The 4 Phases Of Fame, Broken Down By A Psychologist
Everyone has wondered what it would be like to be famous at one point or another in life. Even if it's not something you actively crave, the lifestyle of a famous person can be fascinating.
Unless you are famous, you can never truly know the experience of having your name on everyone's lips, your face plastered across billboards and having every move of yours scrutinized by millions.
Like most things in life, the reality of fame is not what most people fantasize about. There is more to living a celebrity lifestyle than red carpets and adoring fans. It's a complex psychological journey that can take a person on a wild ride through their inner emotional world.
Famous people often experience different phenomenologies throughout their highly publicized careers. As explained by a 2003 article by Brown University, the word 'phenomenology' describes 'a philosophy of experience.' This means that throughout their time in the spotlight, many singers, actors and public figures relate to the lived experience of fame in different ways at different points in time.
Here are the four different phases of fame.
Chappell Roan is this generation's 'it' girl, and her recent rise to fame is a textbook case of fame's love-hate phase. While she is arguably one of the most relevant stars at the moment, Roan herself has admitted that when it comes to fame, it's not all glamorous.
In a recent interview with The Guardian, she compared fame with the sensation of 'going through puberty,' noting that there are emotions she has never felt before and now has to deal with.
It's easy to see why a star whose fame saw a meteoric rise like Chappell Roan would struggle with the consequences of fame. On one hand, she deeply appreciates the platform it has given her art. She is free to express herself and gets paid to do it — a dream she has harbored, by her own admission, since she was a child.
On the other hand, fame can also be abusive. The pressure, scrutiny and invasiveness can be overwhelming and violating.
Many young celebrities often liken their early careers to being touted around like 'show ponies.' This is an experience unlike any other and one that requires firm boundaries if the celebrity wishes to survive in a cutthroat environment.
In a 2009 study published in the Journal of Phenomenological Psychology on the experience of fame, a celebrity interviewee stated, 'I have been addicted to almost every substance known to man at one point or another, and the most addicting of them all is fame.'
Fame opens doors to a lifestyle most average people can only imagine. The society we live in treats celebrities like royalty, and the non-stop inflow of adulation and appreciation can be difficult to detach from.
Pop culture news is rife with stories where celebrities indulge in degrading and potentially dangerous things to cling to relevance and status – celebrities who will do anything for the next 'hit' of fame.
A 2013 study from Personality and Individual Differences correlated the 'need' to be famous with feelings of vulnerability and narcissism. People often want the power associated with fame, and many will do anything to achieve it. Fame can be a psychological drug that, if not handled with care, can wreck individuals the same way any drug addiction can.
Like anything in life, fame can be adapted to as well. Celebrities like Keanu Reeves seem to have cornered the market on how to be a household name while keeping some semblance of normalcy about them. Of course, none of us can ever know their true nature, but there is a small and rarified group that has navigated long, illustrious careers with little to no scandals.
This is the phase of adaptation. Celebrities who enjoy this experience are the rare beings who have conquered the beast and come out relatively unscathed. Considering the nature of the fame 'monster' and the ever-growing world of cancel culture, this is no easy feat.
The study mentioned above in the Journal of Phenomenological Psychology shows that celebrities who achieve this phase have a fame protocol that helps them overcome the pitfalls of being well-known.
One celebrity stated, 'You don't make eye contact, or you keep walking . . . and you just don't hear (people calling your name).' While these patterns can contribute to reclusive behaviors, many of them help celebrities keep their sense of sanity in a world of chaos.
Remember when J.K. Rowling, the author of the beloved Harry Potter series, could do no wrong? Fame, however, can be fickle, and public opinion can turn on a dime, especially when your values are strongly in contrast to the fan base that once adored you.
As one 2006 article in The New York Times eloquently puts it, 'Fame eats its own.' This is what most celebrities eventually come to accept. The reward of being a household name comes with the pitfall that, eventually, the media will turn on you, and that will be a wave you have to ride.
As an antidote to this, many celebrities choose to focus on the job rather than fame itself. The New York Times' article also states that many celebrities choose to take solace in the work they produce and how that affects people. For these celebrities, this is the trade-off for being famous.
While most of us feel like we own our favorite celebrity, we must remember there is a person behind the glitz and glamor; not a God, but also, not an object. Fame might look enticing from the outside, but it comes with a hefty price tag — one that's most often paid in the currency of mental and emotional well-being, and frequently without consent.
