Members Demand Answers from Black Farmers Advocacy Group
On January 30th, attorneys representing an advocacy organization for black farmers are scheduled to go before an appeals court to argue their case about expanding payments to more farmers, previously excluded from a recent government assistance program.
Meanwhile, a months-long WREG investigation reveals complaints from several of the organization's members who say the group claiming to help them is in fact hurting them.
Consider it a calling Stephanie Smith hadn't planned to answer. As a young woman, Smith says she didn't see herself living on a farm, let alone helping to tend to cows.
'Now, I couldn't imagine myself anywhere else. This home, this is us,' said Smith as she leaned on a fence that separates their home from the rest of the land on their sprawling property.
Smith's husband is a fourth-generation farmer in West Tennessee.
'It's so important that we keep all of this in the family,' said Smith.
But carrying on that legacy, including caring for cattle on 50-plus acres isn't easy or cheap.
Smith explained to WREG, 'You have to buy food, you have to make sure that they're warm, you have to make sure that they are healthy.'
So after being denied government loans in the past, the Smiths decided to apply for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Discrimination Financial Assistance Program.DFAP would issue payments to farmers and ranchers to help grow or start operations.
MSCS could file lawsuit if state takes over the school board
Smith said, 'We were thinking, this is going to be just what we need.'
Smith says her family met with a group led by a local pastor and his wife to learn more about the program.
'They talked a lot about racism over the years and how hard it was for people to even complete the application process,' Smith told the NewsChannel 3 Investigators.
She says they were also encouraged to become a part of the Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association.
The national organization headquartered in Memphis has been around for nearly 30 years and boasts about its history of helping black farmers.
'In order for them to be able to assist us, we needed to join their organization. So there was a $100 fee,' said Smith.
Smith continued, 'They did stress to us, we're not charging you to complete the 40 pages, but you do have to give us a donation.'
Which according to Smith was $40.
However, Smith explained it seemed like a small price to pay for the assistance of people who understood the paperwork.
Smith walked us through how it was presented to them, 'We know what they're looking for. We understand the language and we're going to take care of that entire process for you.'
So Smith added, 'We felt like we were going to be in good hands.'
The DFAP application deadline was extended from October of 2023 to January 17, 2024.Smith said months passed, and they never heard anything, except a request for an additional donation from the couple they'd handed over payments to and lots of personal information to file on their behalf.
And because farming is a family affair, Smith's sister-in-law Mildred and her husband who help with the cattle and farm row crops also joined in, along with other relatives.
'So at this point, they've gotten a total of $260, you know, per person,' explained Smith.
Then in August of 2024, Stephanie Smith's husband received a letter from the USDA.
She read it aloud to WREG as we sat in her kitchen on a late summer afternoon.
'This letter is to inform you that your application has not been found eligible for financial assistance under the parameters of the program.'
The reason cited in the letter read, 'The application was submitted after the deadline.'
Smith explained their confusion after receiving the letter, 'We came to you and we gave our money to you all the way back in October, long before any deadline!'
Her sister-in-law Mildred Smith said, 'You guys…took our money and we need to know what's going on!'
Smith's denial letter is dated August 1st.A day earlier, the USDA announced it issued more than $2 billion in payments to more than 40,000 applicants for its Discrimination Financial Assistance Program.
Residents concerned after Main Event opens hours after shooting
Smith said when she called the couple that helped them she was told, 'Oh don't worry about that, that letter is a scam!'
However, the Smith's denial letter was no scam. In fact, around the same time, the USDA was warning about scams on its website.
A spokesperson told the WREG Investigators 'We are aware of scams misleading people to believe the program will reopen, which is not true, and that some organizations have collected fees from potential applicants under false pretenses.'
After getting the runaround, including claims of a system crash, Smith says from the people who agreed to help file the application, she called the USDA directly and said a representative told her exactly when the application was submitted.
'That's so unfortunate because we received your application June 11th, 2024,' said Smith of what she learned after reaching out to the DFAP hotline included on their denial letter.
That date was five months after the deadline.
WREG asked Smith, 'How did you feel when you heard all of that from DFAP?'
She replied, 'We were hurt, there's no other word. We were hurt.'
The USDA sent NewsChannel 3 a list of organizations it contracted with that held free meetings across the country to educate people about its Discrimination Financial Assistance Program. The Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association wasn't one of them.
We tried to speak with James Williams, who Smith says signed them up for BFAA, taking their membership dues and that donation.
