I gave Welsh government what it wanted, says chancellor
Rachel Reeves has defended the UK government's spending plans for Wales, telling BBC Wales she delivered what the Welsh government had asked for.
Opposition parties have been critical of the chancellor's spending review, calling the money earmarked for the railways a "drop in the ocean" compared to what the country needs.
The chancellor said the plan to spend £445m on Welsh railways was a "significant package" and defended the £118m earmarked for coal tips, which is short of estimates previously made by the Welsh government.
Reeves denied the spending review had left Wales short changed and said Wales was getting a "record" amount of cash.
New stations in £445m 10-year Wales rail plan
Spending review sets scene for Senedd election
Spending review could mean cuts in Wales - experts
Rachel Reeves made the comments on a visit to the Taff's Well Transport for Wales depot on Friday.
The Treasury is providing £300m for five new stations around Cardiff and Newport between 2026 and 2030, and a series of improvement works including measures to improve capacity in north Wales.
Another £48m is going on the South Wales Metro, while £90m is being allocated over 10 years to work on future schemes.
Speaking to BBC Wales, Reeves said: "This investment delivers the five train stations from the Burns review in south Wales, improvements to the core valley network as well as the level crossing improvements in north Wales to link people to the jobs that are available.
"This is significant investment that the Welsh government asked for. A Labour government in Westminster working with the Labour government here in Wales to deliver for people in Wales.
"At the same time there's the record devolution settlement for the Welsh government and, on top of that as well, the £118m for coal tips to keep those safe in Wales."
When it was put to her that it was far short of the up to £600m previously estimated to be needed for coaltips, Reeves said: "No, the £118m is what the Welsh government asked for from the UK government and we've delivered that in full.
"And we are also delivering in full the requests for investments for the Burns review stations for example."
Asked if Wales was being short changed by the 0.9% cut to Welsh government capital spending, she said: "No, we're investing in the transport infrastructure, in the coal tips and a record devolution settlement."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: Poll of the day: Do you support the assisted dying bill?
The assisted dying bill returns to Parliament today for its final reading amid growing controversy – and a vote that could determine whether the legislation moves forward or falls entirely. A group of Labour MPs dramatically withdrew their support on Thursday night, citing serious concerns about the removal of key safeguards, including the requirement for High Court oversight. They warned that the bill had been 'drastically weakened' and no longer offers enough protection for vulnerable patients. If passed, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow people in England and Wales with fewer than six months to live to apply for a medically assisted death. Approval would be required from two doctors and a panel including a senior legal figure, a social worker, and a psychiatrist. Campaigners are making a final push on both sides of the debate, and with a narrow majority at stake, every vote counts. MPs have a free vote and are not bound by party lines. Supporters argue that the bill offers dignity and choice to those in need. Meanwhile, opponents argue it opens the door to abuse and erodes trust in end-of-life care. With so much at stake and such deeply personal questions at the heart of this debate, we want to hear from you: do you support the assisted dying bill? Vote in our poll and let us know your thoughts in the comments.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK borrowing rises in May, making tax hikes ‘increasingly likely'
The Treasury borrowed more than expected in May, prompting fresh warnings from economists that autumn tax rises are 'increasingly likely'. Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that public sector net borrowing reached £17.7bn last month — £600m higher than the £17.1bn forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and £700m above the same month in 2024. ONS deputy director for public sector finances Rob Doody said: 'Last month saw the public sector borrow £700m more than at the same time last year, with only 2020, affected as it was by Covid-19, seeing higher May borrowing in the time since monthly records began. 'While receipts were up, thanks partly to higher income tax revenue and national insurance contributions, spending was up more, affected by increased running costs and inflation-linked uplifts to many benefits.' Despite May's overshoot, borrowing for April and May combined stood at £37.7bn — £2.9bn lower than the OBR's cumulative forecast for the first two months of the 2025–26 fiscal year. Nonetheless, analysts warn the chancellor Rachel Reeves may face difficult decisions ahead. Read more: FTSE 100 LIVE: Markets upbeat as UK and EU begin talks on Iran and Trump sets two week deadline 'Despite the overshoot in May, public borrowing was £2.9bn below the OBR's forecast in the first two months of the fiscal year. That said, the OBR may still revise up its borrowing forecasts from March in the autumn budget,' City consultancy Capital Economics said. 'That and already-tight spending plans mean tax hikes later this year appear increasingly likely.' Central government receipts rose by £3.5bn year-on-year to £61.7bn in May, boosted by a £1.9bn increase in income tax, £800m more in VAT receipts and £600m in corporation tax. An increase in employer national insurance contributions contributed to a £1.8bn rise in compulsory social contributions, bringing that total to £15.1bn. However, central government spending climbed by £4.1bn over the same period. Pay rises for public sector workers and higher inflation-linked benefit payments, along with earnings-linked uplifts in pensions, were key drivers of the increase. The latest borrowing leaves the UK's net debt at 96.4% of GDP, 0.5 percentage points higher than a year ago and among the highest levels recorded since the 1960s. Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, warned: 'As the country edges closer to the autumn budget, speculation continues about potential tax changes. Reports suggest Labour may look again at capital gains tax, dividend reliefs, and even consider further freezes to income tax thresholds. Combined with rising property and asset values, this could make the overall tax landscape significantly more punitive. 'In this environment, early and careful tax planning is essential. With thresholds still frozen and reliefs under review, the cost of inaction is only going to rise.' Read more: Looming petrol price increase could hit fragile consumer confidence Thomas Pugh, economist at RSM UK, said the chancellor's room for manoeuvre had narrowed since March. 