Do you empathize with the celebrity experience or do you need to dial back your parasocial connections? Take this science-backed test to find out: Celebrity Attitude Scale.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Insurers Pledge to Ease Controversial Prior Approvals for Medical Care
Facing regulatory crackdowns and intensifying criticism from patients and doctors, the nation's biggest health insurers said on Friday that they would retreat from tactics that have delayed medical care and led at times to denials for necessary treatments. For years, the widespread practice known as prior authorization has vexed patients who might not have been notified until the day of surgery whether a procedure would be covered by their insurance or if a prescription medicine would be denied for no clear reason. Insurers often send unintelligible form letters, leaving patients to puzzle out the basis for the denial or what their next steps should be. Patients may delay or even abandon necessary medical care because they may not even be aware that they can appeal the decisions. Lawmakers, regulators and public outrage have drawn attention to abuses of the system, leading to mounting calls for reforms. Insurers have also been the target of myriad lawsuits, some of which attributed patient deaths to those denials and delays. The murder of Brian Thompson, a UnitedHealthcare executive, last December renewed criticisms of the tactic, unleashing a barrage of complaints that the practice was deployed to avoid covering care. 'Prior authorization is a huge issue for people who are in managed care plans because it is one of the ways plans use to control their costs,' said David A. Lipschutz, co-director for the Center for Medicare Advocacy. He pointed to several studies showing that insurers may have inappropriately denied care, particularly in private Medicare plans. Various reports from federal regulators and researchers show that the vast majority of appeals are successful. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Danny Boyle says he 'wouldn't even contemplate' making 'Slumdog Millionaire' today because of its 'cultural appropriation'
Seventeen years ago, Slumdog Millionaire swept the 81st Academy Awards, walking away with eight of the 10 Oscars it was nominated for. But Danny Boyle, who took home the 2009 Academy Award for Best Director for his work on the film, says he wouldn't be the right person to helm the Mumbai-set drama if it were in the works today. 'Yeah, we wouldn't be able to make that now,' Boyle recently told The Guardian. Released in 2008, Slumdog tells the story of 18-year-old orphan Jamal Malik (Dev Patel), who survives the violent, poverty-stricken slums of Mumbai to win big on the Hindi version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. The film, which loosely follows Vikas Swarup's novel Q & A, used a local crew for its Mumbai filming locations and featured actors speaking both English and Hindi. 'At the time it felt radical,' Boyle said. 'We made the decision that only a handful of us would go to Mumbai. We'd work with a big Indian crew and try to make a film within the culture.' However, the intervening years caused Boyle to rethink that approach. 'You're still an outsider,' the Trainspotting director said. 'It's still a flawed method. That kind of cultural appropriation might be sanctioned at certain times. But at other times it cannot be.' As proud as the 68-year-old Brit is of the film, he acknowledged that a modern Slumdog would have trouble getting financed under that model. 'You wouldn't even contemplate doing something like that today,' he said. 'And that's how it should be. It's time to reflect on all that. We have to look at the cultural baggage we carry and the mark that we've left on the world.' Boyle told to EW in 2009 that he dove into Slumdog because he wanted to make a 'very immediate and vital' movie after finishing work on the chilly sci-fi thriller Sunshine. 'I learned quickly that when you work in Mumbai you have to accept what you find,' he said at the time. 'As a Westerner you have this feeling that you can fight bad things and work on good things and separate the two. What you have to do is accept and absorb both. That's what changed me.' In a 2008 director's roundtable convened by The Hollywood Reporter, Boyle acknowledged that he didn't have a full grasp on India during Slumdog's production. 'I know nothing of it, really,' he said in THR's video. 'You get a tiny little glimpse and maybe if we've done it well, there's a bit of it that's convincing, for the time being until somebody makes something better. You absolutely have to humble yourself in front of it.' Boyle told the roundtable that he expected to be viewed as a colonialist when he arrived in Mumbai and was surprised that the people there viewed him as 'a footnote.' 'It lets you let go of that kind of attitude,' he said. 'Either you go home disappointed or you get home and make the film.'Today, however, Boyle told The Guardian that if he were to be part of the team bringing Slumdog to the screen today, he'd want it to be directed by a young Indian filmmaker. 'And that's how it should be. It's time to reflect on all that,' he said. 'We have to look at the cultural baggage we carry and the mark that we've left on the world.' Boyle discussed his evolving thoughts as the newest film in his zombie horror series makes its worldwide theatrical deb. Starring Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ralph Fiennes, and Alfie Williams, 28 Years Later is a companion piece to 2002's 28 Days Later and 2007's 28 Weeks Later (but not, crucially, the 2000 Sandra Bullock rehab comedy/drama 28 Days). Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly
