
Kara Tointon: Why I had a double mastectomy at 39
Last year I made one of the biggest decisions of my life. I chose to have a double mastectomy and have my fallopian tubes removed. I didn't have cancer, but my decision was driven by it.
Six years ago, my mother, Carol, underwent chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. During that time, she was tested for the BRCA1 and 2 gene alterations, which put you at greater risk of breast and ovarian cancers, because we know they run in our family. It was suggested that my sister, Hannah, and I also take a test. We did so in our own time, when we felt ready.
My result came back positive. Hannah's, thankfully, came back negative. She had convinced herself that we would enter the process together and so it took a moment for her to be able to talk about it, but she has been a rock for me and has been with me every step of the way.
Finding out about the gene alteration gave us all a clarity and an explanation of the generations of women we'd lost in my family, all too early, to cancer. My mum had lost her mother to cancer at the age of 13. In 2002, my Auntie June died lost a ten-year battle to both ovarian and breast cancer and in 2019, two and a half years after her initial diagnosis and three months after my first son, Frey, was born, cancer claimed Mum's life too.
For the next five years after my test I was put under 'surveillance' — I had mammograms and MRIs once per year. Doctors had told me about the option of having a mastectomy when I first took the BRCA alteration test in 2018, but I was hoping to have a second child before I went through any major surgery.
The first scan showed a benign lump. When tested, this wasn't cancerous, but the risk suddenly felt a lot more real. When these lumps showed up again in a few more scans, it was enough to convince me that I wanted the double mastectomy.
The process was surprisingly straightforward. After attending various meetings where everything was explained to me, I waited for the date of surgery. In April last year, I went into the Royal Marsden hospital for one night and returned home the next day with drainage tubes, two mesh layers under my skin where my breasts used to be, and implants underneath. The procedure usually takes up to three hours. My surgeon told me that, although some patients' are able to use fat from their abdomen and buttocks to reconstruct, this wasn't an option for me at this time, hence us choosing implants.
Within a few weeks I was up and about; within two months I was able to lift things. The operation did take a mental toll — I found myself surprisingly tired for about three months, but to a certain extent that was overridden by the overwhelming sense of relief. I still have some procedures to complete but I'm very happy with the results and the decision I've made.
Five months later, when I had just turned 40, I had a second surgery to remove my fallopian tubes, which reduced my risk of ovarian cancer without me needing to go into an early menopause. When I am closer to a natural menopause, I will have my ovaries removed to further reduce my risk. The procedure and my recovery was relatively quick, and again I only spent one night in hospital.
One of the biggest fears people have around this type of surgery is the physical scars it leaves and, while I do have those, I don't worry about them. How you look becomes far less of a concern when you've seen your body heal from two potentially life-saving operations.
I now live a peaceful life in Sogne, southern Norway, with my partner, Marius, and our two sons, but I hope I can use my experience to spread awareness of the tests and operations that can help defend against breast and ovarian cancer.
Many people are afraid to speak about cancer; Mum certainly was. My childhood growing up in the picturesque Westcliff-on-Sea in Essex was joyful and I'm lucky to have such a close family, but there was one thing Mum would never speak about: her health. For me, speaking about my procedures with other women and hearing their stories makes me feel less alone.
That's why I decided to share my experience on Instagram last month. I'd seen a video on my feed of somebody else sharing theirs and it gave me such comfort. At first I felt nervous posting something so personal, but the kind messages I received from other women, many of them going through the same thing, really moved me.
Having the BRCA alteration test and preventive surgery is a personal decision and one with many different considerations, but it was the right one for me. I was able to take back some autonomy — cancer once dominated my family but I feel like I am no longer controlled by it.
I will always grieve that more treatment options were not available to my mum, but I know that she would want me to give other women a message: don't ignore your body; confronting your health head-on could save your life.
