Trump says decision on US role in Israel-Iran conflict to come in two weeks
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump will decide in the next two weeks whether the United States will get involved in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, the White House said on Thursday (Jun 19).
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump was still weighing his options, citing a substantial chance of negotiations with Iran.
"Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," Leavitt quoted Trump as saying.
DIPLOMACY OR FORCE?
Leavitt said Trump was open to diplomacy but insisted that Iran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon.
"The president is always interested in a diplomatic solution ... he is a peacemaker in chief. He is the peace through strength president. And so if there's a chance for diplomacy, the president's always going to grab it," Leavitt said. "But he's not afraid to use strength as well, I will add."
She added that any agreement with Tehran would need to prohibit uranium enrichment and eliminate Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons. Leavitt declined to say whether Trump would seek congressional approval for any military action against Iran.
The White House remains convinced that Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon.
ESCALATING CONFLICT
Leavitt confirmed that Trump was briefed on Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on Thursday, which followed a barrage of missiles and drones launched by Iran, including one that hit an Israeli hospital.
She warned that Iran would face "grave consequences" if it continued pursuing nuclear weapons and failed to engage in talks.
Trump's administration has sent mixed signals in recent days. While Trump has repeatedly hinted at diplomacy, he has also spoken of military action. On Wednesday, he told reporters: "Nobody knows what I'm going to do."
Earlier this week, he suggested in a social media post that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could be targeted, before demanding Iran's "unconditional surrender."
BACKCHANNEL CONTACTS
Three diplomats told Reuters that Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, has held several phone calls with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi since Israel began its strikes last week.
The nature of those discussions remains unclear, but they underscore Washington's dual-track approach, maintaining open diplomatic lines while preparing for potential military involvement.
The escalating war, now in its second week, has shown no signs of abating. Iran, facing its most serious security threat since the 1979 revolution, has been weighing broader retaliation options.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
16 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Rights abuses continue in North Korea a decade after probe, says UN investigator
A North Korean flag flutters on top of a 160-metre tower in North Korea's propaganda village of Gijungdong in this picture taken from the Dora observatory near the demilitarised zone separating the two Koreas, in Paju, South Korea, April 24, 2018. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji/File Photo SEOUL - A decade after a landmark U.N. report concluded North Korea committed crimes against humanity, a U.N. official investigating rights in the isolated state told Reuters many abuses continue, exacerbated by COVID-era controls that have yet to be lifted. James Heenan, who represents the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights in Seoul, said he is still surprised by the continued prevalence of executions, forced labour and reports of starvation in the authoritarian country. Later this year Heenan's team will release a follow-up report to the 2014 findings by the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, which said the government had committed "systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations" that constituted crimes against humanity. DPRK is North Korea's official name. While the conclusions of this year's report are still being finalised, Heenan told Reuters in an interview that the last 10 years have seen mixed results, with North Korea's government engaging more with some international institutions, but doubling down on control at home. "The post-COVID period for DPRK means a period of much greater government control over people's lives and restrictions on their freedoms," he said in the interview. North Korea's embassy in London did not answer phone calls seeking comment. The government has in the past denied abuses and accused the U.N. and foreign countries of trying to use human rights as a political weapon to attack North Korea. A Reuters investigation in 2023 found leader Kim Jong Un had spent much of the COVID pandemic building a massive string of walls and fences along the previously porous border with China, and later built fences around the capital of Pyongyang. A report this week by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies said the COVID pandemic raged in North Korea for more than two years before the regime admitted in May 2022 that the virus had permeated its borders, and that the regime bungled the response in a way that violated freedoms and left most citizens to fend for themselves. On Wednesday SI Analytics, a Seoul-based satellite imagery firm, released a report noting North Korea is renovating a key prison camp near the border with China, possibly in response to international criticism, while simultaneously strengthening physical control over prisoners under the pretence of facility improvement. Heenan said his team has talked to more than 300 North Koreans who fled their country in recent years, and many expressed despair. "Sometimes we hear people saying they sort of hope a war breaks out, because that might change things," he said. A number of those interviewees will speak publicly for the first time next week as part of an effort to put a human face on the U.N. findings. "It's a rare opportunity to hear from people publicly what they want to say about what's happening in the DPRK," Heenan said. He expressed concern about funding cuts for international aid and U.N. programmes around the world, which is pressuring human rights work and threatening support for North Korean refugees. While human rights has traditionally been a politically volatile subject not only for Pyongyang but for foreign governments trying to engage with the nuclear-armed North, Heenan said the issues like prison camps need to be part of any engagement on a political settlement. "There's no point self-censoring on human rights, because... no one's fooled," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - Done deal between Nippon Steel, US Steel ends 18-month saga
CNA938 Rewind Nippon Steel has closed its US$14.1 billion acquisition of US Steel, bringing an end to a bruising 18-month takeover battle that was embroiled in American politics for months until finally gaining support from US President Donald Trump. Andrea Heng and Susan Ng take a closer look at the terms and implications for the steel industry, and impending tariffs, with Professor Lim Tai Wei, Department of Business Administration, Soka University and Japan expert.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US judge blocks Trump plan to tie states' transportation funds to immigration enforcement
US President Donald Trump has signed executive orders calling for cutting off federal funding to so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that do not cooperate with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. PHOTO: REUTERS A federal judge on June 19 blocked President Donald Trump's administration from forcing 20 Democratic-led states to cooperate with immigration enforcement in order to receive billions of dollars in transportation grant funding. Chief US District Judge John McConnell in Providence, Rhode Island granted the states' request for an injunction barring the Department of Transportation's policy, saying the states were likely to succeed on the merits of some or all of their claims. The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by a group of Democratic state attorneys general who argued the administration was seeking to unlawfully hold federal funds hostage to coerce them into adhering to Mr Trump's hardline immigration agenda. The states argued that US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy lacked the authority to impose immigration-enforcement conditions on funding that Congress appropriated to help states sustain roads, highways, bridges and other transportation projects. Since returning to office on Jan 20, Mr Trump has signed several executive orders that have called for cutting off federal funding to so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that do not cooperate with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as his administration has moved to conduct mass deportations. Sanctuary jurisdictions generally have laws and policies that limit or prevent local law enforcement from assisting federal officers with civil immigration arrests. The Justice Department has filed a series of lawsuits against such jurisdictions, including Illinois, New York and Colorado, challenging laws in those Democratic-led states that it says hinder federal immigration enforcement. The lawsuit before Judge McConnell, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, was filed after Mr Duffy on April 24 notified states they could lose transportation funding if they do not cooperate with the enforcement of federal law, including with ICE in its efforts to enforce immigration law. The states argue that policy is improper and amounts to an unconstitutionally ambiguous condition on the states' ability to receive funding authorised by Congress as it leaves unclear what exactly would constitute adequate cooperation. The administration has argued the policy was within Mr Duffy's discretion and that conditions should be upheld as there is nothing improper about requiring states to comply with federal law. The 20 states are separately pursuing a similar case also in Rhode Island challenging new immigration enforcement conditions that the Homeland Security Department imposed on grant programs. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
