Verizon offers multi-year price lock as homes get more connected
Today's families are managing more connected devices than ever to power work, learning, security and connection — often all at once. That's shifting how they prioritize their data plans.
📈 Key numbers: The average Verizon internet household now manages 18 connected devices and consumes 656 GB of data monthly, up 6% YoY, according to the latest Verizon Consumer Connections Report.
42-45% of U.S. internet households own at least one smart home device.
20% of U.S. internet households own a smart video doorbell.
16% own a smart thermostat.
What this means: Connectivity has evolved from a nice-to-have to a must-have.
🔒 Verizon is offering an industry-first 3-year price lock guarantee on all myPlan (mobile) and myHome (home internet) network plans, available to both new and existing customers.
Why it's important: The offer meets a growing consumer demand for financial stability, control and simplicity — especially as families weigh technology investments alongside everyday priorities.
Here's what else: Verizon is also now offering a free phone to new and existing wireless customers on any myPlan when they trade in a device — regardless of its condition.
Plus, get even more immediate savings when bundling home internet, taking $15 off the total monthly bill.
The impact: Families can stay confidently connected — with steady rates on core services like calling, data and texting.
Customers can also save over 40% on five of the most popular subscription services, Netflix & Max and Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+. All five for just $20 per month. Plus, free satellite messaging on qualifying devices.
🏡 Why now: With spring homebuying season underway, the busiest time for real estate, families making big moves may be rethinking how they're setting up their homes — and the tech that powers them.
Verizon's 3-year price lock guarantee offers predictable, multi-year stability across connectivity costs.
The takeaway: As families upgrade their homes and devices, Verizon's price lock guarantee offers something rare in tech: predictability.
With stable rates, smart perks and guaranteed phone trade-ins, it's a connectivity plan that moves at the speed of modern life — without the surprise charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
As Shares Skyrocket, Will Creator Deals Drive Netflix's Next Growth Run?
(Photo by Phil Barker/Future Publishing via Getty Images) Netflix has been on an epic stock market run the past year, share prices up 81% to nestle comfortably above $1,200 apiece as it reaps the rewards of definitively winning the Streaming Wars of the past several years, with analysts setting target prices as high as $1,600. Give credit to management's willingness to pivot, after a disastrous Q1 earnings call three years ago, into ad-supported tiers, a password crackdown, videogame and live events/venues initiatives, and investments in local productions in 50 centers around the world. It's paid off massively for the company and its investors. This week saw Pivotal Research set a Street-high target price of $1,600 for Netflix shares. Netflix shares have skyrocketed the past 12 months, to north of $1,200 a piece But where does the streaming giant go from here if it wants to keep driving growth? The ad tier is launched, and growing slowly, but already bringing in higher average revenue per user than Netflix's traditional ad-free offerings. The password crackdown's boost to subscriber growth is likely largely exhausted, though we won't know going forward, because the company stopped r0utinely reporting subscriber adds before the last earnings call. In that call, the company said it added a whopping 13 million subscribers to puff the global total to 301 million, far larger than any competitor. So where to go to grow? Analysts have some thoughts, mostly about the vast collection of wildly diverse talent pumping out episodes on YouTube and other social media, receiving a share of ad revenue and otherwise monetizing their productions with merchandise, sponsorships, live events and other strategies. That approach has paid off massively for Alphabet-owned YouTube. Nielsen's The Gauge estimates more than 12% of total watch time is devoted to YouTube programming. Roku released stats that were even higher, as much as 18% of view time. Wells Fargo analysts released a note earlier in the week setting a $1,500 target price for Netflix, but suggesting it find ways to be a bit more like YouTube. Wells Fargo Sr. Equity Analyst Steven Cahall said Friday in a CNBC interview that YouTube content, which costs YouTube nothing on the front end, is increasingly grabbing view time with young and even middle-aged consumers. And that's exactly the kind of programming Netflix should be adding to its portfolio. 'Some of this very, very high value, professional short-form seems like a natural in-between where it still has a big impact on consumers but it's not quite the really short, mobile-native, user-generated content,' Cahall said. To grab some of that view time back, Netflix should take a page out of its own playbook from about a decade ago, when it cut nine-figure exclusive deals with prominent showrunners in traditional television such as Shonda Rhimes and Ryan Murphy, Cahall said. The splashy deals put the industry on notice about Netflix's ambitions to create high-quality premium content that could contend with anything on broadcast or cable. 