Mr. Williams answered the door and after introducing ourselves, The WREG Investigators explained we were working on a story about DFAP and we had received some complaints from people who said that their applications were not submitted.
Williams replied, 'I decline to comment on this time. We'll get back with you later.'
We never heard back from Mr. Williams, but asked BFAA's President and Founder Thomas Burrell if he was familiar with Williams, his wife or the complaints surrounding his organization.
The NewsChannel 3 Investigators asked Burrell, 'Did you all ask people or require them to pay to join and then sign up before engaging in conversation about DFAP or anything else that you all were working on at the time?'
He replied, 'There is an emphatic answer to that one Zaneta, and it's no!'
We continued, 'Okay because these folks, they, several of them submitted to Pastor James and Marcia Williams…who said they were working for the organization.'
Burrell continued, 'Trust me, no one in this office, the individuals that you just name does not work (here). They're not affiliated with this office.'
Formerly incarcerated struggle to find housing, making re-entry harder
In fact, Burrell says his organization encouraged their members not to apply for the Discrimination Financial Assistance Program.
They sued the head of the USDA in federal court, on the basis that DFAP should allow applications submitted on behalf of estates, or heirs of farmers who have since passed away.
'As long as USDA is discriminating against black farmers, why shouldn't there be a means to compensate these individuals?,' was the question Burrell posed about DFAP in explaining why they sued.
The WREG Investigators also asked Burrell if he filled out an application himself.
'No. I didn't think it would have been right for me to fill out that application and get paid and at the same time advocating that there's something wrong and suing USDA,' said Burrell.
BFAA's case is headed to a federal appeals court. Oral arguments are scheduled for Thursday, January 30th.
'If we prevail in this lawsuit, those very individuals, except the ones who swung at the foul ball, will be a part of this,' Burrell told WREG.
Meanwhile, Smith told WREG that as of fall 2024, 'They are still taking applications, they are still getting money from families and so for us, it, you know, became we have to stop them.'
Smith says they haven't been able to get a copy of her husband's application from DFAP, but the denial letter shows it was submitted in his late father's name.
'This is submitted like he's alive, a living person,' said Smith who told WREG that was a big concern.
Smith filed a complaint against the Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association with the USDA's Office of Inspector General and the Tennessee Attorney General, where the WREG Investigators found several others.
Smith told the WREG Investigators, 'The government can't be at a point where they acknowledge the wrongdoing that they did to us and then just stand by and watch another organization continue to do us wrong.'
Despite the disappointment of everything that's happened, Smith says her family will forge on, turning to their own family's history of resilience to move forward.
'You know, we've done it for so many years without assistance, looking back. They made a way and we're going to continue to make a way,' said Smith.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
House Democrat: Strike on Iran ‘not necessarily the death blow' to nuclear program
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, suggested the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities are 'not necessarily the death blow' that President Trump claimed when he announced the military action Saturday evening. In an interview on MSNBC, Smith questioned Trump's assessment that the three Iranian nuclear sites were 'totally obliterated' by the strikes and raised the possibility that the U.S. is unaware of more sites. 'President Trump, in his typical fashion, you know, claims facts not in evidence, saying we totally obliterated their whole program,' Smith said. 'Nobody knows that right now. Maybe. Maybe not. We do not know how many of these centrifuges were destroyed.' He also said the U.S. 'can't be 100 percent sure that we knew about all of Iran's centrifuges,' noting the U.S. didn't know about Iran's Fordow nuclear site — one of the three that the U.S. bombed on Saturday — for a decade before it was discovered. And Smith questioned 'how quickly' Iran could reconstitute its nuclear program, adding, 'It sadly does not take that long to build centrifuges once you know how.' 'So it's not necessarily the death blow to Iran's nuclear program. We're still going to have to negotiate with them at some point,' he said. 'So, you know, this assumption that their nuclear program is gone and they'll never be able to build it is simply wrong at this point.' The announcement of U.S. action against Iran came two days after the White House said Trump would decide whether to get involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel 'in the next two weeks' to give a window for negotiations. White House sources indicated the U.S. had given Israel a heads up before it struck the Iranian sites and that Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke after the strikes. The strikes marked a significant entrance by the U.S. into a conflict between Israel and Iran that had been underway for more than a week. They also indicated a shift by Trump, who said he was seeking a diplomatic solution with Iran and sent U.S. officials to make a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program. Smith released a statement on Saturday condemning 'in the strongest terms' Trump's decision to order U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, criticizing the president for acting without congressional approval and without specifying 'clear objectives for these actions.' 'There are no guarantees that it will eliminate the possibility of Iran developing a nuclear weapon or how long it might set their program back,' Smith said in the statement. He said negotiating a nuclear deal is 'the way to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon and to protect American service members.' 'The path that the President has chosen risks unleashing a wider war in the region that is both incredibly unpredictable and treacherous and that threatens the safety and security of the United States, Israel, and ultimately the world,' Smith added in the statement.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
