How rise of AI could leave Earth with just 100 million people

Subhash Kak, an Indian-origin computer science professor at Oklahoma State University, has warned that artificial intelligence could become so widespread that Earth's population may fall from about eight billion to just 100 million by the year 2300. He also claimed that major cities like New York and London could one day become empty ghost towns read more
He also said that major cities such as New York and London could eventually turn into empty ghost towns. AI-Generated/Representative Image
A US-based expert has warned that artificial intelligence could push the world towards a bleak future, cutting the global population from the current eight billion to just around 100 million by the year 2300.
Subhash Kak, an Indian-origin computer science professor who teaches at Oklahoma State University, said the main reason would be the high cost of raising children in a world where there are no jobs left for them.
ALSO READ | Two sides of the same coin: How AI's rise is fueling both optimism and anxiety in India
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He also said that major cities such as New York and London could eventually turn into empty ghost towns.
In this explainer, we look at what the expert has said, his warning, and the changes artificial intelligence has already brought to the job market.
Let's take a look:
'It's going to be devastating': What is the expert's warning?
Subhash Kak, a computer science professor at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, has warned that artificial intelligence will become so widespread that Earth's population could shrink from around eight billion to just 100 million by the year 2300.
Speaking to The Sun, he said, 'It's going to be devastating for society and world society.'
'I think people really don't have a clue.'
Kak believes that this grim future will not be caused by nuclear war or a 'Terminator'-style event, but rather by artificial intelligence taking over most human jobs.
'Computers or robots will never be conscious, but they will be doing literally all that we do because most of what we do in our lives can be replaced,' he said.
'Literally everything, even decision making in offices, will be replaced.'
At present, many technology experts fear that AI is making people obsolete in every field, from law and education to personal relationships.
This, they suggest, will lead to a sharp drop in birth rates, as people might avoid having children who would grow up with no work opportunities, especially with the high cost of raising them.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to Kak, without new generations being born, the world could face a dramatic decline in population.
'There are demographers who are suggesting that as a consequence, the world population will collapse, and it could go down to as low as just 100 million people on the entire planet Earth in 2300 or 2380,' he warned.
At present, many technology experts fear that AI is making people obsolete in every field. Pixabay/Representative Image
If that happens, Kak said major cities like London and New York could end up abandoned.
'I have all the data in the book. This is not just my personal opinion,' he told The Sun, noting that the decline is already happening.
'People have stopped having babies. Europe, China, Japan, and the most rapid fall in population right now is taking place in Korea,' he added.
'Now, I'm not saying that these trends will continue, but it's very hard to reverse them because a lot of people have children for a variety of reasons.'
'One is, of course, social. In the back of your mind, you have a sense of what the future is going to be like.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He also referred to SpaceX chief Elon Musk's repeated concerns about declining birth rates and his push for space colonisation as a possible solution.
'That's why Musk is saying maybe humans should go to space, maybe build colonies elsewhere, so that should such a tragedy hit Earth, then it could be reseeded,' Kak told the publication.
While he is not certain whether humans will die out completely, Kak believes one thing is clear: 'what is absolutely certain is that there is a population collapse occurring right before our eyes'.
ALSO READ | Saying 'please', 'thank you' to ChatGPT? How your polite chats are costing OpenAI millions
The advancement of AI
Notably, artificial intelligence has seen a sharp rise in development over the past few years.
Since its launch in 2022, tools like ChatGPT have become widely used by both businesses and individuals.
However, this rapid progress has raised fresh concerns about the future of jobs.
In March, Chancellor Rachel Reeves pointed out that AI is taking over more and more roles. She made the comments while announcing plans to cut civil service posts.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
At the same time, the need for AI-related skills is also growing quickly.
According to a survey reported in The Wall Street Journal, nearly 87 per cent of hiring managers are now seeking candidates with AI experience. One in four job ads also mentions AI skills as a key requirement.
Will artificial intelligence replace jobs?
In April, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) said that up to 40 per cent of jobs worldwide could be affected by artificial intelligence.
While some roles might only change, others may disappear completely.
The report also noted that jobs typically held by women may face a higher risk than those usually done by men.
Figures from venture capital firm SignalFire show that entry-level hiring at major tech companies has dropped by over half since 2019.
The need for AI-related skills is also growing quickly. Pixabay/Representative Image
Previously, new graduates made up about 15 per cent of fresh hires. That figure has now fallen to just 7 per cent, according to TechCrunch.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently said AI at his company is already working at the level of a mid-tier software engineer.
'We will get to a point where all the code in our apps and the AI it generates will also be written by AI engineers instead of people engineers,' he said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This shift is already affecting the job market. IBM, for example, has laid off around 8,000 staff, many from the human resources department. Reports say AI is now doing many of the tasks that people used to handle.
Still, a 2023 report by Goldman Sachs pointed out that while many jobs may be partly taken over by AI, most roles will continue to need some human input. In the past, automation has also led to the creation of new kinds of work.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hans India