'Looking ahead to the budget in the autumn, the underperformance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the chancellor may already have lost the £9.9bn of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March,' he said. 'Throw in the tough outlook for many government departments announced in the spending review and U-turns on welfare spending and the chancellor will probably have to announce some top-up tax increases after the summer.' Most economic forecasters, including the International Monetary Fund and the Bank of England, have downgraded the UK's growth prospects this year. This could potentially reduce tax receipts over the longer term and force Reeves to make further spending cuts or raise taxes. Alison Ring, director of public sector and taxation at the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, urged longer-term thinking. 'While there is always a hope that tax rises can be kept to a minimum, we hope the chancellor will take this opportunity to consult over the summer on a range of potential tax changes, even if they may not all be needed. It is time to end HM Treasury's extremely bad habit of tinkering with the tax system with policies designed in haste in the run-up to each fiscal event.' The chief secretary to the Treasury said the latest borrowing figures showed the government has 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'. Darren Jones said: 'Since taking office, we have taken the right decisions to protect working people, begin repairing the NHS, and fix the foundations to rebuild Britain. We stabilised the economy and the public finances; now we need to ensure that the British economy delivers for working people. 'Last week's spending review showed how we are investing in the UK's security, health, and the economy through our Plan for Change, so that people are better off.' Read more: Why bitcoin and gold are rallying as bond yields hit 30-year highs Bank of England holds interest rates at 4.25% amid inflation fears What you need to know about UK's private stock market PiscesError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
UK lawmakers begin crunch debate on allowing terminally ill adults to end their lives
Since then, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been scrutinized, leading to some changes in the proposed legislation, which is being shepherded through Parliament by Labour lawmaker Kim Leadbeater rather than the government. Advertisement Divisive issue In opening the debate, Leadbeater relayed how she had heard hundreds of stories from people who saw their loved ones die in traumatic circumstances. 'Not supporting the bill today is not a neutral act. It is a vote for the status quo,' she said. 'And it fills me with despair to think MPs could be here in another 10 years' time hearing the same stories.' Proponents of the bill argue those with a terminal diagnosis must be given a choice at the end of their lives. However, opponents say the disabled and older people could be at risk of being coerced, directly or indirectly, into ending their lives to save money or relieve the burden on family members. Others have called for improvements in palliative care and greater investments in hospices to ease suffering as a better and more moral alternative. Advertisement Passions were running high outside of Parliament where hundreds of people gathered to make their voices heard. Supporters were dressed in clothing emblazoned with the phrase 'Campaign for Dignity in Dying,' while opponents held up banners urging lawmakers not to make the state-run National Health Service the 'National Suicide Service.' The vote is potentially the biggest change to social policy since abortion was partially legalized in 1967. What lawmakers are voting on The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow terminally ill adults aged over 18 in England and Wales, who are deemed to have less than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. The terminally ill person would have to be capable of taking the fatal drugs themselves. Proponents of the bill say wealthy individuals can travel to Switzerland, which allows foreigners to legally end their lives, while others have to face possible prosecution for helping their loves ones die. How the vote may go The outcome of the vote is unclear, as some lawmakers who backed the bill in the fall only did so on the proviso that there would be changes made. Some who backed the bill then have voiced disappointment at the changes, while others have indicated Parliament has not been given enough time to debate the issues. The vote is a free one, meaning lawmakers vote according to their conscience rather than on party lines. Alliances have formed across the political divide. If 28 members switched directly from backing the bill to opposing it, while others voted exactly the same way, the legislation would fail. Timeline if the bill passes Friday's vote isn't the end of the matter. The legislation would then go to the unelected House of Lords, which has the power to delay and amend policy, though it can't overrule the lower chamber. Advertisement Since assisted dying wasn't in the governing Labour Party's election manifesto last year, the House of Lords has more room to maneuver. Any amendments would then go back to the House of Commons. If the bill is passed, backers say implementation will take four years, rather than the initially suggested two. That means it could become law in 2029, around the time that the next general election must be held. Changes to the bill Plenty of revisions have been made to the measure, but not enough for some. Perhaps the most important change was to drop the requirement that a judge sign off on any decision. Many in the legal profession had objected. Now any request would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Changes also were made to ensure the establishment of independent advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions and the creation of a disability advisory board. It was already the case that doctors wouldn't be required to take part, but lawmakers have since voted to insert a new clause into the bill extending the provision to anyone. The wording means 'no person,' including social care workers and pharmacists, is obliged to take part in assisted dying and can therefore opt out. Government stance There is clearly no consensus in the cabinet about the measure. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has indicated he will back the bill on Friday. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, is opposed, but said he will respect the outcome. Advertisement There are also questions about how it would impact the NHS, hospice care and the legal system. Nations where assisted dying is legal Other countries that have legalized assisted suicide include Australia, Belgium, Canada and parts of the United States, with regulations on who is eligible varying by jurisdiction. Assisted suicide is different from euthanasia, allowed in the Netherlands and Canada, which involves health care practitioners administering a lethal injection at the patient's request in specific circumstances.