After a senator's posts about the Minnesota shootings, his incensed colleagues refused to let it go
WASHINGTON (AP) — Mike Lee has in recent years become one of the Senate's most prolific social media posters, his presence seen in thousands of posts, often late at night, about politics. Fellow senators have grown accustomed to the Utah Republican's pugnacious online persona, mostly brushing it off in the name of collegiality. That is, until this past week. His posts, after the June 14 fatal shooting of a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband, incensed Lee's colleagues, particularly senators who were friends with the victims. It all added to the charged atmosphere in the Capitol as lawmakers once more confronted political violence in America. As the Senate convened for the week, Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn., marched past a crowd of reporters and headed toward the Senate floor: "I can't talk right now, I have to go find Sen. Lee." Smith, whose name was listed in the suspected shooter's notebooks recovered by law enforcement officials, spoke to Lee for several minutes. The next day, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., did the same. By midday Tuesday, Lee had deleted his tweets. 'I would say he seemed surprised to be confronted,' Smith later told reporters. The shooting unfolds On the morning of June 14, Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., announced that former state House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, had been shot and killed in their home outside Minneapolis. Another Democratic lawmaker, state Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, were critically injured, in a shooting at their home nearby. The next day, as police searched for the shooter, Lee posted a photo of the alleged shooter with the caption 'Nightmare on Waltz street" — an apparent misspelled attempt to shift blame toward Walz, who was his party's vice presidential nominee in 2024. In a separate post on his personal account, @BasedMikeLee, the senator shared photos of the alleged suspect alongside the caption: 'this is what happens When Marxists don't get their way.' On his official Senate social media account, Lee was 'condemning this senseless violence, and praying for the victims and their families.' A spokesperson for Lee did not respond to a request for comment. The man arrested, Vance Luther Boelter, 57, held deeply religious and politically conservative views. After moving to Minnesota about a decade ago, Boelter volunteered for a position on a state workforce development board, first appointed by then-Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, in 2016, and later by Walz. Boelter has been charged with two counts of murder and two of attempted murder. Lee's online posts draw bipartisan backlash Once a critic of Donald Trump, Lee has since become one of the president's most loyal allies. Lee's online persona is well established, but this year it has become especially prominent: a Salt Lake Tribune analysis found that in the first three months of 2025, Lee averaged nearly 100 posts per day on X. What was different this time was the backlash came not just from Democrats. To Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., Lee's posts were 'insensitive, to say the least, inappropriate, for sure' and 'not even true.' 'I just think whenever you rush to a judgment like this, when your political instincts kick in during a tragedy, you probably should realign some priorities,' Cramer said. Republican state Rep. Nolan West wrote on social media that his respect for Lee had been 'rescinded.' A spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., did not respond to a request for comment. Last Monday night, after Smith's confrontation with Lee, a senior member of her staff sent a pointed message to Lee's office. 'It is important for your office to know how much additional pain you've caused on an unspeakably horrific weekend,' wrote Ed Shelleby, Smith's deputy chief of staff. He added, 'I pray that Senator Lee and your office begin to see the people you work with in this building as colleagues and human beings.' Lee avoided reporters for much of the week, though he did tell them he had deleted the posts after a 'quick' discussion with Klobuchar. Lee has not apologized publicly. "We had a good discussion, and I'm very glad he took it down,' Klobuchar said at a news conference. Tragedy prompts reflection in Congress The uproar came at a tense time for the Senate, which fashions itself as a political institution that values decorum and respect. Senators are under intense pressure to react to the Trump administration's fast-paced agenda and multiple global conflicts. Republicans are in high-stakes negotiations over the party's tax and spending cuts plan. Democrats are anxious about how to confront the administration, especially after federal agents briefly detained Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., at a recent Department of Homeland Security news conference in California. Lawmakers believe it's time to lower the temperature. 'I don't know why Mike took the comments down, but it was the right thing to do,' said Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M. 'I appreciate my Republican colleagues who were very clear with their observations. And those that spoke up, I want to commend them." He added: 'We just all have to talk to each other. And what I learned from this week is people need to lean on each other more, and just get to know each other more as well."
Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
After a senator's posts about the Minnesota shootings, his incensed colleagues refused to let it go
WASHINGTON (AP) — Mike Lee has in recent years become one of the Senate's most prolific social media posters, his presence seen in thousands of posts, often late at night, about politics. Fellow senators have grown accustomed to the Utah Republican's pugnacious online persona, mostly brushing it off in the name of collegiality. That is, until this past week. His posts, after the June 14 fatal shooting of a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband, incensed Lee's colleagues, particularly senators who were friends with the victims. It all added to the charged atmosphere in the Capitol as lawmakers once more confronted political violence in America. As the Senate convened for the week, Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn., marched past a crowd of reporters and headed toward the Senate floor: 'I can't talk right now, I have to go find Sen. Lee.' Smith, whose name was listed in the suspected shooter's notebooks recovered by law enforcement officials, spoke to Lee for several minutes. The next day, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., did the same. By midday Tuesday, Lee had deleted his tweets. 'I would say he seemed surprised to be confronted,' Smith later told reporters. The shooting unfolds On the morning of June 14, Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., announced that former state House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, had been shot and killed in their home outside Minneapolis. Another Democratic lawmaker, state Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, were critically injured, in a shooting at their home nearby. The next day, as police searched for the shooter, Lee posted a photo of the alleged shooter with the caption 'Nightmare on Waltz street' — an apparent misspelled attempt to shift blame toward Walz, who was his party's vice presidential nominee in 2024. In a separate post on his personal account, @BasedMikeLee, the senator shared photos of the alleged suspect alongside the caption: 'this is what happens When Marxists don't get their way.' On his official Senate social media account, Lee was 'condemning this senseless violence, and praying for the victims and their families.' A spokesperson for Lee did not respond to a request for comment. The man arrested, Vance Luther Boelter, 57, held deeply religious and politically conservative views. After moving to Minnesota about a decade ago, Boelter volunteered for a position on a state workforce development board, first appointed by then-Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, in 2016, and later by Walz. Boelter has been charged with two counts of murder and two of attempted murder. Lee's online posts draw bipartisan backlash Once a critic of Donald Trump, Lee has since become one of the president's most loyal allies. Lee's online persona is well established, but this year it has become especially prominent: a Salt Lake Tribune analysis found that in the first three months of 2025, Lee averaged nearly 100 posts per day on X. What was different this time was the backlash came not just from Democrats. To Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., Lee's posts were 'insensitive, to say the least, inappropriate, for sure' and 'not even true.' 'I just think whenever you rush to a judgment like this, when your political instincts kick in during a tragedy, you probably should realign some priorities,' Cramer said. Republican state Rep. Nolan West wrote on social media that his respect for Lee had been 'rescinded.' A spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., did not respond to a request for comment. Last Monday night, after Smith's confrontation with Lee, a senior member of her staff sent a pointed message to Lee's office. 'It is important for your office to know how much additional pain you've caused on an unspeakably horrific weekend,' wrote Ed Shelleby, Smith's deputy chief of staff. He added, 'I pray that Senator Lee and your office begin to see the people you work with in this building as colleagues and human beings.' Lee avoided reporters for much of the week, though he did tell them he had deleted the posts after a 'quick' discussion with Klobuchar. Lee has not apologized publicly. 'We had a good discussion, and I'm very glad he took it down,' Klobuchar said at a news conference. Tragedy prompts reflection in Congress The uproar came at a tense time for the Senate, which fashions itself as a political institution that values decorum and respect. Senators are under intense pressure to react to the Trump administration's fast-paced agenda and multiple global conflicts. Republicans are in high-stakes negotiations over the party's tax and spending cuts plan. Democrats are anxious about how to confront the administration, especially after federal agents briefly detained Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., at a recent Department of Homeland Security news conference in California. Lawmakers believe it's time to lower the temperature. 'I don't know why Mike took the comments down, but it was the right thing to do,' said Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M. 'I appreciate my Republican colleagues who were very clear with their observations. And those that spoke up, I want to commend them.' He added: 'We just all have to talk to each other. And what I learned from this week is people need to lean on each other more, and just get to know each other more as well.' ___ Associated Press reporter Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