21 minutes ago

• Hans India

Shah's take on English has serious repercussions

This is with reference to the news items "Those who speak English in India will soon feel ashamed: Shah'. India's strength lies in its linguistic diversity. By framing English as a foreign language and linking it to shame, Shah's statement fuels the flames of linguistic chauvinism. This spells danger, especially in a country like India where language has been the flashpoint that triggered regional and communal violence in almost every nook and corner. One must forget that English serves as a bridge language in India, including in higher education, business and inter-state communication. Non-Hindi speaking states are likely to see Shah's statement as one more attempt to establish a Hindi-centric identity in the entire country. Shah's controversial statement carries deep political and global implications. P Victor Selvaraj, Tirunelveli- 627002 Unbecoming of Shah A new controversy is likely to start following the statement of Union Hoe Minister Amit Shah on languages, which is a sensitive issue in India where states have come into existence based on language. This is evident from Maharashtra, where a controversy is underway over adoption of Hindi. Shah warned of a day when speakers of English in India would feel ashamed, but the question is why make such a damaging statement, in the firstplace. By all accounts, it is a shameful remark from a leader of Shah's stature. It reeks of prejudice and myopia, elements that knowledgeable politicians ought to shun. English's centrality to the Indian context is undeniable. To make matters worse, he said 'our culture, our history, and our religion cannot be understood in foreign languages. We will run our country in our own languages and lead the world too.' Earlier this month, Shah launched the Bharatiya Bhasha Anubhag (BBA), or Indian Languages Section, to provide an organised platform for all Indian languages to move towards 'freeing the administration from the influence of foreign languages'. States like Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have witnessed protests on the imposition of Hindi. The Tamil Nadu government has opposed the three-language formula in the National Educational Policy (NEP) tooth and nail, claiming it was an attempt to bring Hindi to the State 'through the backdoor'. In a country that speaks in many tongues and where linguistic tensions are quite common, English has served as the veritable lingua franca, bridging segments of the population. In this globalised world, English is the bridge that connects India to the world and its economy. Shah's demonisation of English needs to be located within a broader ideological and epistemic thrust. But the spirit of the idea of India - linguistically or otherwise - is a celebration of pluralism and accommodation: English, with its many virtues and uses, has a firm place in the Indian ethos. It is expected that the government will see the pros and cons before implementing ill-conceived initiatives. Yash Pal Ralhan, Jalandhar-144003 Shah's shameful statement It was a shameful statement that the Union Home Minister Amit Shah made during a book launch event in Delhi where he spoke of a time "when those speaking English in the country would feel ashamed". English is one of the global languages and helps to understand our living world, especially in the AI era. When we study in our mother tongue, we understand well. But when we need to exchange what we learned, English is the tool. It may help unite the world but not to lead. Unnikrishnan Mangalasseri, Manjeri PO, Kerala-676121 Union Minister should eat his words Ourministers and senior politicians should always talk using measured words and not in an irresponsible manner (Those who speak English will soon feel ashamed: Shah). English (the lingua franca) is an international language. Undermining its importance in our country is like cutting one's nose to spite one's face. It is widely used in businesses, education and judiciary and provides ample opportunities for global communication as well as career advancements. A good command over English boosts our students' prospects not only in India but also abroad. Amit Shah should eat his own words. Dr Sunil Chopra,Ludhiana Shah's gaffe is regrettable AmitShah's statement that "those who speak English in this country would soon feel ashamed" deserves to be taken with a fistful of salt. English, as we all know, is the aspirational language of India's rising middle class. On that count, regional languages, even Hindi, serve a limited purpose. English is the sine qua non of today's India that has set out to claim its place on the global high table. Even the Prime Minister with his RSS/Hindi background, thought it fit to give English a brief hug while driving home a point about terrorism, and that too in Bihar. Mignon McLaughlin, American journalist and author, had said, "Every American child should grow up knowing a second language, preferably English." And that perhaps holds water for every Indian child living in these times. Amitji, are you listening? Avinash Godboley, Dewas (MP)

