Sunscreens RANKED - from best buys to those to avoid at all costs... as consumer watchdog reveals one 'ineffective' £28 cream could pose safety risk
A £28 sunscreen, marketed as 'perfect for the whole family', has failed a safety test carried out by Which?—despite claiming to be 'especially suitable' for children.
The revelation may have left consumers asking which sun creams they can actually trust.
Consumer watchdog Which? tested 15 popular SPF50 and SPF30 products from high-street names and supermarkets, using strict international safety standards.
Each was assessed for ultraviolet (UV) protection and SPF protection, and rated for ease of use by a panel of volunteers.
Two were labelled 'Don't Buys' after failing key tests, while seven earned a 'Best Buy' status, scoring highest overall.
Another two were also labelled 'great value' options, for offering people a cost-effective option to protect against the sun's UV rays.
To trial the creams, scientists applied a small amount on volunteers' backs, before shining a lamp on the patch to simulate the sun's rays.
The time it takes for the skin to become red was then measured.
In another test, scientists took a sample of the cream and spread it onto a glass plate to measure the absorption of UV radiation directly.
To pass, the sunscreen needed to provide at least one third of the claimed SPF.
For example, a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 will take 30 times longer to damage your skin compared to no protection at all.
Here we reveal the full list of 2025 test results, ranked from most to least effective.
Lidl Cien Sun Protect Spray SPF30
The bargain product was given the 'great value' seal of approval by the watchdog, after the panel found it passed both key tests, was easy to apply and 'smelled great'.
They did, however, note it felt 'a bit greasy on skin' after application.
£3.49 Shop
Boots Soltan Protect & Moisturise Lotion SPF30
Which? said the product offered 'excellent UVA and UVB protection'.
UVA and UVB protection are both crucial in sunscreen because they address different types of harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun, which can raise the risk of skin damage and cancer.
UVB rays are primarily responsible for sunburn, while UVA rays penetrate deeper, causing premature aging and wrinkles.
£5.50 Shop
Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Lotion SPF30
The product passed both SPF and UVA tests. It's only downside, Which? said, was the cost.
£8.65 Shop
Sainsbury's SPF30 Moisturising Lotion
The consumer watchdog had no major concerns with the product it said and provides exactly the level of sun protection that it claims.
£5.75 Shop
Superdrug Solait Sun Spray SPF30
Which? said the product 'delivers on SPF and UVA claims' and 'no major issues' at all.
£5.50 Shop
The factor 30's to avoid
Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30
Price: £3.75/200ml
After testing the product twice, Morrisons sun spray failed to provide the 'claimed level of protection from UVB rays', Which? said.
After informing Morrisons of its results, the supermarket giant told Which? it was looking closely at the data and working with its supplier to carry out additional independent testing.
Ultrasun Family SPF30
Price: £28/150ml
Ultrasun's product passed the SPF test but didn't meet the minimum required UVA level for an SPF30 product in either the initial or repeat test.
Responding to the findings, the company said: 'Ultrasun is fully confident in our testing protocols.
'As an independent brand delivering very high UVB and UVA protection options for over 30 years, our detailed testing processes continue to not only meet but surpass industry standards.
'Our chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available, and our UVB and UVA filters are tested both in-vitro and in-vivo.
'We conclusively support the results of our independent tests which found the Ultrasun Family SPF30 reached a UVB-SPF in vivo of 31.4 and a UVA-PF in vitro of 13.1, which equates to a 92% UVA absorbance.'
Garnier Ambre Solaire Sensitive Advanced Sun Spray SPF50+
Garnier's SPF50 spray passed both tests and was 'easy to apply', the watchdog said.
But it noted, the product—which is sold at the likes of Asda, Boots, Morrisons and Sainsbury's—was an expensive option.
£8.00 Shop
Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Spray SPF50+
One of the most recognisable products on the market, Nivea's SPF50+ spray passed both SPF and UVA tests.