Kara is an ambassador for The Eve Appeal — the leading gynaecological cancers charity, which funds research and raises awareness for the prevention and earlier diagnosis of all gynae cancers. You can find information on BRCA gene alterations, genetic testing and preventive options at eveappeal.org.uk

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists reveal how humans will have superpowers by 2030
By 2030, rapid technological advancements are expected to reshape humanity, unlocking abilities once confined to science fiction—from superhuman strength to enhanced senses. Robotic exoskeletons may soon allow people to lift heavy objects with ease, while AI-powered wearables, such as smart glasses and earbuds, could provide real-time information and immersive augmented reality experiences. Healthcare may be revolutionized by microscopic nanobots capable of repairing tissue and fighting disease from within the bloodstream, potentially extending human lifespans. Developers are also working on contact lenses with infrared vision and devices that allow users to "feel" digital objects, paving the way for entirely new ways to experience the world. Tech pioneers like former Google engineer Ray Kurzweil believe these innovations are early steps toward the merging of humans and machines, with brain-computer interfaces offering direct access to digital intelligence. While many of these breakthroughs are already in progress, others remain in the experimental phase, facing significant technical and ethical challenges, including concerns about privacy and safety. Still, some of these futuristic technologies may become reality within the next five years, with the potential to enhance human strength, cognition, and perception in ways never before possible. Superhuman strength Kurzweil, a self-proclaimed futurist, has claimed that the foundation of human immortality will begin in 2030, with man set to merge with machines by 2045. By 2030, robotic exoskeletons could give human beings super strength, either by enabling feats like lifting huge objects in factories or making soldiers stronger on the battlefield. US-based robotics company Sarcos Robotics has already demonstrated a robotic exoskeleton that has a 'strength gain' ratio of 20-to-one. This means that normal people can carry weights of up to 200 pounds over an extended period of time. The suit took 17 years and $175 million to develop. Other exoskeletons, such as German Bionic's 'Exia' exoskeleton, incorporate AI that learns from the wearer's movement, enabling them to lift huge weights without feeling tired. These exoskeletons are already being used by staff in German hospitals. Super-healing and immortality In five years, humans could have tiny 'nanobots' in their bloodstream to keep them healthy, meaning people could recover rapidly from injury and even from diseases such as cancer. Kurzweil has claimed that by 2029, artificial intelligence will become 'superhuman' and that will allow for more technological breakthroughs to follow rapidly. One of the upcoming breakthroughs, according to Kurzweil, will be the development of microscopic nanobots that operate within the bloodstream, maintaining health without the need for constant medical monitoring. In his latest book, The Singularity Is Nearer, Kurzweil forecasts a dramatic transformation in human life after 2029, with essential goods becoming more affordable and people beginning to merge with machines through technologies like brain-computer interfaces, similar to Elon Musk's Neuralink. He also pointed to recent advances in artificial intelligence, including tools like ChatGPT, as evidence that his 2005 predictions are on track, stating that "the trajectory is clear." Super vision Contact lenses that enable wearers to see huge distances or even to beam computer information directly into their eyes could be on sale by 2030. Scientists in China recently developed contact lenses that allow wearers to see in the dark. The new lenses allow wearers to see infrared light, without requiring bulky night-vision goggles. Professor Tian Xue, at the University of Science and Technology of China, said he hopes his work could inspire scientists to create contact lenses that offer people 'super vision.' Enhanced senses Devices that give humans enhanced senses could be on the market, with research by Ericsson, a Swedish multinational networking and telecommunications company, suggesting that digital wristbands could soon give anyone the ability to 'feel' digital objects. Pioneering 'cyborg' designers have already tested devices that give people superhuman senses. Entrepreneur, transhumanist, and self-described cyborg Liviu Babitz created 'Northsense,' which allowed him to sense when he faces magnetic north. Manel Munoz, founder of the Trans Species Society, implanted two 'fins' on top of his head, which enabled him to 'hear' the weather. The sound is transmitted through his skull by bone conduction. Munoz has said he hears the weather through the 'sound of bubbles.' Knowing everything instantly with digital wearables By 2030, AI-enhanced wearables such as earbuds could enable everyone to plug into 'digital superpowers,' with everyone able to receive answers instantly. Meta is already adding AI to Ray-Ban glasses, and Google is designing an operating system for XR (augmented reality and virtual reality). Computer scientist Louis Rosenberg has said that these abilities will emerge from the convergence of AI, augmented reality, and conversational computing. 'They will be unleashed by context-aware AI agents that are loaded into body-worn devices that see what we see, hear what we hear, experience what we experience, and provide us with enhanced abilities to perceive and interpret our world,' Rosenberg explained. 'I refer to this new technological direction as augmented mentality and I predict that by 2030, a majority of us will live our lives with context-aware AI agents bringing digital superpowers into our daily experiences.'


