age of Enlightenment and the Renaissance to the dawn of the scientific method, all helped liberate humankind from threats - real or perceived - posed by nature and from fears rooted in nature's apparent meaninglessness or the metaphorical tabula rasa of human cognition.
These developments, which have dispelled the fog of ignorance and introduced humanity to greater knowledge, ethical understanding and political education, should ideally have fostered greater transparency in statesmanship and collective affairs, promoting an informed collective will and legitimacy in statecraft. However, greater knowledge has fostered enlightened deceit and hypocrisy, which perpetuate carefully controlled ignorance or empower influential figures with vested interests in society, thus fostering opacity and undermining legitimacy in modern statecraft and statesmanship.
This manifests, among other ways, in the rising authoritarianism and securitisation of democracies worldwide. Under the guise of the people's will, totalitarian and Orwellian tendencies are being fostered by the very institutions and leaders tasked with upholding democratic values. Consequently, hard power and brute force supplant the collective public will, imposing self-serving policies that disregard the interests of the people.
Although marked by authoritarianism and disdain for the people's will, such regimes rarely abandon democratic forms entirely for three reasons: First, a democratic façade shields them from international sanctions. Second, it legitimises their authority under the pretense of democracy. Third, it sustains false hope among the populace, thereby deterring rebellion against those in power.
This is because, unless informed, transparent and popular, those in power - whether individuals or institutions — tend to channel most of their resources and energy into masking their insecurities, sustaining their authority, and guarding their misdeeds against potential retribution. In other words, power obtained through questionable means or brute force both stems from and reveals underlying insecurities, driving all efforts to maintain it. This underlying insecurity of power ultimately and inevitably succumbs to the weights of its follies, corruption and abuse. Had it not been so, all the states that our status quo gets inspiration from would not have been consigned to the dustbin of history.
Thus, rather than being lasting and self-sustaining, the autocratisation of democracy is both a cause and a manifestation of insecurity, fear of losing control, and potential retribution for wrongdoings. In other words, authoritarian power reflects the hidden insecurities of vested interests, ill-gotten resources, and fear of retribution for past transgressions. Like dogs or snakes that strike when threatened, authoritarian power escalates aggression toward its people as its insecurities deepen. These insecurities drive further aggression and unlawful acts, ultimately leading the regime to collapse under the burden of its errors, delusions and misdeeds.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Express Tribune

14-06-2025

• Express Tribune

The insecurity of power

Listen to article For millennia, humankind has feared ferocious beasts, unforeseen calamities, "divine retributions", forces beyond comprehension, and natural phenomena beyond their control. Notwithstanding the powerlessness and inherent ignorance in prehistoric times, some individuals seized opportunities to emerge as leaders — such as the 'big men' or chiefs — who embodied mythical figures like Prometheus, Heracles, Theseus, Perseus, Apollo and Asclepius, selflessly pursuing their people's welfare and guiding them, however briefly and imperfectly, to safety and light. This was primarily because the legitimacy of most of them was rooted in transparency, proven abilities and a consensus built sincerely, albeit informed by limited knowledge. However, as societies became more complex and knowledgeable, so did the rules of legitimacy and the nature and scope of transactions between the rulers and the ruled. The evolution of language, which drives reason, logic and philosophy, has equipped humans with reliable tools to examine themselves and their environment, shedding light on their ignorance and gaining a deeper understanding of their surroundings. From nascent reasoning to the Socratic and dialectical methods, and from the Age of Enlightenment and the Renaissance to the dawn of the scientific method, all helped liberate humankind from threats - real or perceived - posed by nature and from fears rooted in nature's apparent meaninglessness or the metaphorical tabula rasa of human cognition. These developments, which have dispelled the fog of ignorance and introduced humanity to greater knowledge, ethical understanding and political education, should ideally have fostered greater transparency in statesmanship and collective affairs, promoting an informed collective will and legitimacy in statecraft. However, greater knowledge has fostered enlightened deceit and hypocrisy, which perpetuate carefully controlled ignorance or empower influential figures with vested interests in society, thus fostering opacity and undermining legitimacy in modern statecraft and statesmanship. This manifests, among other ways, in the rising authoritarianism and securitisation of democracies worldwide. Under the guise of the people's will, totalitarian and Orwellian tendencies are being fostered by the very institutions and leaders tasked with upholding democratic values. Consequently, hard power and brute force supplant the collective public will, imposing self-serving policies that disregard the interests of the people. Although marked by authoritarianism and disdain for the people's will, such regimes rarely abandon democratic forms entirely for three reasons: First, a democratic façade shields them from international sanctions. Second, it legitimises their authority under the pretense of democracy. Third, it sustains false hope among the populace, thereby deterring rebellion against those in power. This is because, unless informed, transparent and popular, those in power - whether individuals or institutions — tend to channel most of their resources and energy into masking their insecurities, sustaining their authority, and guarding their misdeeds against potential retribution. In other words, power obtained through questionable means or brute force both stems from and reveals underlying insecurities, driving all efforts to maintain it. This underlying insecurity of power ultimately and inevitably succumbs to the weights of its follies, corruption and abuse. Had it not been so, all the states that our status quo gets inspiration from would not have been consigned to the dustbin of history. Thus, rather than being lasting and self-sustaining, the autocratisation of democracy is both a cause and a manifestation of insecurity, fear of losing control, and potential retribution for wrongdoings. In other words, authoritarian power reflects the hidden insecurities of vested interests, ill-gotten resources, and fear of retribution for past transgressions. Like dogs or snakes that strike when threatened, authoritarian power escalates aggression toward its people as its insecurities deepen. These insecurities drive further aggression and unlawful acts, ultimately leading the regime to collapse under the burden of its errors, delusions and misdeeds.