It's only downside, Which? said, was the cost.
£7.00 Shop
Sainsbury's SPF50+ Moisturising Spray Lotion
The watchdog said Sainsbury's spray provides the level of sun protection it claimed it does and there were no major downsides to the product at all.
£5.75 Shop
SPF50+ Children's Recommendations
Childs Farm SPF50+ Sun Cream Fragrance-Free
Which? said the product offers 'excellent sun protection' and passed both key tests.
The sunscreen, sold online on Amazon as well as in Boots, does 'feel a bit greasy', it noted.
£12 Shop
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Kate praises children's hospices for ‘lifting spirits through fun'
The Princess of Wales, Kate, praised the "life-changing work" of children 's hospices across the UK. She highlighted their vital support for children at the end of their lives and their success in lifting spirits through laughter, fun, and play. Kate's commendation comes as she continues to balance her public duties following cancer treatment, which was the reason for her absence from Royal Ascot. As a royal patron of East Anglia's Children's Hospices and Ty Hafan Children's Hospice in South Wales, she emphasized the extraordinary care provided to families. Her heartfelt message was posted on social media ahead of the end of Children's Hospice Week, an event raising awareness for these services.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Brits set to endure sleepless night amid heatwave
Warm temperatures could lead to the UK experiencing its first 'tropical night' of the year. A tropical night is where overnight temperatures do not drop below 20C; this could happen on Friday. Scientists indicate that the chance of UK temperatures exceeding 40C has increased significantly, and is now 20 times more likely than in the 1960s due to climate change. Amber heat-health alerts are in effect for all of England until 9am on Monday, with people asked to take precautions out in the warm weather. The health alerts suggest potential significant impacts on health and social care services, including a possible rise in deaths among vulnerable groups and increased demand for health services.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Can anything stop plans for 'death on the NHS'? After MPs vote to LEGALISE assisted dying peers are urged to block or alter 'unsafe' suicide law
Opponents of assisted dying have vowed to keep fighting after MPs voted today to legalise helping people to take their own lives. The Commons backed allowing medics to help terminally ill people to die despite warnings that the legislation is unsafe. But the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which was passed by a majority of just 23 votes this afternoon, still has to clear the House of Lords before becoming law. Critics of the change pointed out that fewer than half of MPs voted in favour and said peers should now seek to block it or slow down its passage so more major changes can be made. Under the legislation terminally ill people in England and Wales diagnosed with less than six months to live will be allowed to seek medical help to die. It is expected that the process will launch by the end of the decade, with estimates suggesting as many as 4,000 people will use it annually within 10 years. Tory MP Greg Smith said: 'It is not too late for us to step back from the brink and pull the plug on this Bill, which now lacks majority support in the House of Commons. 'I trust the House of Lords to scrutinise the Bill in depth and hope it will never reach Royal Assent.' MPs voted by 314 to 291 to approve Kim Leadbeater's Bill despite warnings that it was rushed through and could negatively affect the disabled, domestic abuse victims and people with anorexia. Campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen hailed the vote result as one which will make a 'huge positive difference' and protect terminally ill people from a 'bad death'. MPs made impassioned pleas for and against it becoming law. They had a free vote on a 'conscience matter', with most of the parties split between the yes and no camps. The majority in support of change was 55 in a preliminary vote in November and was cut by more than half. Some MPs appeared visibly emotional as they left the chamber. Among those who voted for the law change were PM Sir Keir Starmer and his Tory predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Deputy PM Angela Rayner and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who will now have to work on bringing in the law change if it gets royal assent, both voted against it, as did current Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. The legislation allows terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The bill will now move to the Lords, with opponents vowing to fight it in the upper chamber. Right to Life spokeswoman Catherine Robinson said: 'The Bill still faces an uphill battle to reach Royal Assent.' MPs voted by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23 - to approve Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill despite warnings that it was rushed through and could negatively affect the disabled, domestic abuse victims and people with anorexia. Mother of the House Diane Abbott asked MPs to vote against the bill, saying: 'people will lose their lives who do not need to. And former Tory minister Sir James Cleverly answered yes camp claims that the law might not change for a decade if it is not done now, as he argued there will be 'plenty of opportunities' in future. And Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said MPs had passed a 'deeply flawed and dangerous' bill. 