logo
INR1,300 crore loans for INR100? Stamp duty notice to ArcelorMittal, banks.

INR1,300 crore loans for INR100? Stamp duty notice to ArcelorMittal, banks.

Time of India13-06-2025

INR1,300 crore loans for INR100? Stamp duty notice to ArcelorMittal, banks.
Getty Images
Synopsis
ArcelorMittal India has been called for enquiry this month over allegations of stamp duty irregularities. Creditors of KSS Petron, a group company, have alleged irregularities in stamp duty payment in assignment of loans in the run up to its acquisition of Essar Steel under the IBC.
By N SUNDARESHA SUBRAMANIAN 4 Mins Read, Jun 13, 2025, 05:55 PM IST
SHARE THIS NEWS
Close
Font Size Abc Small
Small Abc Normal
Normal
Abc Large
Close
A stamp duty dispute has erupted around a 2018 financial transaction involving global steel giant ArcelorMittal and a group of banks. The Collector of Stamps of Mumbai under Maharashtra government has issued a notice for enquiry over alleged irregularities in payment of stamp duty on a loan assignment transaction dating back to 2018. In October 2018, a group of lenders of KSS Petron (KSSPL) led by the State bank of India (SBI) had assigned dues

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gisele Bündchen is now $100 million richer than Tom Brady and it shows she's not just a supermodel but a business powerhouse
Gisele Bündchen is now $100 million richer than Tom Brady and it shows she's not just a supermodel but a business powerhouse

Time of India

time9 hours ago

  • Time of India

Gisele Bündchen is now $100 million richer than Tom Brady and it shows she's not just a supermodel but a business powerhouse

Gisele Bündchen beats Tom Brady in 2025 net worth race (Getty Images) When Tom Brady and Gisele Bündchen ended their 13-year marriage in 2022, fans were quick to take sides. But while the public may have lingered on the drama, both stars quietly turned the page and started thriving in their own ways. Gisele, in particular, has stepped back into the spotlight with purpose—building on her legacy, expanding her empire, and making it clear that her best chapter might just be the one she's writing now. Gisele Bündchen's 2025 net worth proves she's winning more than just fashion runways While their fans continue to speculate on who "won" the divorce, the truth is both have forged remarkable post-divorce paths. But if wealth is the metric, Gisele has surged ahead—with purpose, passion, and a fortune that now outpaces even some of the NFL's biggest names. Following her split from Brady in 2022, Gisele wasted no time in reclaiming her space in the modeling industry and beyond. The Brazilian icon, who had paused her career to prioritize family, has come roaring back into the limelight. Just three months after welcoming a son with her new partner, Joaquim Valente, she's set to grace the cover of Vogue France's June/July 2025 edition—a moment that signals more than just a modeling comeback. This resurgence is part of a larger story. According to Celebrity Net Worth, Gisele earns approximately $40 million annually and boasts a net worth of $400 million. That figure puts her a full $100 million ahead of Tom Brady, whose fortune stands at $300 million with an annual income of $30 million. Even NFL legends like Peyton Manning and Aaron Rodgers trail her, despite Rodgers pulling in $50 million a year—his total net worth hovers around $200 million. The scale of Gisele's success is staggering. From 2001 to 2017, she reigned as the highest-paid model in the world for 14 consecutive years. Her earnings from modeling and endorsements have crossed $500 million, and her résumé features over 550 ad campaigns, more than 2,000 magazine covers, and upwards of 800 runway shows. But her empire stretches far beyond fashion. Gisele has built a brand that taps into lifestyle, wellness, and sustainability. Her eco-conscious skincare line, Sejaa, and her popular sandal brand, Ipanema, have become global hits. Her memoir, Lessons: My Path to a Meaningful Life, was a bestseller and solidified her voice beyond the runway. Add in real estate investments across Miami, New York City, Costa Rica, and Montana—valued at over $100 million—and it's clear Gisele's wealth wasn't stumbled upon. It was architected. She also continues to earn royalties through long-term partnerships with luxury and wellness brands, providing a consistent flow of income without the need for high-profile gigs. Brady, of course, isn't fading into the background. With a $375 million broadcasting deal from Fox and investments in sports teams like the Las Vegas Raiders, Aces, and Birmingham City, he's positioned for long-term financial success. His TB12 brand's merger with fitness company NOBULL and endorsement deals with Delta Airlines and others keep his portfolio strong. Still, the numbers don't lie—Brady trails his ex-wife by a significant margin. In the end, both have emerged strong in their own right. But Gisele's post-divorce glow-up is not just emotional—it's financial. And it's a masterclass in reinvention. Also Read: Tom Brady's ex-wife Gisele Bündchen insults Instagram models, says she'd never lower herself to their Instagram tactics Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here

ArcelorMittal drops plans for green steel in Germany due to high energy costs
ArcelorMittal drops plans for green steel in Germany due to high energy costs