'The argument here is they can do the same thing," Cahall said. 'They can go find these really large-scale creators who put a lot of content on YouTube, get a lot of views, and make a lot of money, and they can say, 'Hey, come to Netflix, you have the same size audience. We'll pay you money, and you don't have to take a risk on advertising.' Such deals will 'take money,' though nothing like those Rhimes and Murphy deals of a decade ago. More importantly, Cahall said, 'it's not the same risk profile.' The creators bring their own audience, and deep knowledge about how to connect with and nurture that audience, removing most of the risk of partnering with them. Certainly, there are plenty of big, long-time online creators who are producing good-quality content at remarkable velocity. In recent months, I've interviewed or moderated panels with leaders from such long-time venues as Smosh, Dhar Mann Studios, Buzzfeed Studios, and Dhar Mann CEO Sean Atkins, a long-time cable TV veteran, said he gives a few tours a week of the company's extensive production studios in Burbank, Calif., just a couple of miles from the studio lots of Warner Bros., Disney and NBCUniversal. There's an 'oh, sh--' moment on the tour for most of the folks, Atkins said, when they see Dhar Mann's operations are sprawling enough to need the same golf carts to get around the grounds as on the traditional studios. At last week's StreamTV Show conference in Denver, I interviewed Trey Kennedy, an Oklahoma-based comedian who started telling six-second jokes on the long-gone social-video site Vine. Kennedy has long since migrated to TikTok and YouTube for his humor, building an audience big enough that he cut a deal with Hulu for a one-hour comedy special released in January. He has a national comedy tour set for the fall. Also at The StreamTV Show, I interviewed Laura Martin, managing director and sr. internet & media analyst for Needham & Co. To her mind, the 100-plus exhibitors and dozens of niche networks on display at the conference are largely ignored by Wall Street because they're not able to compete at a big enough scale with the two companies that matter most, Amazon and YouTube. Amazon's links between advertising and directly selling those advertised products to its couple of a hundred million or so Prime Video subscribers make it one powerful path for the future of video. And YouTube has married oceans of user-generated content with television's highest-value programming, the NFL, which is available through YouTube TV. 'On the content side, they're sort of blurring the lines, we sort of think that's where the world is going writ large,' Martin said. Wall Street looks at the smaller players and wonders, 'Why aren't you talking about short-form, omni-device and influencers, plus -premium content. There's a real disconnect." Martin said both Paramount Global and Warner Bros. Discovery are stuck in a 'distracted' place. Paramount is trying to negotiated a lawsuit settlement directly with President Donald Trump over alleged 'election interference' for editing a Kamala Harris interview last fall on 60 Minutes. The delays in settling that suit are in danger of putting controlling shareholder Shari Redstone's National Amusements in default before it can complete an $8 billion sale to a group led by David Ellison and Skydance Entertainment. WBD, meanwhile, announced last week that it would go ahead with a widely expected split of the company, putting its legacy cable channels such as CNN, TNT, TBS, and Discovery in one unit, along with most of WBD's $34 billion in debt and a share of the spun-off Studios & Streaming unit. That latter group would include the Max (soon to be renamed HBO Max) streaming service and WBD's production studios for film, TV and games. Shepherding that split to reality will leave WBD leadership distracted for a year, Martin estimated, then will have to wait another year before doing any deals, because of tax-minimization strategies. 'I think it's the wrong strategic move,' Martin said. 'We're not going to be talk about either of those companies for the next two or three years." That leaves a 'competitive set' of serious streaming players of just four: Netflix, Amazon, Alphabet/YouTube, and Disney. 'The question will be if Disney is too small to compete,' Martin said. 'Its (market valuation) is $200 billion, Netflix is $500 billion and the rest are more than $2 trillion.' For Netflix, grabbing more content from YouTube's stable might just be a way to keep driving growth, and perhaps even slightly slowing the YouTube juggernaut, mostly by being a bit more like what YouTube has become.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Midjourney, the AI Company Being Sued by Disney and NBCU, Launches First Video-Generation Tool (WATCH)