'The current Bill fails to protect vulnerable and disabled people from coercion,' he said. 'This is not hyperbolae but based on what happens in the US state of Oregon, the model for this law. 'There, a majority of those who have ended their lives in recent years cite fear of being a burden on their families, carers or finances as a reason.' There was silence in the chamber as the result was returned this afternoon after a day of debate and impassioned arguments. The vote came as supporters and opponents of the law change gathered outside Parliament to press the case, including Bake Off host Prue Leith. Supporters wept, jumped and hugged each other as the news came through that it had been passed by MPs. The crowd of around 100 people in Parliament Square, Westminster, erupted into cheers on Friday afternoon as the news was livestreamed over a speaker by campaigners from Dignity In Dying. One supporter said: 'Yes, dad' and others patted each other on the shoulder. Mother of the House Diane Abbott had earlier asked MPs to vote against the bill, saying: 'There is no doubt that if this Bill is passed in its current form, people will lose their lives who do not need to, and they will be amongst the most vulnerable and marginalised in our society.' And former Tory minister Sir James Cleverly answered yes camp claims that the law might not change for a decade if it is not done now, as he argued there will be 'plenty of opportunities' in future. Many critics on both sides have asked for the legislation to be postponed to allow more scrutiny and changes to it to be made. Labour MP Naz Shah warned anorexia patients could still access assisted dying through a 'loophole'. The Bradford MP cautioned that the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was 'not safe'. Shadow frontbencher Robert Jenrick also reiterated his opposition last night. Writing for the Daily Mail, he reveals how he helped look after his grandmother, Dorothy, as a teenage boy – and how she continued to bring joy to the family as she defied a terminal diagnosis for nearly a decade. The shadow justice secretary says the prospect of legalising assisted dying 'fills me with dread', adding: 'My Nana felt like she was a burden. I know how much she hated the indignity she felt at having to ask my Mum or us to help her with basic needs. 'People like her – and there are many such people – may consider an assisted death as another act of kindness to us. How wrong they would be.' Ms Leadbeater has argued terminally ill people must be given choice at the end of their lives, but opponents of her Bill have warned it fails to guarantee protections for society's most vulnerable. So close is the vote that Alliance MP Sorcha Eastwood, who was isolating with Covid, was offered a private ambulance to bring her to the Commons to vote against it. However she tested negative today and plans to make her own way in. Four Labour MPs confirmed on the eve of the vote that they would switch sides to oppose the proposed new law. Labour's Paul Foster, Jonathan Hinder, Markus Campbell-Savours and Kanishka Narayan voiced concerns about the safety of the 'drastically weakened' legislation, citing the scrapping of the High Court Judge safeguard as a key reason. Liverpool MP Dan Carden - the leader of the Blue Labour group - also said he would vote against the Bill having previously abstained. 'I genuinely fear the legislation will take us in the wrong direction,' he told the Guardian last night. 'The values of family, social bonds, responsibilities, time and community will be diminished, with isolation, atomisation and individualism winning again.' It comes as Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the Archbishop of Westminster and most senior Catholic in the UK, said the Church will close Catholic hospices and care homes if MPs vote for assisted suicide. However Dame Esther Rantzen made a plea to MPs last night, urging them to pass a Bill she said could 'transform the final days of generations in the future' and replace the current 'cruel, messy criminal law'. The broadcaster, who is terminally ill with cancer and has been a prominent supporter of assisted dying, said: 'Please allow us terminally ill the dignity of choice over our own deaths.'