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

ArcelorMittal drops plans for green steel in Germany due to high energy costs

ArcelorMittal , the world's second-largest steelmaker, said on Thursday it had dropped plans to convert two plants in Germany to carbon-neutral production because the country's energy costs were too high. The decision to turn down 1.3 billion euros ($1.49 billion) of public subsidies is the latest blow to a German industrial sector that is still reeling from the blow of suddenly losing access to the Russian gas that had powered its factories for decades. It also casts doubt over the green hydrogen strategy launched by the previous government. The government had hoped the subsidies would encourage ArcelorMittal to convert existing plants at Bremen in the north and Eisenhuettenstadt in the east to use furnaces fired with hydrogen, which can be created from renewably generated electricity. But the steelmaker said it had decided not to go ahead with the plans because energy costs in Germany were too high and there was too much uncertainty about its future energy mix. "The first electric arc forges are being built in countries that can offer competitive and predictable electricity provision," it said, highlighting a recent investment in an electricity-fuelled forge in nuclear-powered France. "Electricity prices in Germany are high both by international standards and compared to neighbouring countries," it said, adding that the entire European steel industry was also suffering because consumers were importing so much rather than buying from local producers. Germany is rapidly building out renewable electricity networks, but the transition from reliance on Russian gas has proven lengthy and economically painful, despite generous subsidies on offer to industries that rely on natural gas to switch to hydrogen in its place. The conservative-led government that took office this year criticised the previous left-leaning government's energy strategy but has not so far spelled out a radically different approach. "The European steel industry is under unprecedented pressure to preserve its competitiveness," said ArcelorMittal Europe head Geert van Poelvoorde. "And that's before the extra costs of decarbonisation ." He urged the European Commission to act to cap imports of certain kinds of steel into Europe, saying foreign competition was the most urgent problem the industry faced.

IBC's weak spot: Slow, difficult recovery from dubious pre-bankruptcy deals
IBC's weak spot: Slow, difficult recovery from dubious pre-bankruptcy deals

Mint

timea day ago

  • Mint

IBC's weak spot: Slow, difficult recovery from dubious pre-bankruptcy deals

New Delhi: Companies on the brink of collapse tend to do certain transactions that benefit the promoters or close partners but are detrimental to the organization and its creditors. While such 'dubious transactions' can later be set aside during bankruptcy proceedings by tribunals, getting the money back is proving an uphill task. Data from regulator Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) reviewed by Mint showed that in FY25, just ₹1,322 crore or a tenth of the amount involved in 'avoidance transactions' disposed of by tribunals were recovered. And overall, just 12% of the ₹65,650 crore worth voidable deals executed by promoters and management of 368 companies–and where tribunals have given their verdict–were recovered, according to IBBI. Such deals could include paying off a friendly creditor just before bankruptcy proceedings while ignoring others, moving assets to related parties or hiding them, selling assets for less than they're worth, or taking loans on unfair or excessive terms. Also read | A series of court orders changed bankruptcy rules. Now, the govt is amending the law 'There is often misconduct by earlier management pre-insolvency and it might be a reason for the insolvency in some cases," said Dhananjay Kumar, partner (head-insolvency and restructuring) at law firm Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. 'Recovery of such amounts is a fundamental function of a law like IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code)," added Kumar. Other challenges pointed out by Kumar include lack of data to challenge these transactions, lack of funds with resolution professionals, and slow movement in National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The matter assumes significance because money recovered from dubious transactions adds to the pool of resources available for a corporate restructure plan. According to IBBI's estimates, on a conservative scale, a decision on avoidance transactions by tribunals would add recovery to creditors by at least 10%. Yogendra Aldak, partner at Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan Attorneys, said the high amounts being flagged as avoidance transactions highlight an alarming trend of promoters deliberately using such transactions 'to deprive a company of its resources for self-serving purposes leading to a snowball effect during times of stress". Read this | Scrapping a key bankruptcy rule may yield faster liquidation, better recovery Further, Aldak said IBC has not been designed as a debt-recovery machine and, instead, prioritises resolution of distressed companies. So, to avoid delays in rescuing businesses, taking decisions on avoidance transactions has been kept independent of corporate debt resolution. However, this makes it hard to recover money from avoidance transactions. For example, only deals made within two years before the insolvency process can be reviewed, which means many questionable transactions are never examined, Aldak explained. Another problem, he said, is tracking the money, as it is often moved through shell companies or hidden in other countries, making recovery even harder. Anisha Jhunjhunwala, senior consultant-IBC at NPV Insolvency Professionals Pvt. Ltd, said that despite clear evidence, enforcing clawbacks from avoidance transactions is a lengthy legal battle, with promoters delaying proceedings through litigation, and tracing diverted assets is complex, especially when routed through layers of related entities or parked overseas. Also read | NCLT member crunch slows down bankruptcy resolution 'The high quantum of flagged transactions reflects serious lapses and, in some cases, wilful misconduct by promoters, particularly during the twilight period before insolvency," said Jhunjhunwala. 'It shows that promoters, anticipating distress, often prioritize asset stripping over stakeholder interest, highlighting the need for stricter pre-insolvency oversight and faster adjudication timelines." The fact that it often takes considerable time for a bankruptcy petition by a creditor to be admitted in a tribunal only allows more time for such unscrupulous activities to take place. Till the end of March 2025, close to 1,200 bankrupt enterprises have been restructured under IBC and their creditors got the chance to recover ₹3.89 trillion or about a third of their admitted claims. This is in addition to proceeds from companies liquidated and the recoveries made by lenders who struck settlement deals with corporate borrowers before tribunals initiated insolvency proceedings. And read | Bankruptcy resolution professionals face creditor fury as cases reach courts

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store