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woman's terrifying warning after she suffered third-degree burns from the SUN
Summer is just around the corner - and one woman is already sharing cautionary tales about what can happen if your receive too much sun. Taylor Faith posted a video to TikTok this week explaining that she had suffered from horrific, third-degree burns after being in the sun for eight hours with no protection. In a short clip posted online, both of Taylor's legs were completely covered in gauze, and a small glimpse of her severely sunburned skin underneath looked bright red and painful. 'Me because I decided not to wear sunscreen,' she wrote on the video. 'Third degree sun burn and haven't been able to walk for five days,' she captioned the video, which has been viewed over six million times. 'I think this life lesson is gonna turn me into a sunscreen activist,' she added. According to a comment left on the post, the hospital told Taylor it was the first time they had seen such a severe burn from the sun. 'My insides are severely damaged and all my blood vessels are as well,' she wrote. According to the Cleveland Clini c, sunburns occur from exposure to the sun's UV rays or UV light from artificial sources. 'You can usually treat first- and second-degree sunburns at home. Third-degree sunburns are very rare but need emergency treatment,' the site noted. A third-degree sunscreen severely damages all layers of your skin, including the fat layer beneath your skin. 'It can also destroy nerve endings. Most third-degree burns result from a chemical burn or a fire and not from sun exposure,' the website added. According to the American Academy of Dermatology, around one in three American people will experience a sunburn each year, this means approximately 100 million people are sunburned annually. The same AAD survey showed less than 34 percent of Americans use sunscreen, with only a third of users reapplying it every two hours. As many as 27 percent of people who do use sunscreen tend not to reapply sunscreen at all. The AAD noted that since sunscreen's protective qualities wear off over time, as well as sweat and water that can wash it off the skin, it's important to reapply sunscreen to protect yourself from the sun's harmful rays and reduce your risk of sunburn. Last year, Dr. Neera Nathan, a Harvard-trained skin cancer surgeon, shared a TikTok revealing she removes cancers from the backs of hands, ears, scalp and neck regularly. She explained that since these areas are often exposed directly to sunlight they're particularly dangerous places to overlook. 'Most people apply sunscreen to their face but don't realize these, and these are often in direct sunlight,' Dr. Nathan told Newsweek. Dr. David Kim, a New York City based dermatologist who was trained at Stanford, agreed, saying the number one place people forget to apply sunscreen is on the ears - followed closely by the scalp and hands. He said while completing his medical degree he regularly found skin cancers on the ears of outdoor athletes who practiced without sunscreen. The risk of getting sunburned can be reduced by protecting the skin everyday, including covering up and wearing sunscreen, as well as reapplying.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Nigel Farage becomes latest MP to cast doubt over Lucy Letby murder conviction
Nigel Farage has added his voice to growing concerns about the safety of Lucy Letby 's murder convictions, saying that he is 'getting more and more doubts'. The Reform UK leader was responding to a powerful article in the Daily Mail by Sir Jeremy Hunt, who was Health Secretary when the babies died at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Sir Jeremy called for an urgent re-examination of the case, saying: 'If Letby really did kill seven babies in their cots and attempted to kill seven more, no punishment short of the death penalty is too harsh. 'But if they were caused by professional shortcomings, we need to know why. 'More than anything else, we need to make sure other families don't have to go through the same tragedy.' He added he had noted the findings of the international panel of paediatric specialists and neonatologists, and had also read a 'wide range of expert concerns about the conduct of the criminal case'. Sir Jeremy said: 'Taken together... this analysis raises serious and credible questions about the evidence presented in court, the robustness of expert testimony and the interpretation of statistical data.' Mr Farage told GB News: 'I'm just beginning to get more and more doubts about that issue.' Since Letby lost her appeal last year a mass of evidence undermining the prosecution's case has been gathered by her new legal team. It has raised questions about the claim the nurse was on duty for every suspicious incident and over the testimony of Dr Dewi Evans, 75, the prosecution's chief expert witness. The Criminal Cases Review Commission, which deals with potential miscarriages of justice, is studying the new material, which includes evidence that Dr Evans changed his mind over how three babies died.