Time of India

24 minutes ago

• Time of India

'The bully must now make peace': What Trump said after Iran strike; top quotes

Donald Trump's address US President Donald Trump addressed the nation late Saturday after what he described as a "spectacular military success," as American forces launched precision strikes on Iran, targeting its nuclear infrastructure. The operation severely damaged three major nuclear sites located in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan -- core facilities of Iran's atomic program. The attack on Fordow, one of Iran's most secure underground nuclear facilities, reportedly involved six 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs. U.S.' B-2 Bombers Air-drop GBU-57 Bombs On Iran's Nuclear Facilities | Trump's Shock Announcement These powerful weapons can only be delivered by the US Air Force's B-2 stealth bombers, underscoring the high-level coordination and military capability deployed in the mission. Trump's speech followed more than a week of Israeli airstrikes aimed at weakening Iran's air defences and softening its nuclear capabilities -- a campaign that appears to have paved the way for the US-led strikes. Here's what Trump said in his address: "Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success." "The attacks were to stop Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and put a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror." "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror." "I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu." "We worked as a team, like perhaps no team has ever worked before, and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel. I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done." "There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." "Iran, bully of the Middle East, must now make peace." "For 40 years, Iran has been saying death to Israel, death to the US. They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs with roadside bombs." "So many were killed by their general, Qasem Soleimani. I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen. It will not continue." "I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done, and most importantly, I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades..."

The Hindu

37 minutes ago

• The Hindu

Are foreign university campuses in India truly beneficial?

Every year, thousands of Indian students pursue higher education abroad, with the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and Australia being among the top choices. According to data from the Ministry of Education, the number of Indian students studying overseas increased by 52.2% over five years; from 586,337 in 2019 to 892,989 in 2023. This is due to several factors: the perception of receiving a globally recognised, high-quality education at top-ranked universities; access to cutting-edge research facilities; improved career prospects; international exposure; better job opportunities and higher salaries; a superior quality of life; and relatively smoother immigration processes. Studies indicate that over 75% of Indian students who study abroad intend to work and settle in their host countries, with only a small fraction planning to return to India. This suggests that such students have already considered critical questions such as: What are the advantages of earning a degree from a foreign university? What career opportunities will it open up? New questions Now, with some foreign universities setting up campuses in India, aspiring students are beginning to ask a new set of questions: What are the benefits of earning a degree from an international university's Indian campus? Is it as valuable as studying at the main campus abroad? Will it offer the same academic experience and career prospects? The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 supports the establishment of independent campuses by foreign universities in India and Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan recently announced that 15 international universities will set up campuses in the country during the current academic year. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has already issued Letters of Intent (LoI) to some institutions, including the University of Liverpool and to the University of Aberdeen to set up branch campuses in Bangalore and Mumbai respectively. According to the specified guidelines, foreign universities seeking entry into India must rank among the top 500 globally, demonstrate subject-specific expertise, and be duly recognised in their home countries to offer academic and research programmes. They will have autonomy in designing their curriculum, managing admissions, setting fee structures and are authorised to award internationally recognised degrees. Foreign universities stand to gain significantly by entering the Indian education sector as they can expand their global footprint, enjoy academic and administrative autonomy, and offer international degrees within India. The presence of top-ranked foreign university campuses in India is also expected to bring several advantages to the country. It can introduce world-class education; help raise domestic academic standards to global levels and promote knowledge exchange. Participation in conferences organised by these institutions can provide Indian scholars with valuable exposure and enriching learning experiences. Moreover, Indian students will be able to earn foreign degrees without going abroad, thereby helping retain talent within the country. Local needs and priorities But one must also ask: who are the actual beneficiaries? Will these branch campuses cater exclusively to the elite? Will academically gifted students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds have an opportunity to gain admission? In a country where millions of young people struggle to access higher education — or are unable to pursue it due to financial constraints — this initiative risks neglecting local needs and priorities. With regard to bringing world-class education to India, any foreign university setting up a campus here is primarily driven by monetary interests, and the focus is likely to be on profit rather than academic excellence. This opens the door to the commercialisation of education, reducing it to a commodity rather than upholding it as a service. Foreign university branch campuses in India risk becoming symbols of elitism rather than instruments of equality or social justice. A truly vibrant campus is one that embraces equality, upholds social justice, and celebrates diversity and inclusiveness. On a typical Indian campus, students from diverse socio-economic and cultural backgrounds come together, interact, and learn from one another. This environment helps everyone become sensitive to the needs of one another and empathetic. A foreign campus in India is unlikely to foster or reflect this kind of inclusive environment. Introducing foreign university campuses should lead to reforms in the education sector, not widen inequality. It is misguided to claim that graduates from foreign university campuses in India will help reduce brain drain. On the contrary, a degree from a foreign university can serve as a stepping stone and increase the chances for those who aspire to work abroad. If the purpose of inviting foreign universities to set up branch campuses in India is to bring world-class education, develop global citizens, and transform the country into a 'Viksit Bharat' (Developed India) by 2047, the focus must be on addressing local needs, particularly by enabling economically and socially disadvantaged groups to access higher education and by improving the overall quality of education. That is what will lead to true transformation. Let us not forget: all that glitters is not gold. The writer is an ELT resource person and education columnist. Email: rayanal@