Gizmodo
31 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
West End Games' Classic ‘Star Wars' RPG Is Still Setting the Blueprint for Its Universe
In the years since Lucasfilm overhauled Star Wars continuity—reclassifying years of Expanded Universe material as 'Legends' before wiping a clean slate of continuity it has developed over the last decade-plus—much of what has been rebuilt has been done so off of the back of re-canonizing elements of that old material. In some ways re-imagined, in others just lifted wholesale, the journey of modern Star Wars is as much about adding new stories as it is weaving the old ones back into them. There are perhaps two pillars that define the reconstructive effort above all. The story of Star Wars' future, as in that in the wake of the events of Return of the Jedi, has somehow inexplicably turned to 1994's The Courtship of Princess Leia as its guiding light. But the story of Star Wars' recent past, the trajectory of the rise of the Imperial machine that has been a richly delved period of exploration in everything from Andor to Bad Batch, from games, comics, and books, to movies like Rogue One and Solo? That's been West End Games' Star Wars RPG. First published in 1987, Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game spent over a decade filling out the background of the world before and after the original Star Wars trilogy across multiple editions and a plethora of sourcebooks. Without much to go on beyond the material Marvel's ongoing Star Wars comic series had developed at the time (itself coming to an end the year West End Games' Star Wars story began), the RPG would become an early groundwork for what would become the beginning of the Star Wars Expanded Universe as we would come to know it in the early 1990s. From species names to Rebel Alliance command structures, from events that still resonate now like the Ghorman Massacre depicted in Andor, Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game was the right combination of coming along at the perfect time and its creatives being given the exact level of free reign to create a perfect sandbox of Star Wars creation. And create WEG did, with dozens of intricate sourcebooks that didn't just cover the broad strokes of what it would mean to have a roleplaying game experience in Star Wars' galaxy, but the nittiest, grittiest details, many of which didn't just go on to shape the Expanded Universe when it began in earnest, but expand even further with the addition of the material created there, delving further and further into Star Wars' past with supplements based on the Tales of the Jedi comics, or Timothy Zahn's Thrawn Trilogy (itself shaped by the early writings of the RPG, given to Zahn as a guideline). It wasn't just raw informational data that WEG's books provided to shape the EU (and in turn modern continuity), but style and tone. This is most keenly felt in Greg Gorden's Imperial Sourcebook, which does a deep dive into details about different facets of the Empire's structure, from intelligence to military, and also explores things like COMPNOR—the Commission for the Preservation of the New Order, essentially the political superstructure of Imperial power—to elucidate the specific fascistic character of the Empire's oppressive tactics. But beyond the actual material itself, one major thing that still remains influential in visions of contemporary Star Wars, is how West End Games taught its writers to write Star Wars. West End Games' Star Wars style guide had a bit of a viral moment a decade ago when it re-emerged on the internet (at places like this very website!), to compare and contrast how its dos and don't matched up with what was then the nascent status of modern Star Wars in the wake of the reboot of canon and the release of The Force Awakens. But while the gift of hindsight can be enjoyable, WEG's advise on what made good Star Wars can still be felt throughout the very best of the material that we're getting today. The style guide pushed writers to be expansive and additive to Star Wars' world, rather than to simply play in what was already in the toybox. Familiar characters were to be few and far between, moral storytelling to be less clear-cut, with villains (new villains!) that had motivation beyond evil for evil's sake. Again, its approach to stories of the Empire were some of its most fascinating, pushing writers to remember that the Empire was made up of genuinely awful people, but also a galaxy of citizenry who had little choice than to conform to the grip of Empire, and who became its willing tool was different to just a regular person with their own wants and needs. Star Wars is a broad sandbox, but West End Games pitched an enduring vision of it that strove for maturity and intelligence, that took the base framework and world of the original movies and genuinely pushed them into new and compelling territories in order to give players a rich and thriving universe to play in. There's an argument to be made, of course, that not all Star Wars should adhere to this tone or particular frame of interest: WEG's vision of Star Wars leaned more into the military sci-fi of its view of the Imperial/Rebel conflict, and not necessarily too far into Star Wars' space fantasy roots, an equally important aspect of the universe. But it's remarkable to see how what has become some of the very best of Star Wars in the modern day—across books, television, comics, games, and movies—carry so much of Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game's heritage, not just in reference to the worlds, names, places, and events it first explored, but in the tonal vision it had for the galaxy far, far away. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