Midjourney has released version 1 of its AI video model, coming a week after the start-up was targeted in a copyright-infringement lawsuit by Disney and NBCUniversal. At launch, Midjourney will charge about eight times more for a generative-AI video job than an image job; each job will produce four 5-second videos, the company said in a blog post. (According to one estimate, Midjourney's pricing works out to 3-5 cents per image.) In the current model, once users have a video they like, they can extend it roughly 4 seconds at a time, four times total. The company claims the pricing is 'over 25 times cheaper' compared with what has been available in the market before. Midjourney shared a sizzle reel of AI-generated video (watch below). More from Variety Why Midjourney Made the Perfect Target for Hollywood's First AI Lawsuit Disney, Universal File First Major Studio Lawsuit Against AI Company, Sue Midjourney for Copyright Infringement: 'This Is Theft' 'Our goal is to give you something fun, easy, beautiful, and affordable so that everyone can explore. We think we've struck a solid balance,' says the June 18 blog post, which is signed 'David' (presumably Midjourney founder and CEO David Holz). The long-term vision, according to Midjourney, is 'an AI system that generates imagery in real-time. You can command it to move around in 3D space, the environments and characters also move, and you can interact with everything.' SEE ALSO: In the blog post, David writes, 'We ask that you please use these technologies responsibly. Properly utilized it's not just fun, it can also be really useful, or even profound — to make old and new worlds suddenly alive.' Midjourney has not issued a public statement about the Disney-NBCU lawsuit or responded to requests for comment. According to the studios, Midjourney is 'the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism' that has profited from their intellectual property. 'Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing,' the Disney-NBCU lawsuit said, citing numerous examples of Midjourney's system producing allegedly infringing images of Marvel superheroes, the yellow Minions from 'Despicable Me,' and characters from Star Wars, 'The Simpsons,' 'Toy Story,' 'Shrek' and more. Midjourney's blog post said that from a technical standpoint, the new video model 'is a stepping stone, but for now, we had to figure out what to actually concretely give to you.' The company is calling the current video workflow 'Image-to-Video,' meaning that you still make images in Midjourney but now you can press an 'Animate' button to turn them into video clips. According to Midjourney, there's an 'automatic' animation setting as well as a 'manual' animation setting that lets you 'describe to the system how you want things to move and the scene to develop.' The company also is allowing users to animate images 'uploaded from outside of Midjourney.' To do this, users can drag an image to the prompt bar and mark it as a 'start frame,' then type a motion prompt to describe how they want it to be animated. Watch Midjourney's AI video sizzle reel: Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warner Bros. Discovery (NasdaqGS:WBD) To Split After 60% Fall; Seeks Investors
Warner Bros. Discovery has announced its decision to split into two separate public companies, a major shift in strategy aiming to focus on streaming growth while housing underperforming cable channels separately. This decision follows a significant decline in stock value since the merger with Warner Media. Over the past month, the company's stock rose 14%, which might align with a broader market sentiment, also up during this period. Events such as Amazon Prime's partnership for early film screenings and new product launches like the "Harry Potter™ Pinball" might add incremental interest in the stock but are unlikely to have drastically influenced this change. We've discovered 1 weakness for Warner Bros. Discovery that you should be aware of before investing here. Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. The recent decision by Warner Bros. Discovery to split into two public companies may potentially affect its strategic plans and earnings forecasts. By focusing one entity on streaming and separating underperforming cable divisions, the aim is to enhance growth and stabilize revenue streams, particularly through Max's international subscriber growth. This structural change could lead to increased direct-to-consumer revenue, as efforts are made to reinforce industry leadership while addressing debt and cost challenges. Over the past year, Warner Bros. Discovery's total return, including share price gains and dividends, was 34.57%. However, when compared with the longer-term period, it underperformed the US Entertainment industry, which returned 62.4% over the same timeframe. Nonetheless, the company's shares did outpace the broader US market, which returned 11.2% during the last year. In terms of the recent 14% increase in share value in the past month, this movement provides context to the company's current position relative to analyst price targets. With the share price sitting at US$8.43, it remains approximately 36.7% below the consensus target of US$13.19. This discount suggests that investors may be waiting to see evidence of positive impacts on revenue and net earnings before aligning more closely with analyst expectations. Our comprehensive valuation report raises the possibility that Warner Bros. Discovery is priced lower than what may be justified by its financials. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:WBD. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