Express Tribune

06-11-2024

• Express Tribune

Elon Musk declares Trump winner ahead of official call: 'Game, set, and match'

Elon Musk, a vocal supporter of Donald Trump, has declared the U.S. presidential election over, announcing Trump as the winner in a statement that quickly garnered global attention. Musk posted 'Game, set and match' to his 203 million followers on X (formerly Twitter), accompanied by political memes and comments that underscored his firm support for Trump. Game, set and match — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) The people of America gave — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) The Tesla CEO's backing of Trump throughout the campaign has been unwavering, using his social media presence and influence to share Republican talking points. Musk previously warned that 'this would be the 'last U.S. election'' if Kamala Harris were to win, a bold claim he made just as Joe Rogan added his own endorsement for Trump. Photographs from Trump's Election Night event show Musk speaking with the former president and UFC head Dana White. Musk later discussed his concerns on 'The Joe Rogan Experience,' claiming Democrats plan to legalize 'enough illegal immigrants to swing future elections in their favor.' 'If the Dems win this election, they will legalize enough illegals to turn the swing states, and everywhere will be like California,' Musk warned. 'There will be no escape. This is it. This will be the last chance.' Experts interviewed by BBC's fact-checking service have disputed Musk's claims, calling them far-fetched. You are the media now — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) Musk also expressed fears that a Kamala Harris administration would target X, claiming her administration would 'sic the DOJ' on the platform. 'There's no way that the Kamala Harris puppet regime would allow X to exist,' Musk stated on Rogan's podcast, referring to the advertiser boycotts on X he claims were led by 'left-wing NGOs with 'Orwellian names.'' Musk added, 'If Trump wins, I think we'll probably see most of the boycott lift, but if Kamala wins, we will see that boycott get stronger. And they will freaking shut down [X].' Musk's statements have added to the media storm surrounding the election and his open endorsement of Trump has sparked both support and criticism from voters across the political spectrum. Let that sink in — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) The future is gonna be fantastic — Elon Musk (@elonmusk)

Express Tribune

05-11-2024

• Express Tribune

Beyoncé channels Pamela Anderson in new "Bodyguard" video urging fans to vote

On Election Day, Beyoncé treated fans to a surprise visual release for her Cowboy Carter track "Bodyguard," urging viewers to vote. Dubbed 'Beywatch' in a nod to Pamela Anderson's iconic Baywatch character, the video showcases Beyoncé embracing Anderson's 90s style in a vibrant homage. BEYONCE JUST DROPPED THE BODYGUARD VISUAL ???? — KEVN ☆彡 (@kevnnnm) This unexpected release has thrilled the Beyhive, as Beyoncé had not provided music videos for her chart-topping Renaissance album in 2022. Fans had long speculated about her choice to keep visuals under wraps, even after the success of her recent album. The "Beywatch" clip, part of her Halloween-themed "Beylloween" series, follows a week where she dressed as Prince and Betty Davis, paying homage to cultural icons. Beyoncé has released visuals for her song 'BODYGUARD' on Election Day: 'VOTE' — Pop Tingz (@ThePopTingz) The video release also emphasizes Beyoncé's support for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. Recently, Beyoncé endorsed Harris by joining her at a rally in Houston, and her campaign anthem, "Freedom," was used officially by Harris. Through her influence and artistry, Beyoncé continues to energize fans ahead of the U.S. election.